HomeMy Public PortalAbout2016-03-03_COW_Public Agenda PackagePage 1 of 1
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Thursday, March 3, 2016 – 8:45 a.m.
AGENDA
1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER.
2. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING:
2.1 Committee of the Whole – February 18, 2016.
3. MATTERS ARISING.
4. CORRESPONDENCE:
4.1 Presentation/Grant Request – Chris Hayes, Chester Minor Hockey (appointment at 9:15 a.m.)
4.2 Correspondence from NS Department of Transportation & Infrastructure Renewal dated February 19,
2016 regarding Agreement for Snow and Ice Control for Millennium Drive.
5. NEW BUSINESS:
5.1 Report from Chief Fire Inspector dated February 17, 2016 regarding Proposed Amendments to the
Nova Scotia Building Code Regulations.
5.2 For Information – Report/Notice from CAO dated February 23, 2016 regarding Request for Standing
Offer (RSO) T-2015-018 - Sludge Removal and Disposal Services.
5.3 For Information – Report from Senior Economic Development dated February 25, 2016 regarding Best
of Chester Municipality Awards.
5.4 Request for Decision from Fire Services and Safety Coordinator dated February 25, 2016 regarding
Safety Program Work Plan 2016.
5.5 Request for Decision from CAO dated February 25, 2016 regarding Revised Strategic Priorities Chart
2016/17.
5.6 Request for Decision from Senior Planner dated February 22, 2016 regarding Water Quality
Monitoring Program - 2015 Season Final Report.
5.7 Request for Decision from Municipal Clerk dated February 26, 2016 regarding Cost of Living Increase
Plan Review Timeline.
6. ADJOURNMENT.
APPOINTMENTS ARRANGED
9:15 a.m. Chris Hayes, Chester Minor Hockey regarding Presentation/Grant Request.
In Camera following regular session under Section 22 of the MGA if necessary
(CPI).
5.8 Request for Direction from Director of Community Development dated February 25, 2016 regarding
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: Feb.17, 2016
TO: Tammy Wilson, CAO
FROM: Earl Woodworth
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUBJECT: Comments on Proposed Building Code Regulation Changes
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND:
Last year the NS Environment Dept. gave notice of proposed amendments to their Regulations for On-
Site Sewage Disposal Systems. The Nova Scotia Building Code Regulations contains wording which is
not in line with the proposed NSDOE changes. The proposed changes were reviewed by the NS
Building Code Advisory Committee and it was agreed they should move forward.
DISCUSSION:
The NS Dept. of Environment has given notice that for certain on-site sewage disposal systems an
Approval from them will not be required. In place of this a notification will be given to the Dept. of
Environment by the system designer and a Receipt issued by the DOE. This Receipt permits the
construction of the on-site system and is the documentation Building Departments will need to issue
Building Permits. Upon completion of the system the design professional will issue a Certificate of
Installation which will be required for the Building Official to issue an Occupancy Permit. It is my
understanding that this amendment will apply only to simple on-site systems such as those serving a
single unit residence. Other systems will still require Approval and review by the DOE. The wording in
the Building Code Regulations has been changed to address these amendments.
One other note is that it appears pit privies will be exempt from notification or approvals by the DOE.
IMPLICATIONS:
Since this is more of a change in documentation it should not affect things on the Building Department
side. The issuance of receipts to the system design professionals may help to speed up the process for
builders and homeowners when it comes to making application for a Building Permit. In the past there
have been significant wait times for the DOE approvals which impacted on our being able to issue
Building Permits. This change will hopefully address that somewhat.
The exemption of pit privies from notifications or approvals by the DOE may help for the construction
of seasonal use “camps” and the like although there are Building Code requirements that have to be
met.
1 Policy:
N/A
2 Financial/Budgetary:
N/A
3 Environmental:
N/A
4 ICSP:
N/A.
5 Other:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
N/A
OPTIONS:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
For information purposes only.
Earl Woodworth
Signature
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
FOR INFORMATION
REPORT TO Warden Webber and Members of the Committee of the Whole
SUBMITTED BY Tammy S Wilson, MURP, MCIP, Chief Administrative Officer
DATE February 23, 2016
SUBJECT Sludge Removal and Disposal Services (T-2015-018)
ORIGIN Procurement Policy
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION
As per the Procurement Policy a Request for Standing Offer was issued for a one year contract for Sludge
Removal and Disposal Services.
A RSO was issued on December 15, 2015 and closed on January 8, 2016. Two submissions were
received.
Section 4.1 of the Procurement Policy (P-04) defines Low Value Procurement as contract for work
/goods with a contract value of less than $50,000 for services (of which this work would be). Contracts
for Low Value Procurement are to be awarded by the Chief Administrative Officer, with a report to
Council advising of all awards with a value of over $10,000.
This report is to serve as notice to Council of the award of the Low Value Procurement of Sludge
Removal and Disposal Services to R Schnare & Son Trucking for the estimated amount of $48,000
including HST. R Schnare & Son Trucking submitted the lowest price based on the sewage and sludge
removal rate as requested in Appendix A of the RSO, and was the highest ranking of the two proponents.
RECOMMENDATION: (Not Applicable- Information Only)
Report is submitted as per Section 4.1 of the Procurement Policy for all Low Value Procurement contract
awards in excess of $10,000.
This report is to serve as notice to Council of the award of the Low Value Procurement Contract for
Sludge Removal and Disposal Services to R Schnare & Sons Trucking for the estimated amount of
$48,000 including HST.
IMPLICATIONS:
1 Policy:
Procurement Policy P-04 was followed, including local preference (of which there were no local tender
submissions received)
2 Financial/Budgetary:
Annual Budget allotment. By regularly tendering this service the Municipality is ensuring the
services it requires are obtained at the best value.
3 Environmental: n/a
4 Strategic Plan:
1. Ensure sufficient infrastructure is available to best serve our residents and businesses
5 Work Program Implications
This is part of the ongoing Work Program for Engineering and Public Works
6 Consultation/Communications (External v Internal)
.
ATTACHMENTS:
None:
OPTIONS:
None
Prepared BY Tammy Wilson, CAO Date February 23, 2016
Reviewed BY Date
Authorized BY Date
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
INFORMATION REPORT
REPORT TO: Webber and Members of the Committee of the Whole
SUBMITTED BY: Marianne Gates
DATE: February 25, 2016
SUBJECT: Best of Chester Municipality Awards
ORIGIN: Strategic Priorities Chart
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION:
An initiative is planned to celebrate businesses in MODC. This memo serves to inform council and ask for
support and assistance to promote to local residents and businesses.
RECOMMENDATION:
NA
BACKGROUND:
Celebrating MODC businesses through an awards program was a strategic priority of Council for the
2015-16 year. The Best of Chester Municipality initiative seeks to accomplish this goal.
The following will be completed to promote:
- An ad will run in “The Breaker” to promote voting;
- An ad will run in “The Breaker” to promote the March 30 event;
- A two- sided flyer will be distributed to all households in Chester Municipality;
- An advertisement will be placed in Municipal Insight;
- A Facebook and Twitter campaign will be conducted from March 1- 21 to promote voting;
- A Facebook and Twitter campaign will be conducted from March 23- 30 to promote the
celebration event; and
- Chester municipal Chamber, New Ross Development Society and Hubbards and Area Business
Association will be asked to promote to their members.
DISCUSSION:
Chester Municipality is fortunate to have businesses that offer great service, fair deals, and awesome
support for our communities. We want to celebrate our local businesses by holding a Best of Chester
Municipality event. These awards will honor and provide well-deserved recognition to some of our
amazing businesses.
These Best of Chester Municipality awards will be selected by the community for being the best in certain
categories. For the Best of Chester Municipality, the public is invited to vote for their favorite businesses
in each category.
Business are encouraged to ask their customers to vote for their business. So spread the work and vote for
your favourite businesses!
The business with the most votes in each category will win a Best of Chester Municipality Award.
Voting will be open from March 1-22, 2016. Twenty-three (23) categories have been pre-determined, as
follows:
Best Contractor / Renovator
Best Convenience Store
Best Farm / Forestry Business
Best Food Establishment (Restaurant, café, tavern)
Best Gallery / Studio / Artisan
Best Gas station
Best Grocery Store
Best Hair Salon / Barber
Best Hardware / Building Supply Store
Best Health Care Provider
Best Hotel/Motel/B&B
Best Legal / Accounting / Financial /Insurance
Services
Best Marine Services Business
Best Mechanic/auto shop
Best Non-profit Group
Best Place to Buy Meat
Best Place to Buy Vegetables
Best Place to have Coffee
Best Place to Hold an Event
Best Real Estate Company
Best Retail / Specialty shop
Best Sport Club/Spa/Yoga/Fitness
Best Vender at a Farmers Market
A celebration event will be held on March 30 at starting at 6 p.m. at Atlantica Oak Island Resort.
There will be delicious snacks served and the winners will be announced and celebrated.
IMPLICATIONS:
1 Policy:
2 Financial/Budgetary:
$3000 budgeted
3 Environmental:
None
4 Strategic Plan:
Promote conditions conducive to fostering economic prosperity.
5 Work Program Implications
Marianne Gates work plan
ATTACHMENTS:
Flyer
OPTIONS:
NA
Prepared BY Marianne Gates Date Feb 25, 2016
Reviewed BY Date
Authorized BY Tammy Wilson, MURP, MCIP Date Feb 25, 2016
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO: Tammy Wilson
SUBMITTED BY: Bruce Blackwood, Fire Services and Safety Coordinator
DATE: 25 February 2016
SUBJECT: Safety Pro gram Work Plan 2016
ORIGIN: Safety Budget
CURRENT SITUATION:
Following a review and gap analysis of the current health and safety activities, a work plan
for the development and implementation the MODC Safety Program has been completed.
The plan has been reviewed with the strategic management team (SMT) and the Joint
Occupational Health and Safety Committee (JOHSC).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Safety Program Work Plan for 2016 be implemented.
First and foremost successful execution of the plan in 2016 will contribute to a safer
workplace for our employees. The safety program is designed to identify and control
workplace hazards, provide appropriate training and through open participation and
communication generate a positive safety culture. Successful execution of the program
positions MODC in compliance with the OHS Act and helps mitigate the possibility of rate
increases or penalties from the Workers Compensation Board. MODC will be favorably
positioned for a certification audit the following year.
BACKGROUND
Under our Health and Safety Policy, MODC is committed to providing a safe and healthful
work environment for its employees and is dedicated to the objective of eliminating the
possibility of injury and illness. MODC has supported this policy over the years through
implementation of safety improvements, process controls, employee training and safe work
practices.
A review of these various initiatives was undertaken and a gap analysis completed. MODC
operations vary from relatively low risk office environments to workplaces with significant
safety risk ie Public Works and Kaizer Meadow. Consequently, MODC faces a broad range of
regulatory requirements under the OHS Act and Regulations, the Worker’s Compensation
Board, and other Safety Regulations eg First Aid.
Although workplace safety is fundamental to MODC operations the ongoing safety
initiatives, have not been consolidated into a comprehensive program that can been
measured and regularly audited.
DISCUSSION
The gap analysis compared the current MODC safety initiatives with general audit
requirements under 14 areas of safety management and employees.
Good progress over the last year has been made in the areas of incident reporting, accident
investigation, statistic and records and most recently workplace inspections. These portions
of the program are implemented however the work plan provides for quality improvement
of these processes.
There is a need for consolidation of the MODC’s regulatory requirements and provision of
suitable resources and training for management.
Our Comprehensive Hazard Assessment as required by the OHS Act has been started with a
focus on the higher risk areas but remains incomplete and presents a risk if required
controls are not identified and implemented.
Safe work practices are developed but need to be reviewed and a process of accountability
implemented.
There is a need for improved communication and training especially in the areas of general
rules, responsibilities and safe work practices.
Our Personal Protective Equipment and Preventative programs need review.
Statistics and records systems are in place for lagging indicators however we are not
tracking predictive leading indicators. Systems need to be automated and closed loop.
Emergency preparedness programs need to be updated.
The Safety Work Plan 2016 improves the programs in place and addresses the gaps
identified, providing a safer workplace and positioning MODC for safety certification.
IMPLICATIONS:
1 P olicy:
Safety Work Plan 2016 supports the MODC Health and Safety Policy dated January 18, 2016
2 Financial/Budgetary:
Incremental to the current budget baseline of $ 10,000, additional funding of $ 15,000 is
requested to cover external resources required in the development of the hazard
assessment and control, safe work practices, training and communication program areas
and as outlined in the Safety Work Plan for 2016.
3 Environmental:
Not applicable.
4. Strategic Plan:
Goal 2: The Municipality will continually improve satisfaction with municipal services.
5. Work Program Implications:
1. Allocation of 70 % of Fire Services Coordinator’s work load to program development
and implementation.
2. Allocation of up to ½ day per week of Director’s and staff time to support of the safety
program.
3. Allocation of additional JOHSC and staff time as required for completion of safety
programs.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Safety Work Plan Council Overview, March 4, 2016
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the Safety Work Plan 2016 and provide additional funding of $15,000 and
staff resources to implement in 2016.
2. Defer approval and funding of the Safety Work Plan 2016 pending further
information as may be required.
Prepared BY Bruce Blackwood, Fire Services Date
Coordinator
Reviewed BY Tara Maguire, Director, Comm. Date
Dev’t.
Authorized BY Tammy Wilson, CAO Date
25 February 2016
25 February 2016
25 February 2016
Co
u
n
c
i
l
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
M
a
r
c
h
4
,
2
0
1
6
We
a
r
e
d
o
i
n
g
a
l
o
t
o
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
b
u
t
n
e
e
d
t
o
c
l
o
s
e
t
h
e
l
o
o
p
Re
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
g
a
p
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
h
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
sa
f
e
t
y
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
O
HS
A
c
t
,
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
Re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
g
a
p
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
Em
p
h
a
s
i
s
o
n
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
S
y
s
t
e
m
(
O
H
S
A
c
t
)
E
v
e
r
y
on
e
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
d
.
