Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2015-08-13_Council Public Agenda PackageMUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER CHESTER MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 8AS a.m. AGENDA 1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER. 2. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: 2.1 Council - Thursday, July 30, 2015 3. MATTERS ARISING: 3.1 Report from Director of Finance regarding the following: a) Budget to Actual Results to June 30th -Operating Account. b) Budget Information Subsequent to Approval. c) Capital Forecast Report and Debt Service Ratio. d) Capital Investment Plans: 1. Recreation and Parks 2. Solid Waste 3. Community Development 4. Information Services S. Public Works 6. Wind Projects 4. COMMITTEE REPORTS: 4.1 Citizens Planning Advisory Committee - Monday, July 27, 2015 - Warden Webber 4.2 Audit & Budget Committee - Thursday, July 30,201S - Warden Webber 4.3 Any other Committee Reports. 5. CORRESPONDENCE: 5.1 Email from Hon. Denise Peterson-Rafuse, MLA dated August 5, 2015 in response to an email sent from M. E. Donovan regarding Chester Highway 3 paved shoulder. 5.2 Municipality of the District of West Hants dated July 23, 2015 regarding Notice of Public Hearing - Proposed Development Agreement - Quick As A Wink Theatre Society - to allow a community theatre on Wentworth Road in the Hamlet of Wentworth Creek. 5.3 Note of Thanks from Shoreham Village Foundation date August 6, 2015 regarding Council Grant for Sponsorship of a Hole for the 2015 Swing for Shoreham Golf Tournament. 5.4 Letter of response from Minister of Service Nova Scotia dated July 23, 2015 regarding changes to Property Online Data Licensing Agreements; allowing municipalities to provide public access to Property Online. 5.5 Email from UNSM dated July 27, 2015 regarding information sent from the Emergency Management Office in regard to National Disaster Mitigation Program Submission Timelines for 2016-2017 Projects. Pagel of 2 6. NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 Request for Decision from Tara Maguire, Director of Community Development dated August 4, 2015 regarding Plan Review - Facilitator Scope of Work. 6.2 Request for Decision from Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner dated July 30, 2015 regarding Applications for alteration to Municipal Heritage Properties located at 14 Main Street in Chester Village and 5343 Highway 3 in Chester Basin. 7. ADJOURNMENT. Page 2 of 2 Municipality of the District of Chester Income Statement - Actual vs. Budget July 30, 2016 2015-2016 2015-2016 2015-2016 Protective Services: ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE FORECAST REVENUE (Page I of 2) June 30th, 2015 TOTAL $ % MARCH 31, 2016 Taxes - Assessable Property Fire Protection - Islands 5,714 11,768 6,054 49% Residential $4,757,881 $9,429,272 $4,671,391 50% $9,429,272 Commercial 712,683 1,384,864 672,181 51% 1,384,864 Resource 145,571 293,197 147,626 50% 293,197 Non -Profit Acreage 2,076 4,153 2,077 50% 4,153 Forest Lands (-50,000) 13,723 27,439 13,716 50% 27,439 Forest Lands (+50,000) Streetlights 8,590 4,295 50% 8,590 $131,810 $5,636,229 $11,147,515 $5,511,286--91-0/; 39,223 -$11,147,515 Area Rates: Protective Services: Fire Protection - Districts 1,3&7 $132,012 $262,141 $130,129 50% $262,141 Fire Protection - Islands 5,714 11,768 6,054 49% 11,768 Fire Protection - Forest Land 660 1,312 652 50% 1,312 Fire Protection - Hydrants 12,045 24,091 '12,046 50% 24,091 Fire Protection - Fire/Village Commissions 766,668 1,516,072 749,404 51% $917,099 $1,815,384 $898,285 51% --l-15,16,072 $1,815,384 Transportation Services: Streetlights $75,230 $'13'1,810 $56,580 57% $131,810 Private Road Maintenance 42,791 82,014 39,223 52% 88,892 Endeavour Avenue '18,510 37,245 18,735 50% 37,245 $136,531 $251,069 $11114,538 -- 64-6/- -------7 6 Environmental Health Services: . -- - - ---- -- Universal Sewer $431,205 $830,513 $399,308 52% $830,513 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal -------- $730,921 $1,375,879 $644,958 53% $1,375,879 Mill Cove - Private Wells $17,700 $35,400 $17,700 50% $35,400 ACES School - Sprinkler System $0 $9,477 $9,477 0% $8477 Taxes Based on Business Revenue: Allant Corporation $49,128 $50,000 $872 98% $50,000 NIS Power Corporation 22,237 22,237 0 100% 22,237 NIS Power HST Rebate 0 ------$-122,237 50,000 50,000 0% 50,000 $50,872 58% $122,237 Other Taxes: Deed Transfer Tax $162,898 $800,000 $637,102 20% $800,000 Wind Farm Developer Tax 0 250,000 250,000 0% 250,000 Change in Use -$182,898 0 0 0 -0 -$1,050,000 $887,10216a/, -$1-,050,000 Grants in Lieu of Taxes: Federal Government and Agencies $0 $61,842 $61,842 0% $61,842 Provincial Government and Agencies 0 95,494 95,494 0% 95,494 $0 $157,336 $157,336 0% $157,336 SUBTOTAL $8,103,948 $16,794,810 $8,690,862 ---- - ------ - 48% - ------ $16,801,688 Other Revenues from Own Sources: Municipality of the District of Chester $24,925,138 $15,264,758 39% $255149,738 Income Statement - Actual vs. Budget Administration Services $37,657 $158,800 2015-2016 2015-2016 $158,800 Transportation Services 2015.2016 7,432 ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE Building Inspection Services FORECAST REVENUE (Page 2 of 2) June 30th, 2015 TOTAL $ % MARCH 31, 2016 Set -vices Provided Other Governments/Agencies: 1,484 20% 1,850 Sewer Hookup Services 90 Wind Turbine COMFIT - NS Power $132,048 $719,650 $587,602 '18% $7,19,650 Solid Waste and Disposal Fees 882,952 2,687,807 1,804,855 33% 2,687,807 Planning, Fire Insp, Build Insp, REMO Fees 0 . . . .. . " " I 76,908 0% "; 6i,405 Fire Commission Insurance Prerniurns 0 67,000 67,000 0% 67,000 Animal Control Fees 2,750 33,000 30,250 8% $386,700 $8_81,583_ $1,017,750 $3,584,365 $2,566,615 28% __33,000 $3,574,952 Other Revenues from Own Sources: $9,660,380 $24,925,138 $15,264,758 39% $255149,738 EXTRAORDINARY OR SPECIAL REVENUE Administration Services $37,657 $158,800 $121,143 24% $158,800 Transportation Services 7,702 7,432 -270 104% 7,702 Building Inspection Services 375 15,000 14,625 3% 15,000 Animal Control Services 366 1,850 1,484 20% 1,850 Sewer Hookup Services 90 0 -90 200 Solid Waste and Disposal Services 302,924 564,251 261,327 54% 564,251 Planning Services 610 god 16,290 4% 16,900 Industrial Park Lease Fees 1,250 5,000 3,750 25% 5,000 Recreation & Culture Services 35,726 112,35076,624 -----$494,883 32% 112,350 $386,700 $8_81,583_ 44% $882,053 Unconditional Transfers: Federal Government $0 $1,300 $1,300 0% $1,300 Provincial Government 6,699 11,080 4,381 60% 11,080 Other Local Govern ment/Agen cles0 0 0 0 $6,699 $12,380 $5,681 54% $12,380 Conditional Transfers: Federal Government $0 $1,208,667 $1,208,667 0% $1,208,667 Provincial Government 84,979 958,389 873,410 9% 1,078,389 Other Local Govern ment/Agencies 60,304 150,665 100,361 33% 247,330 $2,3_17,721 -$2,162,438 6% $2,534,386 Other: Transfer, Prior Year's Surplus $0 $33,639 $33,639 0% $33,639 Transfer From Own Funds 10,000 1,300,640 _____1,334,279 1,290,640 1% 1,310,640 $10,000 $1,324,279 1 5/6_ $1,344,279 SUBTOTAL $9,660,380 $24,925,138 $15,264,758 39% $255149,738 EXTRAORDINARY OR SPECIAL REVENUE $0 $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUES $9,660,380 $24,925,138 $15,264,758 39% $25,149,738 Warden, Council & Committee: Municipality of the District of Chester Income Statement - Actual vs. Budget JL11Y 30, 2015 2015-2016 20152016 2015.2016 Council/Committee Remuneration ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE FORECAST EXPENDITURES (Page 1 of 4) June 30th, 2015 TOTAL $ MARCH 31, 2016 General Government Services: $161,560 Warden, Council & Committee: Council/Committee Remuneration $41,429 $161,560 $120,131 26% $161,560 Administrative Expenses 24,203 74,789 50,586 32% 74,789 Grants to Organizations 24,842 200,500 175,658 12% 210,500 Elections and Plebiscites 0 -$90,-474 ------$4-51,849 15,000 15,000 0% 15,000 $361,375 20% $461,849 CAO/Clerk Administration: Salaries $80,783 $362,742 $281,059 22% $362,742 Administration Expenses 23,235 125,800 102,565 18% 125,800 Town Crier 0 1,000 1,000 0% 1,000 Surveys/Appraisals 0 1,500 1,500 0% 1,500 Communications 1,666 23,000 21,334 7% 23,000 Capital from Revenue Projects 0 0 0 0 $105,684 $514,042 $408,358 21% $514,042 Finance/Tax Administration: Salaries $75,191 $314,922 $239,731 24% $314,922 Administration Expenses 81,042 215,736 134,694 38% 215,736 Property Tax Administration 117,900 280,829 162,929 42% 280,829 Assessment Recovery Costs 85,366 341,463 256,097 25% 341,463 Capital from Revenue Projects 0 0 0 0 Depreciation 0 23,513 23,513 0% 23,513 $359,499 $1,176,463 $816,964 31% $1,176,46-3 information Services: Salaries $45,550 $205,965 $160,415 22% $205,965 Administration Expenses 80,721 249,104 168,383 32% 249,104 Capital from Revenue Projects 0 60,140 50,140 0% 50,140 Debt Charges 16,470 19,483 3,013 85% 19,483 Depreciation 0 66,172 66,172 0% 66.172 $142,741 $590,864 $448,123 24% $590,864 Municipal Property: Salaries $28,484 $83,950 $55,466 34% $83,950 Administrative Expenses 20,507 40,420 19,913 51% 40,420 Property Services 31,771 128,780 97,009 25% 128,780 Wharves, Boat Launches, etc 1,997 '16,300 14,303 12% 16,300 Community Development/Gardens 402 17,500 17,098 2% 17,500 Capital from Revenue Projects 1,356 308,600 307,144 0% 308,500 Depreciation 0 10,239 10,239 0% 10,239 $84,517 $605,689 $521,172 14% $605,689 Public Works: Salaries $39,232 $147,960 $108,728 27% $147,960 Administrative Expenses 17,246 92,000 74,764 19% 92,000 Sprinkler/Fire Mill Cove 8,394 72,610 64,216 12% 72,610 Capital from Revenue Projects 0 0 0 0 Depreciation 0 14,40614,406 0% 14,406 1 $64,872-$326,976 $262,104 20% $326,976 SUBTOTAL $847,787 $3,665,883 - --- - -------- $2,818,096 23% $35675,883 2015-2016 2015-2016 2015.2016 ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE FORECAST EXPENDITURES (Page 2 of4) June 30th, 2015 TOTAL $ % MARCH 31, 2016 Protective Services: Police Services $0 $1,682,931 $1,682,931 0% $1,682,931 Correction Services 59,110 236,441 177,331 25% 236,441 Legal - Prosecution Services 0 5,000 5,000 0% 5,000 By-Law Enforcement 4,721 46,490 41,769 10% 46,491 Animal Control 5,630 70,480 64,850 8% 70,480 Emergency Measures 9,803 40,707 30,904 24% 41,003 $79,264 $2,082,049 $2,002,785 4% $2,0_82_,346 Fire Services: Fire Services - Salaries & Wages $13,855 $51,831 $37,976 27% $51,831 Fire Services. Administrative Expenses 6,214 61,235 55,021 '10% 61,235 Fire Services . Insurance 64,765 67,000 2,235 97% 67,000 Fire/Village Commissions 361,000 1,516,072 1,155,072 24% 1,516,072 Fire Contract - Districts 1, 3 & 7 61,000 260,104 199,104 23% 260,104 Fire Rescue Boat 2,000 11,768 9,768 17% 11,768 Capital from Revenue Projects 030,000 __t'1_,9_68,010 30,000 0% 30,000 $1,489,176 25% $1,998,010 Building/Fire Inspection: Building Salaries & Wages $32,851 $166,127 $133,276 20% $166,128 Building Administrative Expenses 9,690 65,098 55,408 15% 65,097 Fire Salaries & Wages 13,439 52,026 38,587 26% 52,026 Fire Administrative Expenses4,147 __$60,127 24,799 20,652 17% 24,799 $308,050 $247,923 20% Transportation Services: Roads & Streets: Administration $2,652 $28,010 $25,358 9% $28,010 Provincial Road Maintenance Fee 44,904 179,614 134,710 25% 179,614 Municipal Roads 3,846 30,000 26,154 13% 30,000 Private Road Maintenance 84,972 78,210 -6,762 109% 78,210 Sidewalks/Crosswalks 5,017 87,000 81,983 6% 87,000 Streetlights 18,909 145,450 126,541 13% 145,450 Streetsigns 1,704 12,210 10,506 14% 12,210 Capital from Revenue Projects 0 210,000 210,000 0% 210,000 Short Term Borrowing 3,033 3,920 887 77% 3,920 Debt Charges 69,323 46,044 -23,279 151 1/c 46,044 Depreciation 0 211,175 211,175 0% 211,175 $234,3601,031,633 $797,273 23% $1,031,6-3-3 Sewer Services: Universal Sewer Salaries $44,891 $217,180 $172,289 21% $217,180 Universal Sewer Operating Expenses 45,404 324,540 279,136 '14% 324,540 Capital from Revenue Projects 9,259 1,814,834 1,805,575 1% 1,814,834 Debt Charges 34,520 51,549 17,029 67% 51,549 Depreciation 0 182,303 182,303 0% 182,303 $134,074 $2,590,407 $2,456,333 5% $2,590,406 SUBTOTAL $1,864,446 $11,676,032 $9,811,586 16% $11,686,328 Landfill Salaries 2015-2016 2015-2016 $474,152 2015.2016 $608,716 ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE FORECAST EXPENDITURES (Page 3 of 4) June 30th, 2015 TOTAL $ % MARCH 31, 2016 Solid Waste Collection/Disposal 0% 550,000 Landfill Capital from Revenue Projects 0 Waste Collection Salaries $11,519 $49,838 $38,319 23% $49,838 Waste Collection Operating Expenses 127,966 1,254,175 1,126,209 '10% 1,254,175 Depreciation 0 500 500 01Y0 500 1,158,904 ...................... �tyu,w - ---------- --------- -- - ------ $1,165,028 11% $1,304,513 Landfill Salaries $134,564 $608,716 $474,152 22% $608,716 Landfill Operating Expenses 128,203 799,152 670,949 16% 799,152 Landfill Closure 2 Expenses 0 560,000 560,000 0% 550,000 Landfill Capital from Revenue Projects 0 0 0 23% 0 Landfill Debt Charges 911,351 1,182,829 271,478 77% 1,182,829 Depreciation 0 _-- 1,158,904_ 1,158,904 0% 1,158,904 Regional Housing Authority $1,174,118 $4,299,601 $3,125,483 27% $4,299,601 Recycling Salaries $5,763 $23,307 $17,544 25% $23,307 Recycling Operating Expenses 4,761 28,649 23,888 17% 28,649 Economic Development Capital from Revenue $10,524 $51,956 $41,432 20% 120,000 Total Solid Waste Collection/Disposal $1,324,127 $5,656,070 $4,331,943 23% $5,656,070 Health & Wellness $723 $7,000 $6,277 10% $7,000 Occupational Health and Safety 392 10,000 9,608 4% 10,000 Regional Housing Authority 0 -$1,115 20,000 -$37,000 20,000 0% 20,000 ----$3-7,000 0 114,000 114,000 $35,885 3% Depreciation Environmental Development Services: Economic Development Salaries & Wages $19,117 $79,790 $60,673 24% $78,394 Economic Development Operating Expenses 7,245 141,225 133,980 5% 138,822 Economic Development Capital from Revenue 0 120,000 120,000 0% 120,000 SUBTOTAL $26,362 $341,015 $314,653 8% �337216 Planning Salaries & Wages $99,404 $404,770 $305,366 25% $404,770 Planning Operating Expenses 55,175 268,290 213,115 21% 269,290 Planning Capital from Revenue Projects 0 114,000 114,000 0% 114,000 Depreciation 0 17,812 17,812 0% 17,812 $154,579 $804,872 $650,293 19% LQRDA/REN $7,853 $45,794 $37,941 17% $38,003 Tourism Development $1,500 $43,000 $41,500 3% $43,000 Total Environmental Development Services $190,294 $1,234,681 $1,044,387 15% $1,224,091 SUBTOTAL $3,379,982 $18,603,783 $16,223,801 18% $18,603,489 Appropriation to District School Board 2015-2016 2015-2016 $3,335,316 25% 2015-2016 Transfer to Own Reserves, Funds, Agencies ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE FORECAST EXPENDITURES (Page 4 of 4) June 30th, 2015 TOTAL $ - % MARCH 31, 2016 Industrial Park Operating Expenses $2,364 $23,653 $21,289 10% $23,653 Industrial Park Capital from Revenue 0 10,000 10,000 0% 10,000 Depreciation 0 17,448 17,448 0% '17,448 $2,364 $51,101 $48,737 5% $51,101 Wind Power Operating Expenses $16,133 $89,963 $73,830 18*% $102,963 Wind Power Capital From Revenue 0 69,000 69,000 0% 69,000 Wind Power Debt Charges 253,143 331,157 78,014 76% 331,157 $269,276 $490,120 $220,844___ 550/._ $503,120 Heritage Properties $0 $500 $500 ---------- 0% $500 ---------- Recreation and Parks Services: Recreation Salaries $107,577 $387,835 $280,258 28% $399,075 Recreation Grants to Organizations 3,450 38,000 34,550 9% 38,000 Recreation Operating Expenses 58,023 334,597 276,574 17% 323,357 Recreation Capital from Revenue Projects 1,000 289,000 288,000 0% 289,000 Recreation Debt Charges 34,481 40,988 6,507 84% 40,988 Depreciation 0 81,917 81,917 0% 81,917 $1,172,337 $967,806 17% $1,172,337 Church Memorial Park $0 $50,000 $50,000 0% $50,000 Regional Library $17,009 $69,056 $52,047 25% $69,056 Appropriation to District School Board $1,111,772 $4,447,088 $3,335,316 25% $4,447,088 Transfer to Own Reserves, Funds, Agencies $584,000 $1,603,623 $1,019,623 36% $1,603,623 TOTAL EXPENDITURES __f6_,56_8,934 ___$2_6,487,608 $20,918,674 21°/p -$26,500,314 1-477 July 15, 2015 M�� Administration 2015/16 mubsequamto Fire/Village Commission Budget Budget Municipal Properties $10,239 821,058 New Ross $.15/$100 $,17/100 Outside Fire Districts 1&a $.07/$108 $.0648/$100 Outside Fire District 7 g.071./$180 $.0658/$100 Village Commission g151.7/g108 $.1368/$100 Private Road Associations $1,158,904 $1,294,432 Planning Otter Point (deva|oped) g488,00 $525�00 Otter Point (undcve|oped) g80.00 g185.00 M�� Administration g23,513 $23,153 Information Services $66,172 $39,003 Municipal Properties $10,239 821,058 Public Works $14,406 $21,524 Transportation $211,1/S $241,61.0 Sewer Services $182,303 g191,610 Waste Collection $500 $422 Landfill $1,158,904 $1,294,432 Planning $17,812 $1.7'81.2 ECQPark $17,448 $17,448 Wind Turbine $O $254,410 Recreation $81,917 $91,371 Capital Budget Review - 2016/17 to 2019/20 R�aus� 4 20' S Capital Operating Gas Tax ih"ind Revenue Recreation Parkland Landfill Close. Equipment Seaver Grants!Other Fund from Fund from Fund from Project Cost Reserve Reserve Reserve Reserve Reserve Reserve Reserve Reserve Reserve Funds Operations Arca Rate BorrovAng Balance March 31!16 (Estimated) $?6,604 52, 55A,122 $1,423,178 $613,302 $42,000 $48.363 $4,295,304 $58,799 $158,933 2016-17 Recreation & Parks -Trails $80,000 $50.N0 $15,40.0 CCHT Gran; $15,0C' Solid Waste - Heavy Equipment $774;000 .774 000 Comm. Dev. - Stramscape, vehicle, signage $160,000 $8a,n C 5101.000 $50'con Comm. Dev. - Industrial Park $300,000 $300,000 information Services - Hardware?Software $75,044 $62,000 $1C,C04 Publie Works -Sewers $2,272.371 $699,911 $43240 =S 02,498 * CAP,3CF $111 21K $560 n 4 Public Works -Municipal Properties $235,600 $31,50'3 x_0,"40 Prvate $•Cs.i00 $75,0013 Public Works - Roads & Sidewalks $442,427 s"-22,427 $20,000 Area rate Wind Project $5001000 5500,000 TOTAL $4,839,398 $0 $97,50 c1,252,327 $231000 eC $0 $0 $0 $43,20-0 $907,498 8183,100 $111,250 $1,914,524 Cm„ buttons $n 4350.000 057;,00,] $1 0O.000 $0 $$0,10-N S5_0"eo $12,500. $141,0,10 Operating Expendi`ures SO $50,0411 110 $i00'000 $0 $0 $0 $C $0 irterest Eared $50'0 $50,000 $20 COC $12:0013 $51:, -5500 S1018,0110_ -160C $2.400 Balance M`. -arch 31117 (Estimated) $47,100 $2,806,622 $3361;151 $11195,302 $42,500 $58,863 $41953,304 $71,809 $259,133 2017-18 Recreation & Parks - Trails & Park $90,000 $30:100 $35,000 Solid Waste - Cell 4A & Equipment $5,200,000 55.200,000 Comm. Dev. - Streetscape, permit system, signage 5270,000 $30,000 $154,00;; $30,003 $'.0,400 Gomm. Dev. - Industrial Park $300,060 $30C,0'v'0 Information Services - Hardware $15,000 $15,000 Public Works - Sewers $1,039,800 $180,800 $32409 PCAP $145,600 $6sl'ne Public Works - Municipal Properties $378,600 $39,000 $89,600 S250;0^0C Public Works - Roads & Sidewa'ks $200,000 Si8o'000 $2C D"C' Wind Project $91,500,000 $11,55c,300 TOTAL :18,993,400 $4 $134,0.00 $540'8eo .330„00 $0 "a25,000 $0 30 $O $32,400 $134,600 $165,E00 $17,631,000 Centrbutions $G $350,030 $510,00~ $1,000,000 $4 $10;000 5550,000 $12,500 $141,000 Operating Expenditures $0 -50,030 0 $104,030 $0 $0 $0 SO iMerest Earned $50^: a54.030 $20 +�00 $12.000 $500 $500 $105.000 8600 Balance March 31118 (Estimated) $47,600 $3,022,622 $4103354 $1,777,302 $43,000 $44,363 $5,611,344 $84,999 $402,533 2018-19 Recreation & Parks - Trails Solid Waste -Compactor & equipment Comm. Dov. -Streetscape, signage Comm. Dov. - industrial Park Information Services - Hardware Public Works - Sealers Public Works - Municipal Properties Public Works- Roads & Sidewalks Wind Project TOTAL Cci t. b_tions O,Peroflng Expenditures Interest Earned Balance rciarch 31119 (Estimated) 2019-20 Recreation & Parks -Trails Solid Waste - Equipment Comm. Dev, - Streetscape, signage Comm. Dov. - Industrial Park Information Services - HardwareiSoftware Public Works - Severs Public Works - Municipal Properties Public Works - Roads & Sidewalks Wind Project TOTAL Contributions Op astir, Exp= d._res Inurest Earned Balance March 311120 (Estimated) Capital Operating Gas Tax Wind Revenue Recreation Parkland Landfill Close. Equipment Sewer Grants'Other Fund from Fund from Fund from Project Cesi Roserve Reserve Reserve Reserve Reserve Rzseno Reserae Reservz Reserve Funds Operafions Arza Rate Borro:yinq $0 $50.610 $G 101,000 $1 $C, $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $50.00:i $o % !„0 $12.600 $5.^_•^ 8x00 0 8. 0 0Q $660 $2,406 $1,160,000 $31305,622 $245,051 $2,359,302 $43,500 $54,863 €6,268,304 $98,099 $ . ,1 M000 $190.Ooo e1 - OQ•v' $30.000 $1,212,300 $10,000 5210,900 $300,000 $300,100 $265,40�;t $37,x00 PCAP $303,300 $46,000 $15,000 $ ° 5,u; :G $20,000 $1,649,400 $195.30C ',245,700 $EKD.650 PCA. -,'BC Fund $161:456 $357,K0 $112,400 $52,000 $40,490 K0.000 $370,000 $0 $3.56,000, $360,903 c 30,000 $8,000 $0 $20,0110 060,006 $3,846,800 $0 $67,000 5755,300 S33C.000 $0 $0 80 SQ ..2^-5,700 $689,650 $0 $25,000 $5700x0 .v%0C $0 L $550,001 $ 2"nn $1-^,:i6$35C0C $0 $50.610 $G 101,000 $1 $C, $0 $0 $0 $517-0 $50.00:i S2- -00 $12.600 $5.^_•^ 8x00 0 8. 0 0Q $660 $2,406 $48.100 $31305,622 $245,051 $2,359,302 $43,500 $54,863 €6,268,304 $98,099 $300,233 58,000 $8,0nu $25,000 $190,000 $150,000 nti,000 $300,000 $300,9c -o $75.000 $15,000 $61,000 $1,212,300 5210,900 $265,40�;t $37,x00 PCAP $303,300 $46,000 $20,000 $65,000 $$25198,600 $0 $55,006 $360,903 c 30,000 $8,000 $0 Sil 060,006 8265,466 $37,800 $0 $350,000 ;.570,000 $1,000,006 $1, $10,000 $550,03.0 $12,500 `141,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $100,030 $Q $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $50.004 $2001 00 S50C ^0,0 $1.0 9,0100 a600 $2.400 $48,600 $3,600,622 $474,151 $2,941,302 536,000 $65,363 $6,927,304 $51,199 $178,233 $100,400 $201,450 $1;457,300 S2 5, 000 $148,200 $550,000 $63,300 $200,006 $20101 $138,300 $168,200 $775,000 July 11, 2Uu 2015/16 L.o''.0 R: er E_ ld ng Laald II Proiect5 Sever Projects 2016/17 Landfi l Server Proecs Wind Pan, April 1, 2;16 April 1, 20'17 April 1, 2018 April 1, 208 April 1. 20229 Apr111,2321 Apr111,2022 Api!1,2023 Apr'11. 2624 Ma h 3',2997 Mardi 51.'018 March 31, 2619 V --cm 31. 2020 M -,,h 31, 2021 Match 31, 2022 March 31, 2023 Maroh 31, 2024 Ma, ch s'1, 2425 20 2552,000 2154,800 27,600 $=':606 $27,600 82;,600$27,63-0 1'J nd Park $27,606 S27,500 u $13,545 $^.eel' $19,3 518,554 s1 ,383 $16,422 $ .`s6 _ �14,490 , 1 ,52. 512:555 5 .;551,800 $64,052 _3-.:360 61:1 ;Ko $106,361 '. J , 0 - $Y0 .3.60 $.4.105,2 $11:209 24,/67 $1a,613 $14,890 51 Y,"_'68 S T445v ,723 58,467 10 . SE8,666 525,000 $55,867 $58,867 $=8,86' $382,375 $: _4,&c?$5g 867 $58,867 158,8E-,, 5'8,750 _.302 ,210,6 , $18,543 516;483 ,.1 $12,62 $�J,3G2 $&241 $6,181 $29,268 $251,363 $244,614 $237,865 $231,116 $224,367 $111,258 8103,232 $105,206 $7,4;00G 2154,800 $154,800 $154,803 $�2=,800 $154,800 1'J nd Park =., $11;506 00 $13,545 $ _'7,090 $21,672 ,254 110,8315 _v $357,300 2019/20 S93.' o $640,524 $64,052 $64.6S-, $64,052 $64,052 $64,052 $64,052 $.4.105,2 $11:209 $22.418 523 177 <,.. x,935 :15,693 $13,451 2 �2,"'09 58,467 S500,G00 525,000 $25,u0, $201,250 $402,500 $382,375 2352,256 5342,125 5'8,750 $17,500 $`_ 5,625 5'-5175p $14.77„ $I», C,:;0 $3,125 $12,25C 2017/18 $1 C41,U'C'G +1,040,0'00 $1.3-4 0. c o,. Seer Projects 10 1'J nd Park =., $11;506 00 2018/19 $145,600 Landfall 5 $1,100,00. Sewer Prcie_ts _v $357,300 2019/20 S93.' o Land 11 Equiperent $25,000 Sewer Pr ojects .,5 $750,3-60 20 $33,504 $310,861 8302,326 $293,791 5285,256 $276,721 $113,387 $110,270 $25,503 $306,736 $432 513,125 $297,785 $286,834 $279,884 $270,933 $5.600 $1 C41,U'C'G +1,040,0'00 $1.3-4 0. c o,. 51.C)40,00., $1,340,000 $525 1,01,000 5182,00„ $145,600 109.200 Y$93,100 872,800 536,400 $24,500 $22,750 S93.' o $^-"3,100 $0 $93,100 $93,100 $93,103 $._5,2'_3 532,585 $29,32' $2^;68 522,810 $19,551 $16,293 5575,000 $575,000 $575,G00 5575,000 $575,000 5575,000 $201,250 $402,500 $382,375 2352,256 5342,125 $322,000 $301,875 $308,543 $2,325,185 $2,265,402 $2,2051618 $2,145,835 $2,086,051 $986,268 $226.600 522" ,000 $220,000 5220,000 $22G,000 $19,250 $33,506 sac soo y 3,100 $15.400 $7,7+07 $25,730 s3=, -q -o $;5,730 $$5,730 $35,730 $6,253512,566 1,255 $10,004 58,%54 /7,503 50 So $:, 111 $G $25,503 $306,736 $432 513,125 $297,785 $286,834 $279,884 $270,933 $5.600 $5,000 $5,004 $5 600 $875 $106 $525 ..SO $50,001- SSo,oeo $50,060 $56,000 $26,250 $24,500 $22,750 521,060 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $13,563 $82,125 $80,200 $78,275 $76,350 $29,268 $284,867 $864,017 $2,890,879 $3,110,607 $3,095,151 $2,902,849 $2,665,828 $1,549,026 Aug st 4, 2015 , Sbvth 690ej6tf ,t8k8u16 , added 1 fit,% April 1, 2015 April 1. 2016 April 1, 2017 April 1, 2018 April 1, 2419 April 1, 2020 April 1, 2021 April 1, 2022 April 1, 2023 April 1, 20024 Summary March 31, 2016 March 31, 2017 March 31, 2018 March 31, 2019 March 31, 2020 March 31, 2021 March 31, 2022 March 31, 2023 March 31, 2424 March 31, 2025 Annual Debt Service Charges (Current) $1,720,274 $1,922,971 $1,612,459 $1,582,246 $1,431,408 $1,576,053 $312,386 $485,039 $519,789 5231,902 Annual Debt Service Charges iioroposed $0 $29,2468 5284;86-1 $864.0117 52,890,879 $3,:10,607 $3,095,151 $2,902,849 $2,665,82' 51.,549,026 AnnnaiDebtServieeBuME,(Cnrrent+Proposed} 01,720,274 $1,952,239 $11897,326 $2,446;283 $4,372,287 $4,686;665 $3,907,537 $3,387,888 $3,185,617 $1,830,928 C, o Sou;ce R n --,K15r1 . Eudgat..;nc _ , cy 25. ,e .aKerl . ares TP oa ,t: Eu_.ne a Olin,) $16,637,475 9111,456 41� 517,903,07 518,977,458 519,451,894 $"9,935,192 $20,7136,647 .7,563 $21,47? 252 in Lieu Usaxes 157,36 161,269 165,301 169,4434 173,670 178,611 182,462 187,02v 191,600 1-961491anls Se -es Pc,,Jd'toOt-,orG-em-nts 2,855,940 3,141,534 3;220,072 3,542,080 ,630,632 3,721,39! 3,8141432 3,909,793 4,007,538 6JC7,726 C-AFVFIT 719,650 ',641 756,082 774984 794,359 814,218 854,573 855,438 376,824 898,744 .i nd Park Ra,---bia to Raail - 4 0 ��. �'0�� 1,580217 1,610557 ,641,%x79 1,672,996 1,705,117 1;737,556 Oir-e,R--e om0-Scurces 890,358 979,394 1,003,579 1,428,976 1,054,7C'.0 1,081,063 1.108,094 1,135,797 1,1641191 1,1 93,296 Subt�tai2 _,260,759 22,486,250 23,0"-8,407 25,580,5`_4 25,21:1,635 26,557,145 27,519,232 28,197,693 28,592,931 '9,605,366 -ess. Education Co--cct:cns &reusing Deficit 4,703,529 4,797,600 4,893,552 4;991,42-3 5,091.25= 5,193,076 5,296,938 5,402,876 5,510,934 5,621,=53 Toral Net Re-- From Own Souroes 16,557,230 17,688,651 18,154,855 20,589,092 21,119,784 21,664,069 22,222,295 22,794,817 23;381,997 23,984,213 Debt Service Ratios Debt Service Burden to Cavan Source Revenue (Current) 10.39% 10.871 8.881 8.31% 7.58% 7.86% 3.95% 2.301 2.40% 1.271 oeletService Burden toOwn SourceRevenue (Current +Proposed) 110.39,0 11.04! 