HomeMy Public PortalAbout2015-08-13_Council Public Agenda PackageMUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER
CHESTER MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 8AS a.m.
AGENDA
1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER.
2. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING:
2.1 Council - Thursday, July 30, 2015
3. MATTERS ARISING:
3.1 Report from Director of Finance regarding the following:
a) Budget to Actual Results to June 30th -Operating Account.
b) Budget Information Subsequent to Approval.
c) Capital Forecast Report and Debt Service Ratio.
d) Capital Investment Plans:
1. Recreation and Parks
2. Solid Waste
3. Community Development
4. Information Services
S. Public Works
6. Wind Projects
4. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
4.1 Citizens Planning Advisory Committee - Monday, July 27, 2015 - Warden Webber
4.2 Audit & Budget Committee - Thursday, July 30,201S - Warden Webber
4.3 Any other Committee Reports.
5. CORRESPONDENCE:
5.1 Email from Hon. Denise Peterson-Rafuse, MLA dated August 5, 2015 in response to an email sent
from M. E. Donovan regarding Chester Highway 3 paved shoulder.
5.2 Municipality of the District of West Hants dated July 23, 2015 regarding Notice of Public Hearing -
Proposed Development Agreement - Quick As A Wink Theatre Society - to allow a community
theatre on Wentworth Road in the Hamlet of Wentworth Creek.
5.3 Note of Thanks from Shoreham Village Foundation date August 6, 2015 regarding Council Grant for
Sponsorship of a Hole for the 2015 Swing for Shoreham Golf Tournament.
5.4 Letter of response from Minister of Service Nova Scotia dated July 23, 2015 regarding changes to
Property Online Data Licensing Agreements; allowing municipalities to provide public access to
Property Online.
5.5 Email from UNSM dated July 27, 2015 regarding information sent from the Emergency Management
Office in regard to National Disaster Mitigation Program Submission Timelines for 2016-2017
Projects.
Pagel of 2
6. NEW BUSINESS:
6.1 Request for Decision from Tara Maguire, Director of Community Development dated August 4, 2015
regarding Plan Review - Facilitator Scope of Work.
6.2 Request for Decision from Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner dated July 30, 2015 regarding Applications
for alteration to Municipal Heritage Properties located at 14 Main Street in Chester Village and
5343 Highway 3 in Chester Basin.
7. ADJOURNMENT.
Page 2 of 2
Municipality of the District of Chester
Income Statement - Actual vs. Budget
July 30, 2016
2015-2016
2015-2016
2015-2016
Protective Services:
ACTUAL
BUDGET
VARIANCE
FORECAST
REVENUE (Page I of 2)
June 30th, 2015
TOTAL
$
%
MARCH 31, 2016
Taxes - Assessable Property
Fire Protection - Islands
5,714
11,768
6,054
49%
Residential
$4,757,881
$9,429,272
$4,671,391
50%
$9,429,272
Commercial
712,683
1,384,864
672,181
51%
1,384,864
Resource
145,571
293,197
147,626
50%
293,197
Non -Profit Acreage
2,076
4,153
2,077
50%
4,153
Forest Lands (-50,000)
13,723
27,439
13,716
50%
27,439
Forest Lands (+50,000)
Streetlights
8,590
4,295
50%
8,590
$131,810
$5,636,229
$11,147,515
$5,511,286--91-0/;
39,223
-$11,147,515
Area Rates:
Protective Services:
Fire Protection - Districts 1,3&7
$132,012
$262,141
$130,129
50%
$262,141
Fire Protection - Islands
5,714
11,768
6,054
49%
11,768
Fire Protection - Forest Land
660
1,312
652
50%
1,312
Fire Protection - Hydrants
12,045
24,091
'12,046
50%
24,091
Fire Protection - Fire/Village Commissions
766,668
1,516,072
749,404
51%
$917,099
$1,815,384
$898,285
51%
--l-15,16,072
$1,815,384
Transportation Services:
Streetlights
$75,230
$'13'1,810
$56,580
57%
$131,810
Private Road Maintenance
42,791
82,014
39,223
52%
88,892
Endeavour Avenue
'18,510
37,245
18,735
50%
37,245
$136,531
$251,069
$11114,538
-- 64-6/- -------7
6
Environmental Health Services:
. --
- - ---- --
Universal Sewer
$431,205
$830,513
$399,308
52%
$830,513
Solid Waste Collection and Disposal --------
$730,921
$1,375,879
$644,958
53%
$1,375,879
Mill Cove - Private Wells
$17,700
$35,400
$17,700
50%
$35,400
ACES School - Sprinkler System
$0
$9,477
$9,477
0%
$8477
Taxes Based on Business Revenue:
Allant Corporation
$49,128
$50,000
$872
98%
$50,000
NIS Power Corporation
22,237
22,237
0
100%
22,237
NIS Power HST Rebate
0
------$-122,237
50,000
50,000
0%
50,000
$50,872
58%
$122,237
Other Taxes:
Deed Transfer Tax
$162,898
$800,000
$637,102
20%
$800,000
Wind Farm Developer Tax
0
250,000
250,000
0%
250,000
Change in Use
-$182,898
0
0
0
-0
-$1,050,000
$887,10216a/,
-$1-,050,000
Grants in Lieu of Taxes:
Federal Government and Agencies
$0
$61,842
$61,842
0%
$61,842
Provincial Government and Agencies
0
95,494
95,494
0%
95,494
$0
$157,336
$157,336
0%
$157,336
SUBTOTAL
$8,103,948
$16,794,810
$8,690,862
---- - ------ -
48%
- ------
$16,801,688
Other Revenues from Own Sources:
Municipality of the District of Chester
$24,925,138
$15,264,758 39%
$255149,738
Income Statement - Actual vs. Budget
Administration Services
$37,657
$158,800
2015-2016
2015-2016
$158,800
Transportation Services
2015.2016
7,432
ACTUAL
BUDGET
VARIANCE
Building Inspection Services
FORECAST
REVENUE (Page 2 of 2)
June 30th, 2015
TOTAL
$
%
MARCH 31, 2016
Set -vices Provided Other Governments/Agencies:
1,484
20%
1,850
Sewer Hookup Services
90
Wind Turbine COMFIT - NS Power
$132,048
$719,650
$587,602
'18%
$7,19,650
Solid Waste and Disposal Fees
882,952
2,687,807
1,804,855
33%
2,687,807
Planning, Fire Insp, Build Insp, REMO Fees
0
. . . .. .
" " I
76,908
0%
"; 6i,405
Fire Commission Insurance Prerniurns
0
67,000
67,000
0%
67,000
Animal Control Fees
2,750
33,000
30,250
8%
$386,700
$8_81,583_
$1,017,750
$3,584,365
$2,566,615
28%
__33,000
$3,574,952
Other Revenues from Own Sources:
$9,660,380
$24,925,138
$15,264,758 39%
$255149,738
EXTRAORDINARY OR SPECIAL REVENUE
Administration Services
$37,657
$158,800
$121,143
24%
$158,800
Transportation Services
7,702
7,432
-270
104%
7,702
Building Inspection Services
375
15,000
14,625
3%
15,000
Animal Control Services
366
1,850
1,484
20%
1,850
Sewer Hookup Services
90
0
-90
200
Solid Waste and Disposal Services
302,924
564,251
261,327
54%
564,251
Planning Services
610
god
16,290
4%
16,900
Industrial Park Lease Fees
1,250
5,000
3,750
25%
5,000
Recreation & Culture Services
35,726
112,35076,624
-----$494,883
32%
112,350
$386,700
$8_81,583_
44%
$882,053
Unconditional Transfers:
Federal Government
$0
$1,300
$1,300
0%
$1,300
Provincial Government
6,699
11,080
4,381
60%
11,080
Other Local Govern ment/Agen cles0
0
0
0
$6,699
$12,380
$5,681
54%
$12,380
Conditional Transfers:
Federal Government
$0
$1,208,667
$1,208,667
0%
$1,208,667
Provincial Government
84,979
958,389
873,410
9%
1,078,389
Other Local Govern ment/Agencies
60,304
150,665
100,361
33%
247,330
$2,3_17,721
-$2,162,438
6%
$2,534,386
Other:
Transfer, Prior Year's Surplus
$0
$33,639
$33,639
0%
$33,639
Transfer From Own Funds
10,000
1,300,640
_____1,334,279
1,290,640
1%
1,310,640
$10,000
$1,324,279
1 5/6_
$1,344,279
SUBTOTAL
$9,660,380
$24,925,138
$15,264,758 39%
$255149,738
EXTRAORDINARY OR SPECIAL REVENUE
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL REVENUES
$9,660,380
$24,925,138
$15,264,758 39%
$25,149,738
Warden, Council & Committee:
Municipality of the District of Chester
Income Statement - Actual vs. Budget
JL11Y 30, 2015
2015-2016 20152016 2015.2016
Council/Committee Remuneration
ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE FORECAST
EXPENDITURES (Page 1 of 4)
June 30th, 2015 TOTAL $ MARCH 31, 2016
General Government Services:
$161,560
Warden, Council & Committee:
Council/Committee Remuneration
$41,429
$161,560
$120,131
26%
$161,560
Administrative Expenses
24,203
74,789
50,586
32%
74,789
Grants to Organizations
24,842
200,500
175,658
12%
210,500
Elections and Plebiscites
0
-$90,-474 ------$4-51,849
15,000
15,000
0%
15,000
$361,375
20%
$461,849
CAO/Clerk Administration:
Salaries
$80,783
$362,742
$281,059
22%
$362,742
Administration Expenses
23,235
125,800
102,565
18%
125,800
Town Crier
0
1,000
1,000
0%
1,000
Surveys/Appraisals
0
1,500
1,500
0%
1,500
Communications
1,666
23,000
21,334
7%
23,000
Capital from Revenue Projects
0
0
0
0
$105,684
$514,042
$408,358
21%
$514,042
Finance/Tax Administration:
Salaries
$75,191
$314,922
$239,731
24%
$314,922
Administration Expenses
81,042
215,736
134,694
38%
215,736
Property Tax Administration
117,900
280,829
162,929
42%
280,829