De
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
m
e
e
t
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
a
u
d
i
t
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
a
n
d
b
es
t
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
Ov
e
r
a
l
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
h
a
s
1
4
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Ne
e
d
t
o
t
r
a
i
n
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
e
m
o
r
e
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
a
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
c
u
l
t
u
r
e
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
G
a
p
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
M
a
j
o
r
D
e
l
i
v
e
r
a
b
l
e
s
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
es
D
u
e
DateEstimates
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
:
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
L
a
c
k
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
r
e
g
ul
a
t
o
r
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
an
d
a
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
S
M
T
O
H
S
,
WC
B
,
NS
C
S
A
04/16
$
5
K
Tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
0
9
/
1
6
An
n
u
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
12/16
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
:
H
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
Po
l
i
c
y
Ne
e
d
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
po
l
i
c
y
a
n
d
c
r
o
s
s
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
t
o
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
S
M
T
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
3
/
1
6
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
09/16
Se
c
t
i
o
n
3
:
O
H
S
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
L
a
c
k
o
f
t
i
m
e
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
JO
H
S
C
Re
v
i
s
e
d
T
O
R
w
i
t
h
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
ti
m
e
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
6
/
1
6
Se
c
t
i
o
n
4
:
H
a
z
a
r
d
As
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
In
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
a
t
a
b
a
s
e
,
n
o
a
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
pr
o
c
e
s
s
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
S
M
T
OH
S
,
NS
C
S
A
09/16
Ne
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
a
n
d
A
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
1
2
/
1
6
Se
c
t
i
o
n
5
:
S
a
f
e
W
o
r
k
Pr
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
SW
P
o
u
t
d
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
n
o
t
w
e
l
l
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
,
ne
e
d
f
o
r
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
Se
c
t
i
o
n
5
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
S
M
T
a
n
d
an
n
u
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
3
/
1
6
SW
P
S
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
n
d
s
t
a
f
f
tr
a
i
n
e
d
/
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
l
e
12/16
Se
c
t
i
o
n
6
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
R
u
l
e
s
a
n
d
Re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Ne
e
d
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
n
o
fo
r
m
a
l
l
i
n
k
t
o
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
s
Se
c
t
i
o
n
6
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
S
M
T
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
6
/
1
6
OH
S
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
12/16
Se
c
t
i
o
n
7
:
P
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
PP
E
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
i
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
an
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
n
e
e
d
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
Se
c
t
i
o
n
6
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
S
M
T
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
6
/
1
6
PP
E
S
p
e
c
s
,
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
12/16
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
G
a
p
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
M
a
j
o
r
D
e
l
i
v
e
r
a
b
l
e
s
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
es
D
u
e
DateEstimates
Se
c
t
i
o
n
7
:
P
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
PP
E
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
i
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
n
e
e
d
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
Se
c
t
i
o
n
6
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
S
M
T
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
6
/
1
6
PP
E
S
p
e
c
s
,
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
12/16
Se
c
t
i
o
n
8
:
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Pe
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
b
u
t
n
o
f
o
r
m
a
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
P
M
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
o
n
m
a
j
o
r
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
1
2
/
1
6
Se
c
t
i
o
n
9
:
Tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
/
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
ns
Re
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
m
e
t
b
u
t
co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
p
l
a
n
n
e
e
d
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Se
c
t
i
o
n
9
,
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
j
o
b
tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
b
a
c
k
t
o
w
o
r
k
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
S
M
T
OH
S
,
W
C
B
,
NS
C
S
A
12/16
$
1
0
K
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
0
:
I
n
c
i
d
e
n
t
Re
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
n
e
e
d
s
s
o
m
e
r
e
f
i
n
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
m
pr
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
t
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
an
d
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
6
/
1
6
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
1
:
I
n
c
i
d
e
n
t
In
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
n
e
e
d
s
s
o
m
e
r
e
f
i
n
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
m
pr
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
t
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
an
d
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
6
/
1
6
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
2
:
W
o
r
k
p
l
a
c
e
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
n
e
e
d
s
s
o
m
e
r
e
f
i
n
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
m
pr
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
t
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
an
d
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
6
/
1
6
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
3
:
S
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
s
a
n
d
Re
c
o
r
d
s
La
c
k
i
n
g
t
h
e
l
e
a
d
i
n
g
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
o
r
s
,
W
C
B
t
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
,
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
Le
a
d
i
n
g
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
o
r
s
,
W
C
B
,
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
t
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
6
/
1
6
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
4
:
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
Fi
r
e
a
l
a
r
m
s
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
e
d
,
l
a
c
k
o
f
c
o
m
p
e
t
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
pl
a
n
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
p
l
a
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
,
tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
0
6
/
1
6
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO Warden Webber and Members of the Committee of the Whole
SUBMITTED BY Tammy Wilson, MURP, MCIP, Chief Administrative Officer
DATE February 25, 2016
SUBJECT REVISED STRATEGIC PRIORITIES CHART
ORIGIN Council Workshop- Jan 21, 2016
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION:
On Jan 21, 2016, Councillors participated in a Strategic Priority Setting Exercise. The objective of the
exercise was to establish Council’s strategic priorities for the 2016/17 fiscal year and to ensure these
match with the resource capacity of the organization. The overall result being success in achieving what
MODC sets out to accomplish
Attached to this report are: 1) Revised Strategic Priorities Chart (showing items removed); 2) Revised
Strategic Priorities Chart – Final ; 3) Work Plan to accompany Strategic Priorities Chart; 3) Strategic
Priority Session Results
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council approve the revised Strategic Priorities Chart as attached, with implementation subject to
budget/business plan approval /authority.
BACKGROUND :
The Strategic Priorities Charts originates from the Strategic Plan adopted by Council in 2013. The Plan
was a 3 year plan, with 2016/17 being the last year for implementation.
The Strategic Priorities established by Council are filtered through the organization, starting with the
Budget / Business Plan for MODC and thence organizational work plans for all departments. Staff
Performance Goals are matched to the Strategic Priorities of Council and performance is measured
accordingly.
Council reviewed its Strategic Priorities on January 21, 2016. Attached are the results of this review.
DISCUSSION:
The review of the Strategic Priorities Chart saw the following items removed as a result of prioritizing
items :
- Next Priorities
o Sewer By-law Review
o Vendors List Report
o Preferred Vendors List
The following items were removed as they were completed:
- Now Priorities
o REN
o Grant Program
o Fire Contract
The review of the Strategic Priorities Chart saw the following Now / Next Priority items added:
- NOW Priorities:
o GRWS Disposition- Expression of Interest
- Next Priorities
o Councillor Orientation
o Municipal Election
o Affordable Housing
o Organization Review
o Parking Study
o Streetscape Plan- Prioritize
o Open Space –Land Inventory /Assessment
o Debt Strategy
.
IMPLICATIONS:
1 Policy: N/a
2 Financial/Budgetary:
The following items are outside the baseline budget of MODC and require the approval of funds,
either operating or capital :
CAPITAL
• Wind Energy Generation Project $550,000 (actual amount to be lower, subject to municipal
participation
• Parking Study $35,000
• Space Options: Tentative Amount $74,000
• Land Investigation – Business / Industrial Park $300,000
• Flood Plain Mapping - $130,000
OPERATING
• Safety Program Development /Implementation $20,000
• Marketing Strategy $20,000 MODC; $10,000 Kaizer Meadows
• Elections $60,000
• Succession Plan $11,000
• PO Module $40,000
3 Environmental:
4 Strategic Plan:
This is a review of Strategic Priorities in line with the 2013 -16 Strategic Plan
5 Work Program Implications
The majority of the initiatives can be accommodated in the existing work program of departments.
Additional funds are proposed where outside resources are required.
6 Consultation/Communications (External v Internal)
External Communications
Council may wish to prepare a press release on the approval of the Strategic Priorities for 2016/17
when the 2016/17 Business Plan / Budget is approved.
The Strategic Priorities Chart / Business Plan can be posted on the Municipality’s webpage
Internal Communications
Approval of the Strategic Priorities will be communicated to staff
ATTACHMENTS:
Revised Strategic Priorities Chart (final and copy showing changes since Oct 2015)
Revised Work Program
Results of Strategic Priority Session Exercise
OPTIONS:
Council may wish to revise the priorities (add / take away)
Prepared BY Tammy Wilson, CAO Date February 25, 2016
Reviewed BY Date
Authorized BY Date
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES CHART
BLUE= COUNCIL – NOW PRIORITIES
GREEN – COUNCIL – NEXT PRIORITIES
Brown = Dept. Projects
March 3, 2016
NOW Milestone
1. LANDFILL OPTIONS March 2016
2. ORGANIC PROCESSING OPTIONS March 2016
3. ENERGY- RENEWABLE TO RETAIL (Municipal Corp) April 2016
4. MODC VALUE PROPOSITION (BRANDING) March 2016
5. SPACE OPTIONS March 2016
6. GRWS - Disposition (EOI) March 2016
7. WIND REVENUE RESERVE PROJECTS March 2016
NEXT PRIORITIES Milestone
MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN- (Plan Review / Str. Location for ED) Oct 2016
MARKETING STRATEGY (MODC and KM) June 2016
MILL COVE FIRE PROTECTION Oct 2016
MUNICIPAL PLAN REVIEW Oct 2016
LAND INVESTIGATION June 2016
KM INDUSTRIAL ZONE AMENDMENTS March 2016
COUNCILLOR ORIENTATION PROGRAM August 2016
MUNICIPAL ELECTION April 2016
AFFORDABLE HOUSING March 2016
ORGANIZATION REVIEW July 2016
PARKING STUDY April 2016
STREETSCAPE PLAN - PRIORITIZE Sept 2016
OPEN SPACE – LAND INVENTORY / ASSESSMENT Sept 2016
DEBT STRATEGY Oct 2016
CAO/ ADMINISTRATION
ENERGY- RENEWABLE TO RETAIL
SPACE OPTIONS
MUNICIPAL ELECTION
ORGANIZATION REVIEW
• Succession Plan- Finance , Comm Dev’t
FINANCE
DEBT STRATEGY
• Procurement Guidelines
• PO Module
• Investment Policy – KM Landfill Reserve
PUBLIC WORKS
MILL COVE FIRE PROTECTION
MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN
• Standard Operating Procedures – STP’s
• Tender’s- Surveying; Engineering; Heavy
Equipment (trails; municipal property
• Engineering Services Tender
• Sewer Infiltration Program
• Capital Works Program
• Road/Sidewalks Mtc Program
• Kiazer Meadows- Operation Approval Review
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MODC VALUE PROPOSITION
LAND INVESTIGATION- BUSINESS / INDUSTRIAL PARK
MARKETING STRATEGY
GOLD RIVER WESTERN SHORE- EOI
• Facilitate Proposal Writing Workshop
• Video Project – Website
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES CHART
BLUE= COUNCIL – NOW PRIORITIES
GREEN – COUNCIL – NEXT PRIORITIES
Brown = Dept. Projects
March 3, 2016
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MUNICIPAL PLAN REVIEW
WIND REVENUE RESERVE PROJECTS
KM INDUSTRIAL ZONE AMENDMENTS
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
• Safety Program Development / Implementation
• Public Participation Program Policy
INFORMATION SERVICES
• Flood Plain Mapping (with CDD)
• Communications Strategy
• Website Content- Ph 2
• Sewer Asset Collection Project
• VM Upgrade
• Diamond Upgrade- E- Post
RECREATION
OPEN SPACE LAND INVENTORY / ASSESSMENT
• After School Program Implementation
• Trail Enhancement Projects
• Recreation 4 Life Project
• Outdoor Recreation Development
SOLID WASTE
ORGANICS PROCESSING OPTIONS REPORT
LANDFILL OPTIONS REPORT
• Water Tower Options
• Loader Tender
• Landfill Gas Exploration
• South Canoe Look Off
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES CHART
BLUE= COUNCIL – NOW PRIORITIES Strikethough- deletions
GREEN – COUNCIL – NEXT PRIORITIES Highlighted text- additions
Brown = Dept. Projects
Mar 3, 2016
NOW Milestone
1. REN Nov2015
2. ORGANIC PROCESSING OPTIONS Jan 2016
3. ENERGY- RENEWABLE TO RETAIL (Muncipal Corp) Dec 2015 April 2016
4. MODC VALUE PROPOSITION (BRANDING) March 2016
5. SPACE OPTIONS March 2016
6. GRWS OPTIONS March 2016
6. GRANT PROGRAM Dec 2015
7. WIND REVENUE RESERVE PROJECTS Nov 2015 Jan 2016
8. FIRE SERVICES CONTRACT Nov 2015 Jan 2016
NEXT PRIORITIES Milestone
MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN- (Str. Location for ED) Nov 2015
MARKETING STRATEGY Mar2016
KAIZER MEADOWS MARKETING / REBRANDING Mar 2016
SEWER BY-LAW REVIEW Feb 2016
SEWER INFILTRATION PROGRAM April 2016
GOLD RIVER /WESTERN SHORE RENNO Jan 2016
MILL COVE FIRE PROTECTION Dec 2015
MUNICIPAL PLAN REVIEW Oct 2016
SOUTH CANOE LOOK OFF May 2016
VENDORS LIST REPORT Dec 2015
PROCUREMENT POLICY REVIEW- CONTRACT TERMS Nov 2015
PREFERRED VENDORS LIST REPORT March 2016
LAND INVESTIGATION Nov 2015 June 2016
KM INDUSTRIAL ZONE AMENDMENTS Jan 2016
COUNCILLOR ORIENTATION PROGRAM August 2016
MUNICIPAL ELECTION April 2016
AFFORDABLE HOUSING March 2016
ORGANIZATION REVIEW July 2016
PARKING STUDY April 2016
STREETSCAPE PLAN-PRIORITIZE Sept 2016
OPEN SPACE- LAND INVENTORY / ASSESSMENT Sept 2016
DEBT STRATEGY Oct 2016
CAO/ ADMINISTRATION
REN
ENERGY- RENEWABLE TO RETAIL
FIRE SERVICES CONTRACT
SPACE OPTIONS/GRWS OPTIONS
MUNICIPAL ELECTION
ORGANIZATION REVIEW
• Mango Aps- Migration from Chester Wikii
• E- Voting Report / Options
• Succession Plan—Finance / CD
FINANCE
DEBT STRATEGY
• Procurement Guidelines
• PO Module
• Investment Policy – KM Landfill Reserve
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES CHART
BLUE= COUNCIL – NOW PRIORITIES Strikethough- deletions
GREEN – COUNCIL – NEXT PRIORITIES Highlighted text- additions
Brown = Dept. Projects
Mar 3, 2016
PUBLIC WORKS
MILL COVE FIRE PROTECTION
SEWER INFILTRATION PROGRAM 2016
• Standard Operating Procedures – STP’s
• Tenders- Surveying; Heavy Equipment (trails,
municipal properties)
• Tenders- Engineering Services
• Western Shore Forcemain Project
• Sewer Infiltration Program
• Capital Works Program
• Road/Sidewalks Mtce Program
• Kaizer Meadows- Operations/Annual Review
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
GRANT PROGRAM- TOURISM / SPONSHORSHIP
MODC VALUE PROPOSITION
MARKETING STRATEGY
VENDORS LIST REPORT
LAND INVESTIGATION
GOLD RIVER WESTERN SHORE - EOI
• BRE
• Facilitate Proposal Writing Workshop
• Video Project – Website
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MUNICIPAL PLAN REVIEW
GRANT PROGRAM- Fire Sponsorship
WIND REVENUE RESERVE PROJECTS
KM INDUSTRIAL ZONE AMENDMENTS
AFORDBABLE HOUSING
• Animal Control RFP
• Safety Program Development / Implementation
IT SERVICES
GOLD RIVER WESTERN SHORE- IT plan
• Flood Plain Mapping (with Comm Dev”t)
• Communications Strategy
• Website Content- Ph 2
• Sewer Asset Collection Project
• VMware Upgrade
• Diamond Upgrade –E-Post
RECREATION
• GRANT PROGRAM- RECREATION/MUNICIPAL
• OPEN SPACE LAND INVENTORY /
ASSESSMENT
• Swing Gates (Trails)
• Resurfacing work (Trails)
• Crosswalk Flag Program
• Duke & Valley Road Crossing
• Community use of Gold River Bldg
• After School Programs
• Trail Enhancement Project
• Recreation 4 Life Project
• Outdoor Recreation Development
SOLID WASTE
ORGANICS PROCESSING OPTIONS REPORT
LANDFILL OPTIONS REPORT
• Water Tower Options
• Loader Tender
• Landfill Gas Exploration
• South Canoe Lookoff
• Septage Pond Dredging
Wo
r
k
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
–
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
A
c
t
i
o
n
s
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
5
,
2
0
1
6
CA
O
- Chief Administrative Officer
ED
O
-
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
Fi
n
-
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
Re
c
-
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
CD
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
SW
- So
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
Is
s
u
e
D
e
s
i
r
e
d
O
u
t
c
o
m
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
s
Ac
t
i
o
n
s
Ac
t
i
o
n
s
Ac
t
i
o
n
s
OR
G
A
N
I
C
P
R
O
C
E
S
S
I
N
G
OP
T
O
I
N
S
MO
D
C
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
f
i
n
d
a
n
op
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
C
o
m
p
o
s
t
;
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
l
y
g
o
i
n
g
t
o
J
S
B
;
An
a
e
r
o
b
i
c
D
i
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
a
n
op
t
i
o
n
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
v
o
l
u
m
e
s
be
i
n
g
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
a
n
d
C
O
M
F
I
T
•
Vi
a
b
l
e
O
p
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
M
O
D
C
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
1.
