HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022-10-13_Council_Website Agenda Package_Revised 10-11-22.pdf
Page 1 of 2 of Agenda Cover Page(s)
M U N I C I P A L C O U N C I L
A G E N D A
Thursday, October 13, 2022
Livestreamed via YouTube at
www.youtube.com/modcvideo
Office Location: 151 King Street, Chester, NS
1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA/ORDER OF BUSINESS
3. PUBLIC INPUT SESSION (15 minutes – 8:45 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.)
4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
4.1 Council – September 29, 2022.
5. COMMITTEE REPORTS
5.1 Building Code & Unsightly Premises Committee – September 22, 2022 – Warden Webber.
a. Motion Requiring approval of Council from September 22, 2022, Building Code &
6.1 Jamal Assaff regarding 5870 Highway 3, Gold River.
7. MATTERS ARISING
7.1 Request for Decision prepared October 5, 2022 – Community Development & Recreation
– Order to demolish & rectify.
7.2 Request for Decision prepared October 5, 2022 - Fire Services – Fire Services Review.
7.3 Planning Matters Report prepared October 6, 2022 – Community Development &
Recreation - Request to Rezone a portion of PID 60422888.
7.4 Request for Decision prepared October 5, 2022 – Community Development & Recreation -
Community Walking Signs.
7.5 Request for Decision prepared October 5, 2022 - Corporate & Strategic Management -
Award of T-2022-023 Print Services.
7.6 Request for Decision prepared October 5, 2022 – Community Development &
Recreation – Appointment of Inspectors.
7.7 Request for Decision prepared September 28, 2022 - Infrastructure & Operations – RFQ
Unsightly Premises Meeting.
b. Building Official Report.
6. PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Page 2 of 2
For Fleet Purchases.
8. CORRESPONDENCE
8.1 Email from Suzanne McLennan to Councillor Veinotte regarding addition of bicycle
lanes/paved shoulders on Highway 329 along with list of names of people who have
signed a petition.
9. NEW BUSINESS
9.1 November and December Schedule of Council/Committee of the Whole Meetings.
9.2 Information Report prepared October 4, 2022 – Corporate & Strategic Management -
Sponsorship Update.
10. IN CAMERA
11. ADJOURNMENT
9:15 a.m. Jamal Assaff – Demolition of property.
412
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER
Minutes of
COUNCIL MEETING
Livestreamed via YouTube www.youtube.com/modcvideo
from 151 King Street, Chester, Nova Scotia
On Thursday, September 29, 2022
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Warden Webber called the meeting to order at 8:48 a.m.
Present: District 1 – Councillor A. Veinotte District 5 – Councillor A. Assaff
District 2 – Deputy Warden F. Shatford District 6 – Councillor T. Connors
District 3 – Councillor D. Wells District 7 – Councillor S. Church
District 4 – Warden A. Webber
Staff: Dan McDougall, CAO
Tara Maguire, Deputy CAO
Pamela Myra, Municipal Clerk
Emily Lennox, Executive Secretary
Chad Haughn, Director of Community Development & Recreation
Matthew Blair, Director of Infrastructure & Operations
Solicitor: Samuel Lamey, Municipal Solicitor
Public: There were two members in the public gallery.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA/ORDER OF BUSINESS
Additions:
Councillor Veinotte – Request for update on workshops.
Councillor Wells – comfort station in Chester.
Councillor Connors – Committee Report – Seniors Safety Partnership.
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 373
2022-378 MOVED by Deputy Warden Shatford, SECONDED by Councillor Church the
agenda and order of business for the September 29, 2022, Council meeting be
approved as amended. ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC INPUT
Nancy Murray, Chester, indicated she had a letter on the agenda today regarding a
particular lighting issue at the Gazebo at Parade Square. The lights are glaring and do not
need to be on as they are currently. She is asking that they be turned off; she does
understand the lights are required for certain activities, however, when there are no
activities, the lights could be turned off. She noted that the lights are coming on at 6 p.m.
and staying on until 11:00 p.m. and they are extremely bright blue LED lights. She would
like them turned off.
There was discussion on security and safety for users of the gazebo and why the lights were
on at all hours. It was suggested the timers be adjusted or the lighting be replaced with
less glaring lights.
The CAO indicated that recently an accessibility audit was conducted which identified the
usual suspects which are ramps and slopes, but staff is learning that there is far more to
accessibility than only that – there is lighting, colour contrast, and signage as well. He
would like to look at the safety issue and get some advice from an expert on whether
lighting at the gazebo is required for safety or not. There can be visual impairments that
require lighting for safety. Staff will come back with some information and land in a place
that balances all interests.
Sharon Bremner, Chester asked Council if there were any answers to her request made
several weeks ago and Warden Webber noted that Council will receive a presentation with
legal advice at an In Camera session this morning.
Ms. Bremner noted that she would like lights as there are no public streetlights on her street
and it is very dark.
There was discussion on lighting, public and private, and how the process might be started
and what the streetlight cases are in other districts. It was suggested that Ms. Bremner
work with her Councillor on this matter.
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 374
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS
4.1 Council – September 8, 2022.
2022-379 MOVED by Deputy Warden Shatford, SECONDED by Councillor Assaff that the
minutes of the September 8, 2022 Council Meeting be approved. ALL IN
FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
5.1 Committee of the Whole – September 15, 2022 – Warden Webber.
2022-380 MOVED by Councillor Church, SECONDED by Deputy Warden Shatford the
following motion from the September 15, 2022 Committee of the Whole be
approved as follows:
2022-368 – “… give direction to staff to prepare a report and draft
amendments to the Municipal Land Use By-law and Chester Village Land Use
By-law that address the list of housekeeping amendments outlined in the
Request for Direction prepared August 21, 2022 “Municipal Land Use By-Law
and Village Land Use By-Law Amendments” and schedule a date for a Public
Information Meeting.”
2022-370 – “… amend Policy P-103 Flag Raising & Protocol Policy as follows:
• Section 3.03 c add the following to the clause “… except by resolution of
Council. If an observance is recurring, requests can be made to fly a flag on a
specific date(s) annually without submitting a request every year.”
• Section 3.03 i – new clause – In the absence of a representing community
organization, and when appropriate, the Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
Advisory Committee may submit a flag flying request for Council’s review.”
• Section 3.03 j – new clause – The Municipality will fly a list of pre-approved
flags, without a written request.
These flags are:
i. Pan-African flag – first two weeks of February (African Heritage Month).
ii. Trans flag – March 31 (Transgender Day of Visibility) and November 20
(International Transgender Day of Remembrance).
iii. South Shore Autism flag – first week of April (Autism Acceptance Month).
iv. Pride flag – first two weeks of June (Pride Month).
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 375
v. All Children Matter flag – September 30 (National Day for Truth &
Reconciliation/Orange Shirt Day).”
ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
6.1 Ashley Nunn-Smith, CEO & Chief Librarian - South Shore Public Libraries (9:00 a.m.)
Present was Ashley Nunn-Smith, CEO & Chief Librarian of South Shore Public Libraries to
review operations of the South Shore Public Libraries. Ms. Nunn reviewed the information
provided in the form of a presentation with regard to work in the community and
celebrating 50 years of opening since 1972. A video was also shown.
Councillors thanked Ms. Nunn-Smith for the ongoing bookmobile service in their districts.
Also noted was the wonderful service of the mobile library during COVID when they
distributed not only books, but COVID test kits as well. It was agreed the mobile library has
impacted everyone either directly or indirectly. It is great to see new community members
discovering the bookmobile as well.
BY-LAWS AND POLICIES
7.1 Tax Exemption Policy P-25 – Second/Final Notice – Amendment to adjust income
levels as well as the scale of exemption amounts as outlined in the Request for
Decision prepared August 12, 2022 and presented to Council on September 8, 2022.
Tim Topping, Director of Financial & Information Services was present for questions or
discussion.
2022-381 MOVED by Deputy Warden Shatford, SECONDED by Councillor Church that
Council conduct Second and Final Notice to amend the Tax Exemption Policy P-
25 as follows:
• Align annual adjustment amounts to the most relevant benchmarks (Average
Weekly Earnings percentage change year-over-year);
• Adjust maximum exemption as per the PVSC assessment cap, adjusted for
change in tax rate.;
• Create a new income threshold bracket at the top of the scale, where the
benefit trails off to zero to a maximum of $29,590;
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 376
• Add a section to allow residents a three-month period for late applications to
be accepted, pending CAO approval;
• Include questions on the application form asking if they would be like to be
contacted when applications are open in the following year and how they
would like to be notified; and
• Add a clause that would allow a review for special circumstances if there was
a failure to meet the deadline.to adjust income levels as well as the scale of
exemption amounts.
ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
COMMITTEE REPORTS (continued)
5.2 Seniors Safety Committee – Councillor Connors.
Councillor Connors noted that both Chris Acomb and Carol Hipwell have left the
partnership and the organization is nearing the end of the hiring process. Prior to the
departures, contact was made between the staff and some board members to partner
organizations.
Within the next two weeks the Board will be approving the Strategic Plan for the
organization to take them to 2025. This will allow them to better focus as an organization.
We have committee nominations in November so there could be interest from others
around that table that want to join the team and she could step away.
BY-LAWS AND POLICIES (continued)
7.2 Regional Emergency Management By-Law 146:
a. Request for Decision prepared September 16, 2022 – Corporate & Strategic
Management - Regional Emergency Management By-Law No. 146 – Repeal and
Replacement – First Reading to amend to include Town of Lunenburg as well as
some housekeeping amendments.
b. New Regional Emergency Management By-Law No. 146 with changes outlined.
c. Current Regional Emergency Management By-Law No. 146 to be repealed.
The Municipal Clerk pointed out the reason for the By-Law’s return to the table. It was
suggested by the province that to avoid confusion with versions, the previous version be
repealed and replaced with the new By-Law.
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 377
2022-382 MOVED by Councillor Wells, SECONDED by Deputy Warden Shatford that
Council conduct first reading to Repeal By-Law No. 146 Regional Emergency
Management By-Law and replace with a new Regional Management By-Law No.
146 with the following additions/changes:
• Adding the Town of Lunenburg as a participating municipal unit where
required;
• 2.1 a. Correction to The Emergency Management Act (Removing R from
R.S.N.S.);
• 2.1 c. Change the date to the Intermunicipal Service Agreement date;
• 2.1 d and e. Change to Minister and Deputy Minister Responsible for
Emergency Management;
• 3.1 b. – Add “State of Emergency” to clause;
• 3.2 c. Add “(NS EMO)” to clause;
• 3.3 b. Add “Nova Scotia” and “NS” to clause; and
• 5 – “previously adopted versions of by-law 146 are hereby repealed upon the
effective date of the adoption of this regional emergency management by-
law.
ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
7.3 Flag Raising & Protocol Policy P-103 – First Notice to amend Policy to include a list of
pre-approved flags, allowing the Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion Advisory Committee to
submit a request to Council, and allow recurring observances rather than require a
request annually.
2022-383 MOVED by Councillor Connors, SECONDED by Councillor Assaff that Council
conduct First Notice to amend the Flag Raising & Protocol Policy P-103 to
include a list of pre-approved flags, allowing the Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion
Advisory Committee to submit a request to Council, and allow recurring
observances rather than require a request annually as follows (underlined
portions):
ADDITION to 3.03 c:
“A special purpose flag shall be flown for a period of up to two weeks, or for
the duration of the associated event, whichever is less. No organization will be
granted approval to fly a special purpose flag for more than 2 weeks per year to
allow fair and equitable opportunities for community organizations and causes
to be represented except by resolution of Council. If an observance is recurring,
requests can be made to fly a flag on a specific date(s) annually without
submitting a request every year.
NEW PARAGRAPHS i and j in section 3.03:
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 378
i. In the absence of a representing community organization, and when
appropriate, the Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Advisory Committee may
submit a flag flying request for Council’s review.
j. The Municipality will fly a list of pre-approved flags, without a written
request. These flags are:
Pan-African flag – first two weeks of February (African Heritage
Month)
Trans flag – March 31 (Transgender Day of Visibility) and November
20 (International Transgender day of Remembrance)
South Shore Autism flag – first week of April (Autism Acceptance
Month)
Pride flag – first two weeks of June (Pride Month)
All Children Matter flag - September 30 (National Day for Truth &
Reconciliation/Orange Shirt Day)
ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
MATTERS ARISING
8.1 Information Report prepared September 1, 2022 – Financial & Information Services –
Tax Payments with Credit Card.
Present was Tim Topping, Director of Financial & Information Services who updated
Councillors with the reason credit card payment is not accepted at the counter. The
Municipality does have a number of payment options to pay tax bills, interact, cash,
cheques, mortgage company.
There is also a payment provider that can be used by taxpayers, but that provider is
separate from the Municipality. Users of that provider are charged a fee on top of the
transaction which varies, depending on the amount being paid. In general, he wanted to
make it clear that the Municipality does not charge an additional fee.
There are people who want to use a credit card for various reasons, i.e., not able to pay the
entire amount at one time (but they can pay monthly or biweekly if they wish), and others
who want to obtain benefits from using a credit card. If we were to accept credit cards
directly, everyone in municipality would be funding those benefits. People can determine if
the benefit they receive is good for them and the costs are individually incurred.
We do accept credit card payment for discretionary programs such as permits and
programs with a small cost of approximately $750 per year in a $30 Million+ budget. He
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 379
provided a recap of the information received on credit card use from 17 other Municipal
units and only one of those units includes the credit card fees in their general budget.
There are other ways that residents can make payments:
Preauthorized payments - residents can come in to complete and sign a form that
allows preauthorized payments.
Online banking.
Regular or monthly payments via cheque or cash.
8.2 Request for Decision prepared September 8, 2022 – Infrastructure & Operations –
Request for Proposals for Village of Chester Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade.
This information was deferred to another meeting.
8.3 Request for Decision prepared September 8, 2022 – Infrastructure & Operations –
Request for Proposals for Otter Point Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade.
Councillor Veinotte declared a conflict of interest and left the room.
Fred Whynot, Director of Public Works was present via Zoom and outlined the current
issues with treatment and disinfection. Council previously received a report in May and
staff pursued PCAP funding and were successful in receiving 50% of the cost, up to $50,000.
Three companies were invited to provide proposals, with the best value received from ABLE
Engineering. The submission included highlights when the contractor will work with staff
toward a solution, assessment, and recommendations and pricing to present to Council for
direction. If approved, then construction would take place in the 2023 construction year.
2022-384 MOVED by Deputy Warden Shatford, SECONDED by Councillor Assaff that
Council award the Otter Point Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Design to
ABLE Engineering for an estimated cost of $34,150 plus HST. COUNCILLORS AT
THE TABLE WERE IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
The CAO noted that information from all bidders was included to allow transparency in
decision making. There are no company names due to FOIPOP rules.
A break was held from 9:46 a.m. to 10:02 a.m.
Councillor Veinotte returned to the Council Chambers.
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 380
8.4 Request for Decision prepared August 19, 2022 – Infrastructure & Operations –
Request for Proposals for Gold River Bridge Design.
Fred Whynot, Director of Public Works was present via Zoom and provided a brief history of
the current situation. They received four proposals and are recommending the proposal
from Design Point Engineering & Surveying. The company will go onsite to look at two or
three options and will bring these reports and recommendations with costs back to Council.
Once an option is approved, they will do the required studies, i.e., archeological,
geotechnical, etc. The tender will go back to Council for approval. They are able to begin
the project fairly quickly as they are aware the Municipality would like the tender ready to
be issued in the spring.
There was discussion on some location options, concerns of neighbours, and the need to
reach out to neighbours to protect their privacy as much as possible.
2022-385 MOVED by Councillor Assaff, SECONDED by Councillor Church that Council
award the design of the Gold River Bridge detailed in the Request for Proposals
prepared August 19, 2022 “RFP for Gold River Bridge Design” to DesignPoint
Engineering & Surveying Ltd. at a cost of $140,730.00 plus HST.
DISCUSSION:
Councillor Veinotte commented that he liked the format of the report; it is concise
and gives a good overview of what was important and measured. It is a good
standard and hopefully staff will maintain this.
ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE
9.1 Correspondence from Nancy Murray of Chester regarding lights in the Gazebo
(Parade Square) be turned off.
This was dealt with earlier in the meeting when Ms. Murray was present.
9.2 Roxie Bremner regarding consideration to appeal municipal property tax exemption
for the 2021/22 year.
Tim Topping, Director of Financial & Information Management, was present to review the
letter brought forward from Ms. Bremner through Councillor Wells. She had qualified
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 381
previously but in the last year did not receive it due to personal reasons outlined in the
letter.
Councillor Wells indicated that he had visited her and had details of the circumstances
which are legitimate. He is satisfied that it wasn’t a lack of interest, it was lack of ability. He
felt it was appropriate to bring it to Council and ask for Council’s consideration to allow the
exemption to be applied.
2022-386 MOVED by Councillor Wells, SECONDED by Councillor Church that Council
approve the letter of appeal from Roxie Bremner with regard to receiving the
property tax exemption for the 2021/22 year due to extenuating circumstances.
ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
9.3 Correspondence Dated September 8, 2022 from McInnes Cooper regarding request
from M. Keddy Farm and Forest Limited.
Warden Webber noted that this is an unusual request and knows that several members of
Council have spoken with Mr. Keddy, and it was felt that a legal opinion was required before
making a decision.
Councillor Connors indicated that she had received photos from one of the partners last
evening and concern was noted with the recent hurricane which downed a significant
number of trees; in the wood industry, they sell by weight and a dead tree loses weight.
The Solicitor was requested to have a report for Council at the October 13, 2022 Council
meeting.
Concern was noted on why we would need to consider this matter without hearing from
both parties, particularly if the other party is not aware of the request. It seems like a
private dispute. The other parties would be made aware as part of the process.
The Solicitor indicated that there is a procedure; however, the Act is light on as to why – it
states Council has authority but no detail as to why a Municipality would or wouldn’t do
this. There are costs as well and Warden Webber noted that the parties would be
responsible for costs. This would be a decision indicating the Municipality would appoint
an arbitrator. It was suggested to contact other municipalities to determine if they have
gone through this procedure.