Assessment Recovery Costs
85,366
341,463
256,097
25%
341,463
Capital from Revenue Projects
0
0
0
0
Depreciation
0
23,513
23,513
0%
23,513
$359,499
$1,176,463
$816,964
31%
$1,176,46-3
information Services:
Salaries
$45,550
$205,965
$160,415
22%
$205,965
Administration Expenses
80,721
249,104
168,383
32%
249,104
Capital from Revenue Projects
0
60,140
50,140
0%
50,140
Debt Charges
16,470
19,483
3,013
85%
19,483
Depreciation
0
66,172
66,172
0%
66.172
$142,741
$590,864
$448,123
24%
$590,864
Municipal Property:
Salaries
$28,484
$83,950
$55,466
34%
$83,950
Administrative Expenses
20,507
40,420
19,913
51%
40,420
Property Services
31,771
128,780
97,009
25%
128,780
Wharves, Boat Launches, etc
1,997
'16,300
14,303
12%
16,300
Community Development/Gardens
402
17,500
17,098
2%
17,500
Capital from Revenue Projects
1,356
308,600
307,144
0%
308,500
Depreciation
0
10,239
10,239
0%
10,239
$84,517
$605,689
$521,172
14%
$605,689
Public Works:
Salaries
$39,232
$147,960
$108,728
27%
$147,960
Administrative Expenses
17,246
92,000
74,764
19%
92,000
Sprinkler/Fire Mill Cove
8,394
72,610
64,216
12%
72,610
Capital from Revenue Projects
0
0
0
0
Depreciation
0
14,40614,406
0%
14,406 1
$64,872-$326,976
$262,104
20%
$326,976
SUBTOTAL
$847,787
$3,665,883
- --- - --------
$2,818,096
23%
$35675,883
2015-2016
2015-2016
2015.2016
ACTUAL
BUDGET
VARIANCE
FORECAST
EXPENDITURES (Page 2 of4)
June 30th, 2015
TOTAL
$
%
MARCH 31, 2016
Protective Services:
Police Services
$0
$1,682,931
$1,682,931
0%
$1,682,931
Correction Services
59,110
236,441
177,331
25%
236,441
Legal - Prosecution Services
0
5,000
5,000
0%
5,000
By-Law Enforcement
4,721
46,490
41,769
10%
46,491
Animal Control
5,630
70,480
64,850
8%
70,480
Emergency Measures
9,803
40,707
30,904
24%
41,003
$79,264
$2,082,049
$2,002,785
4%
$2,0_82_,346
Fire Services:
Fire Services - Salaries & Wages
$13,855
$51,831
$37,976
27%
$51,831
Fire Services. Administrative Expenses
6,214
61,235
55,021
'10%
61,235
Fire Services . Insurance
64,765
67,000
2,235
97%
67,000
Fire/Village Commissions
361,000
1,516,072
1,155,072
24%
1,516,072
Fire Contract - Districts 1, 3 & 7
61,000
260,104
199,104
23%
260,104
Fire Rescue Boat
2,000
11,768
9,768
17%
11,768
Capital from Revenue Projects
030,000
__t'1_,9_68,010
30,000
0%
30,000
$1,489,176
25%
$1,998,010
Building/Fire Inspection:
Building Salaries & Wages
$32,851
$166,127
$133,276
20%
$166,128
Building Administrative Expenses
9,690
65,098
55,408
15%
65,097
Fire Salaries & Wages
13,439
52,026
38,587
26%
52,026
Fire Administrative Expenses4,147
__$60,127
24,799
20,652
17%
24,799
$308,050
$247,923
20%
Transportation Services:
Roads & Streets:
Administration
$2,652
$28,010
$25,358
9%
$28,010
Provincial Road Maintenance Fee
44,904
179,614
134,710
25%
179,614
Municipal Roads
3,846
30,000
26,154
13%
30,000
Private Road Maintenance
84,972
78,210
-6,762
109%
78,210
Sidewalks/Crosswalks
5,017
87,000
81,983
6%
87,000
Streetlights
18,909
145,450
126,541
13%
145,450
Streetsigns
1,704
12,210
10,506
14%
12,210
Capital from Revenue Projects
0
210,000
210,000
0%
210,000
Short Term Borrowing
3,033
3,920
887
77%
3,920
Debt Charges
69,323
46,044
-23,279
151 1/c
46,044
Depreciation
0
211,175
211,175
0%
211,175
$234,3601,031,633
$797,273
23%
$1,031,6-3-3
Sewer Services:
Universal Sewer Salaries
$44,891
$217,180
$172,289
21%
$217,180
Universal Sewer Operating Expenses
45,404
324,540
279,136
'14%
324,540
Capital from Revenue Projects
9,259
1,814,834
1,805,575
1%
1,814,834
Debt Charges
34,520
51,549
17,029
67%
51,549
Depreciation
0
182,303
182,303
0%
182,303
$134,074
$2,590,407
$2,456,333
5%
$2,590,406
SUBTOTAL
$1,864,446
$11,676,032
$9,811,586
16%
$11,686,328
Landfill Salaries
2015-2016
2015-2016
$474,152
2015.2016
$608,716
ACTUAL
BUDGET
VARIANCE
FORECAST
EXPENDITURES (Page 3 of 4)
June 30th, 2015
TOTAL
$ %
MARCH 31, 2016
Solid Waste Collection/Disposal
0%
550,000
Landfill Capital from Revenue Projects
0
Waste Collection Salaries
$11,519
$49,838
$38,319 23%
$49,838
Waste Collection Operating Expenses
127,966
1,254,175
1,126,209 '10%
1,254,175
Depreciation
0
500
500 01Y0
500
1,158,904
......................
�tyu,w
- ---------- --------- -- - ------
$1,165,028 11%
$1,304,513
Landfill Salaries
$134,564
$608,716
$474,152
22%
$608,716
Landfill Operating Expenses
128,203
799,152
670,949
16%
799,152
Landfill Closure 2 Expenses
0
560,000
560,000
0%
550,000
Landfill Capital from Revenue Projects
0
0
0
23%
0
Landfill Debt Charges
911,351
1,182,829
271,478
77%
1,182,829
Depreciation
0
_--
1,158,904_
1,158,904
0%
1,158,904
Regional Housing Authority
$1,174,118
$4,299,601
$3,125,483
27%
$4,299,601
Recycling Salaries
$5,763
$23,307
$17,544
25%
$23,307
Recycling Operating Expenses
4,761
28,649
23,888
17%
28,649
Economic Development Capital from Revenue
$10,524
$51,956
$41,432
20%
120,000
Total Solid Waste Collection/Disposal
$1,324,127
$5,656,070
$4,331,943
23%
$5,656,070
Health & Wellness
$723
$7,000
$6,277
10%
$7,000
Occupational Health and Safety
392
10,000
9,608
4%
10,000
Regional Housing Authority
0
-$1,115
20,000
-$37,000
20,000
0%
20,000
----$3-7,000
0
114,000
114,000
$35,885
3%
Depreciation
Environmental Development Services:
Economic Development Salaries & Wages
$19,117
$79,790
$60,673
24%
$78,394
Economic Development Operating Expenses
7,245
141,225
133,980
5%
138,822
Economic Development Capital from Revenue
0
120,000
120,000
0%
120,000
SUBTOTAL
$26,362
$341,015
$314,653
8%
�337216
Planning Salaries & Wages
$99,404
$404,770
$305,366
25%
$404,770
Planning Operating Expenses
55,175
268,290
213,115
21%
269,290
Planning Capital from Revenue Projects
0
114,000
114,000
0%
114,000
Depreciation
0
17,812
17,812
0%
17,812
$154,579
$804,872
$650,293
19%
LQRDA/REN
$7,853
$45,794
$37,941
17%
$38,003
Tourism Development
$1,500
$43,000
$41,500
3%
$43,000
Total Environmental Development Services
$190,294
$1,234,681
$1,044,387
15%
$1,224,091
SUBTOTAL
$3,379,982
$18,603,783
$16,223,801
18%
$18,603,489
Appropriation to District School Board
2015-2016
2015-2016
$3,335,316
25%
2015-2016
Transfer to Own Reserves, Funds, Agencies
ACTUAL
BUDGET
VARIANCE
FORECAST
EXPENDITURES (Page 4 of 4)
June 30th, 2015
TOTAL
$ -
%
MARCH 31, 2016
Industrial Park Operating Expenses
$2,364
$23,653
$21,289
10%
$23,653
Industrial Park Capital from Revenue
0
10,000
10,000
0%
10,000
Depreciation
0
17,448
17,448
0%
'17,448
$2,364
$51,101
$48,737
5%
$51,101
Wind Power Operating Expenses
$16,133
$89,963
$73,830
18*%
$102,963
Wind Power Capital From Revenue
0
69,000
69,000
0%
69,000
Wind Power Debt Charges
253,143
331,157
78,014
76%
331,157
$269,276
$490,120
$220,844___
550/._
$503,120
Heritage Properties
$0
$500
$500
----------
0%
$500
----------
Recreation and Parks Services:
Recreation Salaries
$107,577
$387,835
$280,258
28%
$399,075
Recreation Grants to Organizations
3,450
38,000
34,550
9%
38,000
Recreation Operating Expenses
58,023
334,597
276,574
17%
323,357
Recreation Capital from Revenue Projects
1,000
289,000
288,000
0%
289,000
Recreation Debt Charges
34,481
40,988
6,507
84%
40,988
Depreciation
0
81,917
81,917
0%
81,917
$1,172,337
$967,806
17%
$1,172,337
Church Memorial Park
$0
$50,000
$50,000
0%
$50,000
Regional Library
$17,009
$69,056
$52,047
25%
$69,056
Appropriation to District School Board
$1,111,772
$4,447,088
$3,335,316
25%
$4,447,088
Transfer to Own Reserves, Funds, Agencies
$584,000
$1,603,623
$1,019,623
36%
$1,603,623
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
__f6_,56_8,934
___$2_6,487,608
$20,918,674
21°/p
-$26,500,314
1-477
July 15, 2015
M��
Administration
2015/16
mubsequamto
Fire/Village Commission
Budget
Budget
Municipal Properties
$10,239
821,058
New Ross
$.15/$100
$,17/100
Outside Fire Districts 1&a
$.07/$108
$.0648/$100
Outside Fire District 7
g.071./$180
$.0658/$100
Village Commission
g151.7/g108
$.1368/$100
Private Road Associations
$1,158,904
$1,294,432
Planning
Otter Point (deva|oped)
g488,00
$525�00
Otter Point (undcve|oped)
g80.00
g185.00
M��
Administration
g23,513
$23,153
Information Services
$66,172
$39,003
Municipal Properties
$10,239
821,058
Public Works
$14,406
$21,524
Transportation
$211,1/S
$241,61.0
Sewer Services
$182,303
g191,610
Waste Collection
$500
$422
Landfill
$1,158,904
$1,294,432
Planning
$17,812
$1.7'81.2
ECQPark
$17,448
$17,448
Wind Turbine
$O
$254,410
Recreation
$81,917
$91,371
Capital Budget Review - 2016/17 to 2019/20
R�aus� 4 20' S
Capital
Operating
Gas Tax ih"ind
Revenue
Recreation
Parkland
Landfill Close.