Op
t
i
o
n
s
R
e
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
O
W
(
S
W
;
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
1
5
)
2.
Bu
d
g
e
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
b
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
3.
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
S
W
/
E
n
g
;
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
5
)
1.
Co
n
f
i
r
m
C
O
M
F
I
T
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
S
t
a
t
u
s
(
C
A
O
:
?
)
2.
De
c
i
s
i
o
n
r
e
:
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
w
i
t
h
M
i
n
a
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
e
x
p
l
o
r
e
other
op
t
i
o
n
s
(
S
W
:
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
;
A
p
r
i
l
2
0
1
6
)
3.
De
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
v
o
l
u
m
e
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
(
M
i
n
a
s
)
4.
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
a
s
p
e
r
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
(
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
/
C
A
O
; Feb
20
1
6
)
5.
20
1
7
/
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
C
A
O
:
D
e
c
2
0
1
6
)
EN
E
R
G
Y
–
R
E
N
E
W
A
B
L
E
T
O
RE
T
A
I
L
Le
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
s
o
o
n
e
n
a
b
l
e
th
e
s
a
l
e
o
f
e
n
e
r
g
y
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
t
o
cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
.
M
O
D
C
w
a
n
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
a
d
y
t
o
t
a
k
e
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
of
t
h
i
s
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
•
Re
n
e
w
a
b
l
e
t
o
R
e
t
a
i
l
W
i
n
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
•
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
’
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
•
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
n
d
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
d
1.
Sc
o
p
i
n
g
f
o
r
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
(
C
A
O
/
W
a
r
d
e
n
;
F
e
b
2
0
1
6
)
2.
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
M
i
n
a
s
(
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
:
F
e
b
2
0
1
6
)
3.
Re
f
r
e
s
h
e
d
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
m
o
d
e
l
(
S
e
p
t
2
0
1
6
)
4.
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
D
e
f
i
n
e
d
a
n
d
I
n
t
e
r
-
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
A
O
: April
20
1
6
)
5.
20
1
6
/
1
7
B
u
d
g
e
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
(
C
A
O
:
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
1
6
)
6.
Ph
a
s
e
1
–
G
o
/
N
o
G
o
(
C
A
O
:
S
e
p
t
2
0
1
6
)
7.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
(
M
i
n
a
s
:
2
0
1
8
)
RE
P
A
R
E
M
O
D
C
V
A
L
U
E
PR
O
P
O
S
I
T
I
O
N
(
B
R
A
N
D
I
N
G
)
MO
D
C
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
t
s
va
l
u
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
in
v
e
s
t
o
r
s
:
w
h
y
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
n
MO
D
C
?
•
Va
l
u
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
g
r
e
e
d
t
o
•
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
ar
o
u
n
d
v
a
l
u
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
1.
Br
a
n
d
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
(
E
D
O
;
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
1
6
)
2.
Va
l
u
e
P
r
o
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
n
d
a
g
r
e
e
d
t
o
(
E
D
O
;
M
a
y
2016)
3.
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
(
E
D
O
;
S
e
p
t
2
0
1
6
)
Wo
r
k
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
–
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
A
c
t
i
o
n
s
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
5
,
2
0
1
6
CA
O
- Chief Administrative Officer
ED
O
-
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
Fi
n
-
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
Re
c
-
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
CD
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
SW
- So
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
Is
s
u
e
D
e
s
i
r
e
d
O
u
t
c
o
m
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
s
Ac
t
i
o
n
s
Ac
t
i
o
n
s
Ac
t
i
o
n
s
GO
L
D
R
I
V
E
R
/
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
SH
O
R
E
–
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Co
u
n
c
i
l
d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
re
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
a
l
t
o
n
s
c
h
o
o
l
.
Op
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
b
a
n
d
o
n
e
d
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
Op
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Bl
d
g
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
f
o
r
w
i
n
t
e
r
1.
Op
t
i
o
n
s
R
e
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
–(C
A
O
:
Fe
b
2016 )
2.
Wi
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
-
(
E
n
g
:
N
o
v
2
0
1
5
)
3.
De
v
e
l
o
p
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
(
E
D
O
:
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
1
6
)
4.
De
v
e
l
o
p
s
c
o
p
e
a
n
d
E
O
I
(
E
D
O
:
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
1
6
)
5.
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
(
C
A
O
:
M
a
y
2
0
1
6
)
WI
N
D
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
Th
e
r
e
l
a
c
k
s
c
l
a
r
i
t
y
a
r
o
u
n
d
wh
a
t
a
r
e
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
fu
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
W
i
n
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
P
o
l
i
c
y
.
Cl
e
a
r
l
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
f
r
o
m
w
h
i
c
h
t
o
ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
1.
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
t
o
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
– CA
O
:
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
6
2.
Re
v
i
s
e
d
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
:
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
1
6
3.
Po
l
i
c
y
?
-
T
B
D
(
M
a
y
2
0
1
6
)
LA
N
D
F
I
L
L
O
P
T
I
O
N
S
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
c
o
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
GF
L
c
a
u
s
i
n
g
M
O
D
C
t
o
e
x
p
l
o
r
e
wa
y
s
t
o
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
/
s
e
c
u
r
e
vo
l
u
m
e
a
n
d
t
h
u
s
f
u
t
u
r
e
•
Pr
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
f
o
r
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
vo
l
u
m
e
•
Op
t
i
o
n
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
i
p
f
e
e
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
w
i
t
h
S
u
s
t
a
n
e
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
1.
Se
c
u
r
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
v
o
l
u
m
e
(
2
0
,
0
0
0
t
o
n
n
e
s
m
i
n
)
(
S
o
l
i
d
Waste:
Ma
r
2
0
1
6
)
2.
VW
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
p
t
i
o
n
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
:
M
a
r
c
h
20
1
6
)
3.
Su
s
t
a
n
e
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
S
W
:
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
6
)
4.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
S
W
:
S
e
p
t
2
0
1
6
)
Wo
r
k
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
–
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
A
c
t
i
o
n
s
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
5
,
2
0
1
6
CA
O
- Chief Administrative Officer
ED
O
-
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
Fi
n
-
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
Re
c
-
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
CD
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
SW
- So
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
NE
X
T
P
R
I
O
R
I
T
I
E
S
DE
S
I
R
E
D
O
U
T
C
O
M
E
AC
T
I
O
N
S
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
St
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
L
o
c
a
t
e
d
f
o
r
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
ne
e
d
s
t
o
b
e
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
lo
c
a
t
e
d
t
o
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
/
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
•
An
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
P
l
a
n
f
o
r
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
w
h
i
c
h
su
p
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
1.
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
/
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
Se
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
S
i
t
e
by Council (EDO:
Ju
n
e
2
0
1
6
)
2.
Re
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
n
e
e
d
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
from
st
u
d
y
/
s
i
t
e
(
E
n
g
:
S
e
p
t
2
0
1
6
)
3.
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
i
n
M
P
S
/
L
U
B
R
e
v
i
e
w
(
C
D
;
S
e
pt 2016)
4.
Fi
v
e
Y
e
a
r
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
–
R
e
v
i
s
e
d
(
E
n
g
;
Nov 2016)
Ka
i
z
e
r
M
e
a
d
o
w
M
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
Ka
i
z
e
r
M
e
a
d
o
w
n
o
t
ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
m
a
r
k
e
t
e
d
•
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
t
h
a
t
ta
r
g
e
t
s
k
e
y
s
e
c
t
o
r
s
a
n
d
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
ma
r
k
e
t
s
K
a
i
z
e
r
M
e
a
d
o
w
•
Re
b
r
a
n
d
i
n
g
o
f
K
a
i
z
e
r
1.
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
/
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
S
t
u
d
y
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
- (EDO; June
20
1
6
)
2.
Re
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
t
a
r
g
e
t
m
a
r
k
e
t
s
f
o
r
K
a
i
z
e
r
M
e
a
d
ow
ba
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
i
n
r
e
p
o
r
t
s
(
M
c
S
w
e
e
n
y
&
C
B
L
C
/
J
o
z
za);
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
;
(
E
D
O
;
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
6
)
3.
Br
a
n
d
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
f
o
r
M
O
D
C
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
(
E
D
O
;
M
a
r
2
0
1
6
)
4.
KM
M
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
(
E
D
O
;
O
c
t
2
0
1
6
)
20
1
5
/
1
6
B
u
d
g
e
t
:
$
1
0
K
20
1
6
/
1
7
B
u
d
g
e
t
:
$
1
0
K
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
We
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
ab
o
u
t
w
h
a
t
a
n
d
h
o
w
w
e
ma
r
k
e
t
;
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
on
e
m
e
r
g
i
n
g
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
se
c
t
o
r
s
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
•
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
-
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
e
t
s
e
m
e
r
g
i
n
g
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
e
c
t
o
r
s
1.
Ta
r
g
e
t
S
e
c
t
o
r
s
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
(
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
/
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
rk Study ;
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
/
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
S
c
a
n
b
y
RE
N
)
(
E
D
O
;
J
u
l
y
2
0
1
5
)
2.
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
M
e
t
h
o
d
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
(
E
D
O
;
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
6
)
3.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
d
r
a
f
t
e
d
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
E
D
O
;
J
u
l
y
2016)
4.
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
(S
e
p
t
2
0
0
6
)
20
1
5
/
1
6
B
u
d
g
e
t
:
$
1
5
K
B
r
a
n
d
i
n
g
(
p
l
u
s
$
1
0
K
c
a
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
)
20
1
6
/
1
7
B
u
d
g
e
t
:
$
2
0
K
M
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
Wo
r
k
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
–
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
A
c
t
i
o
n
s
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
5
,
2
0
1
6
CA
O
- Chief Administrative Officer
ED
O
-
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
Fi
n
-
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
Re
c
-
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
CD
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
SW
- So
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
NE
X
T
P
R
I
O
R
I
T
I
E
S
DE
S
I
R
E
D
O
U
T
C
O
M
E
AC
T
I
O
N
S
Mi
l
l
C
o
v
e
F
i
r
e
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
As
p
e
r
N
S
U
A
R
B
,
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
i
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
W
a
t
e
r
Su
p
p
l
y
f
o
r
F
i
r
e
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
th
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
m
e
r
l
y
se
r
v
i
c
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
M
i
l
l
C
o
v
e
Wa
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
Op
t
i
o
n
s
R
e
p
o
r
t
1.
Op
t
i
o
n
s
R
e
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
O
W
(
E
n
g
;
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
1
6
)
2.
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n
-
T
B
D
3.
Bu
d
g
e
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
(
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
;
A
p
r
i
l
2
0
1
6
)
4.