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 382
The Solicitor will prepare a report and all parties will be notified.
NEW BUSINESS
10.1 Request for Decision prepared September 21, 2022 – Community Development &
Recreation Department – New Road Name Assignment in Martins River (Rascals
Ridge).
Sylvia Dixon was present and outlined the request noting that there were no objections
from the fire department or public works. There was one recommendation, however, to
remove the apostrophe.
2022-387 MOVED by Councillor Assaff, SECONDED by Deputy Warden Shatford that
Council approve the private road name “Rascals Ridge” (without the
apostrophe) off of East Side Martins River Road and advise the appropriate
authorities and departments. ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
10.2 Request for Decision prepared September 21, 2022 – Community Development &
Recreation Department – Designated Community Fund Request – New Ross Trails
Society.
Chad Haughn, Director of Community Development & Recreation was present for questions
if needed.
2022-388 MOVED by Councillor Connors, SECONDED by Councillor Assaff that Council
provide a Designated Community Fund Grant to the New Ross Trails Society in
the amount of $300.00. ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
10.3 District Council Grants:
a. Studio Singers – District 7 - $1,500.
b. Chester Municipal Heritage Society:
o District 2 Request - $500.
o District 4 Request - $1,000.
o District 7 Request - $500.
Chad Haughn, Director of Community Development & Recreation was present to review the
requests if needed.
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 383
Councillor Wells declared a conflict of interest and left the room.
2022-389 MOVED by Councillor Church, SECONDED by Deputy Warden Shatford that
Council approve a District 7 Council Grant to Studio Singers in the amount of
$1,500.00. COUNCILLORS AT THE TABLE WERE IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
Councillor Wells returned to the Council Chambers.
2022-390 MOVED by Deputy Warden Shatford, SECONDED by Councillor Church that
Council approve the following District Council Grants for the Chester Municipal
Heritage Society:
o District 2 Request - $500.
o District 4 Request - $1,000.
o District 7 Request - $500.
ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
10.4 Fire Prevention Week – Bruce Blackwood, Fire Services Coordinator.
2022-391 MOVED by Councillor Church, SECONDED by Deputy Warden Shatford that
Council approve the Fire Prevention Week 2022 proclamation be signed by the
Warden and posted in the usual manner. ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
10.5 Workshops – Councillor Veinotte.
Councillor Veinotte commented that over the past couple of years, a number of workshops
were requested. He would like to see a schedule to have them completed so that
something can be done before the end of the Council term.
The CAO indicated that the quarterly report on the Strategic Priorities Chart has an
estimated time for initiatives. This is usually done by quarter; however, it is not always
broken down into individual presentations for Council. This method is always open to
change. Staff can review the priorities chart to see if we can come up with more insight for
Council into when presentations to Council or the Committee of the Whole might occur by
month. He is happy to ensure it doesn’t cause more administrative effort.
Warden Webber suggested determining what workshops are pending and prepare a
schedule.
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 384
Councillor Veinotte would prefer to have the workshops before the lead into some projects.
He understands that sometimes things come up here and are not a part of the strategic
plan but may be politically important. There are certain things residents want to see done
and we need to be able to react in a timely manner or at least give feedback as to when
those items will be addressed.
Deputy Warden Shatford commented that the Fire Advisory Committee structure has been
on his Commission’s radar for over a year. He also noted that the amount being spent on
water due to dry wells is high and would like to see some movement on the community
wells initiative.
The CAO noted that he was hearing comments about workshops related to strategic
priorities but some of the local issues may not be on priorities chart. He asked Councillors
to forward him an email if they require an update. He did note that staff were expecting the
Fire Service Review very soon.
Councillor Veinotte commented on the PACE By-Law and wanted some time set aside to
discuss this. There was an appetite to do something, but he is not sure of detail because
there has been no opportunity to talk about it.
Questions were asked regarding comfort centres and asked if there is a possibility of
providing a community well at a comfort centre. There was some issue noted in signing an
agreement to say the centre would have safe drinking water in their facility.
The question was asked as to how long the water program would be offered and the Fire
Services Coordinator indicated that the requests for water coupons are starting to drop off.
He did note that approximately 8,000 coupons have been distributed but they don’t have
any data on well recovery results yet.
It was agreed that an email would be sent to Council for input on the program and whether
to end it.
The CAO asked Council if, as part of the program review, were they interested in a
community wells program as a substitute for the bottled water program?
Councillor Veinotte commented that people requesting water may have an issue with their
well and use the water program, however, there is a well program in place for people if they
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 385
wish to use it. It was noted that providing a test to determine who would be able to
receive water would increase administrative burdens.
It was suggested that the information on the loan program be offered, and it was noted
that this information goes in the newsletter and on the website. When people come in for
coupons, they are provided with information on the loan program as well. It was also noted
that Graves Island Provincial Park is offering bulk water.
10.4 Village of Chester Comfort Station – Councillor Wells.
Councillor Wells thanked the Deputy CAO for the information emailed prior to Hurricane
Fiona and noted that his area didn’t require a comfort station as other areas did.
His concern is that if the Village Comfort Station had been needed, there would be no
power as the generator is still out of service. He recalled discussing the generator in
February and noted that part of the assistance program from the province was providing
funds for generators for comfort stations.
The Fire Services Coordinator indicated that he spoke with the Church, however, there were
no grants available at that time. He can get back to them now with the province’s new
programming.
There was a brief discussion regarding comfort centres, generators, cost of generators, and
funding. Warden Webber commented that if the Province has a new program, maybe that
is the solution for comfort centres.
Councillor Wells also wanted to go on record to thank the Chester Volunteer Fire
Department for being out in the storm throughout the night to remove downed trees.
IN CAMERA
11.1 Section 22(2)(a) of the Municipal Government Act – acquisition, sale, lease and
security of municipal property – Road Reserve.
2022-392 MOVED by Deputy Warden Shatford, SECONDED by Councillor Assaff the
meeting convene In Camera as per Section 22(2)(A) of the Municipal
Government Act – Road Reserve. ALL IN FAVOUR. MOTION CARRIED.
Council (continued) September 29, 2022 386
ADJOURNMENT
2022-393 MOVED by Deputy Warden Shatford, SECONDED by Councillor Church the
meeting adjourn. (10:55 a.m.)
___________________________ ___________________________
Allen Webber Pamela Myra
Warden Municipal Clerk
MOTION FROM BUILDING CODE & UNSIGHTLY PREMISES COMMITTEE
OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2022
2022-372 RECOMMENDATION FOR DEMOLITION
MOVED by Deputy Warden Shatford, SECONDED by Councillor Connors the Building Code &
Unsightly Premises Committee recommended Council issue the property owner(s) of 5870 Hwy
3, Gold River, Lunenburg County, PID 60158557 an Order to demolish the derelict and(or)
dangers structure on the property within 14-Days. MOTION CARRIED.
2022-373 ADJOURNMENT
INFORMATION REPORT
REPORT TO: Building Code & Unsightly Premises Committee
MEETING DATE: September 22, 2022
DEPARTMENT: Community Development & Recreation
SUBJECT: 5870 Hwy 3, Gold River
ORIGIN: CM-DG2022-006
Date: September 22, 2022 Prepared by: Tammy Hamm, Administrative Coordinator
Date: September 22, 2022 Authorized by: Brent Haase, Building Official
CURRENT SITUATION
Brent Haase, Building Official, and Brendan Mosher, By-Law Enforcement Officer conducted a site inspection of
5870 Hwy 3, Gold River as a result of complaint with reference to a dangerous structure.
BACKGROUND
The By-Law Enforcement Officer conducted and initial site inspection and requested a consult from the Building
Official to inspect the structural integrity of the building and possibility of remediation. The Building Official
confirmed that the structure creates an immediate concern for life safety and is beyond the state of repair.
DISCUSSION/UPDATES
The recommendation from the Building Official is to caution tape the area to discourage entry to the structure.
An Order should also be issued to demolish the structure as soon as possible. The site should be investigated to
determine if there is a well located on that site that could pose a safety concern.
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO: Council
MEETING DATE: Thursday October 13th, 2022
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUBJECT: Order to demolish & Rectify
ORIGIN: Dangerous & Unsightly Committee
Date: October 5, 2022 Prepared by: Brendan Mosher, Bylaw Enforcement Officer
Date: October 5, 2022 Reviewed by: Chad Haughn, Director of Community Development & Recreation
Date: October 5, 2022 Authorized by: Dan McDougall, CAO
RECOMMENDED MOTION
The following motion was made at the Thursday September 22nd, 2022 Building Code & Unsightly Premises
Committee meeting related to the property located at 5870 Highway #3, Gold River:
Motion: MOVED by Deputy Warden Shatford, SECONDED by Councilor Connors that the Building Code
& Unsightly Premises Committee recommend to Council the property owner(s) of 5870 Highway #3,
Gold River, Lunenburg County, PID 60158557 be issued an Order to demolish 1 derelict and(or)
dangerous structure on the property within 14-Days. MOTION CARRIED.
CURRENT SITUATION
This report is in front of Council since this property has a structure on it that is past the point of repair and poses
a significant life safety risk towards the public if anyone attempted to enter this structure.
BACKGROUND
September 20th, 2022 A public member called the office to report a dangerous structure in the community of
Gold River. This resident came across the property at 5870 Highway #3, Gold River while out for a walk. The
resident indicated that they went to close to the structure partially fell into the basement.
September 21st, 2022 Brendan Mosher conducted a site visit. During the site visit it was determined that the
structure is starting to cave in on itself and is in an unsafe condition. The chimney is free standing, one exterior
wall is missing, and the foundation is missing in spots.
Building Official, Brent Haase, went to the site later that day and confirmed that the structure is in a dangerous
condition with no way of properly securing it for public safety. Brendan Mosher installed danger tape around the
structure for basic safety precautions. Brent Haase also outlined in his report that we need to locate the well on
the property to confirm it is also secured and not in a dangerous condition to the public.
IMPLICATIONS
By-Law/Policy
The following bylaws and Acts are outlined for this report:
Municipal Government Act – The act requires notice be given to the property owner when an order to demolish
is proposed and the owner be given the opportunity to appear before Council.
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 2
MGA Section 346 (3) “Where it is proposed to order demolition, before the order is made not
less than seven days notice shall be given to the owner specifying the date, time and place of
the meeting at which the order will be considered and that the owner will be given the
opportunity to appear and be heard before any order is made.”
In this case, the property owner was provided with the required notice and has intentions to speak with Council
on October 13, 2022.
Dangerous or Unsightly Premises Policy P-80
The Dangerous & Unsightly Committee determines when a property is considered dangerous or unsightly and
through the Bylaw Enforcement Officer attempts to bring violations into compliance. However, the decision to
order a demolition resides with Council. Policy Statement 5 says, “Council retains its authority under the
Dangerous or Unsightly Premises provisions contained in the Municipal Government Act to order demolitions.”
Financial/budgetary
If the property owner does not follow through with the issued order the Municipality of Chester will complete
the assigned order through the Heavy Equipment Contract and any expenses accumulated will be assigned to
the property owners taxes.
Has Legal review been completed? Yes
ATTACHMENTS
1. Building Officials Report
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 3
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 4
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 5
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 6
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 7
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 8
REQUEST FOR DECISION
Prepared By: Bruce Blackwood Date October 5, 2022
Reviewed By: Tara Maguire Date October 5, 2022
Authorized By: Dan McDougall Date October 5, 2022
CURRENT SITUATION
At a meeting of April 7, 2022, the ad hoc Steering Committee reviewed the final fire services review
(Risk Assessment) report (March 2022) received from Fire Underwriters Survey (FUS) of SCM Opta
Information Intelligence Inc. and determined that it met the scope of the project outlined in the
RFP MODC-T-2019-004.
Following the meeting of April 7th, 2022, the Steering Committee with representation from the
Commissions and Fire Departments further reviewed a total of 38 recommendations made by Fire
Underwriter Survey consultants.
The Steering Committee met again on September 7, 2022 to discuss the recommendations
contained within the report. The recommendations had been grouped into several categories
related to possible improvements in fire insurance ratings, capacity, response times and general
services to the public.
The Steering Committee agreed on several priorities within these recommendations that they felt
the fire services and the MOC should work on in the short and longer term. These areas are
summarized below;
1. Equipment and Apparatus: (develop 20 year replacement schedule for engines/tankers)
2. Water Supply (Develop a dry hydrant program)
3. Fire Department Response: (computer aid dispatch/auto aid, multiple station response
4. Training: (Investment in training resources, regional facilities, local trainers)
5. Volunteer Work Force (volunteer recruitment and retention strategic plan)
6. Risk Management (pre-incident planning programs, wildfire mitigation programs)
7. Administration: (records management, standard templates, MOC road specifications)
REPORT TO: Municipal Council
SUBMITTED BY: Bruce Blackwood, Fire Services
Coordinator
DATE: October 5, 2022
SUBJECT: Fire Services Review
ORIGIN: Fire Services
2 Request For Decision
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the MOC receive the Fire Underwriters Survey (FUS) Fire services Review (Risk
Assessment) report of March 2022 as meeting the scope of the project outlined in RFP MODC-T-
2019-004 and work with the Fire Services on the priorities outlined by the Steering Committee. As
the ad hoc Steering Committee has completed its assigned task in evaluation of the final report
and providing Council with advice on fire service priorities, it is recommended it be discontinued .
Further to Council’s request to reestablish a Fire Advisory Committee (FAC), it is recommended
that this the FAC be the Committee of Council to move forward on the implementation of the fire
service priority recommendations.
BACKGROUND
Following discussions with the fires services a scope of work was developed to complete a fire
services review (risk assessment) for the Municipality of Chester. In August 2019 Council approved
the budget for the project. The RFP was awarded to Fire Underwriters Survey (FUS). The 3 phases
of the study were completed in February 2021, at which time the ad hoc Steering Committee
began its review of the scope and the draft reports. Follow up visits and data collection by the
consultants were completed to address gaps in the report identified by the Steering Committee.
The consultants’ final report was issued in March 2022 and in April 2022 the Committee accepted
the report as meeting the scope of the project.
The Steering Committee met again on September 7, 2022 and from all the recommendations made
in the report, jointly outlined several priorities that they felt the fire services and the MOC should
work on in the short and longer term.
D ISCUSSION
The risk assessment was completed with the participation of all 7 Commissions and Fire
Departments serving the MOC. The report quantified fire risk and identified other major risks that
our fire services are facing within the MOC. Overall, the fires services has demonstrated the
capacity to mitigate fire risk within the various communities and is meeting the established
insurance gradings. The fire service continues to evaluate resources that may be required to meet
other risks identified in the report.
Recommendations were made by the FUS consultants on opportunities for improvement. Of these
recommendations the fire services have identified priorities that are to be worked on in
conjunction with the MOC.
3 Request For Decision
IMPLICATIONS
Policy
To be determined. Possible new policies coming from the implementation of the priority
recommendations.
Financial/Budgetary
To be determined depending on the implementation plans agreed upon.
Environmental
No immediate impact but consultation with NSE environment will be required on some of the
recommendations.
Strategic Plan
Reference to:
• Maintain a high level of fiscal responsibility
• Continually improve public satisfaction with municipal services
Work Program Implications
Covered in work program of Fire Services Coordinator.
OPTIONS
1. Receive the Fire Underwriters Survey (FUS) Risk Assessment report of March 2022 as
meeting the scope of the project outlined in RFP MODC-T-2019-004 and work with the Fire
Services on the initial priorities outlined by the Steering Committee. Discontinue the ad
hoc Steering Committee. Per Council’s request, reestablish the Fire Advisory Committee
(FAC) to move forward on the implementation of the priority recommendations.
2. Refer back to staff to provide further information on the risk assessment and
recommendations.
A TTACHMENTS
Update to Council on report and Steering Committee Review
March 2022 report supplied previously.
COMMUNICATIONS (INTERNAL/EXTERNAL)
N/A
MOC Fire Services Review
(Risk Assessment Study)
Steering Committee Council Update
October 13, 2022
Purpose of Fire Services Review
•Identify current fire protection and emergency services needs of each
community
•Review current fire protection and emergency services response capacity
•Outline possible service delivery models to mitigate community risks
•Explore service improvements/potential cost savings for fire services and
public sector (e.g., improved Insurance Gradings)
•Provide data and optimization models to support future decisions on services
and standards required across the Municipality.
Overview of Fire Services Review Report
Phase 1 -Risk Identification
•Identification and mapping of fire
risks and required fire flow within
each Fire District.
•Calculation and mapping of
response zones (NFPA 1720 -Rural
Volunteer Fire Service) .
•Identification of other types of
emergency risks and hazards
within the communities.
Phase 2 -Risk & Capacity Analysis
•Analysis of fire/emergency service
capacity to provide effective
response to identified risks and
domestic and commercial insurance
gradings
•Review and optimization of water
supply points across the MOC
•Property coverage mapping
(2.5/5/8km) within each Fire District
•Impact of growth and future
development on fire service capacity
•Recommendations on improvements
to fire services to improve insurance
gradings and service to the public
Phase 3 –Optimization
Recommendations
•Optimizations to determine if better
levels of coverage can be provided
with the same /or fewer fire halls
•Model of service coverage of current
boundaries vs consolidated response
•Optimization of coverage with halls
located at 2.5/5 and 8 km from risks
•Optimization of coverage based on
required fire flows and of coverage
within 5 km of a water supply point
•Current fire district boundaries and
fire stations optimized to the 8 km
risk coverage.
Consultant’s Summary
•Fire Services in MOC demonstrate the capacity to meet established
insurance classifications.
•MOC departments are rural volunteer departments with no municipal water supply which limits their
domestic protection classification to maximum 3B (within 8 km distance restrictions)
•Domestic Dwelling Protection Grade (DPG) upgraded to 3S in applicable areas within each Fire District
due to recent superior Water Shuttle Accreditation
•PFPC (commercial) classifications are at basic levels without pressurized municipal water supplies.
•MOC would benefit operationally and administratively from adopting a consolidated fire
services model using the 7 existing fire stations
•i.e. response times, standardized training, procedures, purchasing, etc.