10.45% 11.88% 20,70% 21.63% 17.58% 14.86% 13.621 7.631 Sbvth 690ej6tf ,t8k8u16 , added 1 fit,% Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2016/17 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 1. Recreation and Parks Recreation & Parks Department endedBv--------------------------------------------------- $80,000 $15,000 $0 $50,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Notes: ICSP Munici al Sources Provincial I Federal I Other I Long Term Estimated Annual Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Gas Tax Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs Trails - Surface Upgrades AT 6.20) 2 $50,000 $40,000 $10,000 Trails - Bridge Evaluation 1 $15,000 $15,000 Trails - Swing Gates Project 1 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $80,000 $15,000 $0 $50,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Notes: CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Recreation & Parks Department Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2017118 coded Notes: $90,000 $35,000 $25,000 $30,000 ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Gas Tax Government Government Sources Borrowing Trails - Surface Upgrades (AT 6.20) 2 $30,000 $30,000 Trails - Bridge Evaluation 1 $15,000 $15,000 Deep Cove Parking & Fishing Project 3 $25,000 $25,000 Gold River Park 3 1 $20,0001 $20,000 Notes: $90,000 $35,000 $25,000 $30,000 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Recreation & Parks Department Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2010/19 Funded ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Gas Tax Government Government Sources Borrowing Hawboldt Trail (AT 6.5) 3 $60,000 $60,000 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 201 5/1 6 - 2019120 Recreation & Parks Department Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2019/20 ended ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Gas Tax Government Government Sources Borrowing Hubbards Sidewalk to Trail Connection Design 3 $8,000 $8,000 Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget year 2016-17 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 2. Solid Waste Solid Waste Department Funded $41U,000 $470,000 ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Replace Bulldozer 1 $200,000 $200,000 Curbside inspection truck 1 $30,000 $30,000 excavator 1 $200,000 $200,000 truck one ton 1 $40,000 $40,000 $41U,000 $470,000 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 201 5/1 6 - 2019120 Solid Waste Department Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget year 2017-18 BV-------------------------------------------------------------- ICSP Munici al Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Cell site 4A 1 $3,045,000 $3,045,000 dump truck 1 $200,000 $200,000 $3,245,000 $3,245,000 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Solid Waste Department Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget year 2018-19 I I I IGSF' I I Municipal Sources I I�rovinclal I reaeral I utner I Lona I erm I Proiect Name I Cateraorvl Proiect I Total Estimated Costs I ODeratina I Reserves I Other I Government I Government I Sources I Borrowina I Road improvement compactor dumD truck $1,140,000 $1,1 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Solid Waste Department Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget year 2019-20 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Community Development Department 3. Community Development Category Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2016117 $460,000 $50,000 $330,000 $80,000 Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual Project Name Service Category Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs Highway 3 Streetscape Implementation Planning 3 $80,000 $80,000 Wayfinding Planning 2 $10,000 $10,000 Fire Services - Equipment Planning 1 $10,000 $10,000 ED -Industrial Park Development/Acquisition Planning 2 $300,000 $300,000 Vehicle Replacement Building Insepction 2 $40,000 $40,000 ED - Signage Planning 3 $20,0001 1 $20,000 $460,000 $50,000 $330,000 $80,000 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Community Development Department Category Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2017/18 $570,000 $10,000 $410,000 $150,000 $0 Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual Project Name Service Category Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs Highway 3 Streetscape Implementation Planning 3 $150,000 $150,000 Wayfinding Planning 2 $10,000 $10,000 Fire Services - Equipment Fire Services 2 $10,000 $10,000 ED - Signage Planning 3 $20,000 $20,000 ED -Industrial Park Development/Acquisition I Econ Dev 1 2 1 $300,0001 1 $300,000 Permit Tracking System I Planning 3 $80,0001 $80,000 $570,000 $10,000 $410,000 $150,000 $0 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2016/16 - 2019120 Community Development Department Category Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2018119 $490,000 $10,000 $330,000 $150,000 Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual Project Name Service Category Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs Highway 3 Streetscape Implementation Planning 3 $150,000 $150,000 Wayflnding Planning 2 $10,000 $10,000 Fire Services - Equipment Fire Services 2 $10,000 $10,000 ED - Signage Planning 3 $20,000 $20,000 ED -Industrial Park Development/Acquisition Econ Dev 2 $300,000 $300,000 $490,000 $10,000 $330,000 $150,000 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Community Development Department Category Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2019/20 $490,000 $10,000 $330,000 $150,000 Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Lono Term Estimated Annual Project Name Service Category Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs Highway 3 Streetscape Implementation Planning 3 $150,000 $150,000 Wayfinding Planning 2 $10,000 $10,000 Fire Services - Equipment Fire Services 2 $10,000 $10,000 ED - Signage Planning 3 $20,000 $20,000 ED -Industrial Park Development/Acquisition Econ Dev 2 $300,000 $300,000 $490,000 $10,000 $330,000 $150,000 Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2016/17 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Information Services Department 4. Information Services endedBv -------------------------------------------------------------- $87,500 $15,000 $72,500 ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing TRANSFER TO RESERVES 1 no $12,500 $12,500 HARDWARE UPGRADES 1 no $15,000 $15,000 VMWARE INFRASTRUCTURE 1 no $60,000 $60,000 $87,500 $15,000 $72,500 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019120 Information Services Department Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2017118 endedBv ---------------------------------------------------------------- ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing TRANSFER TO RESERVES 1 no $12,500 $12,500 HARDWARE UPGRADES 1 no $15,000 $15,000 $27,500 $27,500 Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2018/19 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Information Services Department < --------------------- -------------- --------------------------Funded Bv------------------------------------------------------------------- > ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing TRANSFER TO RESERVES 1 no $12,500 $12,500 HARDWARE UPGRADES 1 no $15,000 $15,000 $27,500 $27,500 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 Information Services Department Catergory Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2018/20 nded $87,500 $15,000 $72,500 ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing TRANSFER TO RESERVES 1 no $12,500 $12,500 HARDWARE UPGRADES 1 no $15,000 $15,000 VMWARE INFRASTRUCTURE 1 no $60,000 $60,000 $87,500 $15,000 $72,500 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN - PUBLIC WORKS Budget Year 2016-2017 S. Public Works REMEMBER TO ESCALATE ANY BUDGETS 81, per year REMEMBER TO FACTOR IN INCREASES BASED ON LEVEL OF ESTIMATE - ROM --> Class A estimate to virortmenzal unes.e€ vVansrewaier HaM Improvemen-ts.-.Phase 2 LIesign i Yes I .vim.. xu`u 525,004 Pro e�y c£z'? a''' ::'�.:; :'.;' ?iYr ,., .c'1 .3tt';_,�`�;3., _` `ce>.:. =zmsrL�� nann, S`; u,`€: c$.t+ ? cwsm eu '> - � � .: - Y`Y .' s'€_`>3t $S._e O 520,000 Erylro,memal Chester Basin VOWTPt^;rovemenss,Deco.mssior ;R€rae. ei-t'PSImprovements : i �7� PiotvCii°J�k �te'tY3 . . ., c.....'.: ° Wit"?':.'•. :'..: ? ... Sn: $2,00'. Property Various Truck Replacement - 3 (Jareds 2008) Purchase 1 Yes .. �. Environmental u Neal Ross 4' WTP imp vemer-f_s`Decommission, nr �R _ + .... z a ��=er4 . 'F0rtne= d River VNIester,v Sriori SchW Renovatfar;S ` X1,11atructi n ' ","T", :: Yes' :.:.� S75.Q�a'-57 E 46 :t =,s v4 i . [ u iP T ice: .:: Sidewalk - Duke Street phase 3 b Construcfion ? Yes 4 R Environ mantas Western Sham WWW Upgrades - UV & Bldg Up^rades Construction 1� Yes 94 3 1 ;: 0,000', $398A2- a398.124 S398J24.Y':.ks'wi..' Transportation Mill Cove Road Rehabilitation - Foxvood 'Construction, 1 Yes ; .. Envire ._ ental Various C...lecIio . S v _,em Cieanin &. Videoina -Blue Area Inspection Yes $27,50.0 �� 3.50 S13.750 .'-' a Inffta '.�Jik av3€`3: ..�: ....,.: ,.. .C_,�-_:ISF Yea .,. y,+;` ...: Environmental 4ad,_Us Collection Svst_rr, par A13vwsnce Eased or, .,,e.