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
E
n
g
;
_
_
_
_
)
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
P
l
a
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
Re
v
i
s
e
d
M
P
S
f
o
r
M
O
D
C
Ti
m
e
l
i
n
e
t
o
b
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
w
i
t
h
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
C
D
:
M
a
r
c
h
2016)
La
n
d
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
- Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
/
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
Co
u
n
c
i
l
h
a
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
a
de
s
i
r
e
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
of
l
a
n
d
f
o
r
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
/
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
p
a
r
k
Si
t
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
;
p
r
i
c
e
n
e
g
o
t
i
a
t
e
d
;
l
a
n
d
ac
q
u
i
r
e
d
1.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
t
a
r
g
e
t
a
r
e
a
s
(
E
D
O
:
J
u
l
y
2
0
1
5
)
_
2.
En
g
a
g
e
B
r
o
k
e
r
(
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
:
J
a
n
2
0
1
6
)
3.
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
i
t
e
s
(
E
D
O
;
April
20
1
6
)
4.
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
/
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
i
t
e
b
y
C
o
u
ncil (EDO:
Ju
n
e
2
0
1
6
)
5.
Ne
g
o
t
i
a
t
e
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
i
n
b
u
d
g
e
t
l
i
m
i
t
s
(
E
D
O
;
J
u
ly 2016)
Co
u
n
c
i
l
l
o
r
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
2
0
1
6
Or
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
o
r
n
e
w
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
me
m
b
e
r
s
•
Or
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
h
a
t
m
e
e
t
s
n
e
e
d
s
of
M
O
D
C
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
•
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
1.
In
p
u
t
f
o
r
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
r
s
r
e
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
l
e
r
k
:
May
20
1
6
)
2.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
l
e
r
k
:
A
u
g
2
0
1
6
)
3.
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
C
A
O
:
N
o
v
2
0
1
6
)
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
Oc
t
2
0
1
6
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
;
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
r
a
n
b
y
MO
D
C
s
t
a
f
f
a
n
d
R
e
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
Of
f
i
c
e
r
(
l
e
g
a
l
c
o
u
n
s
e
l
)
•
Re
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
•
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
f
o
r
a
n
d
he
l
d
1.
Re
p
o
r
t
to
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
r
e
:
R
e
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
R
e
m
u
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
;
Vo
t
e
r
’
s
L
i
s
t
;
(
C
l
e
r
k
:
A
p
r
i
l
2
0
1
6
)
2.
Re
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
r
e
:
P
o
l
l
i
n
g
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
(
C
l
e
r
k
:
M
a
y 206)
3.
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
L
i
s
t
(
R
O
:
J
u
l
y
3
1
)
4.
No
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
c
k
a
g
e
s
(
C
l
e
r
k
:
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
6
)
5.
Ba
l
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
O
r
d
e
r
e
d
;
P
o
l
l
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
ions
bo
o
k
e
d
;
D
R
O
’
s
P
o
l
l
C
l
e
r
k
s
h
i
r
e
d
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
n
e
d
(
C
l
e
r
k
:
Oct
20
1
6
)
6.
E-
V
o
t
i
n
g
(
A
d
v
a
n
c
e
d
P
o
l
l
)
-
(
R
O
:
O
c
t
2
0
1
6
)
7.
Or
d
i
n
a
r
y
P
o
l
l
D
a
y
(
R
O
:
O
c
t
2
0
1
6
)
Wo
r
k
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
–
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
A
c
t
i
o
n
s
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
5
,
2
0
1
6
CA
O
- Chief Administrative Officer
ED
O
-
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
Fi
n
-
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
Re
c
-
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
CD
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
SW
- So
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
NE
X
T
P
R
I
O
R
I
T
I
E
S
DE
S
I
R
E
D
O
U
T
C
O
M
E
AC
T
I
O
N
S
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
•
Po
l
i
c
i
e
s
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
in
M
P
S
1.
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
A
g
e
F
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
(
CD: March
20
1
6
)
2.
St
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
o
n
P
r
o
v
i
n
c
i
a
l
/
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
R
o
l
e
,
S
P
I
(
C
D
:
May
20
1
6
)
3.
Dr
a
f
t
o
f
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
f
o
r
M
P
S
–
P
l
a
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
Or
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
Ne
e
d
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
a
r
e
ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
l
y
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
s
i
z
e
d
fo
r
w
o
r
k
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
;
Ne
e
d
t
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
i
e
s
an
d
i
n
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
i
e
s
i
n
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
•
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
(
d
o
n
e
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
l
y
)
t
o
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
a
r
e
a
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
w
e
l
l
an
d
a
r
e
a
s
f
o
r
a
t
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
;
•
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
i
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
1.
Re
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
r
e
:
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
o
f
R
e
v
i
e
w
(
C
A
O
:
J
u
l
y
2
016)
2.
De
f
i
n
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
L
e
v
e
l
e
x
p
e
c
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
:
A
u
g
u
s
t
2016)
3.
Re
p
o
r
t
r
e
:
A
r
e
a
s
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
w
e
l
l
a
n
d
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
A
O
:
S
e
p
t
2
0
1
6
)
4.
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
C
A
O
:
N
o
v
2
0
1
6
)
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
Co
n
c
e
r
n
o
v
e
r
l
a
c
k
o
f
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
in
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
C
o
r
e
a
n
d
a
d
e
s
i
r
e
to
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
•
Op
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
i
s
s
u
e
s
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
1.
Bu
d
g
e
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
(
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
:
A
p
r
i
l
2
0
1
6
)
2.
Sc
o
p
e
o
f
W
o
r
k
a
g
r
e
e
d
t
o
(
C
D
:
M
a
y
2
0
1
6
)
3.
Pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
C
a
l
l
(
C
D
:
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
6
)
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
P
l
a
n
– Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
H
w
y
3
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
p
l
a
n
.
T
I
R
5
y
e
a
r
pl
a
n
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
a
v
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
Hw
y
3
f
r
o
m
D
u
k
e
S
t
t
o
H
w
y
12
.
W
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
l
o
o
k
a
t
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
wi
t
h
T
I
R
•
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
1.
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
w
i
t
h
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
t
o
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
S
e
p
t
20
1
6
)
Op
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
– La
n
d
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
/
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
•
Fu
l
l
l
i
s
t
o
f
a
l
l
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
o
w
n
e
d
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
of
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
u
s
a
g
e
.
•
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
M
a
p
o
f
a
l
l
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
ow
n
e
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
•
Re
v
i
e
w
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
o
f
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
(
Rec: May
20
1
6
)
.
•
Up
d
a
t
e
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
w
i
t
h
a
l
l
r
e
c
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
d or sold
(R
e
c
:
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
6
)
.
Wo
r
k
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
–
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
A
c
t
i
o
n
s
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
5
,
2
0
1
6
CA
O
- Chief Administrative Officer
ED
O
-
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
Fi
n
-
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
Re
c
-
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
CD
-
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
SW
- So
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
•
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
o
f
al
l
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
•
Wo
r
k
w
i
t
h
G
I
S
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
i
s
t
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
m
a
p
o
f
all
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
(
R
e
c
:
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
6
)
.
•
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
o
f
a
l
l
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
o
r
u
p
d
a
t
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
s
(
R
e
c
:
O
c
t
o
b
er 2016)
De
b
t
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
•
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
a
d
e
b
t
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
p
l
a
n
t
o
ma
x
i
m
i
z
e
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
g
r
o
w
t
h
th
r
o
u
g
h
e
q
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
m
e
a
n
s
•
Fu
l
l
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
b
t
A
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
M
o
d
e
l
u
t
i
l
i
zing current
an
d
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
e
d
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
d
a
t
a
.
(
F
i
n
:
O
c
t
2
0
1
6
)
•
Po
l
i
c
y
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
d
e
b
t
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
(
F
in: Oct
20
1
6
)
Work Plan 2016-17– Strategic Actions
February 25, 2016
CAO- Chief Administrative Officer
EDO- Economic Development Officer
Fin- Finance Director
Rec- Recreation
CD- Community Development
SW- Solid Waste
Issue Desired Outcome Actions
Ma
n
d
a
t
o
r
y
I
t
e
m
s
PR
O
J
E
C
T
/
P
R
I
O
R
I
T
Y
LE
A
D
D
E
P
T
OP
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
CA
P
I
T
A
L
NO
W
/
N
E
X
T
/
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
M
a
n
u
a
l
(
S
T
P
)
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Su
c
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
M
I
N
$1
1
,
0
0
0
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Bl
d
g
B
y
-la
w
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
s
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
’
T
NE
X
T
La
n
d
f
i
l
l
O
p
t
i
o
n
s
(
S
u
s
t
a
n
e
)
SO
L
I
D
W
A
S
T
E
NO
W
GR
W
S
S
c
h
o
o
l
O
p
t
i
o
n
s
AD
M
I
N
NO
W
Mi
l
l
C
o
v
e
F
i
r
e
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
–
Pl
a
n
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
NE
X
T
PO
M
o
d
u
l
e
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
FI
N
A
N
C
E
$4 0,
0
0
0
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Co
u
n
c
i
l
l
o
r
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
AD
M
I
N
NE
X
T
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Pl
a
n
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
NE
X
T
Sa
f
e
t
y
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
’
T
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
AD
M
I
N
$6
0
,
0
0
0
NE
X
T
Fi
r
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
AD
M
I
N
NO
W
La
n
d
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
-
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
/
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
EC
O
N
O
M
I
C
D
E
V
’
T
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
NE
X
T
Ki
a
z
e
r
M
e
a
d
o
w
s
– Zo
n
e
Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
s
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
’
T
NE
X
T
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
P
l
a
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
’
T
$
NE
X
T
Sp
a
c
e
O
p
t
i
o
n
s
AD
M
I
N
$7
4
,
0
0
0
NO
W
Wi
n
d
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
AD
M
I
N
$5
5
0
,
0
0
0
NO
W
OP
T
I
O
N
A
L
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
/
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
Le
a
d
De
p
t
.
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
No
w
/
N
e
x
t
/
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
–
MO
D
C
a
n
d
K
M
(
1
6
p
t
s
)
EC
O
N
O
M
I
C
D
E
V
’
T
NE
X
T
La
n
d
f
i
l
l
G
a
s
Ex
p
l
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(1
5
p
t
s
)
SO
L
I
D
W
A
S
T
E
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Or
g
a
n
i
c
s
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
Op
t
i
o
n
s
(
1
4
p
t
s
)
AD
M
I
N
/
S
O
L
I
D
W
A
S
T
E
NO
W
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
(
1
4
pt
s
)
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
’
T
NE
X
T
St
a
f
f
i
n
g
R
e
v
i
e
w
(
1
3
p
t
s
)
AD
M
I
N
NE
X
T
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
(
9
p
t
s
)
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
’
T
$2
5
,
0
0
0
NE
X
T
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
P
l
a
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
(
8
p
t
s
)
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
’
T
NE
X
T
Wi
n
d
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
-
fu
n
d
i
n
g
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
(
8
p
t
s
)
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
’
T
NO
W
OS
L
a
n
d
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
(
7
p
t
s
)
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
NE
X
T
Fl
o
o
d
P
l
a
i
n
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
(
6
pt
s
)
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
3 0,
0
0
0
NE
X
T
Gr
o
w
t
h
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
(
6
p
t
s
)
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
’
T
(
P
L
A
N
Re
v
i
e
w
)
NE
X
T
De
b
t
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
(
6
p
t
s
)
FI
N
A
N
C
E
NE
X
T
Ot
h
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
-
I
n
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
S
c
o
r
e
s
Wi
f
i
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
–
5
p
t
s
Pe
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
P
o
l
i
c
y
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
p
t
s
Se
w
e
r
B
y
-
l
a
w
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
p
t
s
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
–
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
R
d
4
p
t
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
E
n
g
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
–
3
p
t
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
–
3
p
t
s
I
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
a
d
i
n
e
s
s
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
1
p
t
Op
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
-
N
e
e
d
s
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
-
3
p
t
s
Pr
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
(
0
p
t
s
)
Re
d
T
a
p
e
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
(
0
p
t
s
)
Bu
l
k
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
i
n
g
(
0
p
t
s
)
Ve
n
d
o
r
s
L
i
s
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
0
p
t
s
)
Pr
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
V
e
n
d
o
r
s
L
i
s
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
0
p
t
s
)
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
T
e
r
m
s
o
f
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
(
1
p
t
.
)
Fi
r
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
(
1
p
t
.
)
Re
c
o
r
d
s
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
o
l
i
c
y
/
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
(
0
p
t
s
)
Ow
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
o
f
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
(
0
p
t
s
)
Pr
o
v
i
n
c
i
a
l
/
F
e
d
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
(
0
p
t
s
)
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO: Tammy Wilson, CAO
SUBMITTED BY: Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner
DATE: 22 February 2016
SUBJECT: Water Quality Monitoring Program, 2015 Season, Final Report
ORIGIN: 2015-392: Council acceptance of program and test results
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION:
The Municipality engaged Bluenose Coastal Action Foundation (BCAF) to prepare a water quality
monitoring program for Fox Point Lake and to coordinate water quality testing for the 2015 season.
The program and initial test results were presented to Council on September 10, 2015, and later
forwarded to the Department of the Environment. Monitoring activity commenced May 26 and
continued through to October 23. The final Report was submitted at the end of November 2015 and
received by the Committee on February 10, 2016.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council receive the Report for 2015 and share with the Department of the Environment.
BACKGROUND:
The Municipality appointed the Water Quality Monitoring Committee in response to concerns
expressed at the Public Hearing for the re-zoning of lands in the Mill Cove Area to permit a commercial
golf course nearby. These concerns pertained to identified changes in water quality, possibly resulting
from such development.
The Committee is comprised of representatives of Municipal Council, the Municipal Area Advisory
Committee, the Aspotogan Heritage Trust, the Fox Point Lake Property Owners Association, Aspotogan
Ridge Inc. (the nearby golf course developer) and a local resident with knowledge of water quality
monitoring.
DISCUSSION:
The Water Quality Monitoring Program for Fox Point Lake consisted of a series of tests to assess the
trophic (life supporting) state of this water body. Among other things, these include tests for
phosphorus, nitrogen, chlorophyll a, water clarity, dissolved oxygen, and fecal coliform. Volunteer
monitors resident in the Fox Point Lake area conducted the testing following training, and under
supervision.
Key points:
Lake water can be contaminated by septic systems, agricultural run-off, development, and
acidification through rainfall.