•Future planning of fire station locations should focus on a central station in Chester and
optimizing other fire station locations to provide maximal coverage within 8 km of the hall.
Consultant’s Summary
Fire Services should consider:
•development of its water supply to meet requirements of NFPA 1142 as an alternate to municipal water
supply (Dry hydrants)
•improvement in response times through using a single dispatch system and implementing Computer
Aided Dispatch (CAD)
•improvements in response times through automatic aid and multiple station response protocols
especially during the workday hours
•improvements in some key areas identified in the capacity evaluations, e.g. preplanning, training,
recruitment and retention, records management.
MOC should consider:
•policy and by-laws in support of fire services, eg wildfire mitigation, subdivision and private road design
and maintenance, building access, fire safety inspections and fire prevention etc,
•other community risks identified and determine resource allocations necessary to address these risks
Overview of Recommendations
•A total of 38 recommendations in the final report were reviewed by the Steering Committee (Commissions
and Departments)
•These were grouped into several key categories related to improvements in fire insurance ratings and general
services to the public.
1.Equipment and Apparatus (replacement schedules, specialized response units)
2.Water Supply (rural areas and marinas)
3.Fire Department response (computerized dispatch, automatic aid)
4.Training (regional centers, local trainers)
5.Volunteer Work Force/Recruitment and Retention (joint municipal programs and plans)
6.Risk Management (preplanning)
7.Administration (operating standards/procedures records management
•Although each District has some specific local needs there is agreement on some short and longer term
priorities for the overall fire services
Steering Committee Overview of Recommendations
(Volunteer Workforce)
Recruitment and Retention
Strategic Plan
(Equipment and
Apparatus)
Maintain 20 Year
Replacement Schedule
for Engine/Tankers
(Training)
Improve Training Programs
through investment in training
resources, regional facilities
and local trainers
(Water Supply)
Dry Hydrant Program
(including marinas)
(Administration)
Records Management
System, Standard
reports)
(Risk Management)
Development of a Pre-
Incident Plan Program
(Fire Department
Response)
Consolidated Dispatch
Agreement and Response
Protocols
(Fire Department Response)
Improve Daytime response
(recruitment, from multiple
stations)
(Risk Management)
Wildfire Mitigation
Program
(Response)
Fire Department Access Issue
(private roads, subdivisions,
design/maintenance
Short term, fire services operations, limited complexity
Short to medium term, fire services , MOC support, some complexity
Medium term, fire services, MOC support, other agencies, higher complexity
Next steps
•Have Council accept the fire services priorities as presented by the Steering Committee
•Re -establish FAC
•Work with FAC to develop action plan and working committees
•Provide ongoing support to fire services as required and requested
•Track implementation of action plans
PLANNING MATTERS REPORT
REPORT TO: Municipal Council
MEETING DATE: October 13, 2022
DEPARTMENT: Community Development & Recreation
SUBJECT: Request to Rezone a portion of PID 60422888
ORIGIN: 2022-327
Date: October 6, 2022 Prepared by: Garth Sturtevant, Senior Planner
Date: October 6, 2022 Reviewed by: Dan McDougall, CAO
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Applicant: Larex Management Ltd. Zone: Settlement Residential Two Zone & Mixed Use Zone
Proposal: Rezone entire parcel to MU Rezoning Required: X Yes _ _ No __ N/A
Location: Hubbards, N.S. (PID 60422888) Neighbour Notification: Notice of Public Hearing will be sent to
neighbouring property owners within 30m of the subject property
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Staff are seeking Council approval of the following motions in accordance with the Options section of this
report:
Motion 1:
1. That Municipal Council direct staff to return to the Municipal Planning Advisory Committee to obtain a
new motion, in compliance with Policy p-109, regarding the application to rezone a portion of PID
60422888.
Motion 2:
1. That Municipal Council confirm their intent to renew the application to amend the Municipal Land Use
By-law to rezone a portion of PID 60422888, thereby renewing the 120 day timeline for publishing first
notice of a Public Hearing in accordance with Section 21 (2) of the Municipal Government Act
CURRENT SITUATION
Larex Management on behalf of 3220572 Nova Scotia Limited and James Boudreau Limited has submitted an
application to rezone a portion of PID 60422888 from Settlement Residential Two (SR-2) Zone to Mixed Use
(MU) Zone. The lot is currently split-zoned and the request is seeking to have the lot fall completely under the
regulations of the Mixed Use Zone. The stated intent of the request is to facilitate a future commercial
subdivision and development of highway orientated services potentially including but not limited to gas station,
retail outlets, home renovation retailers and others.
BACKGROUND
Current zoning for properties around Exit 6 was established during the Municipal Plan review which concluded in
January 2020 with the adoption of the new Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law. When considering zoning for
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 2
the Exit 6 area, staff originally proposed the Mixed-Use Zone, however, based on discussions in the community
and concerns expressed regarding commercial developments along Highway 3 this approach was altered to
include the Settlement Residential Two Zone. This approach has resulted in the current scenario where the
subject property is split zoned between the MU and SR-2 Zones (Map 1).
The subject property is approximately 30.5 acres in total area. Surrounding land uses include a cluster of
residential properties immediately West of the site. Two properties in residential use directly abut the site, with
approximately 9 additional properties in residential use near the site or directly across Mill Lake Road No. 1.
The Southern
property
boundary abuts
land owned by
the Crown to
facilitate the
expansion work
on Highway
103. A future
public road
access will be
constructed
south of the
site to provide
vehicular
access.
The Eastern
boundary
includes a small
section of
waterfrontage
on Sawler Lake,
with the
remainder
being bounded
by
undeveloped,
forested land.
The North
boundary abuts
a large
undeveloped
parcel of land, which includes a small watercourse that flows across the site in the far North-Eastern corner.
Staff conducted a site visit on August 16th to photograph the site in its current state and get a feeling for
conditions on the ground. The site is currently undeveloped with a mixed forest composition. There is a small
pathway crossing the property, but otherwise remains in a natural state.
Figure 1 - showing PID 60422888 and surrounding land use
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 3
As noted above, there is a
small watercourse in the
Northeast corner of the lot.
This watercourse is protected
in the Municipal Planning
Strategy and Land Use By-law.
All development that requires
a development permit must
be at least 20m from the
ordinary high-water mark of
the watercourse. Additionally,
Sawler Lake is protected by
the Lakefront Overlay
(Appendix C: Watercourse
and Waterbodies Map). This
ensures that all new dwelling
units and developments other
than a small accessory
structure, must be setback at least 20m from the ordinary high water mark.
There are no known species at risk on or near the subject property (Appendix D: Species at Risk). The site also
appears suitable for development in most areas. There are the noted setbacks from watercourses and
waterbodies in addition to several areas of steep slopes that would likely need to be avoided or terraformed to
create a suitable building site (Appendix E: Slope Map). Nothing found during the site visit or review of existing
conditions has caused significant concern for staff regarding the suitability of the site for the proposed use of a
commercial subdivision.
DISCUSSION
The request to rezone a portion of PID 60422888 is generally in keeping with the policies and provisions
contained in the Municipal Planning Strategy. Both the Settlement Residential Two and Mixed Use Zones are
permitted within the “Settlement Area” Designation of the Municipal Planning Strategy. This allows the rezoning
to be completed without need to amend the Municipal Planning Strategy.
The Settlement Residential Two Zone has more regulations and controls, particularly in relation to the size of
commercial and light industrial developments permitted by right. The SR-2 Zone allows most commercial and
light industrial developments up to a maximum 100m2 of floor area by Development Permit or up to 500m2 of
floor area by Site Plan Approval. Conversely, the Mixed Use Zone allows most commercial and light industrial
uses up to 2000m2 by Development Permit and those greater than 2000m2 require a Development Agreement.
The SR-2 Zone requires Site Plan Approval for 3 or more dwelling units on a lot. In the MU Zone, Site Plan
Approval is required for 5-11 units on a lot and a Development Agreement is required for 12 or more units on a
lot.
The SR-2 Zone limits the size and intensity of non-residential land uses, with the intent of primarily supporting
residential uses interspersed with complimentary commercial and light industrial uses.
Figure 2 - showing existing lot conditions, mixed forest and undeveloped
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 4
The MU Zone was designed to
support a wide array of land
uses and intensities, with a
variety of approval processes
determined by the size of the
development. The MU Zone was
intended to maintain the
existing rural development
pattern found primarily
between Highway 103 and the
coastline, while offering basic
land use controls for new
development to reduce land use
conflicts where possible. The
MU Zone is most often found
around Highway 103 Exits and in
areas outside Hamlets and
established residential
neighbourhoods such as
Marvin’s Island, Marriot’s Cove
Road and Forest Village Drive.
The MU Zone is used as a “fill in”
for areas between communities
that have expressed a desire for
more rigid controls.
Access
While not required to be
contained in the request to
rezone, staff understand that the proposed access to the site is
to be provided via a new public road (Figure 5). This new road
would intersect with Mill Lake Road No. 1 and provide access
to the southern property boundary.
Mill Lake Road No. 1, Highway 103 and the new road are all
under ownership of the Provincial Department of Public Works.
All approvals for access points and traffic control issues rest
with Public Works. If the development proceeds with
subdivision approval to create lots for sale and/or
development, a copy of the approval from Public Works would
need to be submitted with the subdivision application to
indicate there is approved access for each proposed new lot.
Figure 4 - showing approximate location of new public road
Figure 3 - Showing PID 60422888 with current zoning
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 5
There is no Municipal sewer
or water serving the lot. It is
anticipated that the
development will be served
by a series of on-site septic
systems. On-site septic
approvals are issued by Nova
Scotia Environment. A copy of
the approval from NSE must
be submitted prior to a
subdivision application being
approved.
Proposed Use and Draft
Layout – Commercial
Subdivision
In the letter of request to
rezone the property, the
Developer states the intended
use of the property is for
commercial uses via a
planned subdivision. The
following images have been
provided by the Developer. It
should be noted that the
design and intended use of
the site is subject to change
and there is no obligation on behalf of
the Developer to undertake the
development as shown (figures 5 & 6).
The images below show the proposed
access road, to be constructed to
provide access to the site and continue
West, parallel to Highway 103, to
provide road access to existing residents
of Sawler Lake. This work will be carried
out by or in conjunction with the
Provincial Department of Public Works.
The Developer will be responsible to
construct the roadway to serve the new
commercial uses within the interior of
PID 60422888.
The layout of lots and structures on the
lot is subject to Municipal Subdivision
approval, which includes confirmation
Figure 5 - DRAFT access plan (subject to construction and approval by NS Public Works)
Figure 6 - Proposed layout of commercial subdivision (subject to
Subdivision Approval)
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 6
from Nova Scotia Environment that an on-site septic system can be designed to serve the lot. Additionally,
confirmation from Nova Scotia Public works will be required to confirm access to the new lots from the public
roadway. Subject to those approvals, the Developer has provided Figure 6 to show the intended layout and
design of the commercial subdivision.
PLANNING STRATEGY POLICY ANALYSIS
Policy Analysis & Staff Comment:
Policy V-10
Council intends to control land use and
development in a manner that will lessen
conflicts between land uses and in a
manner that is compatible with the
existing pattern of land use in the
Municipality.
The proposed rezoning would change from one Community
Character Zone (SR-2) to another zone in the same Character
Area (MU). This indicates that the Municipal Planning Strategy
views the rezoning as being of lesser impact as no change to the
MPS is required. Both zones contain regulations to separate and
buffer differing uses and the rezoning is not anticipated to
result in new or worsened conflict with existing surrounding
uses. It should also be noted that the development could
proceed under the current zoning (SR-2), but would be limited
in the size of the structure permitted on each lot compared to
the MU Zone.
Policy V-11
Land use policies and regulations shall
reflect each area’s:
a) rural or village context;
b) existing land uses;
c) community character;
d) desire for regulation;
e) vision.
The subject property is split zoned between SR-2 and MU.
Properties further inland are zoned MU and those near Highway
103 are zoned SR-2. The request to rezone the entire parcel to
MU reflects the vision for the anticipated type of development
that would occur near Highway Exits. While there has been
some debate on the vision for Exit 6, with some conflicting
comments made about reducing commercial uses near the exit,
the plan establishes the MU Zone as being appropriate for
Highway Exit development.
Policy CC-14
A Settlement Area designation shall be
created, which shall generally be placed
on the more densely-populated areas
primarily south of Highway 103 that have
experienced modest development
pressures. The extent of the Settlement
Area shall be identified on the
Generalized Future Land Use Map.
Both the SR-2 Zone and the MU Zone occur and are permitted
within the Settlement Area. Rezoning from SR-2 to MU keeps
the designation the same and therefore no amendment is
required to the Municipal Planning Strategy.
Policy CC-15
The intent of the Settlement Area
designation is to:
a) permit a mix of uses that can
foster cohesive development of
moderate density;
b) provide a varying level of
regulation which recognizes the
diversity of the different
development patterns within the
Settlement Area;
The proposed development relates directly to Policy CC-15.
The SR-2 Zone is similar to the MU Zone, but contains smaller
permitted commercial developments. Both zones allow
Commercial, Residential and Light Industrial uses, in
acknowledging the longstanding approach to mixed use
development in the Municipality.
The request to rezone states that the intended use of the site is
to subdivide and create a commercial development virtually
adjacent Highway 103.
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 7
c) prepare for development,
especially near major highways;
d) encourage development
compatible with the Area’s
character;
e) ensure that commercial and light
industrial development is well-
designed and does not create
highway strip development;
f) safeguard the natural
environment, especially water
quality.
The MU Zone contains yard setbacks and other requirements
that are designed to ensure the development is acceptable to
the community and is in keeping with the Municipal Planning
Strategy.
The draft site plan (Figure 6) from the developer appears to
show intent to create an easily accessible commercial
development that maintains setbacks, space between
structures and appears to exceed requirements on buffering
from neighbouring uses.
Existing protections, including the Lakefront Overlay and
Watercourses, Water Bodies and Wetlands, in the Land Use By-
law provide protection to Sawler Lake and Mill Brook.
Policy CC-24
Within the Mixed-Use Zone, it shall be
the intent of Council to:
a) allow a range of residential,
commercial, institutional and light
industrial uses;
b) provide modest setbacks for
certain rural uses, commercial and
light industrial uses and forestry
processing; prohibit heavy
industrial uses and fur farming.
The proposed use would see development of a commercial
subdivision in keeping with policy CC-24. Additionally, the
development will adhere to the setback requirements of the
MU Zone to create separation from any nearby properties not
in commercial use.
Policy CC-25
In the Mixed-Use Zone, a development
permit shall be required for:
a) low density residential
developments;
b) small commercial, institutional and
light industrial developments;
c) forestry processing;
d) small campgrounds, RV Parks and
tourist accommodations.
The proposed development is expected to occur through
subdivision of the lands and the issuance of development
permits for each structure. The proposal does not envision
commercial development at a scale that would require a
Development Agreement, per the regulations of the Mixed-Use
Zone.
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 8
Policy A-32
When considering amendments to a land
use by-law or a subdivision by-law,
Council shall consider the following:
a) that the amendment meets the
intent of the Municipal Planning
Strategy and the intent of any
relevant Secondary Planning
Strategies;
b) that the amendment conforms to
all relevant Municipal By-laws;
c) that the applicable public
consultation program has been
followed and residents’ opinions
have been carefully considered;
d) that the amendment is in the best
interest of the Municipality.
a) The proposed rezoning of a portion of PID 60422888
from Settlement Residential Two to the Mixed Use Zone
is in keeping with the policies and intent of the
Municipal Planning Strategy.
b) The proposal appears to conform with all Municipal By-
laws.
c) The required Public Participation Program, detailed in
MPS Policy A-3 will be followed. To date this includes
holding a Public Information Meeting in the community.
Future steps include signage posted on the property, a
mail out to property owners within 30m of the property
and a duly advertised Public Hearing before Council
votes on the proposal.
d) The proposal to create a commercial subdivision aimed
at serving local residents and the travelling public is in
keeping with policy provisions and could result in
substantial commercial growth around Exit 6. This has
positive tax implications and also will serve to attract
residents to the area by providing convenient amenities
and services.
Policy A-33
When evaluating a rezoning application,
Council shall consider other potential
developments and uses that may be
permitted as a result of a proposed zone
change.
If the rezoning proposal is approved, the entirety of PID
60422888 may be developed subject to the Mixed Use Zone
regulations contained in the Municipal Land Use By-law.
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 9
Policy A-34
Applications for a Land Use By-law
amendment shall show:
a) the location, area, and dimensions
of the subject property;
b) the proposed location, dimensions,
height, and proposed use of all
buildings;
c) the means by which the site is to
be serviced by sanitary and storm
sewers, water, electrical service
and other utilities;
d) the location of any parking stalls,
driveways, walkways, lighting,
fencing, refuse containers, and
snow storage;
e) landscaping elements including
existing and proposed shrubs and
trees;
f) architectural features where such
features are regulated by the
planning document;
g) additional reports or
environmental studies as
requested by the Municipality.
a) This report contains a map showing the extent of the
property.
b) The proposal is seeking approval to rezone PID
60422888, no approval to develop or construct
structures is being sought at this time. It is anticipated
that the planned development will be facilitated
through a future subdivision into smaller lots and then
issuance of development permits for as-of-right
development. The Application form states 10-12 lots
are desired with 8+ buildings. A draft layout has been
provided and is shown in Figure 6.
c) There are no municipal services in the vicinity of the
site. The site will be served by on-site water and septic
systems with approvals issued by Nova Scotia
Environment. Copies of these approvals would be
submitted to support the application to subdivide the
lot.
d) Not applicable. The application to rezone does not
include detailed site design. This work is anticipated to
occur following rezoning at the subdivision and
permitting stage.
e) Not applicable. The application to rezone does not
include detailed site design. This work is anticipated to
occur following rezoning at the permitting stage.
f) Not applicable. There are no architectural controls for
as-of-right development in either the SR-2 or MU
Zones.
g) To date there have been no additional studies or
information requested by staff. The request letter
(Appendix A) and Figures 5 & 6 (supplied by the
Developer) provided sufficient information to
complete the staff report and policy analysis.