�I„ p'v ar! Plan n 2 Yes „5, i�FkY�mm—e[.a£ Avaersi2a' :':: :':.: "r-° iY: R �, '.- 2,..-e, ... .. .�: ,i ,...: .:' -fa. G>I:', .. � .-.. .. :.. .... :e ProDe€:v Ch_.,w IMunidaa! Office - Commitee Rio=^:; I I e f.pwty oven 4flCJtc: ... 11. ­Ui S_,!Ics -;iHt. X0 1MpTQ.eFRe .Yc€'a".a�;sia'la�t .se:� .. Yes Y6 .vim.. xu`u :e70..: Pro e�y Chester Basin I Retaining Wail Repairs GcnstrL>ti=an 3 Yes $S._e O 520,000 P2.z*�-s€S4' c , �F{i tufl�l%% ... :.. : i �7� PiotvCii°J�k �te'tY3 . . ., c.....'.: ° Wit"?':.'•. :'..: ? ... , ,�.. Yea.'' $2,00'. Property Various Truck Replacement - 3 (Jareds 2008) Purchase 1 Yes $37.600 53. 5i�0 Prcaew Wd5tarn`Shore " . 'F0rtne= d River VNIester,v Sriori SchW Renovatfar;S ` X1,11atructi n ' ","T", :: Yes' :.:.� S75.Q�a'-57 ;... .:. OCA Transportation Chester Sidewalk - Duke Street phase 3 b Construcfion 3 Yes 5212,427 _212,427 T`a.1sca1tatan .: Chesmrsin::' ':.Sid -aka irtirt _.::`.; ,:'.... ...... . �... '..": Constnic x' '..'i : 2: ... .. Yes:" ;: 0,000', Transportation Mill Cove Road Rehabilitation - Foxvood 'Construction, 1 Yes 5210,004 $210,000 REMEMBER TO ESCALATE ANY BUDGETS 8% per year Budget Year 2017-2018 REMEMBER TO FACTOR IN INCREASES BASED ON LEVEL OF ESTIMATE - ROM — Class A estimate CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN - PUBLIC WORKS Budget Year 2018-2019 REMEMBER TO ESCALATE ANY BUDGETS 8% per year REMEMBER TO FACTOR IN INCREASES BASED ON LEVEL OF ESTIMATE - ROM --> Class ,A estimate Project Description Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other I Long Term .. Environmental - Chester asteviater Plant h�* roetemehts - Phase 3 Design 9 Yes ' $20,000 $25,000 r .- � tr=- r �. :::� _z� isu,_'t'�.;�, s ,� t�t`�.. :. ., , . .,: ^ . ��� -� 'tea` >�. � '_ ._ ���� ,.� -:�.� �, �„ Y 'i7 �?�:�k4�1..,av��=`?�. ��� � �... a'�.-�>;?' x:3�. = a'a .,a. �—��`� � -� �r vE��-�C� Environmental Chester Basin WWTP lm;)rovements/Decrzm ission ngiReplacemei,=PS improvements Construction 1 Yes $981.:904 $327,300 $327:300 $327,300 LVNL V74 .: ,.. .o=: ":. . _: .. ... ...... .. . Environmental Nevi Ross Was T P im, rovemenlslDeco�r ;ission,n-_,;Replacement :t41:�". v,„.,,. ”` ..td:r i ,z b Ie P r� Environmental Western Shore ty`d't,TP Uocrades - Oxy er<atien.Au.omatiun Di esto=iCiartfier-Phase l Design 1 Yes $30.040 $30,000 � ,;;.. :, ,�' 3 .. fG'���e�=.,, "I'll cam., � .1r '._ c3;^t` �:: �1�..." 41g&300 � - i Environmental Varices Collection System Cle, ninq -.Green inspection Yes $23,400 $23,400 Er:S eiF'€r '€ ' ,�", 5 .�- :. :�.:i:..= ,: .€ ar: " . R s � « v :� f,06M,6n% C h. 's . `1 , Y _ 'Sf§.7u"u'- _ 55,E -ms so ErMrorn-erta! Various Collection System, Repair - Allowance ance based on videcin; program Planning 2 Yes $58.A00 $29:200 $29,204 � Env: ., .e1= :.:.€... < ., 777 ,. ?t . . . Property Chester Municipal Office- Committee Room Purchase 3 Yes $0 .,. €�.-<d:iT'`r-'amu"`?3 �:a .,. �r Prope ty Chaster P; nic oa! C e - nnex Demo, Property & BIdQ (Int & Ext) improvements Construction 2 Yes $21.604 $21,800 $21 i Aa&'CHRaie onoff -'r ;2e �# . 77777777777777 oro^ Chester Basin Retaining Wali R pairs grope` .:' .� 2 :., %.:,: =I % % . ,,., % Er P cti3 -� .Des ".�e Property Various %�, Truck Replacement -6 Enr2011 Purchase 2 Yes $39,000 3..9,004 "ropettv` 'Vst me5j i Fv. Si`.., -$ , 77% Transportation Chester Sidewalk - Chester Basin Construction 3 Yes $350,000 $350,044 Trasr crta; n::,:" ' Stern SE dry $20,000'.., 77-7 $2QGi}ti �. �.. Property Various Zeroturn Replacement Purchase 2 Yes 1 $13,000 $13,400 i REMEMBER TO ESCALATE ANY BUDGETS 8% per year Budget Year 2099-2020 REMEMBER TO FACTOR IN INCREASES BASED ON LEVEL OF ESTIMATE - ROM --> Class A estimate CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2016/17 - 2020/21 6. Wind Energy Projects Wind Energy Projects Category Must Do Should Do Could Do Budget Year - 2016/17 Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual Project Name Phase Category ICSP Project Total Est. Costs Operating I Reserves I Other I Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs Capital for KM 0 Chester Wind Farm 1 Planning/Design $500,000 Category Must Do Should Do Could Do Year - 2017/18 Project Name Phase Chester Wind Project 2 Construction ICSP CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2016/17 -2020/21 Wind Energy Projects Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Total Est. Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Governme $11,500,000 Term Estimated Annual owing Operating Costs S12.000.000 5550.000 Revenue to CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2016/17 - 2020/21 Wind Energy Projects Category Must Do 1 Should Do 2 Could Do 3 Budget Year - 2018119 Municipal Sources I Provincial Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual Project Name Phase Category ICSP Project Total Est. Costs Operating I Reserves I Other I Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs Mazer Meadows Turbine 2 Upgrades $50,000 $50,000 Total $50,000 $50,000 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Budget Years 2016/17 - 2020121 Wind Energy Projects Category Must Do 1 Should Do 2 Could Do 3 Budget Year - 2019/20 Municipal Sources Provincial I Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual Project Name Phase Category ICSP Project I Total Est. Costs I Operating I Reserves 7 Other Government I Government sources Borrowing Operating Costs Chester Wind Project 2 Repairs/Upgrades $65,000 $65,000 Total $65,000 $65,000 Pam --ra From: Denise Peterson-Rafuse MLA <denisepetersmla@bellaliant.com> Sent: Wednesday, August OS, 2015 4:54 PM To: 'M.E.Donovan'; rnacisasd@gov.ns.ca Cc: Gordon Tate; Pam Myra; Glen.Strang@novascotia.ca Subject: RE: Chester Hy#3 paved shoulder Good evening, thank You for send nae as copy of your ernail to Steve Maclsaac r(,,�garding th(,,a shoulders on Highway 4 3. 1 have been working with Steve for many year's moving toward active living lanes on as rnanV roads as possible in the COIIStitUency, It is always a good idea to have this conversation as early as possible, so that planning can take place with both municipal and provincial &ithorffies who are involved with act:ive living prograrnming. T r hese things often take a long tirrie to plan, so it is important that we corne tog(.Aher, and take the time to express our, opinion to the decision makers atmut these important iSSUes. Denise Hon, Denise Peterson-Rafuse, MLA Chester St,Margaret's 3794 Highway 3, Chester, NS, BOJ 1JO 902-279-3378 From: M.E.Donovan [maiIto:meliendonovan@gmail.com] Sent: August 5, 2015 3:17 PM To: macisasd@gov.ns.ca Cc: denisepetersmla@bellaliant.coni; Gordon Tate <gtate@chester.ca>; pmyra@chester.ca; Glen.Strang@novascotia.ca Subject: Chester Hy#3 paved shoulder Steve: I am writing to encourage consideration by TIR whenever the segment of the #3 that goes through Chester is repaved that paved shoulders be included in the project. As I understand it, the province currently has AT policies that encourage connectedness, especially connectedness to business centres. Currently using a bicycle or an electric wheelchair or stroller along this segment of the #3 is extremely difficult between the Chester trail where it hits the #3 near the old railroad station and the local stores - grocery/pharmacy/hardware etc - due to the narrowness of what is an extremely busy section of roadway, no sidewalk (admittedly an illegal option) and a virtually non-existent shoulder. On a number of occasions I have witnessed an elderly gentleman risking his life by using his electric wheelchair along this section of the #3 in the middle of the traveled way because he has no other option and clearly walking is not an option for him nor is taking an access -a -bus. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 stnartphone on the Rogers network. Municipality of the District of West Hants 76 Morison Drive, Windsor -West Hants Industrial Park P.O. Box 3000, Windsor, Nova Scotia BON 2T0 Tel: (902) 798-8391 Fax: (902) 798-8553 cop�)fir lu"" July 23, 2015 2 7 Ms. Pamela M. Myra wkwvied by Municipal Clerk Municipality of the District of Chester P.O. Box 369 Chester, INS BOJ UO Dear Ms. Myra: Re: Proposed Development Agreement —Quick As A Wink Theatre Society —to allow a community theatre on Wentworth Road in the Hamlet of Wentworth Creek Pursuant to Section 206(5) of the Municipal Government Act, enclosed please find Notice of Intent with respect to the above mentioned development agreement. Yours truly, Planning Staff L=m Municipality of West Hants Quick As A Wink Theatre Society Development Agreement NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Tuesday, August 11, 2015 7:00 pm West Hants Municipal Building 76 Morison Drive, Windsor, NS West Hants Council is holding a Public Hearing to receive written and verbal presentations from the public on a proposed community theatre on property located on Wentworth Road, in Wentworth Creek. The staff report and draft development agreement are available at the Planning office, 76 Morison Drive, Monday to Friday, 8:30am-4:30pm or at www.westhants.ca/planning.htm]. CALL US (902) 798-6900 EMAIL US planning@westhants.ca Or, behalf of the Shoreham Village Foundation we would like to thank you for being a Hole Sponsor for the 2015 Swing for Shoreham Golf Tournament. Your generosity has enabled us to purchase some much needed items for the Home and we are very grateful. +R„ Al NOVA SCOTIA Servi Ce Nova Scotia Office of the Minister PO Box 216, HaMax, Nou Scotim, (uiada BIJ M - 1plephmie 90) 424 Y)50 Fax 90), 1124 0581 - novmcotja.