The trophic state of lake water can be low (oligotrophic), medium (mesotrophic) or high
(eutrophic). It is desirable for a lake to have an oligotrophic state, that is, a low level of biological
activity. Various measures for nitrogen, phosphorus, dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll a, fecal
coliform and stream velocity result in different trophic states, but point to an overall trophic
state that is medium (mesotrophic) for 2015.
The south inlet stream presented the highest levels of total suspended solids and nutrient levels,
suggesting that development upstream of the sample site may be related.
In mid-September there was an elevated level of fecal coliform in the lake. This was caused by
increased overland run-off due to significant rainfall and was not sourced to nearby
development. Fecal coliform levels later dropped to well below Health Canada guideline limits.
There is now a set of baseline data to compare with any future years. Should this occur, the
report recommends adding pesticide sampling and early ordering of equipment to be ready in
case of an algal bloom.
IMPLICATIONS:
1 Policy:
Water quality monitoring as an activity addresses MPS Policy 6.1.6: It is the intention of Council to
encourage land use and development in a manner that will preserve, enhance and protect the natural
environment and the living environment of the District of Chester.
2 Financial/Budgetary:
The 2015 season was cost-shared between MODC and the Aspotogan Heritage Trust (whose
contribution was $2,500). The total for a program and report was $8,705.96.
3
Environmental:
This project addresses a site-specific issue, but which has implications for land use and development
in proximity to lakes, rivers and streams throughout the District. This issue is being considered
within the Plan Review framework.
4 Strategic Plan:
Goal 4: Strengthen and support environmental, cultural, and social resources
5 Work Program Implications:
Staff co-ordination of this activity is required. Water quality at Fox Point Lake has affected public
consultation proceedings for Plan Review in the Aspotogan area. The Committee is prepared to co-
ordinate a monitoring program for 2016 subject to budget approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Fox Point Lake: Water Quality Monitoring Report – Bluenose Coastal Action Foundation
OPTIONS:
1. Receive the Water Quality Monitoring Report for 1015 and share with the Department of the
Environment
2. Defer acceptance pending further details.
Prepared BY Bill DeGrace, Senior Planner Date 25 February 2016
Reviewed BY Tara Maguire, Director, Comm. Dev.’s. Date
Authorized BY Tammy Wilson, CAO Date 25 February 2016
Fox Point Lake
Water Quality Monitoring Report
Prepared for
Municipality of the District of Chester
Water Quality Monitoring Committee (Mill Cove)
By
S. Fredericks
Bluenose Coastal Action Foundation
37 Tannery Road, PO Box 730
Lunenburg, N.S.
B0J 2C0
November 2015
Summary
This report provides an analysis of results from the 2015 Fox Point Lake Monitoring Program.
The Municipality of the District of Chester appointed a Water Quality Monitoring Committee, in
2014, in response to concerns about the impacts of the Aspotogan Ridge development project on
the water quality of Fox Point Lake. The Fox Point Lake Water Quality Monitoring Program was
developed to establish the baseline water quality conditions of Fox Point Lake and track any
further impacts throughout the course of the development project. The initial monitoring season
ran from May 26, 2015 to October 23, 2015 and was carried out by a small dedicated group of
Fox Point Lake residents, with the assistance of the Coastal Action Project Manager.
The results of this initial monitoring season have provided insights into the biological
productivity, trophic state, and dissolved oxygen conditions of the lake, as well as the water
quality conditions within the outlet stream and the two inlet streams. Recommendations have
been made for the continuation of this monitoring program in 2016.
Table of Contents
Page
1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..1
1.1 Project Background………………………………………………………………………1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives…………………………………………………………….1
1.3 Fox Point Lake 2015 Monitoring Program………………………………………………3
2. Monitoring Results…………………………………………………………………………...5
2.1 Trophic State……………………………………………………………………………..5
2.2 Thermal Stratification – Temperature/Dissolved Oxygen Depth Profile………………...8
2.3 Water Temperature……………………………………………………………………….13
2.4 Dissolved Oxygen………………………………………………………………………...15
2.5 pH…………………………………………………………………………………………17
2.6 Total Dissolved Solids…………………………………………………………………….18
2.7 Total Suspended Solids……………………………………………………………………19
2.8 Total Phosphorus………………………………………………………………………….20
2.9 Total Nitrogen……………………………………………………………………………..22
2.10 Fecal Coliform…………………………………………………………………………..23
2.11 Rainfall and Lake Water Level…………………………………………………………..26
2.12 Stream Discharge………………………………………………………………………..27
3. Discussion……………………………………………………………………………………..29
4. Recommendations ………………………………………………………….............................30
5. References……………………………………………………………………………………..31
Appendix A……………………………………………………………………………………..33
List of Figures
Page
Figure 1.0 – Fox Point Lake drainage basin and sample sites…………………………………..3
Figure 2.0 – Trophic State Index calculations for Fox Point Lake in 2015……………………..7
Figure 3.0 – Thermal stratification of the water column, showing the three layers
of different density…………………………………………………………………8
Figure 4.0 – Depth profile representation of thermal stratification in oligotrophic and
eutrophic lakes……………………………………………………………………..9
Figure 5.0 – Types of dissolved oxygen profiles found in lakes………………………………..10
Figure 6.0 – Water temperature/dissolved oxygen depth profiles from Fox Point
Lake in 2015……………………………………………………………………….12
Figure 7.0 – Water temperature data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015……………..14
Figure 8.0 – Dissolved oxygen (%SAT) data for the Fox Point Lake sample
sites in 2015………………………………………………………………………..15
Figure 9.0 – Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015………16
Figure 10.0 – pH data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015……………………………..18
Figure 11.0 – Total dissolved solids data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015…………19
Figure 12.0 – Total phosphorus data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015……………..21
Figure 13.0 – Total nitrogen data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015…………………23
Figure 14.0 – Rainfall and lake water level data from Fox Point Lake in 2015………………..26
Figure 15.0 – Stream discharge data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015……………..28
Figure A1 – Elevation survey results for installation of water level staff gauge at
Fox Point Lake……………………………………………………………………..33
List of Tables
Page
Table 1.0 – Coordinates of Fox Point Lake sample sites……………………………………….4
Table 2.0 – Key parameter results for determining the trophic state of Fox Point Lake………..6
Table 3.0 – Parameter ranges associated with trophic state in lakes…………………………....6
Table 4.0 – Mean and maximum water temperatures for the Fox Point Lake sample sites…….13
Table 5.0 – Mean and minimum pH for the Fox Point Lake sample sites………………………17
Table 6.0 – Total suspended solids (mg/L) results for the Fox Point Lake sample sites………..20
Table 7.0 – Mean and maximum total phosphorus (mg/L) for the Fox Point
Lake sample sites…………………………………………………………………...21
Table 8.0 – Mean and maximum total nitrogen (mg/L) for the Fox Point Lake sample sites…...22
Table 9.0 – Health Canada guidelines for E. coli during recreational water contact……………24
Table 10.0 – Fecal coliform (CFU/100 mL) results for the Fox Point Lake sample sites……….24
Table 11.0 – Mean and range stream discharge data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites….......27
1
1. Introduction
1.1 Project Background
The Fox Point Lake Water Quality Monitoring Committee was appointed by the Municipality of
the District of Chester in November 2014 in response to ongoing concerns about the Aspotogan
Ridge development project in Mill Cove. Aspotogan Ridge is a 550 acre family lifestyle
community, with the construction of over 500 residential units and an 18-hole golf course
planned over the next several years. Residents of Fox Point Lake have documented several
siltation run-off events entering the lake during construction of the golf course, leading to
concerns over the impacts of the development project on the health of Fox Point Lake and its
drainage basin.
The Water Quality Monitoring Committee was tasked with developing a Water Quality
Monitoring Program in order to document the baseline water quality conditions of Fox Point
Lake and track any changes in the health of the lake over the course of the development project.
Bluenose Coastal Action Foundation was contracted to develop this monitoring program, provide
training and assistance to a group of volunteers, and to analyze and report on the water quality
results of the initial monitoring period.
The Fox Point Lake Water Quality Monitoring Program outlines the environmental conditions of
the Fox Point Lake drainage basin, the potential environmental impacts of the Aspotogan Ridge
development project, basic concepts of lake biology and water quality monitoring, and the
detailed field procedures to be used by a group of volunteer citizens at Fox Point Lake.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Fox Point Lake Water Quality Monitoring Program clearly states a number of goals and
objectives that will provide guidance and direction for the Committee and volunteers throughout
the initial monitoring period and into subsequent monitoring years. Objectives may be added or
modified to reflect any changes to the Aspotogan Ridge development project or the introduction
of additional environmental impacts within the Fox Point Lake drainage basin.
2
The goals of the Program are as follows:
1. Establish a baseline of the water quality conditions and trophic status of Fox
Point Lake based on an initial monitoring period of May-October 2015, with the
understanding that conditions may already be degraded to a certain degree as a
result of development activities.
2. Monitor the water quality conditions and trophic status of Fox Point Lake
throughout the course of the multi-year Aspotogan Ridge development project.
The objectives of the Program are as follows:
a) Monitor various biological, chemical, and physical water quality parameters in Fox
Point Lake to establish a baseline of these indicators and track any changes as a result
of development.
b) Determine the current trophic status of Fox Point Lake based on results of the initial
monitoring period (May-October 2015), using the following key parameters: total
phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll a, and Secchi disk depths.
c) Monitor the trophic status of Fox Point Lake throughout the course of development for
signs of cultural eutrophication.
d) Monitor the water depth of Fox Point Lake throughout the course of development as
an indicator of sediment in-filling or altered drainage basin hydrology.
e) Monitor precipitation amounts throughout the course of development to track local
rainfall patterns and the severity of associated siltation events in Fox Point Lake.
f) Monitor stream flow discharge in two inlet streams and one outlet stream of Fox Point
Lake throughout the course of development as an indicator of altered hydrology within
the drainage basin.
g) Monitor and document siltation events and algal blooms occurring in Fox Point Lake
throughout the course of development.
h) Monitor thermal stratification of Fox Point Lake by conducting temperature/
dissolved oxygen profiles to track the influence of increased nutrient loading on the
algal and dissolved oxygen conditions of the lake.
3
1.3 Fox Point Lake 2015 Monitoring Program
The 2015 monitoring season at Fox Point Lake ran from May 26, 2015 to October 23, 2015 with
a total of ten sampling days, four of which included the collection of water samples for
laboratory analysis. Five residents of the Fox Point Lake area took part in the initial monitoring
season. The volunteer group was provided with a Field Procedures and Sampling Methods
document and took part in an online training program, two field training days on May 26th and
June 14th, as well as a refresher training day on July 30th. Water quality monitoring was
conducted at the four sampling sites identified in the Fox Point Lake Monitoring Program (see
Fig. 1.0) as well as at the location of the rainfall and water level monitoring station (see Table
1.0).
Figure 1.0 – Fox Point Lake drainage basin and sample sites
4
Table 1.0 – Coordinates of Fox Point Lake sample sites
Sample Site Sample Site Coordinates
North Inlet N 44°36’58.27” W 64°05’24.52”
South Inlet N 44°35’47.00” W 64°04’60.00”
Lake N 44°36’04.86” W 64°04.56.28”
Outlet N 44°35’52.92” W 64°04.31.99”
Rainfall Gauge /
Staff Gauge
N 44°35’56.62” W 64°05’02.11”
The rainfall gauge and water level staff gauge were installed on the property of one of the
volunteers on June 19th. This individual lives at Fox Point Lake year-round and was able to
collect daily recordings of rainfall and water level throughout the monitoring season. The staff
gauge, installed on a dock footing, was positioned with the bottom of the gauge resting on the
bottom of the lake. Once installed, the elevation of the gauge was established, in reference to
nearby permanent objects, by a qualified surveyor. The surveyor is a resident of Fox Point Lake
and provided his services at no charge. The staff gauge has been removed for the winter to avoid
ice damage and will require re-installation, at the correct elevation, prior to the 2016 monitoring
season. The local surveyor will likely be available to assist during this installation to ensure the
gauge is set to the exact same elevation as the 2015 monitoring season to allow consistency and
comparability of water level data from one year to the next.
As anticipated, there were some necessary adjustments to be made and additional training and
guidance required throughout the first few weeks of the monitoring season. Gaps in data
collection were identified after the volunteer group conducted two sampling days on their own,
which meant that stream discharge rates could not be calculated for those sampling days. The
refresher training day was provided in order to address these issues and ensure that all members
of the volunteer group were clear on all sampling procedures.
The location of the North Inlet sample site posed a number of challenges throughout the
monitoring season. The construction of a beaver dam and the depth of water at this site restricted
access and made several sampling procedures difficult to perform. The water depth was often
>1m and the channel was over 8 m wide, which meant that the velocity and water depth data had
to be collected from a small boat. Beavers began constructing a dam directly under the Fox
5
Brook Bridge in June, which blocked the entire width of the stream by July and prevented the
volunteers from accessing the sample site by boat. The dam was removed by local residents in
August, however, water levels remained high.
On a day in early summer (date unknown), an unknown substance created a film with a strong
odor over the water surface in the southwest cove of Fox Point Lake. A sample was collected in
a plastic jar by a member of the volunteer group. Unfortunately, this sample could not be
analyzed at a laboratory because it was not collected in a lab-certified sterilized jar and was not
refrigerated. Following this event, a sample jar and cooler were requested from Maxxam
Analytics and were kept at the volunteer’s home. This allowed the volunteer group to be fully
prepared to respond to an algal bloom by collecting a water sample before a bloom dissipates and
delivering the sample to the laboratory within the required timeframe. This was an isolated event,
which did not reoccur during the monitoring season, and therefore, this sampling jar was not
used.
2. Monitoring Results
All of the data collected during the 2015 monitoring season was retrieved by the Coastal Action
Project Manager and entered into a database. Hard copies of the field data sheets and laboratory
results will be consolidated into a folder and given to the Water Quality Monitoring Committee,
along with a digital copy of the 2015 monitoring season database.