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 10
Policy A-35
When considering amendments to the
Land Use By-law, Council shall be satisfied
that the proposal is appropriate with
respect to:
a) compatibility of the proposed land
uses permitted within the
proposed zone;
b) compatibility of the development,
and potential developments, with
adjacent properties in terms of
size, lot coverage and density;
c) potential compatibility issues with
nearby land uses resulting from
lighting, signage, outdoor display
and storage, traffic, vehicle
headlights, and noise;
d) the adequacy of sewer services,
water services, waste management
services and stormwater
management practices;
e) efficient use of existing and new
municipal infrastructure;
f) proximity to and impact on
heritage sites and archaeological
sites;
g) the proximity and capacity of
schools;
h) the adequacy and proximity of
recreation and facilities;
i) the adequacy of the road network
in, adjacent to, or leading to the
development;
j) the potential for erosion or for the
contamination or sedimentation of
watercourses;
k) environmental impacts such as air
and water pollution and soil
contamination;
l) previous uses of the site which
may have caused soil or
groundwater contamination;
m) suitability of the site in terms of
grades, soil and bedrock
conditions, location of
watercourses, water bodies or
wetlands;
n) the ability of emergency services
to respond to an emergency at the
a) The proposed use of the site for highway oriented
commercial uses is permitted within the Mixed Use
Zone. These uses are also permitted in the Settlement
Residential Two Zone, however, size limits apply and a
Development Agreement is required for larger
commercial developments. Both zones are within the
Settlement Character Area, with the proposed change
representing a slight relaxation in regulations.
b) The proposed commercial subdivision is not anticipated
to impact the undeveloped lots on the North, East and
Southern boundaries. There are a cluster of properties
in residential use to the West of the site. The SR-2 and
MU Zone both permit a mix of residential and
commercial/light industrial uses. Setbacks within the
zone and the requirement that very large developments
adhere to a Development Agreement process are
intended to ensure that potential land use conflicts are
minimized or avoided. Based on the draft lot layout
plan (Figure 6) and given setbacks required in the MU
Zone are designed to provide buffering between any
new development and existing residential properties,
no compatibility issues are anticipated.
c) Similar to b) above, once the property is rezoned all
development would need to comply with all provisions
of the Land Use By-law. The types of uses permitted in
the SR-2 Zone and MU Zone are very similar, therefore,
the rezoning is not expected to create or worsen
conflicts between uses as the development could occur
on the lot with existing zoning and reduced building
footprints. Additionally, more than half the lot is
already zoned MU meaning the development as
envisioned can proceed on that portion of the lot.
d) There are no municipal services in the vicinity of the
site. The site will be served by on-site water and septic
systems with approvals issued by Nova Scotia
Environment. Copies of these approvals would be
submitted to support the application to subdivide the
lot.
e) Not applicable. No municipal infrastructure exists or is
available to the subject property.
f) Not applicable. No known heritage or archeological
sites are near the subject property.
g) Not applicable.
h) Not applicable.
i) As discussed in this report, access to the site will be
provided by public roads owned and maintained by the
Province. A new public road is anticipated to be
constructed to provide access to the Southern property
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 11
location of the proposed
development;
o) the proposal and the proposed
zone support the intent of this
strategy; and
p) the financial ability of the
Municipality to absorb any costs
relating to the amendment.
boundary and intersecting Mill Lake Road No. 1. If new
roads are created within the subject property, those
would be private or designed and built to the Municipal
standard if intended to be turned over to the
Municipality. The process to turn over a road to the
Municipality is usually negotiated during Subdivision
approval and would require that the road be designed
and constructed in accordance with the Municipal
Specifications.
j) As shown on Appendix E, there are some areas of the
sight with steep slopes. These should be mitigated or
avoided to prevent erosion during development of the
site. There is a small watercourse which intersects the
Northeastern portion of the lot. All uses that require a
Development Permit must remain 20m from the
watercourse. Additionally, no new dwellings are
permitted within 20m of Sawler Lake as per the
regulations of the Lakefront Overlay contained in the
Municipal Land Use By-law.
k) Not applicable. The rezoning does not involve
development of the site. This will all occur following the
rezoning through subdivision approval and application
for development permits. During this time all standard
provisions of the Land Use By-law will apply. In addition
other levels of government, including Provincial Nova
Scotia Environment have regulations and authority
relating to pollution and erosion during construction
activities.
l) Not applicable. There are no known previous uses of
the site. Aerial photography and records reviewed in
preparing this report would indicate the site has been
undeveloped for a substantial period if it has ever been
developed.
m) As noted above, Appendix E shows the existing slopes
on the site. Watercourses and waterbodies are
protected by the Lakefront Overlay and Wetlands,
Waterbodies and Watercourses provisions of the
Municipal Land Use By-law, including setbacks from the
high water mark. There are no know issues with
geology, bedrock conditions or soil.
n) No issue anticipated. With the development proposed
to be served by public roads, there are no concerns
from staff in terms of emergency response.
o) Yes, both the SR-2 Zone and MU Zone support a wide
variety of commercial uses. The MU Zone specifically
supports larger commercial uses by development
permit.
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 12
p) No costs to the Municipality are anticipated as a result
of the rezoning. Future subdivision and commercial
development at the site may be accompanied by a
request that the Municipality take ownership of the
new road serving the commercial development. This
would require negotiation with Council, likely at the
time of Subdivision approval.
By voting to approve or reject this rezoning proposal,
Council is making no indication and is under no
obligations to take over any newly created roads. Those
negotiations would follow the rezoning and will
constitute a separate process. The estimated
maintenance costs for the road are not possible to
calculate at this time without additional details and
design work is completed.
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
A Public Information Meeting was held on Thursday September 8, 2022. The meeting was held at the Hubbards
Area Lion’s Club, beginning at 6:30pm. Approximately 65 members of the public attended the meeting. Staff
recorded notes from the meeting and a complete record is attached as Appendix F.
MUNICIPAL PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
A meeting of the Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (MPAC) was held on Wednesday September 21, 2022
beginning at 6:00pm in Municipal Council Chambers. Staff presented a report to the Committee and several
members of the public requested time to address the committee.
Following discussion, the Committee passed* the following motion (*See Consideration of the MPAC Motion
Section below):
2021-023 MOVED by Councillor Abdella Assaff, SECONDED by Ross Shatford for the
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee recommend that Council approve the request to rezone
a portion of PID 60422888 from Settlement Residential Two Zone to the Mixed-Use Zone.
MOTION CARRIED
A complete record of the meeting (draft minutes), including public comments, submissions and questions is
attached to this report as Appendix G.
CONSIDERATION OF THE OF MPAC MOTION
Following the Municipal Planning Advisory Committee meeting staff have become aware that a previously
unrecognized procedural error occurred during voting. The error had the potential to affect the outcome of the
vote and as such, deserves attention from Council before proceeding with this file.
According to Section 21 (2) of the Municipal Government Act and Policy P-109 Council and Committee
Procedural Policy, Section 10.4, the Chair of a Committee of Council is expected to vote on the matter being
considered. This runs counter to past practice for the Village Planning Advisory Committee, Municipal Planning
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 13
Advisory Committee and most if not all other Municipal Committees, where the Chair would only vote to break a
tie. As such, the Vice Chair of MPAC, acting as Chair for the September 21st meeting was not aware that he
should participate in the vote. As the result of the vote was 4 in favour with 3 opposed, the Chair’s vote may
have caused a tie, meaning the motion would have been defeated.
This effectively means that Council does not have a motion or recommendation from MPAC that was passed in
accordance with Municipal policy. Therefore, staff recommend sending the matter back to a meeting of the
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee with the intent of receiving a new motion and recommendation from
the Committee in accordance with Council policy.
Alternatively, Council may choose to proceed, by recognizing that the role of MPAC is to provide advice to
Council on planning matters. Council may consider the recommendation as having been received, regardless of
the outcome and is under no obligation to act in keeping with a duly passed recommendation from MPAC.
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ACT: 120 DAY TIMELINE FOR LUB AMENDMENTS
Related to the above decision on whether a new motion from MPAC should be sought, consideration for MGA
Section 210 (6) may be required. This section states that if an application to amend a Land Use By-law, which
does not require subsequent amendments to the Municipal Planning Strategy, has surpassed 120 days between
the time of a completed application and the first published notice of the Public Hearing, the application shall be
deemed refused.
The application form and fee were received on June 30, 2022, meaning that the first notice of the Public Hearing
would need to be published no later than October 28, 2022. If Council determines they wish to send the file back
to MPAC for a new motion, staff also suggest Council pass a motion to confirm the application will surpass the
120 timeline, but that Council deems the application to remain open until a Public Hearing is called and a
decision is made.
Alternatively, if Council determines they are satisfied with the current motion from MPAC, a date for a Public
Hearing may be set and advertisements published prior to the expiration of the 120 day timeline.
OPTIONS
Staff are seeking direction from Council. If Council is prepared to give 1st reading, staff are requesting a second
motion to establish the date for the Public Hearing
Motion 1:
1. That Municipal Council direct staff to return to the Municipal Planning Advisory Committee to obtain a
new motion, in compliance with Policy p-109
2. That Municipal Council give 1st reading to the draft amendments to rezone a portion of PID 60422888
from the Settlement Residential Two Zone to the Mixed-Use Zone.
3. That Municipal Council reject the request to rezone a portion of PID 60422888.
Motion 2:
1. That Municipal Council confirm their intent to renew the application to amend the Municipal Land Use
By-law to rezone a portion of PID 60422888, thereby renewing the 120 day timeline for publishing first
notice of a Public Hearing in accordance with Section 210 (6) of the Municipal Government Act.
2. That Municipal Council refuse to renew the application, thereby deeming the application refused.
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 14
3. That Municipal Council set the date for the Public Hearing on this matter (can be no earlier than
November 3rd).
IMPLICATIONS
By-Law/Policy
The policy analysis contained in this report outlines the connections and impacts of Municipal Planning Strategy
Policy. While the rezoning may support additional Municipal activities and priorities, no direct connection to
additional policies or By-laws has been made at this time.
Financial/budgetary
No costs to the Municipality are anticipated as a result of the request to rezone PID 60422888. The potential for
the Municipality to be asked to take ownership of a new road would represent an indirect cost but is not directly
tied to the rezoning file. No estimated costs are available as the road is yet to be designed.
Environmental
None anticipated. The site is in an area without Municipal wastewater service or Municipal streets.
Strategic Priorities
The request to rezone PID 60422888 will assist the Municipality in advancing the following Priority Outcomes of
the 2021-24 Strategic Priorities Framework:
Priority Outcomes: Economic Development
Promote and grow the Municipality’s economic sectors.
Position the Municipality as Nova Scotia’s south shore community of choice for residents, businesses,
and organizations, and as an international tourism destination.
Priority Outcomes: Governance & Engagement
Ensure municipal bylaw and policy frameworks reflect current and changing needs.
Work Program Implications
No significant impacts are anticipated. Staff time to follow-though the rezoning process is the only anticipated staff
commitment.
Has Legal review been completed? Yes.
COMMUNICATIONS (INTERNAL/EXTERNAL)
Communication to date has followed policy and process of the Municipality.
In compliance with Municipal Planning Strategy A-6 Early Notice to Abutting Municipalities has been
sent to Halifax Regional Municipality to allow submission of comments or discussion prior to Council
considering the proposal.
The Public Participation Program approved by Council as Municipal Planning Strategy A-3 is being
followed, including advertisements for this Committee meeting appearing in Progress Bulletin, being
posted to Municipal Office doors, Municipal Website and Municipal Social Media channels.
o A Public Information Meeting was advertised and held on September 8, 2022 at the Hubbards
Area Lion’s Club
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 15
ATTACHMENTS
Appendix A – Letter of request to rezone PID 60422888
Appendix B – Map showing PID 60422888 rezoned to Mixed Use Zone
Appendix C – Map showing watercourses and waterbodies in relation to PID 60422888
Appendix D – Map showing known locations of species at risk in relation to PID 60422888
Appendix E – Slope Map of PID 60422888
Appendix F – Record of comments and questions from Public Information Meeting held September 8, 2022
Appendix G – Draft Minutes (including public comments) of MPAC Meeting held September 21, 2022
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 16
Appendix A – Letter of request to rezone & Application for Land Use By-law amendment
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 17
Appendix B - Map of subject property if rezoned to Mixed Use
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 18
Appendix C – Map showing watercourses and waterbodies in relation to PID 60422888
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 19
Appendix D – Map showing known locations of species at risk in relation to PID 60422888
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 20
Appendix E – Slope Map of PID 60422888
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 21
191
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER
Notes of Public Information Meeting of the
Held at Hubbards Lions Club
On Thursday, September 08, 2022
Senior Planner, Garth Sturtevant opened the meeting at 6:30 pm.
PRESENT
There were 65 people in attendance.
Staff Garth Sturtevant, Senior Planner
Chad Haughn, Director of Community Development & Recreation
Darlene Scott, Administrative Assistant
Erin Lowe, Senior Economic Development Officer
Council Councillor Shatford, District 2
Senior Planner, Garth Sturtevant presented the group with a presentation
Highlights from the presentation:
A request to rezone a portion of PID 60422888 from SR-2 to MU was submitted by Larex
Management on behalf of 3220572 Nova Scotia Limited
The site is intended for a future commercial subdivision servicing Highway 103 and Hubbards
residents
The property is approximately 30.5 acres in area
PID 60422888 is currently a split zone, half MU and SR-2
Currently no direct road frontage
Site is undeveloped and consists of mixed forest
Stated agreement with Provincial Dept. of Public Works to provide public road access
Intended access is at the southern boundary from Mill Lake Road No. 1
Site is directly abutted by two properties in residential use, several other residential lots to the
West of the site
Rezoning requires an amendment to the Municipal Land Use By-Law-requires no amendments
to the Municipal Planning Strategy
Any subdivision of the lot and issuing of permits would follow the rezoning process, which
would ensure road access and septic approval
Appendix F – Comments and Questions from Public Information Meeting (Sept. 8, 2022)
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 22
Both of the zones fall with the same character area in the Planning Strategy. Both fall within the
Settlement Character area. It has 4 zones in it and all have a different level of regulations. They
are all intended to be at or near highway 103 exits or between 103 and the coast.
Policy Consideration:
The Senior Planner reviewed several policies from the Municipal Planning Strategy (Policies A-32, A-33,
A-34 & A-35) that must be considered whenever an application to amend the Municipal Land Use By-
law is made.
The Process
Application to Rezone received by Council
Public Information Meeting
Staff Report presented to Planning Advisory Committee (Sept.21, 2022 at 6:00 in Municipal
Council Chambers)
Staff Report & PAC Recommendation presented to Council (1st reading)
Public Hearing (property owners within 30m will receive mailed notice)
Council Vote
14 day Appeal Period (any aggrieved party may appeal Council’s decision to the NS Utility
and Review Board
Following the staff presentation the floor was opened to questions. Staff and/or the Developer
would respond depending on the nature of the question:
Q. Is the purpose to service Highway 103, if so, what is wrong with the services in Hubbards,
Tantallon, Chester as it exists? Why do we need a new development to service Highway 103
A. (DEVELOPER) - The decision arrived from the demand. The tenants will make that decision they
will look at the market and if they feel there is sufficient demand, they will make the investment.
Q. When you say Commercial subdivision, do you mean Bluewater businesses or housing?
commercial retail and not residential?
A. (DEVELOPER) - It will not be like Bluewater businesses or housing. It will be commercial and
retail businesses. We are not just in the Land development; we are also into Commercial
building. We see this as a long-term development. The development would build and own the
building and lease them to tenants to keep control over the architecture style and inspiration of
this commercial development.
Q. Will there be condos?
A. (DEVELOPER) - There will be no condo lots, it would not be in our best interest to mix those
types of development
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 23
Q. Can you list any possible tenants or lease agreements that are in place that you may have?
A. (DEVELOPER) - Currently we have no agreements in place
Q. Can you do Commercial developments in the SR-2 zone? Am I correct that without rezoning
you could build a 500 sq metre structure on a lot and with the rezoning of the property you
would be able to build a structure 4 times that size.
A. (STAFF) – That is correct. Both zones permit the same type of uses. The difference comes in with
the size and approval process of these uses. The rezoning would allow larger development per
lot.
Comment: You could do the commercial development that suits our community, but you want more
with less restrictions. It doesn’t stop the developer from what he wants to do, it is just on a smaller
scale. The zone as is controls the size, scale and scope of the project.
Two years ago, the community said they wanted those restrictions on that lot and now the developer
wants more and wants the restrictions taken off.
A. (STAFF) - In 2020 we did bring in a new Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-Law.
Originally the area around 103 was proposed to be Mixed Use Zone. What we had heard at that
time was the community was looking for a more residential development around the highway
exit. The understanding was this request was preliminary around highway 3. The zoning applies
around the highway exit as it is shown and through the property requesting to be rezoned. If the
requested rezone is approved, properties along Highway 3, who expressed concerns with
commercial development, will maintain their current SR-2 Zoning.
Q. Can you still develop if the property is not rezoned? We want some size controls, don’t
want another Tantallon and Lakewood Drive.
A. (STAFF) - That is correct it could still be developed but on a smaller scale.
Q. Why should the community want that?
A. (STAFF) - That is why we have these policy statements and require us to go through this process.
Q. Concerns about the access to the roads as this will increase the traffic, will there be extra
lanes? Will there be parking along the roads as there is a blind spot and a bit of a hill.
A. (STAFF) - All the roads in the area and Mill Lake Road 1 are owned by the province- the
provincial Department of Public Works. They will be giving the approval for the access points
and when they get to the process of subdividing a lot that will all need approval from
Department of Public Works, and they will look at how much traffic there will be and the turning
radius and site stopping distances. They are the responsible body, and I can only assume if the
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 24
demand increases to a point that is crosses a threshold, then they would possibly do an
upgrade, but that is up to them.
Comment:
When the meetings for the Plan Review were held it was a little disappointing on the amount of interest
there was from the community. The zoning was designed similar to look like the Tantallon strip mall.