('� mmam­ Alyn Webber, Warden Municipality of the District of Chester 151 King Street PO Box 369 Chester, NS BOJ I JO Dear Mr. W bb*14 Thank you for your letter dated May 25th, 2015 requesting changes to Property Online Data Licensing Agreements; allowing municipalities to provide public access to Property Online. I certainly share your desire to provide clients with timely access to our records. We are currently exploring the viability of system enhancernents to allow casual users one time access to our data for a nominal fee. This will afford clients ease of access to our having to purchase a more costly monthly subscription. in the meantime, we continutw to provide in-person public access to Property Online at each of our 5 Regional Land Registration Offices in Sydney, Dartmouth, Amherst, Lawrencetown and Bridgewater. From: UN5K4Info <Dnfo@unam.ca> Sent: Monday, July 27'2Ol5S:52PK4 To: Tracy Verbeke Subject; NATIONAL DISASTER k1[TDSATD]N PROGRAM SUBMISSION TIMELINES FOR 2016-2017 PROUEcT5—ActionRequired: For Information Purposes Attachments: [onespodencetomunicipalities (year 2projects) RNALdocx;ATTOOOOl,htm TO: Mayors /Wardens, Councillors, All Units CC: Chief Administrative Offiuue/Clcrk-Treasorers,All Units RE: NATIONAL DISASTER MITIGATION PROGRAM SUBMISSION TIMELINES FOR 20162017 PROJECTS - I6ue-rriailbelow is fmmthe Bmugeocy ManagementOffice, an(] we've bcuuaskedtuforward the information on to the Membership: The Nova Scotia Emergency Management Office has been advised that Public Safety Canada has released the National Disaster Mitigation Program submission timelines for 2016-2017 projects. |nrecognition ufincreasing disaster risks and costs, the 2014federal budget earmarked $ZOOmillion over five years tm establish the National Disaster Mitigation Program (NDMP) as part of the Government's commitment to build safer and more resilient communities. The NDMP will address rising flood risks and costs, and build the foundation for informed mitigation investments that could reduce, or even negate, the effects of flood events in the future. The NDMP was established in April 2015 to reduce the impacts of natural disasters on Canadians by: • Focusing investments onsignificant, recurring flood risk and costs; and • Advancing work Lofacilitate private residential insurance for overland flooding. Provincial and territorial governments are the eligible recipients for funding under the NDMP. However, provincial and territorial authorities may collaborate with and redistribute funding to eligible entities, such as municipal or other local governments, public sector bodies, private sector bodies, band councils, international non-government organizations or any combination of these entities. To learn more about the National Disaster Mitigation Program, please visit the Public Safety Canada website - de August 't If YOU have any questions, or would like to discuss project options, please contact the Nova Scotia Emergency Management Office by email emo@novascotia.ca or by phone 1 (902) 424-5620. Ur"Ism 11honc: (902) 423--8331 Fax: (902) 4-25-5592 PLEASE NOTE: If you do not want to receive communications from UNSM, please e-mail Tracy Verbeke at tverbeke(it),unsin.ca, and you will be removed from the mailing list. Greetings, The Nova Scotia Emergency Management Office has been advised that Public Safety Canada has released the National Disaster Mitigation Program submission timelines for 2016-2017 projects. In recognition of increasing disaster risks and costs, the 2014 federal budget earmarked $200 million over five years to establish the National Disaster Mitigation Program (NDMP) as part of the Government's cornmitment to build safer and more resilient communities. The NDMP will address rising flood risks and costs, and build the foundation for informed mitigation investments that could reduce, or even negate, the effects of flood events in the future. The NDMP was established in April 2015 to reduce the impacts of natural disasters on Canadians by: • Focusing investments onsignificant, recurring flood risk and costs; and • Advancing work to facilitate private residential insurance for overland flooding. Provincial and territorial governments are the eligible recipients for funding under the NDMP. However, provincial and territorial authorities may collaborate with and redistribute funding to eligible entities, such as municipal or other local emLeTjiwants alic ii t fdipq- cfumrik- Tm|eannmmveobouttheNatk)na|DisasterK4biga1ionPrognam,pheasevisbthePub|icSafetvCanada vvebsite- August 1". 2015: Call for 2016-2017 proposals October 8 th , 2015: Individual project proposal submission deadline to Emergency Management Office October 311t, 2015: Individual project proposal submission deadline to Public Safety Canada November 111 — 30th , 2015: Public Safety Canada assessment of proposals February — March 2016: Finalize negotiation and signature contribution agreements ASAP: Funding Flows MUNICIPALITY OF THE 6.1 DISTRICT OF CHESTER REQUEST FOR DECISION REPORT TO Municipal Council SUBMITTED BY Tara Maguire, Community Development Director DATE August 4, 2015 SUBJECT Plan Review - Facilitator Scope of Work ORIGIN Procurement Process - T 2014-013 & Council Motion 2014-541 CURRENT SITUATION: We are about to enter the next phase of engagement for the plan review process. The process for engagement has been an evolutionary one, but staff feels that the input being received will lead to better decisions, and results that are reflective of what is needed and wanted in our communities. As the scope of the community engagement has expanded after extensive discussion with CPAC and Council, our public engagement facilitator has requested an adjustment to their fees. RECOMMENDATION: To approve an additional $10,500 plus HST to have Third Sector Enhancement Ltd. facilitate a third round of community engagement meetings and prepare a summary report. BACKGROUND: In November 2014, Council awarded the contract for Facilitation and Delivery of a Public Engagement Program to Third Sector Enhancement Ltd. (Third Sector) in the amount of $38,500 plus HST. The contract with Third Sector was based on two phases. Phase One was scheduled from Fall 2014 -Spring 2015 and involved facilitation of four community-based forums (Aspotogan, Chester, New Ross, Western Shore), as well as set of five theme -based focus groups with specific stakeholder involvement. The second phase was planned for Spring 2016 and involved another four information sessions, in open house format, in Chester, Aspotogan, New Ross, and Western Shore. As the plan review has evolved, the public consultation has grown significantly. The first phase of engagement went from four community sessions to eight. The focus groups went from five topics to eight topics (however, they were multiple sessions held the same evening) and expanded to include the public and not just stakeholders. So far, Third Sector has accommodated this and absorbed any additional costs. Phase 2 (Spring 2016) has been discussed with Third Sector, and they anticipate absorbing the costs of an additional 4 sessions for that round as well. DISCUSSION: Some concern was heard during the sessions that the summer residents would not be given an opportunity to have input. In response, an additional round of summer/fall engagement sessions in each District was added. This new phase will start in Chester Village on August 19 and will end early in November 2015. The sessions will consist of a staff -led open house/drop in portion during the morning and afternoon. In the evening, there will be a facilitator -led session with some hands-on engagement activities. The sessions are intended to present information and receive feedback on the draft goals and approach. We will also be seeking some input on some of the key questions that will help to inform CPAC during the next phase of the plan review. The use of a facilitator during these sessions provides an objective, impartial, third party view. Whether by perception, or in reality, their involvement lends some degree of assurance and credibility that what is being said in the meetings is the same message that is received by Council and CPAC. This additional amount would enable Third Sector to facilitate all three rounds of public engagement and would provide consistency in reporting. Staff would facilitate the formal engagement process once it goes to public hearing. The requested amount of $10,500 is consistent with the costs presented in the original contract for each phase of engagement. The original contract had the following price structure: Phase One Workplan Development with CPAC: $3,400 Community and Sector forums and formative report $15,500 Survey design, implementation and analysis $3,500 Preparation of formative report #2 and summative report phase 1 $5,600 Total Phase 1 $28,000 Phase Two Community forums $7,600 Final report preparation and presentation $3,200 Total Phase Two $10,500 The contract broke down payment based on the following schedule: Upon acceptance of workplan, expected shortly after initiation meeting: 25% of contract value Upon submission of draft strategy: 40% of contract value Upon submission and acceptance of final strategy: 35% of contract value Accordingly, only the 35% of the contract is outstanding and will be included in the 2016-17 budget. If approved, it is recommended the additional, unbudgeted amount of $10,500, be paid to the consultants once a report on the fall 2015 round of engagement is received and accepted by CPAC. 1 Policy: n/a 2 Financial/Budgetary: This is an unbudgeted expense that would be charged to the Plan Review account. 