Water quality parameters have been analyzed individually and compared to established
guidelines that are designated for various forms of water usage, such as the protection of aquatic
life, drinking water, or irrigation purposes. The Canadian Council of Ministers of the
Environment (CCME) provides guidelines for many parameters in the Canadian Water Quality
Guidelines (CCME, 2002). In addition, Health Canada provides guidelines based on drinking
and recreational uses of water in Guidelines for Canadian Recreational Water Quality (Health
Canada, 2012).
2.1 Trophic State
The trophic state of a lake describes its level of biological productivity and provides a valuable
benchmark from which to monitor changes in the health of a lake and its drainage basin, over
time, as a result of various anthropogenic activities. Oligotrophic lakes display low levels of
6
productivity and relatively pristine conditions, mesotrophic lakes have moderate biological
production, and eutrophic lakes exhibit high densities of plant biomass. Eutrophication is the
natural, long-term process of lakes progressing from lower trophic states to higher ones over
time, while cultural eutrophication refers to the accelerated trend towards higher trophic levels
due to anthropogenic impacts within the drainage basin of a lake. Symptoms of cultural
eutrophication include increased nutrient loading, increased algal and rooted aquatic plant
growth, and low dissolved oxygen conditions (Brown & Simpson, 1998; Brylinski, 2004).
Determining the trophic state of a lake involves the analysis of key variables: total phosphorus,
total nitrogen, chlorophyll a, and Secchi disk depth. The results obtained for these water quality
parameters from the Lake sample site during the 2015 monitoring season (see Table 2.0) have
been used to classify the current trophic state of Fox Point Lake.
Table 2.0 – Key parameter results for determining the trophic state of Fox Point Lake
Total Phosphorus
(µg/L)
Total Nitrogen
(µg/L)
Chlorophyll a
(µg/L)
Secchi disk
depth (m)
Mean 9.8 233 1.36 2.09
Range 6-14 218-266 0.77-3.41 1.62-2.75
Table 3.0 – Parameter ranges associated with trophic state in lakes (Brown & Simpson, 1998)
7
By comparing the results from Fox Point Lake to a set of parameter ranges and means (see Table
3.0) established by Vollenweider & Kerekes (1982), the trophic state of Fox Point Lake is
predominantly oligotrophic. The ranges provided for total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and
chlorophyll a, suggest that the lake is oligotrophic, while the results of Secchi disk depth indicate
a eutrophic state. Given this discrepancy, the results from Fox Point Lake have been further
analyzed, using the Carlson Trophic State Index (TSI), to assign a numerical score (Carlson,
1977). The TSI ranges from 0 to 100 and can be calculated for each parameter individually,
using the following formulas:
Secchi disk: TSI(SD) = 60 – 14.41 ln(SD) TSI(SD) = 49
Chlorophyll a: TSI(CHL) = 9.81 ln(CHL) + 30.6 TSI(CHL) = 34
Total Phosphorus: TSI(TP) = 14.42 ln(TP) + 4.15 TSI(TP) = 37
(ln = natural log)
Figure 2.0 – Trophic State Index calculations for Fox Point Lake in 2015
Lakes with a TSI of less than 40 are oligotrophic, mesotrophic lakes have TSI values between 40
and 50, and lakes with a TSI value greater than 50 are classified as eutrophic. The TSI value for
chlorophyll a is often given priority as it provides the most accurate prediction of algal biomass.
The results for Fox Point Lake using the TSI, again, indicate an oligotrophic state, suggesting
that the lake has fairly low biological productivity (see Fig. 2.0). This classification, however, is
based on the assumption that algal biomass should be considered the key parameter in defining
the water quality of Fox Point Lake. Shallow lakes, such as Fox Point Lake, often suffer more
from the overgrowth of rooted aquatic plants rather than algae, in which case the TSI for
chlorophyll a may not be the most appropriate indicator (Brown & Simpson, 1998). In addition,
the TSI value for Secchi disk depth (TSI = 49) suggests a nearly eutrophic state. Secchi disk
depth is not only influenced by algal biomass, but can be effected by the presence of sediment,
silt, and other dissolved materials in the water column (NSSA, 2014; EPA 2002). Given the fact
that sedimentation issues have been documented on numerous occasions in Fox Point Lake, the
TSI for Secchi disk depth should also be considered a key indicator of water quality in Fox Point
Lake.
8
This analysis of trophic state has established an important baseline from which to monitor any
changes in the water quality of Fox Point Lake over the next several years. While there are no
absolutes in the classification of trophic state, the TSI values for total phosphorus, chlorophyll a,
and Secchi disk depth provide a ‘grade’ which can be re-assessed each year and provide insight
into potential causes of water quality degradation.
2.2 Thermal Stratification – Temperature / Dissolved Oxygen Depth Profiles
Thermal stratification of a lake involves the separation of the water column into layers of
different densities based on changing water temperatures (see Fig. 3.0). This process begins with
spring turnover, following ice melt, when the water temperature of a lake is consistent from top
to bottom (see Fig. 4.0). Wind circulation draws dissolved oxygen to the bottom waters and pulls
nutrients to the surface. In late spring/early summer, the surface waters begin to warm and three
layers begin to form throughout the water column. The epilimnion represents the warmer surface
Figure 3.0 – Thermal stratification of the water column, showing the three layers of different
density (Chowdhury et. al., 2014)
layer, where light is able to penetrate and wind action circulates the water. The metalimnion, or
thermocline, represents the middle layer where temperature changes rapidly with depth. The
bottom layer, or hypolimnion, holds the coldest, densest water.
By late summer, when stratification is at its strongest, there is little to no mixing between the
layers, which means that the hypolimnion is no longer receiving dissolved oxygen from the
9
surface. This finite supply of dissolved oxygen in the bottom layer can be depleted over the
course of the summer as a result of dead organic matter sinking to the lake bottom and
decomposing. Bacteria and other decomposers may use up the available oxygen as they consume
this organic debris, leading to extremely low dissolved oxygen levels in the hypolimnion and a
decreased ability to support aquatic life (Brylinski, 2004).
Low dissolved oxygen conditions have significant physiological and behavioural effects on
aquatic organisms. The CCME Water Quality Guideline for the Protection of Aquatic Life for
dissolved oxygen is ≥ 6.5 mg/L for cold water species (CCME, 1999). Dissolved oxygen levels
which fall below this guideline cause stress in aquatic organisms and may result in relocation,
dormancy, or death.
Figure 4.0 – Depth profile representation of thermal stratification in oligotrophic and eutrophic
lakes (Wetzel, 2001)
In order to monitor thermal stratification and dissolved oxygen conditions in Fox Point Lake,
depth profiles were conducted on a bi-weekly basis over the deepest point in the lake (Lake
sample site). Both water temperature and dissolved ox ygen data were collected at 1 m intervals
from the water surface to the bottom of the lake. A graphical representation of this data is useful
for identifying the depth of the thermocline, and understanding the dissolved oxygen conditions
10
throughout the water column over the summer period. Depth profiles also provide useful insight
into the trophic state of a lake (EPA, 2002).
Figure 5.0 displays the four types of dissolved oxygen profiles that can develop during thermal
stratification, depending on the level of biological productivity (trophic state) of a lake. An
orthograde profile is seen in oligotrophic lakes (low nutrient input, low productivity) when the
dissolved oxygen concentration decreases in the epilimnion and increases in the hypolimnion.
Clinograde profiles are observed in eutrophic and mesotrophic lakes (high nutrient input, high
productivity) when the dissolved oxygen concentration decreases in the hypolimnion and
increases in the epilimnion. Heterograde profiles develop when there are high or low
concentrations of dissolved oxygen at unlikely depths throughout the water column. Negative
heterograde profiles display low dissolved oxygen concentrations in the metalimnion
(thermocline), usually caused by an accumulation of decomposing organisms caught at the
density boundary. Positive heterograde profiles display high dissolved oxygen concentrations in
the metalimnion, usually caused by a high concentration of photosynthesizers in that part of the
water column (Mackie, 2004).
Figure 5.0 – Types of dissolved oxygen profiles found in lakes (Mackie, 2004)
11
A total of ten depth profiles were conducted in Fox Point Lake (see Fig. 6.0). On two occasions,
May 26 and July 30, the profiles were done with a 10 m YSI water meter cable, rather than the
30 m cable which was normally used. The water temperature profile indicates that thermal
stratification was established in the lake by early June, with an initial thermocline depth of 8-10
m. As surface water reaches peak temperatures in July and August, the depth of the thermocline
shifts to 6-8 m, which increases the proportion of the low-oxygen hypolimnion layer in the water
column. As surface temperatures begin to drop in October, the thermocline begins to sink to
lower depths as the lake approaches fall turnover. Based on the results, the thermal stratification
in Fox Point Lake did not break down at any point, which means that no additional dissolved
oxygen would have reached the hypolimnion throughout the summer.
The dissolved oxygen profile displays fairly consistent, but gradually decreasing, concentrations
of dissolved oxygen through the water column until mid-July. The dissolved oxygen begins to
display negative heterograde profiles on July 30, Aug. 17, Aug. 30, and Sept. 14. These results
indicate that decomposing organisms were caught at the density boundary between the
metalimnion and hypolimnion and were consuming dissolved oxygen as they fed on organic
material. During this time, dissolved oxygen levels were consistently below the CCME
Guideline for Protection of Aquatic Life (≥ 6.5 mg/L) at depths > 4-6 m. On Oct. 5 and Oct. 23,
the dissolved oxygen displays a clinograde profile, which indicates that Fox Point Lake is either
mesotrophic or eutrophic.
The depth profiles conducted at Fox Point Lake in 2015 suggest a trophic state of mesotrophic or
eutrophic. These results seem to contradict the Trophic State Index values calculated for
chlorophyll a, total phosphorus, and Secchi disk depth. It is possible that the depth profiles
provide a more accurate prediction of trophic state than the TSI values, given that water samples
were collected only four times during the monitoring period, while depth profiles were
conducted ten times.
12
Figure 6.0 – Water temperature/dissolved oxygen depth profiles from Fox Point Lake in 2015
13
2.3 Water Temperature
Water temperature is one of the most important indicators of water quality and plays a significant
role in the health and productivity of aquatic ecosystems. Water temperature effects many
physical, chemical, and biological factors in an aquatic system. Dissolved oxygen is strongly
influenced by temperature, as cold water is capable of holding more oxygen than warmer water.
Aquatic organisms have varying levels of sensitivity to temperature as well as optimal
temperature ranges, in order to maintain health and productivity. Extreme temperature
fluctuations outside of those optimal ranges, both acute and chronic, can cause physiological
stress, relocation, or death (NSSA, 2014). Salmonids, such as Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and
Brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), require cold water for survival. Brook trout, known to
populate Fox Point Lake, are one of the most temperature sensitive salmonid species, and will
begin to experience physiological stress when water temperatures exceed 20°C. In response to
high temperatures, fish will seek out areas of thermal refugia, such as spring/groundwater-fed
streams and streams with deep cold-water pools (MacMillan et al., 2005).
Table 4.0 – Mean and maximum water temperatures for the Fox Point Lake sample sites
North Inlet South Inlet Lake Outlet
Mean Water Temperature
(°C)
14.5 14.4 18.9 17.7
Maximum Water
Temperature (°C)
18.7 17.7 23.9 22.9
14
Figure 7.0 – Water temperature data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015
Figure 7.0 displays the water temperature data collected at the four Fox Point Lake sample sites
throughout the 2015 monitoring season. All four sites show a similar warming and cooling trend
from spring, through summer, and into the fall season. The Lake and Outlet sample sites
exceeded the 20°C threshold consistently throughout the months of July and August, while the
North Inlet and South Inlet sample sites did not exceed 20°C at any point during the monitoring
season (see Table 4.0). These results indicate that fish may have experienced physiological
stress, during July and August, in certain parts of the outlet stream and in the surface waters
(epilimnion) of the lake, causing them to seek out cooler habitats such as deep-water pools
within the outlet stream, deeper water in the lake (hypolimnion), or the cooler waters of both the
north and south inlet streams. These results highlight the fact that the north and south inlet
streams provide important thermal refugia habitat for fish during times of high water temperature
in the lake. Maintaining the health of these streams is critical for the fish populations of Fox
Point Lake, particularly the ecosystem functions which regulate in-stream water temperature
such as riparian vegetation, groundwater discharge, and natural channelization. Impacts of
development such as the removal of riparian vegetation, re-direction of groundwater sources,
sedimentation, or over-widening of a watercourse would degrade stream health and lead to
higher in-stream temperatures (DFO, 2006).
15
2.4 Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved oxygen is one of the most important indicators of water quality and aquatic ecosystem
health. Sources of dissolved oxygen in water include wind and wave action, photosynthesis by
aquatic vegetation, rainfall, and cascading water. The amount of dissolved oxygen available to
aquatic life in a lake is influenced by several factors including thermal stratification, algal and
aquatic plant density, water temperature, and the oxygen content of inlet streams (EPA, 2002).
Dissolved oxygen is measured and reported in two ways, as a concentration in mg/L and as
percent saturation (% SAT). Percent saturation describes the amount of dissolved oxygen in
water relative to the maximum amount of oxygen that could be dissolved in that amount of
water. When water can no longer dissolve any additional oxygen, it has reached its saturation
point (100% SAT), however, water can become supersaturated (> 100% SAT) in very turbulent
conditions or during periods of high photosynthetic rates (see Fig. 8.0). The CCME Water
Quality Guideline for the Protection of Aquatic Life for dissolved oxygen is ≥ 6.5 mg/L for cold
water species and ≥ 5.5 mg/L for warm water species (CCME, 1999).
Figure 8.0– Dissolved oxygen (% SAT) data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015
16
Figure 9.0 – Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015
As seen in Figure 9.0, the dissolved oxygen levels at all four sample sites show a similar trend of
decreasing during the warmest period of the monitoring season (July-Aug) due to the fact that
oxygen becomes less soluble in water as temperature increases (CCME, 1999; Mackie, 2004).
The surface waters at the Lake sample site remained well above the guideline, likely due to wind
and wave action, rainfall, and photosynthesis. The Outlet sample site also displayed healthy
dissolved oxygen conditions, mostly due to the turbulent, cascading flow of water directly
upstream of the sample site. Dissolved oxygen levels at the South Inlet sample site were close to
or below the guideline during the warmest part of the monitoring period, which may be a result
of the slow water velocity in this stream or the elevated levels of nutrients leading to excessive
algal growth and decreased dissolved oxygen.