Equipment
Seaver Grants!Other
Fund from
Fund from
Fund from
Project Cost
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve
Funds
Operations
Arca Rate
BorrovAng
Balance March 31!16 (Estimated)
$?6,604
52, 55A,122
$1,423,178
$613,302
$42,000
$48.363
$4,295,304
$58,799
$158,933
2016-17
Recreation & Parks -Trails
$80,000
$50.N0
$15,40.0 CCHT Gran;
$15,0C'
Solid Waste - Heavy Equipment
$774;000
.774 000
Comm. Dev. - Stramscape, vehicle, signage
$160,000
$8a,n C
5101.000
$50'con
Comm. Dev. - Industrial Park
$300,000
$300,000
information Services - Hardware?Software
$75,044
$62,000
$1C,C04
Publie Works -Sewers
$2,272.371
$699,911
$43240
=S 02,498 * CAP,3CF
$111 21K
$560 n 4
Public Works -Municipal Properties
$235,600
$31,50'3
x_0,"40 Prvate
$•Cs.i00
$75,0013
Public Works - Roads & Sidewalks
$442,427
s"-22,427
$20,000 Area rate
Wind Project
$5001000
5500,000
TOTAL
$4,839,398
$0
$97,50
c1,252,327
$231000
eC
$0
$0
$0
$43,20-0
$907,498
8183,100
$111,250
$1,914,524
Cm„ buttons
$n
4350.000
057;,00,]
$1 0O.000
$0
$$0,10-N
S5_0"eo
$12,500.
$141,0,10
Operating Expendi`ures
SO
$50,0411
110
$i00'000
$0
$0
$0
$C
$0
irterest Eared
$50'0
$50,000
$20 COC
$12:0013
$51:,
-5500
S1018,0110_
-160C
$2.400
Balance M`. -arch 31117 (Estimated)
$47,100
$2,806,622
$3361;151
$11195,302
$42,500
$58,863
$41953,304
$71,809
$259,133
2017-18
Recreation & Parks - Trails & Park
$90,000
$30:100
$35,000
Solid Waste - Cell 4A & Equipment
$5,200,000
55.200,000
Comm. Dev. - Streetscape, permit system, signage
5270,000
$30,000
$154,00;;
$30,003
$'.0,400
Gomm. Dev. - Industrial Park
$300,060
$30C,0'v'0
Information Services - Hardware
$15,000
$15,000
Public Works - Sewers
$1,039,800
$180,800
$32409 PCAP
$145,600
$6sl'ne
Public Works - Municipal Properties
$378,600
$39,000
$89,600
S250;0^0C
Public Works - Roads & Sidewa'ks
$200,000
Si8o'000
$2C D"C'
Wind Project
$91,500,000
$11,55c,300
TOTAL
:18,993,400
$4
$134,0.00
$540'8eo
.330„00
$0
"a25,000
$0
30
$O
$32,400
$134,600
$165,E00
$17,631,000
Centrbutions
$G
$350,030
$510,00~
$1,000,000
$4
$10;000
5550,000
$12,500
$141,000
Operating Expenditures
$0
-50,030
0
$104,030
$0
$0
$0
SO
iMerest Earned
$50^:
a54.030
$20 +�00
$12.000
$500
$500
$105.000
8600
Balance March 31118 (Estimated)
$47,600
$3,022,622
$4103354
$1,777,302
$43,000
$44,363
$5,611,344
$84,999
$402,533
2018-19
Recreation & Parks - Trails
Solid Waste -Compactor & equipment
Comm. Dov. -Streetscape, signage
Comm. Dov. - industrial Park
Information Services - Hardware
Public Works - Sealers
Public Works - Municipal Properties
Public Works- Roads & Sidewalks
Wind Project
TOTAL
Cci t. b_tions
O,Peroflng Expenditures
Interest Earned
Balance rciarch 31119 (Estimated)
2019-20
Recreation & Parks -Trails
Solid Waste - Equipment
Comm. Dev, - Streetscape, signage
Comm. Dov. - Industrial Park
Information Services - HardwareiSoftware
Public Works - Severs
Public Works - Municipal Properties
Public Works - Roads & Sidewalks
Wind Project
TOTAL
Contributions
Op astir, Exp= d._res
Inurest Earned
Balance March 311120 (Estimated)
Capital
Operating
Gas Tax
Wind Revenue Recreation
Parkland Landfill Close. Equipment Sewer
Grants'Other
Fund from
Fund from
Fund from
Project Cesi Roserve
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve Reserve
Rzseno Reserae Reservz Reserve
Funds
Operafions
Arza Rate
Borro:yinq
$0
$50.610
$G
101,000
$1
$C,
$0
$0
$0
$60,000
$50.00:i
$o % !„0
$12.600
$5.^_•^
8x00
0 8. 0 0Q
$660
$2,406
$1,160,000
$31305,622
$245,051
$2,359,302
$43,500
$54,863
€6,268,304
$98,099
$ . ,1 M000
$190.Ooo
e1 - OQ•v'
$30.000
$1,212,300
$10,000
5210,900
$300,000
$300,100
$265,40�;t $37,x00 PCAP
$303,300
$46,000
$15,000
$ ° 5,u; :G
$20,000
$1,649,400
$195.30C
',245,700
$EKD.650
PCA. -,'BC Fund
$161:456
$357,K0
$112,400
$52,000
$40,490
K0.000
$370,000
$0
$3.56,000,
$360,903
c 30,000
$8,000
$0
$20,0110
060,006
$3,846,800 $0
$67,000
5755,300
S33C.000
$0
$0
80
SQ
..2^-5,700 $689,650
$0
$25,000
$5700x0
.v%0C
$0
L
$550,001
$ 2"nn
$1-^,:i6$35C0C
$0
$50.610
$G
101,000
$1
$C,
$0
$0
$0
$517-0
$50.00:i
S2- -00
$12.600
$5.^_•^
8x00
0 8. 0 0Q
$660
$2,406
$48.100
$31305,622
$245,051
$2,359,302
$43,500
$54,863
€6,268,304
$98,099
$300,233
58,000
$8,0nu
$25,000
$190,000
$150,000
nti,000
$300,000
$300,9c -o
$75.000
$15,000
$61,000
$1,212,300
5210,900
$265,40�;t $37,x00 PCAP
$303,300
$46,000
$20,000
$65,000
$$25198,600
$0
$55,006
$360,903
c 30,000
$8,000
$0
Sil
060,006
8265,466 $37,800
$0
$350,000
;.570,000
$1,000,006
$1,
$10,000
$550,03.0
$12,500
`141,000
$0
$50,000
$0
$100,030
$Q
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500
$50.004
$2001
00
S50C
^0,0
$1.0 9,0100
a600
$2.400
$48,600
$3,600,622
$474,151
$2,941,302
536,000
$65,363
$6,927,304
$51,199
$178,233
$100,400 $201,450 $1;457,300
S2 5, 000
$148,200 $550,000
$63,300 $200,006
$20101
$138,300 $168,200 $775,000
July 11, 2Uu
2015/16
L.o''.0 R: er E_ ld ng
Laald II Proiect5
Sever Projects
2016/17
Landfi l
Server Proecs
Wind Pan,
April 1, 2;16 April 1, 20'17 April 1, 2018 April 1, 208 April 1. 20229 Apr111,2321 Apr111,2022 Api!1,2023 Apr'11. 2624
Ma h 3',2997 Mardi 51.'018 March 31, 2619 V --cm 31. 2020 M -,,h 31, 2021 Match 31, 2022 March 31, 2023 Maroh 31, 2024 Ma, ch s'1, 2425
20 2552,000
2154,800
27,600
$=':606
$27,600
82;,600$27,63-0
1'J nd Park
$27,606 S27,500 u
$13,545
$^.eel'
$19,3
518,554
s1 ,383
$16,422
$ .`s6
_
�14,490 , 1 ,52. 512:555
5 .;551,800
$64,052
_3-.:360
61:1 ;Ko
$106,361
'. J , 0
-
$Y0 .3.60
$.4.105,2
$11:209
24,/67
$1a,613
$14,890
51 Y,"_'68
S T445v
,723
58,467
10 . SE8,666
525,000
$55,867
$58,867
$=8,86'
$382,375
$: _4,&c?$5g
867 $58,867 158,8E-,,
5'8,750
_.302
,210,6 ,
$18,543
516;483
,.1
$12,62
$�J,3G2 $&241 $6,181
$29,268 $251,363 $244,614 $237,865 $231,116 $224,367 $111,258 8103,232 $105,206
$7,4;00G
2154,800
$154,800
$154,803
$�2=,800
$154,800
1'J nd Park
=., $11;506 00
$13,545
$ _'7,090
$21,672
,254
110,8315
_v $357,300
2019/20
S93.' o
$640,524
$64,052
$64.6S-,
$64,052
$64,052
$64,052
$64,052
$.4.105,2
$11:209
$22.418
523 177
<,.. x,935
:15,693
$13,451
2 �2,"'09
58,467
S500,G00
525,000
$25,u0,
$201,250
$402,500
$382,375
2352,256
5342,125
5'8,750
$17,500
$`_ 5,625
5'-5175p
$14.77„
$I», C,:;0
$3,125
$12,25C
2017/18
$1 C41,U'C'G
+1,040,0'00
$1.3-4 0. c o,.