3 Environmental: n/a 4 Strategic Plan: The following Goals of the Strategic Plan would support this recommendation: • Continually improve public satisfaction with municipal services; • Strengthen and support environmental, cultural, and social resources; • Continually reinforce the positive image of the Municipality through leadership in public engagement and communication 5 Work Program Implications If not approved, staff would need to lead the engagement sessions and would have to review the workplan for possible impact. Staff would need to spend considerable additional time preparing for the evening sessions and would need to prepare the summary report. ATTACHMENTS: n/a OPTIONS: 1. Approve the unbudgeted change request to the consulting services agreement with Third Sector Enhancements in the amount of $10,500 to be paid upon receipt and acceptance of the consultant's report by CPAC. 2. Deny the request for the change request to the consulting services agreement and direct staff to review the work program implications. Prepared BY Tara Maguire, CDD Director Date 8/6/2015 Reviewed BY Date Authorized BY Date MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER REQUEST FOR DECISION 30 REPORT TO: Tammy Wilson, CAO SUBMITTED BY: Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner DATE: 30 July 2015 SUBJECT: Applications for alteration to Municipal Heritage Properties ORIGIN: Village Area Advisory Committee and Municipal Area Advisory Committee comments (solicited) CURRENT SITUATION: Approval of Council is required to permit minor alterations to two Municipal Heritage Properties. One property is located at 14 Main Street in Chester Village. The other property is located at 5343 Highway 3 in Chester Basin. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the following: (1) Installation of two 2ft. x 4 ft. (approx.) skylights, one on each slope, of the roof of the Municipal Heritage Property located at 14 Main Street, Chester Village, as proposed. (2) Demolition of an existing rear shed addition of the Municipal Heritage Property located at 5343 Highway 3, Chester Basin, and replacement with an addition of similar proportion, as proposed. BACKGROUND: (1) 14 Main Street, Chester Village, constructed c. 1881, is the former Methodist Church, which later became a private residence. It has undergone a number of alterations. The owners wish to bring more light into the main living area by adding two skylights. (2) 5343 Highway 3, Chester Basin, is a private residence with two main parts dating back to 1860 and 1877. It has also undergone several alterations. The owner wishes to demolish the existing shed addition, which is in a dilapidated state, and replace it with a similar addition. DISCUSSION: Staff reports for each application are attached. Following analysis, staff considered both interventions to be minor and took the view that they would not adversely affect the heritage character of the properties. Accordingly, staff recommended support of the requests. As it has been difficult during this summer period to obtain a quorum for the Area Advisory Committees, and given that there is a thirty -day window to submit a recommendation to the Municipality, staff sought the opinion of committee members by e-mail. (1) For 14 Main Street, six members (a majority) responded by e-mail, considered the intervention to be minor, and supported the staff position. One member did not respond/could not be reached and one member disagreed with the staff position and indicated that there should be a discussion of the request. (2) For 5343 Highway 3, eight members (a majority) responded by e-mail, considered the intervention to be minor, and supported the staff position. One member did not respond/could not be reached. IMPLICATIONS: 1 Policy: While there are no policies on built heritage in the Municipal Planning Strategy, policy 4.10.12 of the Village Area Secondary Planning Strategy states: 4.10.12 To regard the Heritage Property By-law as the principal means of control of substantial alteration to registered Municipal Heritage Properties. 2 Financial/Budgetary: N/A 3 Environmental: N/A 4 Strategic Plan: Goal #4: The Municipality will strengthen and support environmental, cultural and social resources. 5 Work Program Implications No significant implications ATTACHMENTS: (1) Staff Report: 14 Main Street, Chester Village (2) Staff Report: 5343 Highway 3, Chester Basin OPTIONS: a) Approve one or both requests, with or without conditions; b) Deny one or both requests; c) Refer one or both requests back to the Area Advisory Committee(s) for discussion and recommendation. Prepared BY Bill DeGrace Date 30 July 2015 Reviewed BY Tara Maguire Date Authorized BY Date DATE: TO: FROM: DEPARTMENT: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER R E P O R T 17 July 2015 Carol Nauss, Chair Members of the Village Area Advisory Committee Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner Community Development 10 Main Street / Municipal Heritage Property 14 Main Street Village of Chester Steve Cook and Katie McRorie, owners of the property located at 14 Main Street in the Village of Chester (Map), have made application to install two skylights, one on each roof slope. The subject property, the former Methodist Church, is located in the traditional core of Chester Village, in an area that is predominantly residential (Photos, Figs. 1-3). Like many parts of the central village residential area, there is a mix of old and relatively new structures in this area. The property was registered as Municipal Heritage Property under the Heritage Property Act in 1991. Changes to the property include the addition of a set of casement windows on the rear elevation, new front -yard landscaping featuring a pergola, and a new roof installed in 1997. SIGNIFICANCE: The Canadian Historic Places Register listing for the Old Methodist Church Building indicates it was constructed c.1881 and remained in use as a place of worship until 1918. It is built in the Gothic Revival style as evidenced by the pointed windows, but also has elements common to the Greek Revival style. Character -defining elements include: ■ Large three -paned equilateral triangle window with hood; ■ 8 -over -8 lancet arched windows with three -paned equilateral triangle tops with hoods on the front elevation; ■ Three -bay facades of 6 -over -1 lancet arch windows with three -paned triangular tops and hoods on the side elevations; ■ Main entrance on the gabled end; ■ Heavily -decorated simple return eaves; ■ Corner boards styled as Greek pilasters with small capitals. APPLICATION DETAILS: The applicants wish to place skylights on the either side of the roof in order to bring more natural light into the main living area. The location and size (2feet x four feet) is shown schematically in Fig. 4. REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: In the Heritage Property Act, "substantial alteration" means any action that affects or alters the character -defining elements of a property. "character -defining elements" means the materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings that contribute to heritage value and that must be sustained in order to preserve heritage value. "heritage value" means the aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or significance for past, present or future generations and embodied in character- defining materials, forms, locations, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings. The Municipality's "Preserving our Heritage Properties" guide contains principles and guidelines. The basic principles of: respect for historic character, maintenance and repair over replacement (when possible), compatibility of use, authenticity and integrity, apply to all registered historic properties. At the same time, the need to comply with the Building Code and other life safety codes is recognized. When it comes to modern interventions like skylights and solar panels, the guidelines indicate that they should be placed so as not to adversely affect the building's character -defining elements. Moreover, they should be installed in such a way that if they were removed in the future, the historical integrity of the building would not be impaired. The Municipal guide is currently being updated to reflect the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. These national standards have been adopted by provinces and territories including Nova Scotia. The national standards recommend selecting appropriate rooftop service equipment which is as inconspicuous as possible and respects the building's heritage value. DISCUSSION: Staff would suggest that, while the proposed intervention is an added feature, it is minor in nature and does not change the roof slope or overall character of the building. Moreover, if the skylights were ever removed in the future, the integrity of the building would not be impaired. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application by Steve Cook and Katie McRorie to install two skylights, one on each roof slope, at 14 Main Street, be recommended to Council for approval. Submitted by: Bill DeGrace, MCIP, LPP Senior Planner 3925 96 169 I88 165 47 IS 7 2411 243,1242 240 239237 , II .......... 235 232 3872 3930 ` 233 a 230 ' 227.„ 3884 a � 222 39 23910 Cil 3900 3888 3925 96 169 I88 165 47 3870 3868 35 3 145,. . ..... 144 S,•,•, p 3838 ��ghw ay 3 M- 3839 226 204 2021 MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER Rev.: Descripti : Date: Location Map: Heritage Alteration Application I CV -HP -0014; 14 Main St, Chester �q Civics �\ •••-• Road s 0 Lo ratiiu Map 14 Main St, Chester 2015/07/13 Scale: 1, 2.500 Water Prom Date: 2015/07/13 ., a,e •„,G„a.v,�, so,o„.m Ti Dare: it /a 25 0 50 .IProperties Dace Printed: 2015/07/13 PID cnassircariinu:ee400-zo A'oject ID: n/a Metres Status: iso 7E o iso 1111111111111111160093507 Digital Finders and File Name: y „m .� CV Hl' 0014 Old MethidistChu Feet "Maw Lucatiin” IS 7 3870 3868 35 3 145,. . ..... 144 S,•,•, p 3838 ��ghw ay 3 M- 3839 226 204 2021 MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER Rev.: Descripti : Date: Location Map: Heritage Alteration Application I CV -HP -0014; 14 Main St, Chester �q Civics �\ •••-• Road s 0 Lo ratiiu Map 14 Main St, Chester 2015/07/13 Scale: 1, 2.500 Water Prom Date: 2015/07/13 ., a,e •„,G„a.v,�, so,o„.m Ti Dare: it /a 25 0 50 .IProperties Dace Printed: 2015/07/13 PID cnassircariinu:ee400-zo A'oject ID: n/a Metres Status: iso 7E o iso 1111111111111111160093507 Digital Finders and File Name: y „m .� CV Hl' 0014 Old MethidistChu Feet "Maw Lucatiin” Figs. 10 and 20: Front elevation Fig. 3 Rear and west elevations Fig. 4: West roof slope showing skylight DATE: TO: FROM: DEPARTMENT: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER R E P O R T 23 July 2015 Mary Ellen Clancey, Chair Members of the Municipal Area Advisory Committee Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner Community Development 5343 Highway 3, Chester Basin / Municipal Heritage Property 5343 Hwy 3 Chester Basin Rodney Redden, owner of 5343 No. 3 Highway in Chester Basin (Map), has made application to demolish a dilapidated rear enclosed porch and replace it with a new enclosed porch of generally similar appearance and dimension. The subject property, known as "Shady Rest", is located in the heart of Chester Basin in an area that is predominantly residential but contains some commercial uses nearby (Photos, Figs. 1-4). It was registered as a Municipal Heritage Property under the Heritage Property Act in 1992. Over the years, this building has undergone many changes as demonstrated in a picture supplied by the owner (Fig. S). They include construction of a taller, 21/z storey addition (apparently for a second family), enclosure of the front porch, removal of eaves and gable trim, insertion of picture and slider windows in the 1960s (later replaced with a bay window and casement windows in 1997), and a new roof in 2006. SIGNIFICANCE: The inventory site form for this building indicates that the original building is believed to have been constructed c. 1860, while the west -side addition appeared c. 1877. While the file does not contain a written set of character -defining elements, photographic evidence clearly places this building within the large family of Lunenburg County dwellings that are a vernacular response to the Gothic Revival style. Typical of this building type are the symmetrical front elevation, storey -and -half height, central dormer with pointed dormer window, and steeply -pitched roof. The later addition repeats the steeply -pitched roof in a taller form with predominantly six -over -six sash windows. The building sits on a manicured lawn, set back from the main road. There is an accessory structure (garage) on the same lot. APPLICATION DETAILS: The rear elevation of the house contains a shed -roofed enclosed rear porch. Constructed sometime in the 1960s/70s, this structure is rudimentary in nature and has outlived its useful life. The owner wishes to remove it and replace it with a new enclosed porch. The basic plan is shown in the attached sketches provided by the contractor (Figs. 6-7). This structure would be faced in wood shingles, with a central entry. Rather than the screened and boarded -up openings of the current structure, the applicant is proposing to use vinyl casement windows and a central metal door with features that mimic a wood -paneled door. REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: In the Heritage Property Act, "substantial alteration" means any action that affects or alters the character -defining elements of a property. "character -defining elements" means the materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings that contribute to heritage value and that must be sustained in order to preserve heritage value. "heritage value" means the aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or significance for past, present or future generations and embodied in character- defining materials, forms, locations, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings. The Municipality's "Preserving our Heritage Properties" guide contains principles and guidelines. The basic principles of: respect for historic character, maintenance and repair over replacement (when possible), compatibility of use, authenticity and integrity apply to all registered historic properties. At the same time, the need to comply with the Building Code and other life safety codes is recognized. In addition, Council Policy P-46, adopted in 2004, permits owners of heritage properties to use modern replacement materials for windows and doors "if they match the original size and frame of the opening, width of the trim, style and design of the original windows/doors that are being replaced." The Municipal guide is currently being updated to reflect the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. The national standards have been adopted by provinces and territories including Nova Scotia. The most relevant standard in this instance is: "Conserve the heritage value and character -defining elements when creating any new additions to an historic place or any related new construction. Make new work physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to and distinguishable from the historic place." DISCUSSION: Staff would submit that the proposed replacement rear porch should be a product of its own time and need not incorporate the heritage features of the main dwelling, such as window and door trim. However compatibility with the original structure is important, and to this end staff notes the continuation of the use of wood shingle siding which is appropriate, and the use of windows which are of an appropriate scale and proportion. Moreover, the addition is clearly intended to be a minor element in the overall structure. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application by Rodney Redden to demolish and replace a rear enclosed porch be recommended to Council for approval. Submitted by: Bill DeGrace, MCIP, LPP Senior Planner MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER He" Descripti— Date: CM-HP-5343: Location Map 5343 Highway 3, Chester Basin Civics 0 1 Le cativo Map 5343 Highway3 2015/07/06 — Road s From Date: 2015/07/06 Scale: 1,3,000 Water Date Printed: „/a aceern,cea.zms/m/os so 25 0 50 1.IProperties classificanun#.66400-20 "�"•` A0°'."" Metres PID Pi jectID:„/a sews: exists loo 0 200 60096518 1),g,,,]is d F.11 NI.— v a.. _ aa�in Feet Figs. 10 and 20: Front elevation Figs. 30 and 40: Existing rear porch Fig. 5: 5343 Highway 3 c. 1910 m Fig. 6: Rear porch end view tt Fig 7: Rear porch side view -�I�:Iii IL el