The SR-2 zoned was requested. Along Highway 3 that was the intent at that time so in order to prevent
it from happening the zoning giving to that area was SR-2. That took in a bigger area than realized. It
included turning off the highway onto the number 3 coming into Hubbards.
Q. When you walk along the path before it was purchased you could see a lot of wildlife, birds,
various types of mosses and large trees. Will the public have access to a conservatist report
of some sort or information around the work that has been done to ensure conservation
affords and whether or not that will be part of the planning process? What amount of forest
will be preserved or will it be clear cut? Is there going to be some consideration for the
wildlife and bird population?
A. (STAFF) - Both the MU zone and the SR-2 Zone require a development permit, there is nothing
in the Land Use By-Law that requires them to submit any environmental studies. There will be
regulations of setbacks that will need to be adhered to. If a site plan or development agreement
was required these types of studies would be required. (DEVELOPER) - The developer advised
before putting in a request to rezone they took a look at the forest for risks.
Q. Can this be requested (environmental studies for developments requiring only a development
permit) if community feels it is important to them?
A. (STAFF) - Not for this project, but you can advocate for changes to the zoning to add those
requirements going forward.
Q. Can the size of the development be limited by not changing the zone from SR-2 to MU?
A. (STAFF) - That is correct. The portion of the lot seeking rezoning would remain SR-2 and be
subject to a smaller size commercial development. The portion of the lot currently zoned MU
could be developed as planned by the Developer.
Q. What type of commercial development do you anticipate for the property?
A. (DEVELOPER) - There are no commitments at this time. The initial demand is to service Highway
103. Could be gas, grocery stores, possible medical services etc. Maybe take advantage of the
lake and have a business for renting/selling kayaks etc.
Q. It seems like a lot of the intent and focus was along the lot adjacent to Mill Lake Road, but
with your comments that you made possibly a marina development it sounds like you are
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 25
trying to access Sawler Lake.
A. (DEVELOPER) - Not suggesting a marina use, but possible kayak rental or sales. There is no focus
on the lake area. The commercial subdivision would occur first.
Q. If there was a service station, what protection is there for the lake if there should be a leak?
A. (DEVELOPER) - The tanks are doubled walled therefore if there was a leak the flow would stay in
between the two walls also there would be alarm that would go on to indicate the flow rate was
going down.
Q. What about water? Have you done a water study?
A. (DEVELOPER) - We have drilled holes and there would be sufficient water supply for the
development
Q. What about sewer?
A. (STAFF) – Before approval for subdivision is given, a copy of the approval issued by Nova Scotia
Environment will ensure there are adequate on-site septic systems designed for the lots.
Q. Who had you approached?
A. (DEVELOPER) - Nothing is final therefore we are unable to give out that information.
Q. Have you developed any other properties like proposed here?
A. (DEVELOPER) - On a smaller scale, some gas stations and convenience stores. Also, several years
ago completed the Hydrostone Market redevelopment in Halifax.
Q. Who will own the building that are being built?
A. (DEVELOPER) - The structures will be owned by the developer and will be leased to tenants
Q. Why do you need rezone the SR-2 zone so that it will allow for a highway strip development?
A. A Request has been received, as stated previously, the MU Zone allows larger commercial uses
to be built by Development Permit compared to the SR-2 zone. Note: All zones allow
Commercial uses except for Single Unit Residential Zone. Policy is a goal or intent statement of
Council. Council will consider the comments here tonight and will make the final decision on
whether to rezone part of 60422888
Q. Do you have any images of what you have done or envisioned?
A. (DEVELOPER) - No
Q. There is nothing to say that the property won’t be developed with apartments?
A. (DEVELOPER) - The focus is to service Highway 103 and surrounding communities
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 26
Q. Will there be standards for what is going into the development?
A. (DEVELOPER) - The objective layout will be landscaping, trees and architecture.
Q. In respect to architecture control when it comes to a Tim Horton’s, MacDonald’s, Irving etc.
they all have a certain look; how will you control it?
A. (DEVELOPER) - There is flexibility in the architecture in some detailing and building design
features on the exterior.
Q. Do you plan to secure tenants before you build or will there be empty buildings
A. (DEVELOPER) - If we did a multi tenancy for small local business once a certain lease up point is
reached of businesses, construction will start.
Q. Will you lease to other business that are similar to what is already in the community?
A. (DEVELOPER) - The intension is not to hurt other businesses in the area or create internal
competition within the development.
Q. When a commercial development such as what you are proposing comes to the area, do you give
back to the community?
A. (DEVELOPER) - We have interest into contributing to the community. There is a certain
percentage put aside for small initiatives in the community.
Q. There is not a lot of information on where the highway will be coming out. Is there
information that we can obtain.
A. (STAFF) - Information can be found on the province’s website regarding the highway
Q. What is the timeline for breaking ground?
A. (DEVELOPER) - When the twining of the highway is done. First tenant in 2023
Q. Who does the taxes get paid to?
A. (STAFF) - The Municipality of Chester will receive the taxes
Q. Will they be working at night? Hopefully there will be nothing happening between the hours
of 10:00pm and 7:00am.
A. (DEVELOPER) - There would be no working between those hours.
Q. Will there be a buffer between the current property owners and the construction?
A. (DEVELOPER) - The developer advised there would be a buffer left. (STAFF) – at minimum, the
MU Zone requires a buffer of 5m from all property lines.
P l a n n i n g M a t t e r s R e p o r t P a g e | 27
(DEVELOPER) - Note: To get access to the cottages beyond Sawler Lake they will build the Sawler Lake
Road. Mill Lake Road will come up and T into Sawler Lake Road and will come into the development
that way and Sawler Lake Road residences will continue down Sawler Lake Road. The access road will
be the service road. There was a traffic study and that dictates what would need to be upgraded.
Q. With the traffic study what was the volume of traffic?
A. (DEVELOPER) - Would have to look up the information. The hope is to upgrade the Mill Lake
Road, there will be no extra lanes.
Comment: The development is welcomed as it means more jobs, but I have concern what the
development will do to the down town core.
21
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER
Minutes of Meeting of the
MUNICIPAL PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022
The meeting was called to order at 6:04 P.M by the Vice Chair.
PRESENT
Members: Lee Harnish, Vice Chair Councillor Sharon Church
Dennis Wood Hugh Harper
Carol Nauss Abdella Assaff
Margeson Reeves Ross Shatford
Staff: Garth Sturtevant, Senior Planner
Chad Haughn, Director of Community Development and Recreation
Darlene Scott, Administrative Assistant
Regrets: Leslie Taylor
Absent: Leslie Taylor Hassan Hammond, Chair
Gallery: 11 persons
2. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING:
2.1 Approval of Minutes dated June 15, 2022
2021-023 MOVED by Carol Nauss, SECONDED by Ross Shatford to accept the minutes from
June 15th, 2022 as presented. MOTION CARRIED
3. CORRESPONDENCE:
3.1 Email received from Cathy Mellett (with stated support from 16 other names) dated
September 11, 2022, requesting MPAC delay meeting to consider the request to rezone a
portion of PID 60422888 from SR-2 to MU.
Appendix G – Comments and Questions from MPAC Meeting (Sept. 21, 2022)
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
Senior Planner read the email received by Ms. Mellett with the Municipal Clerks response
following:
Subject: Application to rezone a portion of PID 60422888 (at Exit 6, Highway 103) Hubbards
Good Afternoon, Ms. Mellett.
Thank-you for your letter and input requesting delay of the Municipal Planning Advisory
Committee.
We understand from your letter that you attended the Public Information Session held by staff
on September 8th. The Senior Planner, Garth Sturtevant shared the process that we follow for
these meetings. The Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) is not a decision-making
body. They provide advice to Council regarding applications for Planning Amendments -
including rezoning. Their recommendation goes to Council for a final decision. Council is
required to hold a mandatory public hearing if they wish to proceed with approval of a rezoning.
Once PAC hears the application (and their decision and recommendations are based on the
proposal’s alignment with our Municipal Planning Strategy), it will be sent to Council for their
consideration.
Our next Council meeting will not be until September 29, 2022. If Council were to give notice of
their intention to approve the rezoning, they would then need to set a date for the public
hearing which requires at least 14 clear days (and in this case 21 clear days notice) to the public.
It is unlikely that a public hearing would be held before the middle to end of October.
We understand that you would like a chance to engage and share your thoughts on this
proposal. The public hearing is the chance for the public to do this. A letter can also be
submitted to Council or the PAC. However, at this time, PAC, nor Council, can change the
Municipal Planning Strategy to put in additional requirements for this application. As the
application has already been received, Council and PAC must consider the existing policies and
tools that are in place.
Your letter and this response will be included in the agenda package for the Planning Advisory
Committee. At this time, we confirm the existing meeting date will be maintained.
Pam
PAM MYRA
Municipal Clerk/Director of Human Resources
Office: 902-275-4109
Cell: 902-277-1872
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
From: CATHY MELLETT
Sent: September 11, 2022 9:58 PM
Subject: Subject: Application to rezone a portion of PID 60422888 (at Exit 6, Highway 103)
Hubbards
By way of this email, the undersigned residents of the affected area formally request a one-
month delay in the PAC meeting to consider the request to rezone this lot from Settlement
Residential 2 zone to Mixed Use (MU) zone. We understand that the proposed date for the PAC
to consider this matter is September 21, 2022, with the staff report available sometime this
coming week.
We understand that there are legislative requirements that must be met in considering any
application for rezoning, to afford applicants fairness and avoid undue delay. Any request for an
amendment to the Land Use By-law which has not reached a Public Hearing within 120 days of
application is deemed refused under Section 210(6) of the Municipal Government Act. This
opens up an appeal mechanism for the applicant.
More than 60 residents attended the Public Information Meeting (PIM) this past Thursday,
September 8th, and there were many unanswered questions from the meeting regarding this
application for rezoning and what could then potentially be developed on the property if the
rezoning were approved. The applicant’s interest is commercial. But as residents, we will have to
live with the impact of this significant recommendation by the PAC and decision by the Council.
We are also entitled to fairness in this process.
We understand that the rezoning is contingent on alignment with the policies of the Municipal
Planning Strategy (MPS) and related maps and bylaws. Any informed discussion must take the
MPS and related documents into consideration. As you know, the MPS and related documents
are quite complex and require time to understand. It also takes time – and significantly more
information than has been provided publicly to date – to assess the impact of the applicant’s
proposed rezoning and the commercial development that they have stated will then follow. It is
our intention to provide a written document for consideration of the PAC that includes an
analysis of what we consider to be the relevant policies of the MPS and zoning bylaws, as well as
implications of the proposed rezoning. A few days is not sufficient to do this work as volunteers,
or to secure the necessary independent planning advice required.
We also plan to present, for consideration by the PAC and Council, alternative planning tools
(some of which may require amendments to the MPS) which should be considered in addressing
the many concerns presented by the community at the PIM a few days ago. As the PAC knows,
once rezoning grants the owner development rights, it is difficult to reverse that process and the
developer’s private interests increasingly take precedence over other public interests, despite
those interests being significantly affected. The decision to rezone is a very important step in
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
this process and should therefore not be taken without allowing adequate time for meaningful
engagement by the members of the public who are most affected.
In summary, as residents of District 2, we are formally requesting a 30-day postponement of any
consideration by the PAC of this application, to let us review the MPS and related documents,
seek other planning advice about this matter, and prepare a written submission, first to the PAC
and then Council. The PAC's recommendation is considered carefully by Council. The PAC not
having the ability to receive our submission could be prejudicial to your recommendation and
ultimately Council’s decision, and it raises questions of procedural and substantive fairness.
Not all of us are familiar with the usual timelines from PIM to PAC meeting in the Municipality of
Chester, but based on the previous, extensive experience that some of us have with Halifax
Regional Municipality and input from some experts we have consulted who have experience
with other municipal governments, this timeline seems very fast. This delay is requested in the
interest of fairness to the community and landholders, and it need not jeopardize the 120-day
requirement under the Municipal Government Act.
Cathy Mellett, Mill Lake Road West, Hubbards
Nancy McKinnell, Mill Lake Road West, Hubbards
Richard Elliott, Mill Lake Road No. 1, Hubbards
Robert Champagne, Mill Lake Road No. 1, Hubbards
Stephen Blacker, Hardwood Lane, Hubbards
Colleen Blacker, Hardwood Lane, Hubbards
Pat Lawrence, Mill Lake No. 1, Hubbards
Ted Ross, Mill Lake Road No. 1, Hubbards
Roland Lewis, Hardwood Lane, Hubbards
Sandra Lewis, Hardwood Lane, Hubbards
Alison Lewis, Mill Lake Road West, Hubbards
Robert Schwartz, Mill Brook Lane, Hubbards
Tina Schwartz, Mill Brook Lane, Hubbards
Peter Lewis, Mill Lake Road West, Hubbards
Liane Johnson, Mill Lake Road West, Hubbards
Michelle Everson, Mill Lake Water Access, Hubbards
Dan Everson, Mill Lake Water Access, Hubbards
2021-023 MOVED by Councillor Sharon Church, SECONDED by Ross Shatford that the
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee received the email from Cathy Mellett as information.
MOTION CARRIED
4. BUSINESS ARISING:
4.1 None
5. NEW BUSINESS:
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
5.1 Consideration of a staff report and Municipal Land Use By-Law Zoning Map Amendment to
rezone a portion of PID 60422888 from Settlement Residential Two to Mixed Use Zone.
Senior Planner, Garth Sturtevant presented the committee with a staff report.
Highlights from the presentation:
1. Staff is recommending that the Municipal Planning Advisory Committee recommended
that Council approve the request to rezone a portion of PID 60422888 from Settlement
Residential Two Zone to Mixed-Use Zone.
Current Situation
A request to rezone a portion of PID 60422888 from SR-2 to MU was submitted by Larex
Management on behalf of 3220572 Nova Scotia Limited
PID 60422888 is currently a split zone, half MU and SR-2
The site is intended for a future commercial subdivision servicing Highway 103 and
Hubbards residents
Background
Current zoning for properties around Exist 6 was established during the Municipal Plan
Review, staff original proposed the Mixed Use based on discussions in the community
and concerns expressed regarding commercial development along Highway 3 this
approach was altered to include the Settlement Residential Two Zone. This approach has
resulted in the current scenario where the subject property is split zoned between the
MU and SR-2 Zone.
The property is approximately 30.5 acres in area
The site is directly abutted by two properties in residential use, several other residential
lots to the West of the site
The Southern property boundary abuts land owned by the Crown to facilitate the
expansion work of Highway 103
Intended access is at the southern boundary from Mill Lake Road No. 1
The Eastern boundary includes a small section of waterfrontage on Sawler Lake
The North boundary abuts a large undeveloped parcel of land, which includes a small
watercourse that flows across the site in the far North-Eastern corner.
All development that requires a development permit must be at least 20m from the
ordinary high-water mark of the watercourse.
Sawler Lake is protected by the Lakefront Overlay
There are no known species at risk on or near the subject property.
There are noted setbacks from watercourses and waterbodies in addition to several areas
of steep slopes that would likely need to be avoided or terraformed
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
Discussion
Both the SR-2 and MU Zones are permitted within the “Settlement Area”
The rezoning can be completed without amending the MPS
The SR-2 Zone allows most commercial and light industrial development up to a
maximum 100m2 of floor area by Development Permit or up to 500m2 with a Site Plan
Approval
The MU Zone allows most commercial and light industrial use up to 2000m2 by
Development Permit and those greater than 2000m2 require a Development Agreement
Site Plan Approval is required for 3 or more dwelling units per lot in the SR-2 Zone.
Site Plan Approval is required for 5-11 units on a lot and a Development Agreement is
required for 12 or more units.
The SR-2 Zone limits the size and intensity of non-residential land uses, with the intent of
primarily supporting residential uses interspersed with complimentary commercial and
light industrial uses.
The MU Zone was intended to maintain the existing rural development pattern found
primarily between Highway 103 and the coastline, while offering basic land use controls
Access
Currently there is no direct road frontage
Stated agreement with Provincial Dept. of Public Works to provide public road access
New road will intersect with Mille Lake Road No.1 and provide access to the southern
property boundary
All approvals for access points and traffic control issues rest with Public Works
Any subdivision of the lot and issuing of permits would follow the rezoning process,
which would ensure road access and septic approval
Proposed Use and Draft Layout-Commercial Subdivision
The Developer states the intended use of the property is for commercial uses via a
planned subdivision.
The proposed access road, to be constructed to provide access to the site and continue
West, parallel to Highway 103, to provide road access to existing residents of Sawler
Lake. The work will be carried out by or in conjunction with the Provincial Department of
Public Works.
Developer will be responsible to construct the roadway to serve the new commercial
uses
The layout of lots and structures on the lot is subject to Municipal Subdivision approval,
which includes confirmation from Nova Scotia Environment which confirms that an on-
site septic system can be designed to serve the lot. It will also require confirmation from
Nova Scotia Public Works that there is access to the new lots from the public roadway
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
The Senior Planner outlined the relevant polices in the staff report. The Senior Planner reviewed
Policy CC-15, Policy A-32 and Policy A-35.
Policy CC-15 is talking about the Settlement Area
Policy CC-15
The intent of the Settlement Area designation is to:
a) permit a mix of uses that can foster cohesive development of moderate density;
b) provide a varying level of regulation which recognizes the diversity of the different
development patterns within the Settlement Area;
c) prepare for development, especially near major highways;
d) encourage development compatible with the Area’s character;
e) ensure that commercial and light industrial development is well- designed and does not
create a highway strip development;
f) safeguard the natural environment, especially water quality.
Staff Comments:
The SR-2 Zone is similar to the MU Zone have similar permitted uses, but the size difference.
Both zones allow Commercial, Residential and Light Industrial uses. The request states it is a
Commercial development that is aimed to service Highway 103 and Hubbards.
The MU Zone contains yard setbacks and other requirements that are designed to ensure the
development is acceptable to the community and is in keeping with the Municipal Planning
Strategy.
The draft site plan from the developer appears to show intent to create an easily accessible
commercial development that maintains setbacks, space between structures and appears to
exceed requirements on buffering from neighbouring uses.