Seer Projects
10
1'J nd Park
=., $11;506 00
2018/19
$145,600
Landfall
5 $1,100,00.
Sewer Prcie_ts
_v $357,300
2019/20
S93.' o
Land 11 Equiperent
$25,000
Sewer Pr ojects
.,5 $750,3-60
20
$33,504 $310,861 8302,326 $293,791 5285,256 $276,721 $113,387 $110,270
$25,503 $306,736
$432
513,125
$297,785 $286,834 $279,884 $270,933
$5.600
$1 C41,U'C'G
+1,040,0'00
$1.3-4 0. c o,.
51.C)40,00.,
$1,340,000
$525
1,01,000
5182,00„
$145,600
109.200
Y$93,100
872,800
536,400
$24,500
$22,750
S93.' o
$^-"3,100
$0
$93,100
$93,100
$93,103
$._5,2'_3
532,585
$29,32'
$2^;68
522,810
$19,551
$16,293
5575,000
$575,000
$575,G00
5575,000
$575,000
5575,000
$201,250
$402,500
$382,375
2352,256
5342,125
$322,000
$301,875
$308,543
$2,325,185
$2,265,402
$2,2051618
$2,145,835
$2,086,051
$986,268
$226.600
522" ,000
$220,000
5220,000
$22G,000
$19,250
$33,506
sac soo
y 3,100
$15.400
$7,7+07
$25,730
s3=, -q -o
$;5,730
$$5,730
$35,730
$6,253512,566
1,255
$10,004
58,%54
/7,503
50
So
$:,
111
$G
$25,503 $306,736
$432
513,125
$297,785 $286,834 $279,884 $270,933
$5.600
$5,000
$5,004
$5 600
$875
$106
$525
..SO
$50,001-
SSo,oeo
$50,060
$56,000
$26,250
$24,500
$22,750
521,060
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
SO
$13,563 $82,125 $80,200 $78,275 $76,350
$29,268 $284,867 $864,017 $2,890,879 $3,110,607 $3,095,151 $2,902,849 $2,665,828 $1,549,026
Aug st 4, 2015 ,
Sbvth 690ej6tf ,t8k8u16 , added 1 fit,%
April 1, 2015
April 1. 2016
April 1, 2017
April 1, 2018
April 1, 2419
April 1, 2020
April 1, 2021
April 1, 2022
April 1, 2023
April 1, 20024
Summary
March 31, 2016
March 31, 2017
March 31, 2018
March 31, 2019
March 31, 2020
March 31, 2021
March 31, 2022
March 31, 2023
March 31, 2424
March 31, 2025
Annual Debt Service Charges (Current)
$1,720,274
$1,922,971
$1,612,459
$1,582,246
$1,431,408
$1,576,053
$312,386
$485,039
$519,789
5231,902
Annual Debt Service Charges iioroposed
$0
$29,2468
5284;86-1
$864.0117
52,890,879
$3,:10,607
$3,095,151
$2,902,849
$2,665,82'
51.,549,026
AnnnaiDebtServieeBuME,(Cnrrent+Proposed}
01,720,274
$1,952,239
$11897,326
$2,446;283
$4,372,287
$4,686;665
$3,907,537
$3,387,888
$3,185,617
$1,830,928
C, o Sou;ce R n --,K15r1 . Eudgat..;nc _ , cy 25. ,e .aKerl
. ares TP oa ,t: Eu_.ne a Olin,)
$16,637,475
9111,456 41�
517,903,07
518,977,458
519,451,894
$"9,935,192
$20,7136,647
.7,563
$21,47? 252
in Lieu
Usaxes
157,36
161,269
165,301
169,4434
173,670
178,611
182,462
187,02v
191,600
1-961491anls
Se -es Pc,,Jd'toOt-,orG-em-nts
2,855,940
3,141,534
3;220,072
3,542,080
,630,632
3,721,39!
3,8141432
3,909,793
4,007,538
6JC7,726
C-AFVFIT
719,650
',641
756,082
774984
794,359
814,218
854,573
855,438
376,824
898,744
.i nd Park Ra,---bia to Raail
-
4
0
��. �'0��
1,580217
1,610557
,641,%x79
1,672,996
1,705,117
1;737,556
Oir-e,R--e om0-Scurces
890,358
979,394
1,003,579
1,428,976
1,054,7C'.0
1,081,063
1.108,094
1,135,797
1,1641191
1,1 93,296
Subt�tai2
_,260,759
22,486,250
23,0"-8,407
25,580,5`_4
25,21:1,635
26,557,145
27,519,232
28,197,693
28,592,931
'9,605,366
-ess. Education Co--cct:cns &reusing Deficit
4,703,529
4,797,600
4,893,552
4;991,42-3
5,091.25=
5,193,076
5,296,938
5,402,876
5,510,934
5,621,=53
Toral Net Re-- From Own Souroes
16,557,230
17,688,651
18,154,855
20,589,092
21,119,784
21,664,069
22,222,295
22,794,817
23;381,997
23,984,213
Debt Service Ratios
Debt Service Burden to Cavan Source Revenue (Current)
10.39%
10.871
8.881
8.31%
7.58%
7.86%
3.95%
2.301
2.40%
1.271
oeletService Burden toOwn SourceRevenue (Current +Proposed)
110.39,0
11.04!
10.45%
11.88%
20,70%
21.63%
17.58%
14.86%
13.621
7.631
Sbvth 690ej6tf ,t8k8u16 , added 1 fit,%
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2016/17
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 1. Recreation and Parks
Recreation & Parks Department
endedBv---------------------------------------------------
$80,000 $15,000 $0 $50,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Notes:
ICSP
Munici al Sources Provincial I Federal I Other
I Long Term Estimated Annual
Project Name
Catergory
Project Total Estimated Costs
Operating Reserves Gas Tax Government Government Sources
Borrowing Operating Costs
Trails - Surface Upgrades AT 6.20)
2
$50,000
$40,000 $10,000
Trails - Bridge Evaluation
1
$15,000
$15,000
Trails - Swing Gates Project
1
$15,000
$10,000 $5,000
$80,000 $15,000 $0 $50,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Notes:
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Recreation & Parks Department
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2017118
coded
Notes: $90,000 $35,000 $25,000 $30,000
ICSP
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term
Project Name
Catergory Project
Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Gas Tax Government Government Sources Borrowing
Trails - Surface Upgrades (AT 6.20)
2
$30,000 $30,000
Trails - Bridge Evaluation
1
$15,000 $15,000
Deep Cove Parking & Fishing Project
3
$25,000 $25,000
Gold River Park
3
1 $20,0001 $20,000
Notes: $90,000 $35,000 $25,000 $30,000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Recreation & Parks Department
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2010/19
Funded
ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term
Project Name
Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Gas Tax Government Government Sources Borrowing
Hawboldt Trail (AT 6.5)
3 $60,000 $60,000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 201 5/1 6 - 2019120
Recreation & Parks Department
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2019/20
ended
ICSP
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term
Project Name
Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating
Reserves Gas Tax Government Government Sources Borrowing
Hubbards Sidewalk to Trail Connection Design
3 $8,000
$8,000
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget year 2016-17
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20 2. Solid Waste
Solid Waste Department
Funded
$41U,000 $470,000
ICSP
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term
Project Name
Catergory
Project Total Estimated Costs
Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing
Replace Bulldozer
1
$200,000
$200,000
Curbside inspection truck
1
$30,000
$30,000
excavator
1
$200,000
$200,000
truck one ton
1
$40,000
$40,000
$41U,000 $470,000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 201 5/1 6 - 2019120
Solid Waste Department
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget year 2017-18
BV--------------------------------------------------------------
ICSP Munici al Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term
Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing
Cell site 4A 1 $3,045,000 $3,045,000
dump truck 1 $200,000 $200,000
$3,245,000 $3,245,000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Solid Waste Department
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget year 2018-19
I I I IGSF' I I Municipal Sources I I�rovinclal I reaeral I utner I Lona I erm
I Proiect Name I Cateraorvl Proiect I Total Estimated Costs I ODeratina I Reserves I Other I Government I Government I Sources I Borrowina I
Road improvement
compactor
dumD truck
$1,140,000 $1,1
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Solid Waste Department
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget year 2019-20
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Community Development Department 3. Community Development
Category Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2016117
$460,000 $50,000 $330,000 $80,000
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual
Project Name
Service
Category Project Total Estimated Costs
Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs
Highway 3 Streetscape Implementation
Planning
3
$80,000
$80,000
Wayfinding
Planning
2
$10,000
$10,000
Fire Services - Equipment
Planning
1
$10,000
$10,000
ED -Industrial Park Development/Acquisition
Planning
2
$300,000
$300,000
Vehicle Replacement
Building Insepction
2
$40,000
$40,000
ED - Signage
Planning
3
$20,0001
1 $20,000
$460,000 $50,000 $330,000 $80,000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Community Development Department
Category Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2017/18
$570,000 $10,000 $410,000 $150,000 $0
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual
Project Name
Service
Category
Project Total Estimated Costs
Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs
Highway 3 Streetscape Implementation
Planning
3
$150,000
$150,000
Wayfinding
Planning
2
$10,000
$10,000
Fire Services - Equipment
Fire Services
2
$10,000
$10,000
ED - Signage
Planning
3
$20,000
$20,000
ED -Industrial Park Development/Acquisition
I Econ Dev
1 2
1 $300,0001
1 $300,000
Permit Tracking System
I Planning
3
$80,0001
$80,000
$570,000 $10,000 $410,000 $150,000 $0
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2016/16 - 2019120
Community Development Department
Category Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2018119
$490,000 $10,000 $330,000 $150,000
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual
Project Name
Service
Category Project Total Estimated Costs Operating
Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs
Highway 3 Streetscape Implementation
Planning
3 $150,000
$150,000
Wayflnding
Planning
2 $10,000
$10,000
Fire Services - Equipment
Fire Services
2 $10,000 $10,000
ED - Signage
Planning
3 $20,000
$20,000
ED -Industrial Park Development/Acquisition
Econ Dev
2 $300,000
$300,000
$490,000 $10,000 $330,000 $150,000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Community Development Department
Category Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2019/20
$490,000 $10,000 $330,000 $150,000
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Lono Term Estimated Annual
Project Name
Service
Category Project Total Estimated Costs Operating
Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs
Highway 3 Streetscape Implementation
Planning
3 $150,000
$150,000
Wayfinding
Planning
2 $10,000
$10,000
Fire Services - Equipment
Fire Services
2 $10,000
$10,000
ED - Signage
Planning
3 $20,000
$20,000
ED -Industrial Park Development/Acquisition
Econ Dev
2 $300,000
$300,000
$490,000 $10,000 $330,000 $150,000
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2016/17
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Information Services Department 4. Information Services
endedBv --------------------------------------------------------------
$87,500 $15,000 $72,500
ICSP
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term
Project Name Catergory
Project
Total Estimated Costs
Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing
TRANSFER TO RESERVES 1
no
$12,500
$12,500
HARDWARE UPGRADES 1
no
$15,000
$15,000
VMWARE INFRASTRUCTURE 1
no
$60,000
$60,000
$87,500 $15,000 $72,500
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019120
Information Services Department
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2017118
endedBv ----------------------------------------------------------------
ICSP Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term
Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing
TRANSFER TO RESERVES 1 no $12,500 $12,500
HARDWARE UPGRADES 1 no $15,000 $15,000
$27,500 $27,500
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2018/19
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Information Services Department
< --------------------- -------------- --------------------------Funded Bv------------------------------------------------------------------- >
ICSP
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term
Project Name Catergory Project Total Estimated Costs Operating
Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing
TRANSFER TO RESERVES 1 no $12,500
$12,500
HARDWARE UPGRADES 1 no $15,000
$15,000
$27,500 $27,500
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2015/16 - 2019/20
Information Services Department
Catergory Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2018/20
nded
$87,500 $15,000 $72,500
ICSP
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term
Project Name
Catergory
Project
Total Estimated Costs
Operating Reserves Other Government Government Sources Borrowing
TRANSFER TO RESERVES
1
no
$12,500
$12,500
HARDWARE UPGRADES
1
no
$15,000
$15,000
VMWARE INFRASTRUCTURE
1
no
$60,000
$60,000
$87,500 $15,000 $72,500
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN - PUBLIC WORKS
Budget Year 2016-2017
S. Public Works
REMEMBER TO ESCALATE ANY BUDGETS 81, per year
REMEMBER TO FACTOR IN INCREASES BASED ON LEVEL OF ESTIMATE - ROM --> Class A estimate
to virortmenzal
unes.e€
vVansrewaier HaM Improvemen-ts.-.Phase 2
LIesign
i
Yes I
.vim.. xu`u
525,004
Pro e�y
c£z'? a''' ::'�.:; :'.;'
?iYr ,., .c'1 .3tt';_,�`�;3., _` `ce>.:. =zmsrL�� nann, S`; u,`€: c$.t+ ? cwsm eu '>
-
� �
.: -
Y`Y .'
s'€_`>3t
$S._e O
520,000
Erylro,memal
Chester Basin
VOWTPt^;rovemenss,Deco.mssior ;R€rae. ei-t'PSImprovements
: i �7� PiotvCii°J�k �te'tY3 . . ., c.....'.:
° Wit"?':.'•. :'..:
? ...
Sn:
$2,00'.
Property
Various
Truck Replacement - 3 (Jareds 2008)
Purchase
1
Yes
.. �.
Environmental u
Neal Ross
4' WTP imp vemer-f_s`Decommission, nr �R _ + ....
z
a ��=er4
. 'F0rtne= d River VNIester,v Sriori SchW Renovatfar;S `
X1,11atructi n '
","T",
:: Yes' :.:.�
S75.Q�a'-57
E 46
:t =,s
v4 i . [ u iP T ice: .::
Sidewalk - Duke Street phase 3 b
Construcfion
?
Yes
4 R
Environ mantas
Western Sham
WWW Upgrades - UV & Bldg Up^rades
Construction
1�
Yes
94 3 1
;: 0,000',
$398A2- a398.124 S398J24.Y':.ks'wi..'
Transportation
Mill Cove
Road Rehabilitation - Foxvood
'Construction,
1
Yes
; ..
Envire ._ ental
Various
C...lecIio . S v _,em Cieanin &. Videoina -Blue Area
Inspection
Yes
$27,50.0
�� 3.50
S13.750
.'-'
a Inffta
'.�Jik av3€`3: ..�: ....,.: ,.. .C_,�-_:ISF
Yea
.,. y,+;`
...:
Environmental
4ad,_Us
Collection Svst_rr, par A13vwsnce Eased or, .,,e.�I„ p'v ar!
Plan n
2
Yes
„5,
i�FkY�mm—e[.a£
Avaersi2a' :':: :':.:
"r-° iY: R �, '.- 2,..-e, ... .. .�: ,i ,...: .:'
-fa. G>I:',
.. � .-.. .. :.. .... :e
ProDe€:v
Ch_.,w
IMunidaa! Office - Commitee Rio=^:;
I
I
e f.pwty
oven
4flCJtc:
...
11. Ui S_,!Ics -;iHt. X0 1MpTQ.eFRe
.Yc€'a".a�;sia'la�t .se:�
..
Yes
Y6
.vim.. xu`u
:e70..:
Pro e�y
Chester Basin
I Retaining Wail Repairs
GcnstrL>ti=an
3
Yes
$S._e O
520,000
P2.z*�-s€S4' c ,
�F{i tufl�l%% ... :..
: i �7� PiotvCii°J�k �te'tY3 . . ., c.....'.:
° Wit"?':.'•. :'..:
? ...
, ,�..
Yea.''
$2,00'.
Property
Various
Truck Replacement - 3 (Jareds 2008)
Purchase
1
Yes
$37.600
53. 5i�0
Prcaew
Wd5tarn`Shore "
. 'F0rtne= d River VNIester,v Sriori SchW Renovatfar;S `
X1,11atructi n '
","T",
:: Yes' :.:.�
S75.Q�a'-57
;... .:. OCA
Transportation
Chester
Sidewalk - Duke Street phase 3 b
Construcfion
3
Yes
5212,427
_212,427
T`a.1sca1tatan .:
Chesmrsin::'
':.Sid -aka irtirt _.::`.; ,:'.... ...... . �... '..":
Constnic x' '..'i
: 2:
... .. Yes:"
;: 0,000',
Transportation
Mill Cove
Road Rehabilitation - Foxvood
'Construction,
1
Yes
5210,004
$210,000
REMEMBER TO ESCALATE ANY BUDGETS 8% per year
Budget Year 2017-2018 REMEMBER TO FACTOR IN INCREASES BASED ON LEVEL OF ESTIMATE - ROM — Class A estimate
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN - PUBLIC WORKS
Budget Year 2018-2019
REMEMBER TO ESCALATE ANY BUDGETS 8% per year
REMEMBER TO FACTOR IN INCREASES BASED ON LEVEL OF ESTIMATE - ROM --> Class ,A estimate
Project Description
Municipal Sources
Provincial Federal Other I Long Term
..
Environmental
- Chester
asteviater Plant h�* roetemehts - Phase 3
Design
9
Yes
' $20,000
$25,000
r .- � tr=- r �. :::�
_z� isu,_'t'�.;�, s ,� t�t`�.. :. ., , . .,:
^ . ��� -� 'tea` >�. � '_ ._ ���� ,.� -:�.� �, �„
Y 'i7 �?�:�k4�1..,av��=`?�. ��� � �... a'�.-�>;?' x:3�. = a'a .,a. �—��`� � -� �r vE��-�C�
Environmental
Chester Basin
WWTP lm;)rovements/Decrzm ission ngiReplacemei,=PS improvements Construction
1
Yes
$981.:904
$327,300 $327:300 $327,300
LVNL
V74 .: ,.. .o=:
":.
. _:
.. ...
...... .. .
Environmental
Nevi Ross
Was T P im, rovemenlslDeco�r ;ission,n-_,;Replacement
:t41:�". v,„.,,. ”`
..td:r i ,z b Ie P r�
Environmental
Western Shore
ty`d't,TP Uocrades - Oxy er<atien.Au.omatiun Di esto=iCiartfier-Phase l
Design
1
Yes
$30.040
$30,000
� ,;;.. :, ,�'
3
.. fG'���e�=.,, "I'll
cam.,
�
.1r
'._
c3;^t`
�:: �1�..."
41g&300 � -
i
Environmental
Varices
Collection System Cle, ninq -.Green
inspection
Yes
$23,400
$23,400
Er:S eiF'€r '€ '
,�", 5 .�- :. :�.:i:..= ,:
.€ ar: " . R s � « v :� f,06M,6n%
C h. 's .
`1
, Y _
'Sf§.7u"u'-
_ 55,E
-ms so
ErMrorn-erta!
Various
Collection System, Repair - Allowance ance based on videcin; program
Planning
2
Yes
$58.A00
$29:200
$29,204 �
Env: ., .e1=
:.:.€...
< .,
777
,. ?t
.
. .
Property
Chester
Municipal Office- Committee Room
Purchase
3
Yes
$0
.,.
€�.-<d:iT'`r-'amu"`?3 �:a
.,.