The North Inlet sample site is immediately downstream of a wetland and over the month of June,
a large beaver dam was constructed 5 m downstream of the sample site. The low dissolved
oxygen conditions at the North Inlet sample site (see Fig. 9.0) can be explained by its location.
Wetlands have high levels of organic materials and decomposition, as well as slow moving
water, which contributes to the low dissolved oxygen conditions. In addition, the beaver dam had
formed a full blockage across the stream in July (removed in August). Beaver impoundments
accumulate organic matter and lead to higher decomposition rates and decreased dissolved
oxygen (Gibbs, 2014; B.C. MoE, 1998).
17
2.5 pH
pH is the measurement of the hydrogen-ion concentration in water, and is expressed on a
logarithmic scale from 0 to 14. A pH of 0 is the most acidic, a pH of 7 is neutral, and a pH of 14
is the most basic. The inverse logarithmic scale means that each pH unit represents a tenfold
change in acidity or alkalinity of water. A pH of 4 is ten times more acidic than a pH of 5. The
CCME Guideline for the Protection of Aquatic Life is within the pH range of 6.5 – 9.0, while the
drinking water guideline is 6.5 - 8.5, and the recreational water quality guideline is 5.0 - 9.0
(CCME, 2002). Natural variation in pH occurs as a result of the composition of soils and
bedrock, drainage from coniferous forests, and the amount of aquatic vegetation and organic
material present. Anthropogenic influences on pH include wastewater discharge, increased
atmospheric carbon dioxide, and acid precipitation (B.C. MoE, 1998).
Fish and other forms of aquatic life experience negative physiological impacts in acidic water
with pH < 5.0. Salmon can withstand a pH as low as 5.0, while trout are slightly hardier and can
withstand a pH as low as 4.7. The severity of these impacts depend on the proportions of organic
and inorganic acids in the water. Organic acids, which leach out of soils and wetlands and give
water a tea color, are less harmful to aquatic life than inorganic acids (sulphuric and nitric acids)
from acid precipitation (NSSA, 2014).
Acidification of water bodies is a significant issue in Nova Scotia, with the province having lost
the greatest percentage of fish habitat, due to acid precipitation, in all of North America. Nova
Scotia lies directly downwind of the high emission polluting areas of central Canada and the
midwest U.S. Southwestern Nova Scotia, in particular, suffers the most from acid precipitation
due to the poor buffering capacity of the soils in this region, which are unable to neutralize the
effects of the acids (NSSA, 2015).
Table 5.0 – Mean and minimum pH for the Fox Point Lake sample sites
North Inlet South Inlet Lake Outlet
Mean pH 4.56 5.08 6.11 5.45
Minimum pH 3.88 4.1 5.66 5.04
18
Figure 10.0 – pH data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015
The pH conditions at Fox Point Lake are similar to those found in many lakes and streams in
southwestern Nova Scotia. All four sample sites displayed pH values below the CCME
Guideline range of 6.5 - 9.0 for the entire monitoring period (see Fig. 10) except for the Lake and
South Inlet sample sites, which each had one pH reading above 6.5. Both the South Inlet and
North Inlet sample sites displayed pH readings <5.0. These acidic conditions may cause stress
for fish populations, however, further research would be required to determine the proportion of
organic and inorganic acids in these ecosystems, and thus the severity of the impacts on fish.
2.6 Total Dissolved Solids
Total dissolved solids is a measure of the amount of dissolved materials in the water column,
such as calcium, magnesium, chloride, sodium, sulphate, nitrate, and bicarbonate. These
dissolved solids can come from natural sources in the environment as well as from sewage
effluent, urban and agricultural run-off, industrial wastewater, and road salts. High levels of
dissolved solids will influence water taste, color, and clarity, thus restricting its use as drinking
water or for irrigation (B.C. MoE, 1998; NSSA, 2014). There are no guidelines for the protection
of aquatic life in terms of dissolved solids, however, Health Canada has established a drinking
19
water guideline of ≤ 500 mg/L (Health Canada, 1991). The average total dissolved solids for
pristine lakes in Nova Scotia is 20 mg/L (Hinch & Underwood, 1985).
Figure 11.0 – Total dissolved solids data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015
Fox Point Lake displayed an average total dissolved solids of 27.5 mg/L, which falls above the
historical average for pristine lakes in Nova Scotia (20 mg/L) but well below the Health Canada
drinking water guideline of 500 mg/L.
2.7 Total Suspended Solids
Total suspended solids is a measure of the solids suspended in a water column which do not pass
through a 45 µm glass fibre filter, such as silt, clay, plankton, microscopic organisms, and fine
organic and inorganic particles. This water quality parameter acts as an indicator of
sedimentation and water clarity. Sources of suspended solids include natural geological erosion,
agriculture, forestry, construction, and wastewater discharge. The average background
concentration in Nova Scotia lakes is 3.0 mg/L (Hinch & Underwood, 1985). The CCME
Guideline for the Protection of Aquatic Life is also dependent on background (baseline) levels of
20
suspended solids. When background levels are ≤ 100 mg/L, the maximum allowable increase is
10 mg/L above the background level. When background levels are > 100 mg/L, the maximum
allowable increase is 10% of background levels (CCME, 2002).
Table 6.0 – Total suspended solids (mg/L) results for the Fox Point Lake sample sites
North Inlet South Inlet Lake Outlet
26-May-2015 <2.0 2.8 <1.0 1.0
30-Jul-2015 1.0 2.0 <1.0 <1.0
14-Sep-2015 <1.0 <2.0 1.2 1.2
23-Oct-2015 1.0 2.0 <1.0 <1.0
Many of the water samples collected from the Fox Point Lake sample sites had levels of
suspended solids that were too low to be detectable (see Table 6.0). These results are recorded as
being less than the ‘Readily Detectable Limit’ (ie: <2.0 mg/L). The highest levels of total
suspended solids were observed at the South Inlet sample site. Sedimentation problems have
been documented in the south inlet stream, presumably a result of golf course and road
development upstream, however, without knowing the baseline levels of suspended solids in this
area, it is hard to determine if these levels of suspended solids are a direct result of sedimentation
impacts.
2.8 Total Phosphorus
Total phosphorus is a measure of both inorganic and organic forms of phosphorus. Phosphorus is
an essential nutrient for plant growth, which has few natural sources in the environment. It is
usually the limiting factor for the growth of algae and aquatic plants in freshwater systems,
meaning that elevated levels in a waterbody are likely a result of anthropogenic activities.
Natural sources of phosphorus in the environment come from weathering and erosion of rocks,
and the decomposition of organic matter. Anthropogenic sources of phosphorus include
industrial effluent, fertilizers, sewage effluent, and run-off from urban, agricultural, or forestry
land-use (B.C. MoE, 1998).
Lakes which are not significantly impacted by anthropogenic activities usually display total
phosphorus levels < 0.01 mg/L (B.C. MoE, 1998). CCME has not established a guideline for
total phosphorus because it is not a ‘toxic substance’, rather it has secondary effects such as
21
eutrophication and oxygen depletion (CCME, 2004). Provincial guidelines have been established
in some parts of Canada. Guidelines established by Ontario’s Ministry of Environment and
Climate Change are widely cited and include separate guidelines for lake and stream habitats.
The total phosphorus guideline in lakes is ≤ 0.02 mg/L, and for rivers and streams the guideline
is ≤ 0.03 mg/L (OMOE, 1979).
Table 7.0 – Mean and maximum total phosphorus (mg/L) for the Fox Point Lake sample sites
North Inlet South Inlet Lake Outlet
Mean Total
Phosphorus (mg/L)
0.019 0.154 0.010 0.008
Maximum Total
Phosphorus (mg/L)
0.030 0.240 0.014 0.008
Figure 12.0 – Total phosphorus data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015
The mean total phosphorus level recorded in Fox Point Lake in 2015 was 0.01 mg/L, suggesting
that the lake is not significantly impacted by anthropogenic activities. Both the North Inlet and
22
Outlet sample sites displayed total phosphorus levels below the guideline for streams (0.03
mg/L). Total phosphorus levels observed at the South Inlet sample site were consistently higher
than the other sample sites, falling well above the stream guideline of 0.03 mg/L. The mean total
phosphorus at this site was 0.154 mg/L and the maximum value recorded was 0.240 mg/L. These
results suggest that there may be anthropogenic activities within the drainage area of the south
inlet stream which are releasing phosphorus into the environment. The South Inlet sample site
was positioned upstream of any drainage from residential development around Fox Point Lake,
and downstream of all development at Aspotogan Ridge, which means that any environmental
impacts observed at this site are likely attributable to upstream development activities.
2.9 Total Nitrogen
Total nitrogen is a measure of all forms of organic and inorganic nitrogen. Nitrogen is an
essential nutrient in plant growth, and is usually the limiting factor for the growth of algae and
aquatic plants in marine systems. Anthropogenic sources of nitrogen include sewage effluent,
urban and agricultural run-off, and industrial effluent (B.C. MoE, 1998). Similar to total
phosphorus, the CCME has not established a guideline for total nitrogen because it is not
considered a ‘toxic substance’ and its negative effects on the environment occur through
secondary effects (eutrophication) (CCME, 2004). Guidelines have been established through
extensive research on the fate of nutrients in freshwater systems. Dodds & Welch (2000) have
established a total nitrogen guideline of ≤ 0.9 mg/L for freshwater environments in which
excessive nutrient loading and eutrophication are likely to occur.
Table 8.0 – Mean and maximum total nitrogen (mg/L) for the Fox Point Lake sample sites
North Inlet South Inlet Lake Outlet
Mean Total Nitrogen
(mg/L)
0.53 1.12 0.23 0.33
Maximum Total
Nitrogen (mg/L)
0.62 2.01 0.27 0.70
23
Figure 13.0 – Total nitrogen data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015
The results for total nitrogen are similar to those for phosphorus, with the South Inlet sample site
being the only location to display elevated nutrient levels. The South Inlet sample site displayed
a mean total nitrogen value of 1.12 mg/L and a maximum value of 2.01 mg/L. These results,
along with those for total phosphorus, suggest that the south inlet stream may be suffering from
excessive nutrient loading from anthropogenic activities.
2.10 Fecal Coliform
Fecal coliform bacteria are found in the wastes of warm blooded animals and are used as an
indicator of fecal contamination in the environment. There are hundreds of types of disease-
causing bacteria, viruses, parasites and other harmful microorganisms, making it impractical to
test for all of them. Non-pathogenic fecal bacteria species, which are easier and more affordable
to test for, are used as ‘indicators’ of the possible presence of more harmful disease-causing
organisms. E. coli (Escherichia coli) is the most appropriate indicator of fecal contamination in
freshwater environments. The majority of fecal coliform bacteria is comprised of E. coli and will
be used as a proxy measurement of E. coli and be compared to the Health Canada guidelines for
E. coli.
24
Health Canada has developed several comprehensive guidelines for the protection of human
health in Guidelines for Recreational Water Quality (2012). Separate guidelines have been
developed to protect human health during various forms of water recreation:
Primary contact: Activities in which the whole body or the face and trunk are frequently
immersed or the face is frequently wetted by spray, and where it is likely that some water will be
swallowed (e.g., swimming, surfing, waterskiing, whitewater canoeing/rafting/kayaking,
windsurfing, subsurface diving).
Secondary contact: Activities in which only the limbs are regularly wetted and in which greater
contact (including swallowing water) is unusual (e.g., rowing, sailing, canoe touring, fishing).
(Health Canada, 2012)
Table 9.0 – Health Canada guidelines for E. coli during recreational water contact
Parameter / Contact Level Guideline for Water Recreation
E. coli
Primary Contact
≤ 400 CFU/100 mL
E. coli
Secondary Contact
≤ 1000 CFU/100 mL
* CFU = colony forming units
Sources of fecal contamination in a watershed include malfunctioning septic systems, livestock,
wildlife, domestic animals, and agricultural run-off. The abundance and persistence of fecal
bacteria in freshwater systems can be influenced by a number of factors, which means that
bacteria sampling results can be highly variable. Exposure to water which is contaminated with
fecal bacteria poses a significant risk to public health and can cause illnesses such as
gastroenteritis, hepatitis, and respiratory infections (B.C. MoE, 1998; Health Canada, 2012).
Table 10.0 – Fecal coliform (CFU/100 mL) results for the Fox Point Lake sample sites
North Inlet South Inlet Lake Outlet
26-May-2015 < 10,000 < 100 < 10 < 10
30-Jul-2015 100 < 100 < 10 10
14-Sep-2015 690 1500 < 10 10
23-Oct-2015 40 140 60 10
25
Several of the fecal coliform results received from the laboratory were recorded as ‘Not
Detected’ (see Table 10.0). These results are reported as being less than the ‘Readily Detectable
Limit’ (ie: < 100 CFU/100 mL). The Readily Detectable Limit (RDL) can be different from one
sample to another depending on the condition of the individual samples and whether or not
sample dilution was required. Reporting a result as < 100 CFU/100 mL means that the true fecal
coliform level in that sample could have been anywhere between 0 and 100 CFU/100 mL, but
the laboratory can only state with confidence that the sample is less than the RDL of 100
CFU/100 mL.
On May 26th, the fecal coliform sample from the North Inlet sample site had a high RDL of
10,000 CFU/100 mL. According to the laboratory technician at Maxxam Analytics, this
particular sample had a lot of organic debris and sediments in it, requiring a number of dilutions
in order to accurately analyze fecal coliform, and resulting in the high RDL value. This means
that it is not possible to know what the true level of fecal coliform bacteria was in this sample,
only that it fell somewhere between 0 and 10,000 CFU/100 mL.