Existing protections, including the Lakefront Overlay and Watercourses, Water Bodies and
Wetlands, in the Land Use By- law provide protection to Sawler Lake and Mill Brook.
Policy A-32
When considering amendments to a land use by-law or a subdivision by-law, Council shall
consider the following:
a) that the amendment meets the intent of the Municipal Planning Strategy and the intent of
any relevant Secondary Planning Strategies;
b) that the amendment conforms to all relevant Municipal By-laws;
c) that the applicable public consultation program has been followed and residents’ opinions
have been carefully considered;
d) that the amendment is in the best interest of the Municipality.
Staff Comments:
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
The amendment does conform to the policies in the Municipal Planning Strategy and there is no
concern with any other Municipal By-Law. The Public Participation Program, which is detailed in
the Municipal Planning Strategy is being followed.
Policy A-35 (c)
Potential compatibility issues with nearby land uses resulting from lighting, signage, outdoor
display and storage, traffic, vehicle headlights, and noise
Staff Comments:
Policies are subjective, one person might think it meets and another may not. We are task with
reviewing of the rezoning not the development. Whatever the proposed use is the development
needs to comply with all revisions of the Land Use By-Law based on size and use. The
regulations in the Land Use By-Law have been designed to be the appropriate level of
regulations in our more rural areas.
Comments from the Committee
The SR-2 Zone was meant for Highway 3 to keep large commercial developments from
occurring in this area.
The request received from the developer is not unreasonable. If the developer is
investing to put up a project, the process should not be difficult for them to do so
This is a one (1) off -split zones on the large property and is not normally found
The back of the property is MU which would allow for the larger development, therefore
put the larger development to the back of the property and the smaller development to
the front in the SR-2 Zone
Anything that brings development to the area should be welcomed as we need
development in the area
Create more jobs
These types are development are better served near a major highway and they are
twining the 103
Makes sense to rezone the portion that is SR-2 Zone to MU Zone
By not rezoning you are making it difficult for what the developer wants to do.
Questions from Committee:
Q. There is the waterfront on Sawler Lake and a small watercourse that goes through that area,
what environmental protection is in place if there is a gas station going in?
A. There are 2 pieces of regulations currently in affect, there is the lakefront overlay which would
require a 20 metre setback for new main building from the ordinary highwater mark. There is
also a 20 metre setback from watercourses. The lakefront overlay also has some regulations
around hard surfaces -the amount of pavement that can happen in within the overlay area is
limited.
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
Q. Is that a drainage ditch in the diagram?
Developer: I believe the intent is that it would collect the rainwater and run it through the
system and put it back into the land. All the requirements would be regulated through the
Department of Environment.
Q. Would this be something that would be addressed when the developer is putting the plans
together?
A. As part of the subdivision approval, it would probably be where the road design
would be evaluated.
Q. Is there anything in the developer’s proposal that would require a development agreement?
A. No, not currently
Q. Can a landowner request rezoning on their property?
A. They can come to Council and make an application and if Council agrees to it the same
process would be followed
Q. Isn’t the Gateway Zone suppose to be at the exits?
A. The Gateway Zone changed through the Plan Review process. It was originally intended to be
at either end of the Hamlet Zone, this was then changed in the case of Exit 6 to a mix of SR-2
and MU Zone at the request of community members.
Q. Is there any reason the developer needs to subdivide the land?
A. Yes, if you keep it as one lot you are limiting the development potential
Comment from Senior Planner:
We are under the Municipal Government Act and are obligated for amendments to the Land
Use By-Law that Council shall within 120 days advertise the 1st Ad for the public hearing. If we
go over those 120 days without the public hearing being advertised technically the application is
deemed refused by Council or they can extend the deadline. If the application is deemed
refused the applicant can then appeal that with the Utility Review Board.
6. ANY OTHER PLANNING MATTERS:
6.1 Call for any other Planning Matters
There were no other planning matters.
7. ADJOURNMENT:
7.1 Richard Elliott-concerns with proposed rezoning of PID 60422888 (5 minutes)
Richard Elliott presented the committee with a handout- Concerned about Large-Scale
Commercial or Industrial Development In Your Neighbourhood?
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
Mr. Elliot stated that the developer has shared very little information on what they are proposing
to do with the property that is the size of 23 football fields and is situated between three lakes;
Sawler Lake, Mill Lake, and Maple Lake in a residential and cottage community if the rezoning
proceeds.
Part of the property is zoned Mixed Use which allows the developer to do some significant
development. This is not satisfactory to the developer so you are being asked to recommend to
Council to rezone the portion of the property that is zoned SR-2 so it can be developed for
Commercial and Industrial uses.
The developer has indicated in the application it intends to build Highway Commercial services
which looks like a gas bar, convenient store, drive through fast food outlet which are all available
just 15 minutes away. Four large commercial buildings and parking for more than 400 vehicles. It
looks like they are planning to build a complex about 300,000 square feet.
The question is not just if this type of development is appropriate it is if rezoning makes sense
on a broader level. Rezoning opens the door for a wide range of permitted commercial and
industrial uses.
This scale of development would be allowed if the property is rezoned to Mixed Use. They
would have to subdivide the property into individual lots to allow them to build larger buildings
on more lots. Rezoning would allow the total floor plan to be 4 times more with little regulations
than the current zoning SR-2.
I disagree with the Planners report with respect that this is just a” slight relaxation in
regulations”. I don’t think this is a fair clarification, there is significant differences between the
SR-2 to MU Zone. They can already undertake significant development on the part of the
property that is already zoned Mixed Use.
The rezoning also affects what uses are permitted. Rezoning from SR-2 to Mixed Use would
open the door to additional uses such as large campgrounds/RV parks, recycling depots, salvage
yards etc. That is one important difference in the uses that you would be opening the door to. If
you rezone there would be less Municipal control.
The question is whether Council should grant the request. Just because you can do something
doesn’t mean that you should. It doesn’t mean it is a good idea and as I have outlined there are
good reasons not to rezone in this case. We also have to think about the relevant policy
directions that are in the Municipal Planning Strategy.
Several of the policies that are in the Planners report are relevant, but there are some others in
the planning strategy that I would submit that is also relevant.
Policy V-7
Both these objections implicated by the proposed rezoning and the development would be
enabled including what is being proposed by the developer.
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
Policy V-10
The Planners report states that the rezoning is not anticipating resulting in a new or worsen
conflict with the existing surrounding uses. Giving the state of intension from the developer if
the rezoning would allow it. It is troubling that the report does not address the incompatibility
of that large scale commercial development with the existing residential and cottage community
into which it would be inserted.
Policy V-11
The Planner’s report does not consider the existing land use or the community character. It also
incorrectly states that the Municipal Planning Strategy establishes the Mixed Use as being
appropriate for Highway exists development. In fact, the proposal that you heard to rezone
property along the highway was rejected in the adoption of the current Municipal Planning
Strategy because of community concern of development around exit 6. That is why the SR-2
zone that is currently in place was adopted. The zone is more in keeping with the rural context
of land uses and community character, all of which policy directs you and Council to consider.
Policy CC-15
This policy is directly relevant but again in my submission it is inadequately considered and
misapplied. Rezoning to allow a much larger scale commercial or industrial development on a
property in excess of 30 acres is not in keeping with the areas character. The policy does indeed
say that the intent is to prepare for development especially near major highways. It says the goal
is to ensure that commercial and light industrial is well designed and does not create highway
strip development, but the request to rezone is specific to rezoning to Mixed Use. This part of
the policy should not be ignored.
Policy A-35
Requires that any amendment to the Land Use By-Law such as the proposed rezoning must be
appropriate with respect to various consideration and these include traffic, vehicle headlights
and noise. The developer has refused to share the studies that have been done to the impact of
this development on the volume of traffic it expects to draw off the highway into the
community. The development would result in a major increase in traffic on Mill Lake Road and
the new Sawler Lake access road.
This is not just vacant land around exit 6 that is suitable for large commercial highway-oriented
development. It is an existing well-developed neighbourhood of rural single-family residences.
In line with the MPS begins with support with the existing community character and land use. I
along with other concerned residents would respectfully ask you that you recommend to
Council that it reject the proposal. You have good reasons to do so and preserving the existing
zoning is in keeping with the objectives of the Municipal Planning Strategy.
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee (continued) September 21st , 2022
Questions and Comments from the Gallery
Appreciate living there as it is
Opposed to the rezoning, considering the Village of Hubbards has everything, to name a
few grocery stores, gas station, doctor office, churches, auto mechanic, liquor store,
pharmacy etc.
Concerned about the wildlife
Concerned about the water table, noise, population and traffic
Council and committee should consider the existing character. Consider single family
residents-cannot see how putting a paved parking lot for 400 vehicles next to family
residents comparable with the character
The Mixed Use Zone allows for larger development- Four (4) larger, which is not
compatible with the area and the people who live there
This development is out by the Highway, which only has a couple of residential
properties next to it, most would be driving past it to get to their cottages
Don’t want exit 6 to look like the development at exit 5
Once the portion of the property has been changed to a Mixed Use Zone it opens the
doors to all sorts of things
2021-023 MOVED by Councillor Abdella Assaff, SECONDED by Ross Shatford for the
Municipal Planning Advisory Committee recommend that Council approve the request to
rezone a portion of PID 60422888 from Settlement Residential Two Zone to the Mixed-
Use Zone. MOTION CARRIED
6. DATE OF NEXT MEETING:
The next meeting will be scheduled for Wednesday, October 19th, 2022 at 6:00 P.M (tentative).
7. ADJOURNMENT:
2021-032 MOVED by Sharon Church the meeting adjourn (7:50 p.m.). CARRIED
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
Lee Harnish Darlene Scott
Vice Chairperson Administrative Assistant
The Company
The proponent is a privately owned, Halifax based, development company which is controlled
and managed by the Larex Group of companies. Larex has been active in the development,
ownership and management of retail and commercial properties throughout Nova Scotia since
1985.
The Hydrostone – A Noteworthy Project
The Larex Group undertook a re-development project in the Young Street block of the
Hydrostone district in the city of Halifax. The project, branded as the Hydrostone Market , was
acquired in 1992 and Larex undertook a two-year major restoration and re-merchandising of
the business mix in the project. The development was the recipient of the 1995 Nova Scotia
Heritage Trust - Built Heritage Award.
The property continues to be owned and managed by the Larex Group.
The Project
The subject lands were acquired by Larex in 2007 in anticipation that the eventual twinning of
Highway 103, along with the organic growth of the Halifax and surrounding areas, would
significantly enhance the sites commercial viability.
The 32-acre site will be a mid to long-term master planned development. It is anticipated that
initial sitework will be commenced and aligned with the completion of the Highway 103 and the
exit ramps work at Exit 6 in Hubbards.
Site design and engineering is being conducted through the assistance of local professional
firms and will meet all governmental permitting requirements including the Provincial
Department of Environment as well as the Department of Infrastructure and Renewal regarding
traffic volume and the egress / aggress to the site.
It is anticipated the first businesses will be open within 12 months of the highway completion,
with the balance of the initial project taking another 60 to 72 months to complete , driven, in
large part by the demand in the market.
The Larex Group objective is to maintain long-term ownership of the lands; as a result, they will
control aspects of the development, including subdividing the lands, construction of the
buildings and leasing. This development model will achieve the ownership objectives pertaining
to the place making aspects, sense of arrival and reasonable control on the ar chitectural
compatibility of the various structures as well as the long-term maintenance and aesthetics of
the project structures and lands.
The project will create neighbourhood community employment opportunities with the initial
phase of the project and is anticipated to generate property tax revenues in the range of
$120,000 - $140,000 annually.
3D Render
It is our objective to be proud of the project we deliver and to be a long-term member and
contributor to the local community.
5531 Young Street, Suite 200 |Halifax, NS | B3K 1Z7 | (P) 902.454.2000
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO: Municipal Council
MEETING DATE: October 13, 2022
DEPARTMENT: Community Development & Recreation
SUBJECT: Community Walking Signs
ORIGIN: Council Request
Date: October 5, 2022 Prepared by: Chad Haughn, Director of Community Development & Recreation
Date: October 5, 2022 Authorized by: Dan McDougall, CAO
RECOMMENDATION
For consideration and discussion.
BACKGROUND
Councillors have expressed interest in community walking signs. Staff carried out a preliminary investigation to
find out the background and details of other community walking sign programs and drafted some preliminary
details related to what a local walking signage campaign in MOC may include.
DISCUSSION
The Municipality of the District of Lunenburg (MODL) implemented a
Community Walking Sign program over the past couple of years to support
established walking groups in the community. The signs were distributed to
those community members who requested them and were placed on private
property, visible from the road. Previous to the MODL sign program, some
provincial MLAs had similar signs asking motorists to slow down.
Since the MODL signage program was popular and signs were being
requested by community members residing in other municipalities, Hike Nova
Scotia further developed the idea into a provincial wide initiative within their
NS Walks project. The idea was to educate the public about the importance of walking and to increase
awareness and safety for walkers in communities across Nova Scotia.
Hike NS received grant funding from the province and offered an initial batch of signs to interested individuals
and organizations around Nova Scotia at no cost. The grant funds received by Hike NS have now been spent and
any communities wanting to join the Hike NS program can receive the sign graphics (photos below) but would
be required to order and purchase their own signs.
Sample MODL Sign
Sample Hike NS Sign
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 2
Staff are suggesting that MOC could create our own unique community walking signs with our own wording,
municipal logo, and design. There are several reasons why we would consider undertaking this type of a
program:
- The Municipality is investing in Active transportation infrastructure (i.e. paved shoulders) and a sign
program is complimentary to this work.
- Encourage people to walk more.
- Remind motorists that they share roads with others i.e. walkers and cyclists.
- Attempt to positively influence on the speed of motorists in various areas of the Municipality.
Community members who want to participate and place a sign on their property would be asked to care for the
sign when it is posted and to remove it and dispose of properly if damaged. Community members could pick up
a sign from Recreation & Parks Services and / or Councillors could help distribute the signs in their districts.
OPTIONS
1. Proceed with a unique MOC Community Walking Sign program.
2. Join the Hike NS Community Walking Sign program.
3. Take no further action on the Community Walking Sign idea.
IMPLICATIONS
By-Law/Policy
NA
Financial/budgetary
After requesting quotes from three different sign companies, Metaline Graphics in Hubbards provided the
lowest price for full color, double sided signs on 4mm coroplast, 18” x 24”, with H-stands. Sign cost is $10.50
each if ordering 300.
$10.50 each x 300 = $3,150 + HST = $3,622.50
Grant funding may be available through Nova Scotia Communities Culture Tourism & Heritage: Active
Communities Fund. This fund could cover up to 75% of cost.
Environmental
NA
Strategic Priorities
Implementing a community walking sign program will assist the Municipality in advancing the following Priority
Outcomes of the 2021-24 Strategic Priorities Framework:
Priority Outcomes: Governance & Engagement
1. Ensure municipal service delivery is efficient and effective, communicated and accessible.
Priority Outcomes: Healthy & Vibrant Communities
1. Ensure residents have access to facilities, natural assets, programs, and services that enrich a quality of
life and provide safe communities for residents and visitors alike.
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 3
Work Program Implications
There would not be a significant impact on work program. Staff would spend some time designing the signs,
placing the order for the signs to be manufactured and then distributing.
Has Legal review been completed? ___ Yes _ _ No _X_ N/A
COMMUNICATIONS (INTERNAL/EXTERNAL)
Part of the implementation of the signage program would include the use existing communication tools to
promote and advertise the opportunity for residents to get involved with the sign program (i.e. social media,
Newsletter and Explore Life).
ATTACHMENTS
NA
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO: Municipal Council
MEETING DATE: October 18, 2022
DEPARTMENT: Corporate & Strategic Management
SUBJECT: Award of T-2022-023 Print Services
Date: October 5, 2022 Prepared by: Jennifer Webber, Communications Officer & Outreach Coordinator
Date: October 5, 2022 Reviewed by: Tara Maguire, Deputy CAO
Date: October 5, 2022 Authorized by: Dan McDougall, CAO
RECOMMENDED MOTION
Staff recommends Option #3, which is that Council award the three-year contract for printing services to the
sole bidder, Advocate Printing, for a total cost not exceeding $79,701 + HST.
CURRENT SITUATION
The contract for Printing Services expired. An RFQ was issued on September 7 and closed on September 26,
2022, at 3:00 p.m. The Municipality received several inquiries but only one submission: Advocate Printing.
BACKGROUND
The Municipality has contracted printing services since 2010. The contract covers printing and occasional
distribution of regular items, such as business cards, publications, and forms. Early on, the Municipality received
a fair number of submissions to issued tenders, however, in recent years, we have seen a significant reduction in
responses due to closures and takeovers.
There are no provincial standing offers available for print services.
Advocate Printing has held our last three Printing Services contracts, and we have a successful and professional
relationship with the company. We are familiar with each other’s processes, and their work is usually very good.
DISCUSSION
Pricing is based on specific jobs with a range of quantity spread over the entire organization. Therefore,
Guaranteed annual costs range from $22,395 to $25,180 (+HST)
Additional costs over course of contract range from $2,539 to $4,161 (+HST)
Optional printing (marketing material, signage) ranges from $510 and up. NOTE: quotes submitted by
the company under the ‘optional printing’ section are for our information and not definitive
procurement. We will use these prices as a pre-submitted quote for each job and then obtain two more
quotes in addition. These costs are not included in the contract.
OPTIONS
1. Reissue the Request for Quotation to see if more companies will submit bids.
2. Do not pursue a contract for Print Services and proceed on a per-job, quotation-based basis.
3. Award the three-year contract for printing services to the sole bidder, Advocate Printing, for the total
cost of $79,701.
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 2
IMPLICATIONS
Financial/budgetary
Pricing is based on specific jobs with a range of quantity spread over the entire organization and already
budgeted in the 2022-23 Operating/Capital Budget.