�r
Prope ty
Chaster
P; nic oa! C e - nnex Demo, Property & BIdQ (Int & Ext) improvements Construction
2
Yes
$21.604
$21,800
$21
i
Aa&'CHRaie onoff -'r ;2e
�#
.
77777777777777
oro^
Chester Basin
Retaining Wali R pairs
grope` .:' .� 2
:., %.:,: =I % % . ,,.,
%
Er P cti3 -�
.Des ".�e
Property
Various
%�,
Truck Replacement -6 Enr2011
Purchase
2
Yes
$39,000
3..9,004
"ropettv`
'Vst
me5j i
Fv.
Si`..,
-$ ,
77%
Transportation
Chester
Sidewalk - Chester Basin
Construction
3
Yes
$350,000
$350,044
Trasr crta; n::,:"
' Stern SE dry
$20,000'..,
77-7
$2QGi}ti
�.
�..
Property
Various
Zeroturn Replacement
Purchase
2
Yes
1 $13,000
$13,400
i
REMEMBER TO ESCALATE ANY BUDGETS 8% per year
Budget Year 2099-2020 REMEMBER TO FACTOR IN INCREASES BASED ON LEVEL OF ESTIMATE - ROM --> Class A estimate
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2016/17 - 2020/21 6. Wind Energy Projects
Wind Energy Projects
Category Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Budget Year - 2016/17
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual
Project Name Phase Category ICSP Project Total Est. Costs Operating I Reserves I Other I Government Government Sources Borrowing Operating Costs
Capital for KM 0
Chester Wind Farm 1 Planning/Design $500,000
Category Must Do
Should Do
Could Do
Year - 2017/18
Project Name Phase
Chester Wind Project
2 Construction
ICSP
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2016/17 -2020/21
Wind Energy Projects
Municipal Sources Provincial Federal
Total Est. Costs Operating Reserves Other Government Governme
$11,500,000
Term Estimated Annual
owing Operating Costs
S12.000.000 5550.000 Revenue to
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2016/17 - 2020/21
Wind Energy Projects
Category Must Do
1
Should Do
2
Could Do
3
Budget Year - 2018119
Municipal Sources
I Provincial Federal Other
Long Term
Estimated Annual
Project Name
Phase Category
ICSP Project Total Est. Costs
Operating I Reserves I Other
I Government Government Sources
Borrowing
Operating Costs
Mazer Meadows Turbine
2 Upgrades
$50,000
$50,000
Total
$50,000
$50,000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN
Budget Years 2016/17 - 2020121
Wind Energy Projects
Category Must Do 1
Should Do 2
Could Do 3
Budget Year - 2019/20
Municipal Sources Provincial I Federal Other Long Term Estimated Annual
Project Name Phase Category ICSP Project I Total Est. Costs I Operating I Reserves 7 Other Government I Government sources Borrowing Operating Costs
Chester Wind Project 2 Repairs/Upgrades $65,000 $65,000
Total $65,000 $65,000
Pam --ra
From: Denise Peterson-Rafuse MLA <denisepetersmla@bellaliant.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August OS, 2015 4:54 PM
To: 'M.E.Donovan'; rnacisasd@gov.ns.ca
Cc: Gordon Tate; Pam Myra; Glen.Strang@novascotia.ca
Subject: RE: Chester Hy#3 paved shoulder
Good evening,
thank You for send nae as copy of your ernail to Steve Maclsaac r(,,�garding th(,,a shoulders on Highway 4 3. 1 have been
working with Steve for many year's moving toward active living lanes on as rnanV roads as possible in the COIIStitUency,
It is always a good idea to have this conversation as early as possible, so that planning can take place with both
municipal and provincial &ithorffies who are involved with act:ive living prograrnming. T r hese things often take a long
tirrie to plan, so it is important that we corne tog(.Aher, and take the time to express our, opinion to the decision makers
atmut these important iSSUes.
Denise
Hon, Denise Peterson-Rafuse, MLA
Chester St,Margaret's
3794 Highway 3, Chester, NS, BOJ 1JO
902-279-3378
From: M.E.Donovan [maiIto:meliendonovan@gmail.com]
Sent: August 5, 2015 3:17 PM
To: macisasd@gov.ns.ca
Cc: denisepetersmla@bellaliant.coni; Gordon Tate <gtate@chester.ca>; pmyra@chester.ca; Glen.Strang@novascotia.ca
Subject: Chester Hy#3 paved shoulder
Steve: I am writing to encourage consideration by TIR whenever the segment of the #3 that goes through
Chester is repaved that paved shoulders be included in the project. As I understand it, the province currently has
AT policies that encourage connectedness, especially connectedness to business centres. Currently using a
bicycle or an electric wheelchair or stroller along this segment of the #3 is extremely difficult between the
Chester trail where it hits the #3 near the old railroad station and the local stores - grocery/pharmacy/hardware
etc - due to the narrowness of what is an extremely busy section of roadway, no sidewalk (admittedly an illegal
option) and a virtually non-existent shoulder. On a number of occasions I have witnessed an elderly gentleman
risking his life by using his electric wheelchair along this section of the #3 in the middle of the traveled way
because he has no other option and clearly walking is not an option for him nor is taking an access -a -bus.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 stnartphone on the Rogers network.
Municipality of the District of West Hants
76 Morison Drive, Windsor -West Hants Industrial Park
P.O. Box 3000, Windsor, Nova Scotia BON 2T0
Tel: (902) 798-8391 Fax: (902) 798-8553
cop�)fir lu""
July 23, 2015 2 7
Ms. Pamela M. Myra
wkwvied by
Municipal Clerk
Municipality of the District
of Chester
P.O. Box 369
Chester, INS BOJ UO
Dear Ms. Myra:
Re: Proposed Development Agreement —Quick As A Wink Theatre Society —to allow a
community theatre on Wentworth Road in the Hamlet of Wentworth Creek
Pursuant to Section 206(5) of the Municipal Government Act, enclosed please find Notice of
Intent with respect to the above mentioned development agreement.
Yours truly,
Planning Staff
L=m
Municipality of West Hants
Quick As A Wink Theatre Society
Development Agreement
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
7:00 pm
West Hants Municipal Building
76 Morison Drive, Windsor, NS
West Hants Council is holding a Public Hearing to
receive written and verbal presentations from the
public on a proposed community theatre on property
located on Wentworth Road, in Wentworth Creek.
The staff report and draft development agreement are
available at the Planning office, 76 Morison Drive,
Monday to Friday, 8:30am-4:30pm or at
www.westhants.ca/planning.htm].
CALL US
(902) 798-6900
EMAIL US
planning@westhants.ca
Or, behalf of the Shoreham Village Foundation we
would like to thank you for being a Hole Sponsor for
the 2015 Swing for Shoreham Golf Tournament.
Your generosity has enabled us to purchase some
much needed items for the Home and we are very
grateful.
+R„
Al
NOVA SCOTIA
Servi Ce Nova Scotia
Office of the Minister
PO Box 216, HaMax, Nou Scotim, (uiada BIJ M - 1plephmie 90) 424 Y)50 Fax 90), 1124 0581 - novmcotja.('�
mmam
Alyn Webber, Warden
Municipality of the District of Chester
151 King Street
PO Box 369
Chester, NS BOJ I JO
Dear Mr. W bb*14
Thank you for your letter dated May 25th, 2015 requesting changes to Property Online
Data Licensing Agreements; allowing municipalities to provide public access to
Property Online.
I certainly share your desire to provide clients with timely access to our records. We are
currently exploring the viability of system enhancernents to allow casual users one time
access to our data for a nominal fee. This will afford clients ease of access to our
having to purchase a more costly monthly subscription. in the meantime, we continutw
to provide in-person public access to Property Online at each of our 5 Regional Land
Registration Offices in Sydney, Dartmouth, Amherst, Lawrencetown and Bridgewater.
From: UN5K4Info <Dnfo@unam.ca>
Sent: Monday, July 27'2Ol5S:52PK4
To: Tracy Verbeke
Subject; NATIONAL DISASTER k1[TDSATD]N PROGRAM SUBMISSION TIMELINES FOR 2016-2017
PROUEcT5—ActionRequired: For Information Purposes
Attachments: [onespodencetomunicipalities (year 2projects) RNALdocx;ATTOOOOl,htm
TO: Mayors /Wardens, Councillors, All Units
CC: Chief Administrative Offiuue/Clcrk-Treasorers,All Units
RE: NATIONAL DISASTER MITIGATION PROGRAM SUBMISSION TIMELINES FOR 20162017 PROJECTS
-
I6ue-rriailbelow is fmmthe Bmugeocy ManagementOffice, an(] we've bcuuaskedtuforward the information on
to the Membership:
The Nova Scotia Emergency Management Office has been advised that Public Safety Canada has released the National
Disaster Mitigation Program submission timelines for 2016-2017 projects.
|nrecognition ufincreasing disaster risks and costs, the 2014federal budget earmarked $ZOOmillion over five years tm
establish the National Disaster Mitigation Program (NDMP) as part of the Government's commitment to build safer and
more resilient communities. The NDMP will address rising flood risks and costs, and build the foundation for informed
mitigation investments that could reduce, or even negate, the effects of flood events in the future.
The NDMP was established in April 2015 to reduce the impacts of natural disasters on Canadians by:
• Focusing investments onsignificant, recurring flood risk and costs; and
• Advancing work Lofacilitate private residential insurance for overland flooding.
Provincial and territorial governments are the eligible recipients for funding under the NDMP. However, provincial and
territorial authorities may collaborate with and redistribute funding to eligible entities, such as municipal or other local
governments, public sector bodies, private sector bodies, band councils, international non-government organizations or
any combination of these entities.
To learn more about the National Disaster Mitigation Program, please visit the Public Safety Canada website -
de
August 't
If YOU have any questions, or would like to discuss project options, please contact the Nova Scotia Emergency
Management Office by email emo@novascotia.ca or by phone 1 (902) 424-5620.
Ur"Ism
11honc: (902) 423--8331
Fax: (902) 4-25-5592
PLEASE NOTE: If you do not want to receive communications from UNSM, please e-mail Tracy
Verbeke at tverbeke(it),unsin.ca, and you will be removed from the mailing list.
Greetings,
The Nova Scotia Emergency Management Office has been advised that Public Safety Canada has
released the National Disaster Mitigation Program submission timelines for 2016-2017 projects.
In recognition of increasing disaster risks and costs, the 2014 federal budget earmarked $200 million
over five years to establish the National Disaster Mitigation Program (NDMP) as part of the
Government's cornmitment to build safer and more resilient communities. The NDMP will address rising
flood risks and costs, and build the foundation for informed mitigation investments that could reduce, or
even negate, the effects of flood events in the future.
The NDMP was established in April 2015 to reduce the impacts of natural disasters on Canadians by:
• Focusing investments onsignificant, recurring flood risk and costs; and
• Advancing work to facilitate private residential insurance for overland flooding.
Provincial and territorial governments are the eligible recipients for funding under the NDMP. However,
provincial and territorial authorities may collaborate with and redistribute funding to eligible entities,
such as municipal or other local emLeTjiwants alic ii t fdipq- cfumrik-
Tm|eannmmveobouttheNatk)na|DisasterK4biga1ionPrognam,pheasevisbthePub|icSafetvCanada
vvebsite-
August 1". 2015: Call for 2016-2017 proposals
October 8 th , 2015: Individual project proposal submission deadline to Emergency Management Office
October 311t, 2015: Individual project proposal submission deadline to Public Safety Canada
November 111 — 30th , 2015: Public Safety Canada assessment of proposals
February — March 2016: Finalize negotiation and signature contribution agreements
ASAP: Funding Flows
MUNICIPALITY OF THE 6.1
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO Municipal Council
SUBMITTED BY Tara Maguire, Community Development Director
DATE August 4, 2015
SUBJECT Plan Review - Facilitator Scope of Work
ORIGIN Procurement Process - T 2014-013 & Council Motion 2014-541
CURRENT SITUATION:
We are about to enter the next phase of engagement for the plan review process. The process for
engagement has been an evolutionary one, but staff feels that the input being received will lead to better
decisions, and results that are reflective of what is needed and wanted in our communities. As the scope
of the community engagement has expanded after extensive discussion with CPAC and Council, our
public engagement facilitator has requested an adjustment to their fees.
RECOMMENDATION:
To approve an additional $10,500 plus HST to have Third Sector Enhancement Ltd. facilitate a third
round of community engagement meetings and prepare a summary report.
BACKGROUND:
In November 2014, Council awarded the contract for Facilitation and Delivery of a Public Engagement
Program to Third Sector Enhancement Ltd. (Third Sector) in the amount of $38,500 plus HST. The
contract with Third Sector was based on two phases. Phase One was scheduled from Fall 2014 -Spring
2015 and involved facilitation of four community-based forums (Aspotogan, Chester, New Ross,
Western Shore), as well as set of five theme -based focus groups with specific stakeholder involvement.
The second phase was planned for Spring 2016 and involved another four information sessions, in open
house format, in Chester, Aspotogan, New Ross, and Western Shore.
As the plan review has evolved, the public consultation has grown significantly. The first phase of
engagement went from four community sessions to eight. The focus groups went from five topics to
eight topics (however, they were multiple sessions held the same evening) and expanded to include the
public and not just stakeholders. So far, Third Sector has accommodated this and absorbed any
additional costs.
Phase 2 (Spring 2016) has been discussed with Third Sector, and they anticipate absorbing the costs of
an additional 4 sessions for that round as well.
DISCUSSION:
Some concern was heard during the sessions that the summer residents would not be given an
opportunity to have input. In response, an additional round of summer/fall engagement sessions in
each District was added. This new phase will start in Chester Village on August 19 and will end early in
November 2015. The sessions will consist of a staff -led open house/drop in portion during the morning
and afternoon. In the evening, there will be a facilitator -led session with some hands-on engagement
activities. The sessions are intended to present information and receive feedback on the draft goals and
approach. We will also be seeking some input on some of the key questions that will help to inform
CPAC during the next phase of the plan review.
The use of a facilitator during these sessions provides an objective, impartial, third party view. Whether
by perception, or in reality, their involvement lends some degree of assurance and credibility that what
is being said in the meetings is the same message that is received by Council and CPAC. This additional
amount would enable Third Sector to facilitate all three rounds of public engagement and would
provide consistency in reporting. Staff would facilitate the formal engagement process once it goes to
public hearing.
The requested amount of $10,500 is consistent with the costs presented in the original contract for each
phase of engagement. The original contract had the following price structure:
Phase One
Workplan Development with CPAC: $3,400
Community and Sector forums and formative report $15,500
Survey design, implementation and analysis $3,500
Preparation of formative report #2 and summative report phase 1 $5,600
Total Phase 1 $28,000
Phase Two
Community forums $7,600
Final report preparation and presentation $3,200
Total Phase Two $10,500
The contract broke down payment based on the following schedule:
Upon acceptance of workplan, expected shortly after initiation meeting: 25% of contract value
Upon submission of draft strategy: 40% of contract value
Upon submission and acceptance of final strategy: 35% of contract value
Accordingly, only the 35% of the contract is outstanding and will be included in the 2016-17 budget. If
approved, it is recommended the additional, unbudgeted amount of $10,500, be paid to the consultants
once a report on the fall 2015 round of engagement is received and accepted by CPAC.
1 Policy:
n/a
2 Financial/Budgetary:
This is an unbudgeted expense that would be charged to the Plan Review account.
3 Environmental:
n/a
4 Strategic Plan:
The following Goals of the Strategic Plan would support this recommendation:
• Continually improve public satisfaction with municipal services;
• Strengthen and support environmental, cultural, and social resources;
• Continually reinforce the positive image of the Municipality through leadership in public
engagement and communication
5 Work Program Implications
If not approved, staff would need to lead the engagement sessions and would have to review the
workplan for possible impact. Staff would need to spend considerable additional time preparing for
the evening sessions and would need to prepare the summary report.
ATTACHMENTS:
n/a
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the unbudgeted change request to the consulting services agreement with Third Sector
Enhancements in the amount of $10,500 to be paid upon receipt and acceptance of the
consultant's report by CPAC.
2. Deny the request for the change request to the consulting services agreement and direct staff to
review the work program implications.
Prepared BY Tara Maguire, CDD Director Date 8/6/2015
Reviewed BY Date
Authorized BY Date
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
REQUEST FOR DECISION
30
REPORT TO: Tammy Wilson, CAO
SUBMITTED BY: Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner
DATE: 30 July 2015
SUBJECT: Applications for alteration to Municipal Heritage Properties
ORIGIN: Village Area Advisory Committee and Municipal Area Advisory
Committee comments (solicited)
CURRENT SITUATION:
Approval of Council is required to permit minor alterations to two Municipal Heritage Properties. One
property is located at 14 Main Street in Chester Village. The other property is located at 5343 Highway
3 in Chester Basin.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council approve the following:
(1) Installation of two 2ft. x 4 ft. (approx.) skylights, one on each slope, of the roof of the Municipal
Heritage Property located at 14 Main Street, Chester Village, as proposed.
(2) Demolition of an existing rear shed addition of the Municipal Heritage Property located at 5343
Highway 3, Chester Basin, and replacement with an addition of similar proportion, as proposed.
BACKGROUND:
(1) 14 Main Street, Chester Village, constructed c. 1881, is the former Methodist Church, which later
became a private residence. It has undergone a number of alterations. The owners wish to bring
more light into the main living area by adding two skylights.
(2) 5343 Highway 3, Chester Basin, is a private residence with two main parts dating back to 1860
and 1877. It has also undergone several alterations. The owner wishes to demolish the existing
shed addition, which is in a dilapidated state, and replace it with a similar addition.
DISCUSSION:
Staff reports for each application are attached. Following analysis, staff considered both interventions
to be minor and took the view that they would not adversely affect the heritage character of the
properties. Accordingly, staff recommended support of the requests.
As it has been difficult during this summer period to obtain a quorum for the Area Advisory Committees,
and given that there is a thirty -day window to submit a recommendation to the Municipality, staff
sought the opinion of committee members by e-mail.
(1) For 14 Main Street, six members (a majority) responded by e-mail, considered the intervention
to be minor, and supported the staff position. One member did not respond/could not be
reached and one member disagreed with the staff position and indicated that there should be a
discussion of the request.
(2) For 5343 Highway 3, eight members (a majority) responded by e-mail, considered the
intervention to be minor, and supported the staff position. One member did not respond/could
not be reached.
IMPLICATIONS:
1 Policy:
While there are no policies on built heritage in the Municipal Planning Strategy, policy 4.10.12 of
the Village Area Secondary Planning Strategy states:
4.10.12 To regard the Heritage Property By-law as the principal means of control of substantial
alteration to registered Municipal Heritage Properties.
2 Financial/Budgetary:
N/A
3 Environmental:
N/A
4 Strategic Plan:
Goal #4: The Municipality will strengthen and support environmental, cultural and social resources.
5 Work Program Implications
No significant implications
ATTACHMENTS:
(1) Staff Report: 14 Main Street, Chester Village
(2) Staff Report: 5343 Highway 3, Chester Basin
OPTIONS:
a) Approve one or both requests, with or without conditions;
b) Deny one or both requests;
c) Refer one or both requests back to the Area Advisory Committee(s) for discussion and
recommendation.
Prepared BY Bill DeGrace Date 30 July 2015
Reviewed BY Tara Maguire Date
Authorized BY Date
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
DEPARTMENT:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
R E P O R T
17 July 2015
Carol Nauss, Chair
Members of the Village Area Advisory Committee
Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner
Community Development
10 Main Street / Municipal Heritage Property
14 Main Street
Village of
Chester
Steve Cook and Katie McRorie, owners of the property located at 14 Main Street in the Village of Chester
(Map), have made application to install two skylights, one on each roof slope.