Guaranteed annual costs range from $22,395 to $25,180 (+HST)
Additional costs over course of contract range from $2,539 to $4,161 (+HST)
Optional printing (marketing material, signage) ranges from $510 and up. NOTE: quotes submitted by
the company under the ‘optional printing’ section are for our information and not definitive
procurement. We will use these prices as a pre-submitted quote for each job and then obtain two more
quotes in addition. These costs are not included in the contract.
Strategic Priorities
Making information available to residents through print assists the Municipality in advancing many Priority
Outcomes of the 2021-24 Strategic Priorities Framework considering access to many public-facing services and
amenities must be communicated in order to succeed, specifically:
Priority Outcomes: Economic Development
1. Promote and grow the Municipality’s economic sectors.
Priority Outcomes: Governance & Engagement
1. Ensure municipal service delivery is efficient and effective, communicated and accessible.
Priority Outcomes: Healthy & Vibrant Communities
1. Ensure residents have access to facilities, natural assets, programs, and services that enrich a quality of
life and provide safe communities for residents and visitors alike.
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO: Municipal Council
MEETING DATE: October 13, 2022
DEPARTMENT: Community Development & Recreation
SUBJECT: Appointment of Inspectors
ORIGIN: Appointment of Inspectors
Date: October 5, 2022 Prepared by: Chad Haughn, Director of Community Development & Recreation
Date: October 5, 2022 Authorized by: Dan McDougall, CAO
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council cross-appoint MODL staff member Amanda Esterbrooks as Building Official, Fire
Inspector and Administer of Dangerous & Unsightly Properties. It is further recommended that MOC staff
member Brendan Mosher be appointed as Fire Inspector and Administrator of Dangerous & Unsightly
Properties.
BACKGROUND
The Shared Services Joint Governance Committee made a recommendation in 2018 that all inspectors at MODL
and MOC are cross-appointed to help ensure continuity of service. Following this recommendation, all
inspectors working at MODL in November 2018 were appointed by MOC Council. Since that time, any new
inspectors that have been hired have been appointed by both municipalities.
Amanda Esterbrooks has recently been hired by MODL as a Building Official and Fire Inspector. She is a level 1
Building Official and has three years experience as a fire inspector.
Brendan Mosher was hired in October 2021 and has been working through various training streams in order to
be qualified to successfully fulfill the duties of Fire Inspector and Bylaw Enforcement including Administrator of
Dangerous & Unsightly Properties. He has progressed through the training and is now at the point of being
eligible to be appointed in these roles.
Brendan is in the process of completing additional training and he will soon be eligible to apply for Special
Constable status which will give him the authority to issue Summary Offence Tickets.
DISCUSSION
In addition to formal training, Brendan has learned municipal file tracking software and is able to open, maintain
and close files as he works through cases. He has also been working closely with MODL Fire Inspector Bruce
Parks on MOC fire inspection files to gain experience in the full inspection process from on-site visits and
engaging with facility owners, to writing reports.
OPTIONS
1. Cross-appoint Amanda Esterbrooks as Building Official, Fire Inspector and Administrator of Dangerous &
Unsightly Properties and appoint Brendan Mosher as Fire Inspector and Administrator of Dangerous &
Unsightly Properties for the Municipality of Chester.
2. Do not make appointments and request additional information from staff.
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 2
IMPLICATIONS
By-Law/Policy
The inspector appointments relate directly to the administration and enforcement of Municipal by-laws and
policies as well as National Building Code and National Fire Code.
Financial/budgetary
NA
Environmental
NA
Strategic Priorities
The cross-appointment of Amada and the appointment of Brendan as outlined above will assist the Municipality
in advancing the following Priority Outcomes of the 2021-24 Strategic Priorities Framework:
Priority Outcomes: Governance & Engagement
1. Ensure municipal service delivery is efficient and effective, communicated and accessible.
Work Program Implications
There are no additions to the work program by implementing the proposed appointments.
Has Legal review been completed? ___ Yes _ _ No _X_ N/A
COMMUNICATIONS (INTERNAL/EXTERNAL)
NA
ATTACHMENTS
NA
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO: Council
MEETING DATE: October 13, 2022
DEPARTMENT: Infrastructure and Operations
SUBJECT: RFQ for Fleet Purchases
ORIGIN: 2022/2023 Capital Budget
Date: September 28, 2022 Prepared by: Tammie Bezanson, CET
Date: September 28, 2022 Reviewed by: Matthew Blair, Director of Infrastructure and Operations
Date: Authorized by: Dan McDougall, CAO
RECOMMENDED MOTION
That council award the purchase of one (1) ¾ ton 4x4 truck, and one (1) ½ ton truck to Steele Chevrolet of
Dartmouth.
CURRENT SITUATION
The approved 2022-2023 Capital Budget included the supply and delivery of one (1) 4X4 ¾ ton truck, budgeted
for $85,000 in the capital budget, for Public Works.
Solid waste had originally asked for one (1) 4x4 ¾ ton truck in the approved capital budget for $85,000, but
further operational discussions dropped the size to one (1) 4X4 ½ ton truck, ½ ton truck.
BACKGROUND
This project has been approved in the 2022-2023 Capital budget, Moved by Councillor Veinotte, Seconded by
Councillor Conners in the April 14, 2022 council meeting.
These trucks will be used primarily for Infrastructure and Operations (IAO), Public Works (3/4 ton) and Solid
Waste (1/2 ton) staff to complete maintenance at various municipal properties as well as, operational activities
such as emergency callouts, weekend wastewater checks and other duties as assigned.
DISCUSSION
An RFQ was issued August 22, 2022, and closed September 9, 2022. A total of two submissions were received for
the ¾ ton truck and one submission received for the ½ ton truck.
The Public Works vehicle was a replacement due to end of service life, and as such a trade-in was included in the
RFQ for the ¾ ton truck. This vehicle was a 2011 Ford F-150 4X4. Submissions were reviewed by staff with
complete evaluation based on the information/criteria submitted as outlined in the RFQs.
Steele Chevrolet Dartmouth ¾ ton 4x4 truck with trade-in
allowance
$59,450.00-$4500.00 = 54,950.00
+HST
Steele Chevrolet Dartmouth ½ ton 4x4 truck $54,490.00 + HST
Company B ¾ ton 4x4 truck with trade-in
allowance
$71,695.00-$5000= $66,698.00 +
HST
Company B ½ ton 4x4 truck No quote submitted
R e q u e s t f o r D e c i s i o n P a g e | 2
No electric or hybrid vehicle options were received from the bidders.
OPTIONS
Option A – Direct Staff to award the following:
MODC-T-2022-021 ¾ ton truck to Steele Chevrolet Dartmouth for $54,950.00 (this included a trade-in
value of $4500)
MODC-T-2022-022 ½ ton truck to Steele Chevrolet Dartmouth for $54,490.00.
Option B – Direct back to staff for further information.
IMPLICATIONS
By-Law/Policy
Procurement would follow P-04, Procurement Policy.
Financial/budgetary
In addition to the purchase costs for the vehicles, budgeted funds will be used for accessories such as power lift
gates, safety back racks etc.
Strategic Priorities
The design and future construction will assist the Municipality in advancing the following Priority Outcomes of
the 2021-24 Strategic Priorities Framework:
Priority Outcomes: Governance & Engagement
1. Ensure municipal fleet is efficient and cost effective.
Work Program Implications
Will the subject of this report have an impact on staff’s work programs? Are additional resources needed or will the action
delay or change any timelines of the departmental work program?
Has Legal review been completed? ___ Yes _ _ No _X_ N/A
COMMUNICATIONS (INTERNAL/EXTERNAL)
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
None
1
Pam Myra (she/her)
From:Andre Veinotte
Sent:October 3, 2022 5:07 PM
To:Pam Myra (she/her)
Cc:Tara Maguire
Subject:FW: Addition of bicycle lanes/paved shoulders on Hwy 329
Attachments:petition_signatures_jobs_34211157_20220914110441.csv
ANDRE VEINOTTE
District #1
Consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
From: Suzanne McLennan
Sent: October 2, 2022 10:12 AM
To: Andre Veinotte <aveinotte@chester.ca>
Subject: Addition of bicycle lanes/paved shoulders on Hwy 329
** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
Please do not open attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin.
Good morning Andre
Good morning
I was the person who initiated the change.org petition to expand Hwy 329 for a bike lane/paved shoulders for safety
reasons.
Here is the spreadsheet with the info on those who "signed" the petition.
Thank you for supporting this important community safety issue.
Suzanne
Name City State Postal Code Country Signed On
Adam Burgess Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Adam Gray Victoria V8P 3P4 Canada 2022-08-17
Akmal Gondal Surrey V3W Canada 2022-08-26
Alan Matheson Halifax B3P Canada 2022-08-22
Ale estrada Toronto m8y3y9 Canada 2022-08-26
Alex Y Toronto M5B Canada 2022-08-17
Alexander Schnare Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-17
Alison Ramey Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-19
Alix George Halifax B3L Canada 2022-08-18
Allan Scarth Blandford B0J Canada 2022-08-27
Allana Cameron Halifax B3J4A2 Canada 2022-08-19
Allison Schnare Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
ally mcdonald Winnipeg R2N Canada 2022-08-26
Amanda Gates Blandford, NS B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Amanda Jackson Bridgewater B4V Canada 2022-08-30
Amanda Joudrey Leblanc Blandford B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Amber Fiander Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Andre Veinotte East Chester B0J1J0 Canada 2022-08-18
Andrea Massie Toronto M6P Canada 2022-08-18
Andrea Stolberg Hacketts Cove BOj It0 Canada 2022-08-18
Andrew Burchell.Nova Scotia B0J Canada 2022-08-17
Andrew Nicholson Halifax B3K 4S2 Canada 2022-08-19
Angela Coupe Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Angela Jessome Chester B0J 1J0 Canada 2022-08-18
Angela Kitching Blandford B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Angela Nelson Glen Haven B3Z Canada 2022-08-18
Angie Harrison Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-17
Anick Lamoureux Fox Point B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-19
Anne Moffatt Blandford B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Anthony Bell Fox Point B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
April Martin Edmonton T6L Canada 2022-08-26
April Rollick Niagara Falls L2E 1E1 Canada 2022-08-17
Barb Imrie Caledon L7E 0M1 Canada 2022-08-18
Bella Story-taku19 Toronto Canada 2022-08-26
Ben Lubega Mississauga L5N Canada 2022-08-18
Bethany Hine Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-25
Betty Lang Blandford B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Bev Bennett Timberlea B3T Canada 2022-08-22
Beverley McDonald Lequille B0S Canada 2022-08-17
Bill Hargreaves Huddersfield ENG HD7 6AD UK 2022-08-21
Bill Hunt Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Bill Ross Hammonds Plains B4B Canada 2022-08-18
BJ Kirby Dartmouth B2W Canada 2022-08-18
Blair Keeling Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-19
SHOULDERS FOR SAFETY REASONS ON HIGHWAY 329
NAMES OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE SIGNED A PETITION FOR THE ADDITION OF BICYCLE LANES/PAVED
Blake McDonald Bridgewater B4V Canada 2022-08-17
boguslaw szemioth Poland 2022-08-18
Boutilier Tanya Northwest cove B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-20
Brad Jones Edmonton T6W 1E7 Canada 2022-08-18
Bradley Stricker Montreal H3S 1Y7 Canada 2022-08-18
Brenda MacDonald Shag Harbour B0W Canada 2022-08-17
Brian Dobbin Burnaby V5B 4S4 Canada 2022-08-18
Brien Smith Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Brigley Linda Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Brittany Billington Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Brittany Neadow Calgary T3G Canada 2022-08-26
Bruce Hodgson Dartmouth B2W 6M8 Canada 2022-08-18
Bryan Little Halifax B3S Canada 2022-08-18
Bryanna Bullshields Edmonton T6X Canada 2022-08-17
Bryce Stewart Victoria V9C2C4 Canada 2022-08-18
C Baker Halifax B3S Canada 2022-08-18
carey Heppner Abbotsford V2T Canada 2022-08-17
Carol Ritchie Halifax B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Carol Simms Lequille B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Carrie Nelson Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Carrie Tanner Halifax B3S Canada 2022-08-18
Cary Vollick Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-23
Catherine Campbell Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-17
Catherine Guest Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-22
cathy thorne Stillwater Lake B3Z1G2 Canada 2022-08-22
Chad Smith Dartmouth B3A Canada 2022-08-18
Charlene Fougere Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-18
Charlie Mcinnes chester B0J 1J0 Canada 2022-08-18
Chavonne Truter Uxbridge L9P Canada 2022-08-18
Cherie Kennedy Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Chris Jackowich Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-19
chris skuse Vancouver V7T Canada 2022-08-18
Chris smith Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-09-01
Chris Turpin Blandford B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Christina Bellefontaine Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Christina Vokey Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-20
Christine Fahie Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Christine MacDonald Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-17
Christine Macey Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-31
Chrystal Gates Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-17
Cindy Knapton Bedford B4A Canada 2022-08-17
Cindy MacLean Upper Tantallon B3Z Canada 2022-08-18
Claire Cochrane Fox Point B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-24
Claude Langlois Hammonds Plains B3z 1n7 Canada 2022-08-18
Cole Crouse Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-18
Coleen Fahie Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
colin cameron Dartmouth B3B Canada 2022-08-17
Crystal Boutilier Millcove B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Dale Newhouse Kentville B4N Canada 2022-08-17
Dan Carrier Blanford NS B2t 1j1 Canada 2022-08-17
Dan Willis St Isidore K0C2B0 Canada 2022-08-18
Dana Routhier Toronto M5A Canada 2022-08-18
Daniel Ouellette Gl B3Z Canada 2022-08-18
Daniel Pang Richmond V6Y Canada 2022-08-18
Daniel Yacob Edmonton T5M3H1 Canada 2022-08-26
Danielle Barkhouse Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-23
dany dalpe Kelowna V1V Canada 2022-08-17
Darlene Harnish Halifax B3J Canada 2022-08-18
Darrell Ernst Bridgewater B4V Canada 2022-08-17
Dave and Ivy Shaw Timberlea B3T Canada 2022-08-18
david bevan Scarborough M1E Canada 2022-08-17
David Ehler Nova Scotia B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-19
David Neal Glen haven B3Z2W9 Canada 2022-08-20
David Regan Halifax B3L Canada 2022-08-18
Davis Gosse Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-18
Dean Hiscock Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Debora MacNeil Bedfrord, NS B4A 4E2 Canada 2022-08-18
Deborah Gass Brookside B3T Canada 2022-08-19
Deborah Reeves Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-27
DEBORAH W PENTICTON V2A 8X9 Canada 2022-08-18
Debra Zelinski Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Denis De Jong Ottawa K2R 1E2 Canada 2022-08-18
Denise King Halifax B3H 2W6 Canada 2022-08-17
Denny Bilac Vancouver V6A 1C4 Canada 2022-08-17
Devyn Blackwell London N6H Canada 2022-08-17
Diane Craig Lasalle H8N Canada 2022-08-18
Dianne Brown Halifax B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Dianne McDonald Wittenburg B0N Canada 2022-08-18
Donna Cross Fox Point B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Donna Langille Italy Cross B4V Canada 2022-08-18
Doris Murphy Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-17
Dylan lanteigne Toronto M5A Canada 2022-08-26
Edward Burdon Calgary T3H 2T5 Canada 2022-08-17
Eileen Perillo Winnipeg R2M Canada 2022-08-18
ella MacDonald Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-17
Emily Peck East River Point B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-19
Eric Jollymore Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Eric Valois Halifax B4B 1T8 Canada 2022-08-19
Erik Nobbe Dartmouth B2Y Canada 2022-08-17
Erin Dunsworth Nova Scotia b0j1t0 Canada 2022-08-25
Erin FitzGerald Hd of St Margaret’s Bay B3Z 2e8 Canada 2022-08-18
Erin McDonald Halifax B3J Canada 2022-08-17
Esmé Malanchuk Cooks Brook B0N Canada 2022-08-18
Ethel Smiley Marshall Black Point B0J Canada 2022-08-18
F H Toronto M4W Canada 2022-08-26
Florance Beaton Mill Cove B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-20
Gail Comeau Saulnierville B0W Canada 2022-08-18
Gail Dominey Halifax B3J Canada 2022-08-17
Gail McClare Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-19
garth moore Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-17
George Burnouf Canada 2022-08-18
Gerd Liemke Gardiner ME 4345 US 2022-08-18
Gilles Lorrain Canada 2022-08-18
Gloria Pink East River Point B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Gloria Werth Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-20
Glynda Wimmer Halifax B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Greg Stephenson Timberlea B3T Canada 2022-08-17
Hannah Stuppiello Ottawa K1H Canada 2022-08-18
Hannah Thompson Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-17
Heather Conrad Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-17
Heather Doucette Dartmouth B2W Canada 2022-08-18
Heather Roberts Toronto M5M Canada 2022-08-18
Hena Arjumand Mississauga L5J Canada 2022-08-25
Ian Sutherland Northwest Cove B0P Canada 2022-08-18
Ian Sutherland Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-18
J Bell Hubbsrds B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Jackie Dunsworth Halifax B3S Canada 2022-08-18
Jacqueline Swinemar Chester B0J1J0 Canada 2022-08-18
Jagger Harnish Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
James Crawford Dartmouth B3A Canada 2022-08-17
James Hartling Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-17
James Nairn Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-25
Jan Blades East River B0J1J0 Canada 2022-08-18
Jan Burns Middle Lahave B4V 3E2 Canada 2022-08-18
Jane Bezanson Berwick B0p Canada 2022-08-18
Jane Bond Lunenburg B0J Canada 2022-08-17
Jane Halickman Hubbards, Nova Scotia B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Jane Murphy Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-17