The subject property, the former Methodist Church, is located in the traditional core of Chester Village,
in an area that is predominantly residential (Photos, Figs. 1-3). Like many parts of the central village
residential area, there is a mix of old and relatively new structures in this area. The property was
registered as Municipal Heritage Property under the Heritage Property Act in 1991. Changes to the
property include the addition of a set of casement windows on the rear elevation, new front -yard
landscaping featuring a pergola, and a new roof installed in 1997.
SIGNIFICANCE:
The Canadian Historic Places Register listing for the Old Methodist Church Building indicates it was
constructed c.1881 and remained in use as a place of worship until 1918. It is built in the Gothic Revival
style as evidenced by the pointed windows, but also has elements common to the Greek Revival style.
Character -defining elements include:
■ Large three -paned equilateral triangle window with hood;
■ 8 -over -8 lancet arched windows with three -paned equilateral triangle tops with hoods on the
front elevation;
■ Three -bay facades of 6 -over -1 lancet arch windows with three -paned triangular tops and hoods
on the side elevations;
■ Main entrance on the gabled end;
■ Heavily -decorated simple return eaves;
■ Corner boards styled as Greek pilasters with small capitals.
APPLICATION DETAILS:
The applicants wish to place skylights on the either side of the roof in order to bring more natural light
into the main living area. The location and size (2feet x four feet) is shown schematically in Fig. 4.
REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:
In the Heritage Property Act,
"substantial alteration" means any action that affects or alters the character -defining elements of a
property.
"character -defining elements" means the materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and
cultural associations or meanings that contribute to heritage value and that must be sustained in
order to preserve heritage value.
"heritage value" means the aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or
significance for past, present or future generations and embodied in character- defining materials,
forms, locations, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings.
The Municipality's "Preserving our Heritage Properties" guide contains principles and guidelines. The
basic principles of: respect for historic character, maintenance and repair over replacement (when
possible), compatibility of use, authenticity and integrity, apply to all registered historic properties.
At the same time, the need to comply with the Building Code and other life safety codes is recognized.
When it comes to modern interventions like skylights and solar panels, the guidelines indicate that
they should be placed so as not to adversely affect the building's character -defining elements.
Moreover, they should be installed in such a way that if they were removed in the future, the
historical integrity of the building would not be impaired.
The Municipal guide is currently being updated to reflect the Standards and Guidelines for the
Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. These national standards have been adopted by provinces
and territories including Nova Scotia. The national standards recommend selecting appropriate
rooftop service equipment which is as inconspicuous as possible and respects the building's heritage
value.
DISCUSSION:
Staff would suggest that, while the proposed intervention is an added feature, it is minor in nature and
does not change the roof slope or overall character of the building. Moreover, if the skylights were ever
removed in the future, the integrity of the building would not be impaired.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the application by Steve Cook and Katie McRorie to install two skylights, one on
each roof slope, at 14 Main Street, be recommended to Council for approval.
Submitted by:
Bill DeGrace, MCIP, LPP
Senior Planner
3925
96
169
I88
165
47
IS
7
2411 243,1242
240
239237
,
II
..........
235
232
3872
3930
`
233
a
230 '
227.„
3884
a
�
222 39 23910
Cil
3900 3888
3925
96
169
I88
165
47
3870 3868
35
3 145,. . ..... 144
S,•,•, p 3838
��ghw ay 3
M-
3839
226
204
2021
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER Rev.: Descripti : Date:
Location Map: Heritage Alteration Application
I
CV -HP -0014; 14 Main St, Chester
�q Civics
�\ •••-• Road s 0 Lo ratiiu Map 14 Main St, Chester 2015/07/13
Scale: 1, 2.500 Water Prom Date: 2015/07/13 ., a,e •„,G„a.v,�, so,o„.m
Ti Dare: it /a
25 0 50
.IProperties Dace Printed: 2015/07/13
PID cnassircariinu:ee400-zo
A'oject ID: n/a
Metres Status:
iso 7E o iso 1111111111111111160093507
Digital Finders and File Name: y „m .�
CV Hl' 0014 Old MethidistChu
Feet
"Maw Lucatiin”
IS
7
3870 3868
35
3 145,. . ..... 144
S,•,•, p 3838
��ghw ay 3
M-
3839
226
204
2021
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER Rev.: Descripti : Date:
Location Map: Heritage Alteration Application
I
CV -HP -0014; 14 Main St, Chester
�q Civics
�\ •••-• Road s 0 Lo ratiiu Map 14 Main St, Chester 2015/07/13
Scale: 1, 2.500 Water Prom Date: 2015/07/13 ., a,e •„,G„a.v,�, so,o„.m
Ti Dare: it /a
25 0 50
.IProperties Dace Printed: 2015/07/13
PID cnassircariinu:ee400-zo
A'oject ID: n/a
Metres Status:
iso 7E o iso 1111111111111111160093507
Digital Finders and File Name: y „m .�
CV Hl' 0014 Old MethidistChu
Feet
"Maw Lucatiin”
Figs. 10 and 20: Front elevation
Fig. 3 Rear and west elevations
Fig. 4: West roof slope showing skylight
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
DEPARTMENT:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
R E P O R T
23 July 2015
Mary Ellen Clancey, Chair
Members of the Municipal Area Advisory Committee
Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner
Community Development
5343 Highway 3, Chester Basin / Municipal Heritage Property
5343 Hwy 3
Chester Basin
Rodney Redden, owner of 5343 No. 3 Highway in Chester Basin (Map), has made application to demolish
a dilapidated rear enclosed porch and replace it with a new enclosed porch of generally similar
appearance and dimension.
The subject property, known as "Shady Rest", is located in the heart of Chester Basin in an area that is
predominantly residential but contains some commercial uses nearby (Photos, Figs. 1-4). It was
registered as a Municipal Heritage Property under the Heritage Property Act in 1992. Over the years,
this building has undergone many changes as demonstrated in a picture supplied by the owner (Fig. S).
They include construction of a taller, 21/z storey addition (apparently for a second family), enclosure of
the front porch, removal of eaves and gable trim, insertion of picture and slider windows in the 1960s
(later replaced with a bay window and casement windows in 1997), and a new roof in 2006.
SIGNIFICANCE:
The inventory site form for this building indicates that the original building is believed to have been
constructed c. 1860, while the west -side addition appeared c. 1877. While the file does not contain a
written set of character -defining elements, photographic evidence clearly places this building within the
large family of Lunenburg County dwellings that are a vernacular response to the Gothic Revival style.
Typical of this building type are the symmetrical front elevation, storey -and -half height, central dormer
with pointed dormer window, and steeply -pitched roof. The later addition repeats the steeply -pitched
roof in a taller form with predominantly six -over -six sash windows. The building sits on a manicured
lawn, set back from the main road. There is an accessory structure (garage) on the same lot.
APPLICATION DETAILS:
The rear elevation of the house contains a shed -roofed enclosed rear porch. Constructed sometime in
the 1960s/70s, this structure is rudimentary in nature and has outlived its useful life. The owner
wishes to remove it and replace it with a new enclosed porch. The basic plan is shown in the attached
sketches provided by the contractor (Figs. 6-7). This structure would be faced in wood shingles, with
a central entry. Rather than the screened and boarded -up openings of the current structure, the
applicant is proposing to use vinyl casement windows and a central metal door with features that
mimic a wood -paneled door.
REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:
In the Heritage Property Act,
"substantial alteration" means any action that affects or alters the character -defining elements of a
property.
"character -defining elements" means the materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and
cultural associations or meanings that contribute to heritage value and that must be sustained in
order to preserve heritage value.
"heritage value" means the aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or
significance for past, present or future generations and embodied in character- defining materials,
forms, locations, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings.
The Municipality's "Preserving our Heritage Properties" guide contains principles and guidelines. The
basic principles of: respect for historic character, maintenance and repair over replacement (when
possible), compatibility of use, authenticity and integrity apply to all registered historic properties. At
the same time, the need to comply with the Building Code and other life safety codes is recognized.
In addition, Council Policy P-46, adopted in 2004, permits owners of heritage properties to use
modern replacement materials for windows and doors "if they match the original size and frame of
the opening, width of the trim, style and design of the original windows/doors that are being
replaced."
The Municipal guide is currently being updated to reflect the Standards and Guidelines for the
Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. The national standards have been adopted by provinces
and territories including Nova Scotia. The most relevant standard in this instance is: "Conserve the
heritage value and character -defining elements when creating any new additions to an historic place
or any related new construction. Make new work physically and visually compatible with,
subordinate to and distinguishable from the historic place."
DISCUSSION:
Staff would submit that the proposed replacement rear porch should be a product of its own time and
need not incorporate the heritage features of the main dwelling, such as window and door trim.
However compatibility with the original structure is important, and to this end staff notes the
continuation of the use of wood shingle siding which is appropriate, and the use of windows which are
of an appropriate scale and proportion. Moreover, the addition is clearly intended to be a minor
element in the overall structure.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the application by Rodney Redden to demolish and replace a rear enclosed
porch be recommended to Council for approval.
Submitted by:
Bill DeGrace, MCIP, LPP
Senior Planner
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER He" Descripti— Date:
CM-HP-5343: Location Map
5343 Highway 3, Chester Basin
Civics 0 1 Le cativo Map 5343 Highway3 2015/07/06
— Road s From Date: 2015/07/06
Scale: 1,3,000
Water Date Printed:
„/a
aceern,cea.zms/m/os
so 25 0 50 1.IProperties classificanun#.66400-20 "�"•` A0°'.""
Metres PID Pi jectID:„/a
sews: exists
loo 0 200 60096518
1),g,,,]is d F.11 NI.— v a..
_ aa�in
Feet
Figs. 10 and 20: Front elevation
Figs. 30 and 40: Existing rear porch
Fig. 5: 5343 Highway 3 c. 1910
m
Fig. 6: Rear porch end view
tt
Fig 7: Rear porch side view
-�I�:Iii
IL
el