Janet Beatty Northwest Cove B0P Canada 2022-08-18
Janet Hall Riverport B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Jared Worth East River Point B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Jasmine Dagley Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-18
Jason Burke Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Jason Reid Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Jason Tanner Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-30
Jeanne Martin Ehler Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-21
Jeff Foster Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-17
Jennifer Coolen Lower Sackville B4C Canada 2022-08-17
Jennifer Gagnon Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Jennifer Kehler Halifax B3L Canada 2022-08-21
Jennifer McCulloch Belnan B2S Canada 2022-08-22
Jennifer Molinaro Southampton N0H2L0 Canada 2022-08-17
Jeremy Law Morin-Heights J0R1H0 Canada 2022-08-18
Jim Graves Hubbarfs B0j1t0 Canada 2022-08-18
Jim Newell Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-18
Joanie Murray Kentville B4N 2C2 Canada 2022-08-18
Joanna Ialongo Montréal H4E 2T3 Canada 2022-08-23
Joanne Anger Halifax B3Z Canada 2022-08-18
Joanne Normand Dartmouth B2V Canada 2022-08-17
Jody Mattie Truro B2N Canada 2022-08-17
John Caldwell Halifax B3S Canada 2022-08-17
John Civello Pickering L1V Canada 2022-08-24
John Dixon Hants B7q Canada 2022-08-19
John MacDonald Halifax B3H 3Z6 Canada 2022-08-17
john mccracken Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-18
Jollymore Grace Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-30
Jonathan Nayler Madoc K0K Canada 2022-08-17
josh blakeney Bedford B4A Canada 2022-08-18
Jp Landry Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-17
Judy Bruce Wasaga Beach L9Z 2B1 Canada 2022-08-17
Judy Butler HRM B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-22
Judy Hannam Hebbs Cross B4V Canada 2022-08-18
Judy Lucas Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-19
Judyann Mccarthy Richmond V7a2b8 Canada 2022-08-17
Julie Knoll Timberlea B3t 0e6 Canada 2022-08-26
Julie McCarron Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-25
June Armour Chester Basin B0J Canada 2022-08-17
Justin Dinning Hamilton L8T Canada 2022-08-17
Justine McMillan Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-19
Justine Muller Kentville B4N Canada 2022-08-18
Justinian Martin Lower Sackville B4C2H3 Canada 2022-08-18
K S Blandford B0J Canada 2022-08-19
Kaitlyn Marentette Windsor N9J Canada 2022-08-26
Karen Boutilier Northwest cove B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Karen Burke Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Karen Crouse Bridgewater B4V Canada 2022-08-18
Karen Manuel Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Karen Overholt Blandford B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Karen Turpin Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-17
Karmen Osborn Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Karrie Spears Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-18
Katie Baker BLANDFORD B0J-1T0 Canada 2022-08-26
Katie Day Halifax B0j 2E0 Canada 2022-08-19
Katie Morash Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-17
Kelly Arlow Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Kelly Lloyd Kingston K7M Canada 2022-08-17
Kelly Webster Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Kelsey Russell Chester B0J 1J0 Canada 2022-08-17
Keltie Jamieson Brookside B3T Canada 2022-08-17
Kennedy Landry Head Of St. Margaret's Bay B3Z 2A8 Canada 2022-08-17
Kerry Mewhort Oliver VoH 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Kevin Seely Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Kevin Sue Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-19
Kharim Schliewinsky Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-18
Kim Jantzi Toronto M4E1K6 Canada 2022-08-17
Kim Perrier Hubbards, NS B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Kim Sawler Dartmouth B2X 3V7 Canada 2022-08-18
Kimberley Grist Stittsville K2V Canada 2022-08-18
Kimberly Mcgowans Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Kledja Aliskenderaj Toronto M4K Canada 2022-08-17
Kori Anderson Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-17
Krista Duval Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-18
Krista Thomas Lower Sackville B4C Canada 2022-08-22
kristen james Winnipeg R3J Canada 2022-08-18
Kristin Kain North Vancouver V7H2H5 Canada 2022-08-18
Kushagra Manchanda Toronto M1j1v1 Canada 2022-08-18
Kyle Lockhart Victoria V8V Canada 2022-08-26
Lacey Johns Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Larissa Hillier Sydney B1P6L4 Canada 2022-08-18
Laura Cranton Brookside B3T Canada 2022-08-27
Laura LeBlanc Toronto M9W Canada 2022-08-18
Laura McCue New Ross, Nova Scotia B0J 2M0 Canada 2022-08-17
Laurence Kaizer Hubbards b0j1t0 Canada 2022-08-25
Leah Noonan Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Leander Drover Halifax B3L Canada 2022-08-17
Lee Laliberte Chester B0J1J0 Canada 2022-08-25
Lee Shadowitz Boutiliers Point B3Z Canada 2022-08-18
Lenore Black Markham L3R Canada 2022-08-17
Lesley Tulloch Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Lily Helder Red Deer T4R Canada 2022-08-17
Linda Pannozzo Fox Point B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Linda Stinson Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Lindsey Bellefontaine Halifax B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Lisa Fiander Bayswater B1p Canada 2022-08-18
Liz Birch Margaree Forks B0E 2A0 Canada 2022-08-18
Liz Manuel Falmouth ns B0P 1L0 Canada 2022-08-17
Logan Daly Sarnia N7S Canada 2022-08-18
Lois Knight Canada 2022-08-18
Lori Dale Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Lori Fancy Lower Sackville B4C Canada 2022-08-17
Lori MacLean Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-22
Lori Parker Edmonton T6E 2T2 Canada 2022-08-18
Lorie Collins Dartmouth B2x3l5 Canada 2022-08-18
Louise Cameron Halifax B3L 1K4 Canada 2022-08-17
Louise Gallant London B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Luigi Pirillo Montréal H1G Canada 2022-08-26
Lynda Hoogendoorn Mississauga L5M 6B7 Canada 2022-08-19
M. Starr Haisla V0T 2B0 Canada 2022-08-17
Madison Perchie Regina S4V 3M1 Canada 2022-08-18
Maggie McCulley Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Magus Warhurst Victoria V9E2H1 Canada 2022-08-26
Manfred Vollmer Queensland B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Marc Kiely Blandford, nova scotia B0j 1t0 Canada 2022-08-17
Marg Clarke St.Lawrence A0E2L0 Canada 2022-08-18
margy seaboyer rr 2 hubbards b0j 1t0 Canada 2022-08-21
Maria G Scarborough M1W Canada 2022-08-26
Mariam Moeed Brampton L6Y0V8 Canada 2022-08-17
marian pickrem Bridgewater B4V Canada 2022-08-19
Marilee Brennan Halifax B3n1p3 Canada 2022-08-17
Marina NW Toronto M9N 1J8 Canada 2022-08-18
Mark Huffman Welland L3B 5N8 Canada 2022-08-23
Mark Macmullin Dartmouth B2W Canada 2022-08-18
Marsha Fanning Halifax B3z Canada 2022-08-18
Marsha Wilson Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-25
Mary Leslie Pelham Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Matthew Morash Fox Point B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Matthew Roberts Hubbards B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Maureen Garnett Canning, NS B0P 1H0 Canada 2022-08-17
Maureen Moore Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
MCINNIS Stephanie Glen Margaret B3Z Canada 2022-08-18
Megan Rafuse Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Melissa MacInnis Lower Sackville B4C Canada 2022-08-18
Michael Doucette Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-23
Michael Norman Whitby L1N3l8 Canada 2022-08-17
Michael Watts Fredericton E3B Canada 2022-08-18
Michele Zigrovic Oakville L6H Canada 2022-08-18
Micheline McAllister Halifax B3J Canada 2022-08-21
Michelle Coolen Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-30
Moka Case Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-21
Monique Cole Chester Basin B0J 1K0 Canada 2022-08-17
morgan newell Deep cove Canada 2022-08-17
Munir S-M Hamilton L9G5C3 Canada 2022-08-17
Nancy Myatt Halifax ns B3S1S2 Canada 2022-08-18
Nancy Vollmer Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Nancy Wood Hatchet Lake B3T Canada 2022-08-18
Natalie Jay Upper Tantallon B3Z Canada 2022-08-18
Natalie Roth Halifax B3J Canada 2022-08-22
Nicholas Villeneuve Peterborough K9J Canada 2022-08-18
Nick Collins Halifax B4B Canada 2022-08-17
Nicole Inamura Mill Cove B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Noh Tukku Calgary T2R 0N1 Canada 2022-08-26
Norma Houston Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-17
Norma McDonell Enfield B2t1g9 Canada 2022-08-21
Normand d'Eon Halifax B2W3G8 Canada 2022-08-17
Olivia Ross Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-17
Ozgur Guney Montréal H7N5N2 Canada 2022-08-18
P Guest Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Pam Butler Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-18
Pam Robinson Saint John E2H 2A7 Canada 2022-08-18
Patricia Sperry Airdrie T4B Canada 2022-08-18
Patricia2 Parker Blandford B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-19
Paul Arsenault Dartmouth B2X Canada 2022-08-18
Paul Burnell Windsor Road B0J 1J0 Canada 2022-08-18
Paul Fischlin Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Paul Gellatly Toronto M8Z0C6 Canada 2022-08-23
paul sehmbey hackett's cove b3z3j3 Canada 2022-08-18
Pauline Dakin Blandford B0K 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Peggy Moore Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-17
Peter Hurst Hubbards B3H Canada 2022-08-19
Petra Toering Ottawa K1J Canada 2022-08-18
Philip Lamont Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Quinn Burchell Hubbards B3z0g3 Canada 2022-08-19
Rafe Porter Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Raul Gutierrez Brampton L6Y Canada 2022-08-17
Ray McGee Halifax B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-27
Rayna Preston Hubbards B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-19
Rebecca Bennett Halifax B3L 4H2 Canada 2022-08-23
Regina Zeh Deep Cove B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-19
Rennie Kayleigh Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-29
Richard Perkins Kanata K2M Canada 2022-08-18
Richard White Deep Cove B0j1t0 Canada 2022-08-18
Rick Balys Bedford B4A Canada 2022-08-21
RICK GIULIANI Burlington L7N1T5 Canada 2022-08-17
Rita Schlitter Edmonton T7N 1N3 Canada 2022-08-17
Rivkah Sherman Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-18
Roar Askheim Halifax B3S Canada 2022-08-17
Rob Macilreith Fall River B2T Canada 2022-08-18
Robert Brewer Hammonds Plains B4B Canada 2022-08-18
Robert Cerminara Bayswater B3m Canada 2022-08-17
Robert Harris Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-17
Robert Hyslop Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-18
Robert Milton Saint-georges G5Y Canada 2022-08-17
Robert Weasel Head Calgary T3H Canada 2022-08-18
Robyn Harnish Glen Haven B3Z Canada 2022-08-25
Rod MacInnis Kelowna V1X 7X7 Canada 2022-08-19
romona cholette Toronto m9w7e8 Canada 2022-08-26
Ron Sweet Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-18
Roslyn DesRocher Scarborough M1V 5C5 Canada 2022-08-26
Ryan Dennis Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
S Chevannes Toronto M6G Canada 2022-08-26
Saeed Mehboob Calgary T3G Canada 2022-08-18
Sagar Marwah Toronto M2n7c4 Canada 2022-08-17
Sally Langille Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-17
Sam Magus Edmonton T5P Canada 2022-08-19
Sara Dorey Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Sarah Citroen Stoney Creek L8G2B9 Canada 2022-08-18
Sarah Hare Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-17
Shaina Falcone Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-21
Shane Huey Lunenburg B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Sharen Urbenz Boutilier’s Point B3Z1V2 Canada 2022-08-18
Sharon Power Meaghers Grant B0N Canada 2022-08-17
Shawn Lenihan Middle Sackville B4E Canada 2022-08-18
Shawna Rees Dartmouth B2X Canada 2022-08-18
Shelly Richardson Mississauga L5C Canada 2022-08-31
Sherryl Campbell Timberlea B3T Canada 2022-08-17
Stella Hill Calgary T3E Canada 2022-08-26
Stephanie Carne Oakville L6H Canada 2022-08-20
Stephanie Lafreniere Bridgewater B4V Canada 2022-08-18
Stephanie Zinck Halifax B3J Canada 2022-08-18
Stephen Groves Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-17
Steve Emberly Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Steve Hare Hillsborough E4H Canada 2022-08-18
Stuart Mcculley Halifax B3S Canada 2022-08-18
Sue Zahorak Ingramport B3Z Canada 2022-08-18
Susan de la Ronde Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Susan Doucette Halifax B3H Canada 2022-08-22
Susan Mosher Chester B0J 1J0 Canada 2022-08-18
Susan Ross Halifax B3M 2c2 Canada 2022-08-18
Susan Webber Halifax B3R 1P1 Canada 2022-08-17
Susannah Hoffmann Halifax B3M Canada 2022-08-18
Susanne Bond Hubbards B0j1t0 Canada 2022-08-17
Suzanne Macl Canada 2022-08-17
taffy taffy haha wed Canada 2022-08-18
Terri Whetstone Blandford B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-27
Terry Papiernik Comox V9M Canada 2022-08-23
Tessa Protasivich Bayswater B0J Canada 2022-08-19
Tiffany Bremner Tancook Island B0j3G0 Canada 2022-08-18
Tiffany Burns-langley Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-17
Tim Farmer Hubards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Tim Morash Mill Cove B0j1t0 Canada 2022-08-22
Timothy Andrews Halifax B3L Canada 2022-08-18
Tina Snair Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-18
Tom Donnahee Dartmouth B3A Canada 2022-08-21
tom heighway Dartmouth B3A Canada 2022-08-17
Tom Johns Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
Tracy Butler Mallorytown Landing K0E Canada 2022-08-23
Trevor Jollymore Blandford B0J1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Tristan Arychuk Canada 2022-08-26
Tristan Guest Hubbards B0J 1T0 Canada 2022-08-18
Troy Sawler Halifax B3M2C7 Canada 2022-08-17
Wanda Clarke Stephens The Lodge NS B0j1t0 Canada 2022-08-18
Wendy Harrington Upper Tantallon B3Z Canada 2022-08-18
Wes Neal Hubbards B0J Canada 2022-08-18
WILLIAM FOUGERE Halifax B3K Canada 2022-08-25
Willow Auswald Kitchener N2H 6A7 Canada 2022-08-17
y z Bedford B4A Canada 2022-08-26
YoBoyNyate Chunkington North Vancouver V7L Canada 2022-08-26
Yvonne Vanhattem Cambridge B0P 1G0 Canada 2022-08-17
Zach Seguin Halifax B3R 1W4 Canada 2022-08-19
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
NOVEMBER 2022
1
NSFM Conference
in Halifax
2
NSFM Conference
in Halifax
3
NSFM Conference
in Halifax
COW
4
NSFM Conference
in Halifax
5
6 7
8
9 10
COUNCIL
11
CLOSED FOR
REMEMBRANCE
DAY
12*
13 14
15
16 17
COW
18 19
20 21
22
23 24
COUNCIL
25 26*
27 28
29
30
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
DECEMBER 2022
1
COW
2 3
4 5
6
7
8
COUNCIL
9 10*
11 12
13
14
15
COW
and
SPECIAL
COUNCIL
16 17
18 19
20
21
22
COUNCIL (if
needed)
23
CLOSING AT
NOON
24*
25 26
CLOSED IN LIEU
OF CHRISTMAS
27
CLOSED IN LIEU
OF BOXING DAY
28
OFFICES CLOSED
29
OFFICES CLOSED
30
OFFICES CLOSED
31
THE. ki`
Date: October 4, 2022
Date:
Date:
REPORT TO:
EETI G DATE:
DEPART E T:
SUBJECT:
0 IGI
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Authorized by:
Council
October 13, 2022
Corporate Strategic anagement
Economic Development Sponsorships Update
Sponsorship Policy, P-87
Erin Lowe, Sr. Economic Development Officer
Tara Maguire, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer
Dan McDougall, Chief Administrative Officer
T IT TI
For the 2022-23 fiscal year, Council has an Economic Development Sponsorship fund to sponsor events,
advertising opportunities, or other or initiatives that provide financial or public relations value to the
municipality that are designed to help achieve Council priorities and generate local economic development
benefit in one or more of the following areas:
• Supporting business growth and employment.
• Increasing visitor attraction.
• Promoting the municipality to residents and visitors.
This Sponsorship is a form of marketing in which organizations pay to be associated with certain events or other
advertising opportunities. Additionally, sponsorship provides community relations benefits by increasing
visibility and recognition as a good community partner.
Organizations are recognized as good community citizens when they support initiatives that assist groups that
benefit or improve the quality of life and/or programing in their community.
Sponsor opportunities are evaluated by the following criteria:
•
•
•
Relevance to the community.
The Municipal logo must be displayed on some marketing of the event.
The audience should be significant in size or targeted.
5 /
T
The following sponsorships were issued by the Senior Economic Development Officer as of October 13, 2022:
Budget 2022-23
$6,000.00
Recent Sponsorships
AFN Gold River Powwow
$1,500.00
Previously Approved
Hubbards Radio Society Cove FM Kitchen Party
$500.00
Request for Decision Page 12
Shoreham Village Foundation Swing for Shoreham Golf Tournament
$700.00
Golf 4 Charity
$100.00
Balance
$3,200.00
TT
T
Letter from Natteal Battiste, Acadia First Nation Councillor
Acadia First Nation 10526 Hwy # 3 Yarmouth, NS B5A 5J7 (902) 742-0257
www.AcadiaFirstNation.ca
Acadia First Nation
10526 Highway 3
Yarmouth NS
B5A5J7
RE: AFN Gold River Powwow
August 24, 2022
Dear Community Partner;
After a two year break due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Acadia First Nation is pleased to announce that we will be
hosting our annual Powwow. Our Powwow will be held in our Gold River Community on September 10th and 11th, 2022.
A traditional Pow wow, in the Mi’kmaw culture, is a celebration and healing opportunity for our Indigenous Nation
across Turtle Island, and a part of the summer long Pow wow trail that takes place across the country. We extend an
invitation to you, as a community partner, to also join us on either days.
Although this is a costly event to host, we proudly do not charge admission to anyone wishing to attend. We averagely
see over 500+ people in attendance. As a Community Partner there are many ways you can assist in making this event a
success and keep it free to all attendees.
Due to the cost of inflation, financial contribution are welcome and greatly appreciated. This will help offset cost with
set up, security, accommodations and honorariums, as well as assist in purchasing supplies. Alternatively, if you are
unable to make a financial contribution, but would still like to make a contribution, please contact me at your earliest
convenience to discuss options for our giveaway gift blanket.
Welalioq (Thank you) in advance for your continued support. Should you have any questions regarding this event or
concerns, please contact me using the contact information listed below.
On behalf of the Powwow Committee,
Natteal Battiste (she/her)
Acadia First Nation Councillor
email: nbattiste@acadiaband.ca | mobile: (782)640-3026