Two exceedances of the Health Canada guideline for primary contact (≤ 400 CFU/100 mL) were
observed during the 2015 monitoring season. These exceedances occurred on the same sampling
date, September 14th 2015, in the north and south inlet streams. The North Inlet sample site result
was 690 CFU/100 mL, and the South Inlet sample site result was 1500 CFU/100 mL. Both the
Lake and Outlet sample sites had very low fecal coliform levels, suggesting that the bacterial
contamination was effectively diluted once it entered the lake. These high fecal coliform levels
may be a result of increased overland run-off due to rainfall. On September 11th, three days
before the sampling date, there were 25.4 mm of rainfall recorded by the rainfall gauge, as well
as an additional 8.1 mm of rain on the sampling date of September 14th. The Nova Scotia
Environment Inspector involved with the Aspotogan Ridge development project was notified of
these sampling results, and a site visit by the inspector did not reveal any obvious sources of
fecal contamination in the south inlet stream or near the development site.
By the next sampling date, October 23rd, the fecal coliform levels had dropped to well below the
Health Canada guideline for primary contact. An additional water sample was collected from the
southwest cove in Fox Point Lake, on this date, to ensure that bacteria contamination was not
entering the lake through the south inlet stream. The results from this sample were well below
the guideline as well (40 CFU/100 mL).
26
2.11 Rainfall and Lake Water Level
Rainfall amounts and lake water level were recorded on a daily basis at Fox Point Lake
throughout the monitoring season. Establishing a baseline of the hydrologic conditions within the
Fox Point Lake drainage basin is necessary in order to identify any significant impacts caused by
the development project. Watercourse and wetland alterations, land level alterations, pond
construction, vegetation removal, and irrigation water usage have the potential to alter the
drainage patterns of the Fox Point Lake catchment area.
Figure 14.0 – Rainfall and lake water level data from Fox Point Lake in 2015
Figure 14.0 displays both the rainfall and water level data together. This data is not represented
at a comparable scale, with rainfall data graphed in millimeters, and water level data graphed in
meters. It is useful, however, to visualize how rainfall influences the lake water level by graphing
these two datasets together. The water level in Fox Point Lake fluctuates up and down in
response to periods of little rainfall (early July) or periods of persistent rainfall (late July to
August). The water level rose quickly following two significant rainfall events in early October.
A total of 368.3 mm of rainfall was recorded at Fox Point Lake from June 19th to October 22nd.
The maximum rainfall amount in a single day was 29.8 mm on August 9th. The water level of
27
Fox Point Lake fluctuated between a depth of 0.61 m and 0.80 m over the monitoring season.
With no historical baseline data available, no inferences can be made about the water level
conditions of the lake. This data will act as a baseline for comparison in future years as
monitoring and development continue. Residents of Fox Point Lake did not observe any
noticeable changes in the fluctuation of water levels in 2015 compared to previous years.
2.12 Stream Discharge
The discharge rate of a stream is a product of its velocity times the depth and width of the water
flowing in that stream (cross-sectional area). Development activities which effect the hydrologic
conditions of the drainage basin may result in changes in stream discharge rates (Meals &
Dressing, 2008).
Table 11.0 – Mean and range stream discharge data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites
North Inlet South Inlet Outlet
Mean Stream Discharge
(m³/s)
0.378 0.033 0.152
Range of Stream Discharge
(m³/s)
0.202 – 0.701 0.021 – 0.058 0.052 – 0.749
28
Figure 15.0 – Stream discharge data for the Fox Point Lake sample sites in 2015
The construction of a beaver dam near the North Inlet sample site created problems for accessing
the site and collecting stream discharge data. Only three discharge rates were calculated for the
North Inlet sample site over the monitoring season. The South Inlet sample site displayed a
consistently low discharge rate with very little variation. The Outlet sample site displayed a gre at
deal of variability in discharge rates. The construction of a small beaver dam roughly 20 m
upstream from this sample site may have contributed to the decrease in discharge rate during the
months of September and October.
Similar to the lake water level data, this stream discharge data will act as a baseline for
comparison to future monitoring efforts as the Aspotogan Ridge development project progresses.
29
3. Discussion
Fox Point Lake is at risk of suffering from cultural eutrophication if human activities and
development projects within its drainage basin are not properly managed. Currently,
development activities cover most of the lake’s southern catchment area, which drains toward the
lake and into the south inlet stream. Understanding the current trophic state of the lake is
necessary in order to recognize any further degradation of water quality as development
activities proceed. A trophic state analysis has suggested that Fox Point Lake is likely
oligotrophic and approaching mesotrophic. Using the results for total phosphorus, total nitrogen,
and chlorophyll a, the lake would be considered oligotrophic, however, the results for Secchi
disk depth and the temperature/dissolved oxygen depth profiles suggest that the lake is
mesotrophic and close to being eutrophic. An additional monitoring season, with more frequent
monitoring of nutrients and chlorophyll a, will provide a clearer picture in regards to the trophic
state of the lake.
Water temperature results have highlighted the importance of the north and south inlet streams as
thermal refugia for fish as temperatures reach stressful levels in the outlet stream and surface
waters of the lake during July and August. Depth profiles conducted in the lake reveal that
dissolved oxygen conditions in the hypolimnion fall below the CCME Guideline for Protection
of Aquatic Life, which means that fish are not able to escape high surface water temperatures by
moving to the bottom waters. Maintaining the health and water quality of the north and south
inlet streams is important for fish populations of Fox Point Lake.
The monitoring results for the South Inlet sample site suggest that this stream may be suffering
from anthropogenic impacts. Elevated total suspended solids and nutrient levels indicate that the
stream may be receiving run-off from areas impacted by human activity. Excessive
sedimentation and algal growth have been observed in this stream throughout the monitoring
period. This stream is most likely not providing high quality habitat for aquatic organisms and
habitat conditions will continue to degrade if this stream is exposed to further anthropogenic
impacts.
Overall, Fox Point Lake does not appear to be suffering significantly from the effects of cultural
eutrophication and development activities within its drainage basin, however, there are signs of
water quality and habitat degradation in the south inlet stream which may be attributable to
development activities throughout the southern part of the drainage basin. Additional monitoring
is required to identify a baseline and determine if the elevated nutrients and suspended sediments
are increasing due to development activities. Temperature/dissolved oxygen depth profiles have
revealed that biological productivity in the lake is high enough to cause oxygen depletion near
30
the bottom of the lake as a result of decomposition. If productivity increases, as a result of
cultural eutrophication, the dissolved oxygen conditions in the hypolimnion will continue to
decline and may become anoxic.
4. Recommendations
The initial 2015 monitoring season was a success overall. The following list of recommendations
is meant to provide guidance for the 2016 monitoring season and address any issues encountered
during the first monitoring season.
It is recommended that the Water Quality Monitoring Committee organizes the
equipment loan through the Community Based Environmental Monitoring Network
(CBEMN) as soon as possible prior to the 2016 monitoring season. Equipment from the
CBEMN is in high demand throughout the summer, especially the 30 m YSI cable which
is required for depth profiles.
Field training is recommended prior to the 2016 monitoring season. Refresher training
should be provided for existing volunteers as well as full training for any new volunteers
that may become involved in 2016.
Pesticide sampling should be added to the monitoring program in 2016. The Nova Scotia
Environment Inspector involved with Aspotogan Ridge has indicated that no pesticides
were used at the development site in 2015, however, they may be included in golf course
management practices once the course is operational.
A sample bottle and cooler should be ordered from Maxxam Analytics at the start of the
2016 monitoring season and kept at Fox Point Lake in order for the volunteers to
immediately collect a water sample in the case of an algal bloom.
The North Inlet sample site should be relocated for the 2016 monitoring season due to
access issues and interference by a beaver colony. The sample site should be moved
closer to the lake in an area that allows for easier access.
Additional temperature/dissolved oxygen depth profiles could be conducted in other deep
parts of Fox Point Lake to better understand thermal stratification and dissolved oxygen
conditions within the lake.
31
References
British Columbia Ministry of Environment (B.C. MoE). 1998. Guidelines for Interpreting Water
Quality Data. Version 1.0. Resources Inventory Committee.
Brown, T. & Simpson, J. 1998. Managing Phosphorus Impacts to Urban Lakes: Determining the
Trophic State of Your Lake. Urban Lake Management. 771-778 pp.
Brylinksi, M. 2004. User’s Manual for Prediction of Phosphorus Concentration in Nova Scotia
Lakes: A Tool for Decision Making Version 1.0. Acadia Centre for Estuarine Research,
Acadia University. 82 p.
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 1999. Canadian water quality
guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: Dissolved oxygen (Freshwater). In: Canadian
environmental quality guidelines, 1999, Canadian Council of Ministers of the
Environment, Winnipeg.
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 2002. Canadian water quality
guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: Total particulate matter. In: Canadian
environmental quality guidelines, 1999, Canadian Council of Ministers of the
Environment, Winnipeg.
Carlson, R.E. 1977. A Trophic State Index for Lakes. Limnol Oceanography 22: 361-369.
Chowdhury, M.S.A., Hasan, K. & Alam, K. 2014. The Use of an Aeration System to Prevent
Thermal Stratification of Water Bodies: Pond, Lake and Water Supply Reservior. Applied
Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2(1), 1-7.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2002. Volunteer Lake Monitoring: A Methods
Manual. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 65 p.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 2006. Ecological Restoration of Degraded Aquatic
Habitats: A Watershed Approach. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Science Branch, Gulf
Region. 180 p.
Gibbs, D. 2014. The effect of beaver ponds on the nutrient composition in the water column and
the sediments of Cart Creek. Earlham College. Richmond, IN. Ecosystems Center:
Marine Biological Laboratory. Woods Hole, MA.
Health Canada. 1991. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Guideline Technical
Document – Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). Government of Canada.
32
Health Canada. 2012. Guidelines for Canadian Recreational Water Quality, Third Edition.
Water, Air, and Climate Change Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety
Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. (Catalogue No H129-15/2012E).
Hinch, P.R. & Underwood, J.K. 1985. A study of aquatic conditions in Lake Echo during 1984.
N.S. Dept. Env. Lib. L192.1 85/00 C2. 38 p.
Mackie, G. 2004. Applied Aquatic Ecosystem Concepts. 2d ed. Dubuque, Iowa. Kendall/Hunt
Publishing Company.
MacMillan, J.L., Caissie, D., LeBlanc, J.E. & Crandlemere, T.J. 2005. Characterization of
summer water temperatures for 312 selected sites in Nova Scotia. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish.
Aquat. Sci. 2582: 43p.
Meals, D.A. & Dressing, S.A. 2008. Surface water flow measurement for water quality
monitoring projects, Tech Notes 3, March 2008. Developed for U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency by TetraTech Inc., Fairfax, VA. 16 p.
Nova Scotia Salmon Association (NSSA) NSLC Adopt-a-Stream Program. 2014. Walking the
River: A Citizen’s Guide to Interpreting Water Quality Data. 43 p.
Nova Scotia Salmon Association (NSSA) NSLC Adopt-a-Stream Program. 2015. Acid Rain.
[http://www.nssalmon.ca/issues/acid-rain].
Vollenweider, R.A. & Kerekes, J.J. (eds). 1982. Eutrophication of Waters: Monitoring,
Assessment and Control. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development,
Paris. 156 p.
Wetzel, G. 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. 3d ed. San Diego, CA: Academic
Press.
33
Appendix A
Figure A1 – Elevation survey results for installation of water level staff gauge at Fox Point Lake
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
REQUEST FOR DECISION
REPORT TO Committee of the Whole
SUBMITTED BY Pam Myra, Municipal Clerk
DATE February 26, 2016
SUBJECT Cost of Living Increase (CPI)
ORIGIN Director of Finance Email of January 22, 2016
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION:
Presently salaries are determined using the 2015/16 Salary Band Schedule approved by Council on
February 27, 2015 (2015-040/068).
RECOMMENDATION:
That Municipal Council approve an increase in the level of compensation payable to MODC employees
and Council members in an amount equal to the previous year’s Consumer Price Index Rate of 0.4%,
with the increase to be effective April 1, 2016.
BACKGROUND:
Annually Council considers applying the previous year’s Consumer Price Index Rate (All Items for Nova
Scotia). This has traditionally been done prior to the beginning of the April 1 Fiscal Year to ensure a
smooth transition for payroll calculations (reducing the need for Payroll Staff to determine
wages/salaries for hours incurred from April 1 to the approval date).
DISCUSSION:
IMPLICATIONS:
1 Policy:
Policy P-09 Remuneration of Warden, Deputy Warden, and Councillors (Section D)
Policy P-55 Personnel Policy (Section 5.3.1)
2 Financial/Budgetary:
- Will result in an increase in salaries of 0.4% over the 2015/16 Employee Salaries equating to
approximately $11,282.00 from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017 (this does not include part-
time).
- Will result in an increase in Council Remuneration of 0.4% over the 2015/16 Remuneration
equating to approximately $688.99 (this does not include remuneration of Committee
Members)
3 Environmental:
Not Applicable.
4 Strategic Plan:
5 Work Program Implications
Approval of the CPI prior to April 1 will reduce the need for additional resources (time) required to
apply CPI to regular and overtime salaries/wages incurred from April 1 to the approval date.
6 Consultation/Communications (External v Internal)
Not Applicable.
ATTACHMENTS:
a. Email from Director of Finance with regard to the CPI Rate of 0.4%.
b. Calculations of Impact of CPI for Employees and Council.
c. Copy of Policy P-09 Remuneration of Warden, Deputy Warden, and Councillors (Section D)
d. Copy of Policy P-55 Personnel Policy (Section 5.3.1)
e. 2015/16 Salary Band Schedule
f. 2016/17 Salary Band Schedule DRAFT
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the amendment to the Salary Bands re: Consumer Price Index – All Items for Nova Scotia
(2015) in the amount of 0.4%.
2. Not approve the amendment to the Salary Bands re: Consumer Price Index (2015) of 0.4%
Prepared BY Pam Myra, Municipal Clerk Date February 26, 2016
Reviewed BY Date
Authorized BY Tammy Wilson, Date February 29, 2016
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
Request for Direction
REPORT TO Warden Allen Webber and Municipal Council Members
SUBMITTED BY Tara Maguire, Director of Community Development
DATE Feb. 25, 2016
SUBJECT Plan Review Timeline - Extension
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION:
The ‘reVision’ plan review process is well underway. In January 2016, the Citizens Planning Advisory
Committee began reviewing draft policy and regulations for our two sets of planning documents. A
revised timeline was presented to Council in the summer of 2014. That plan included an aggressive
timeline that would see adoption of a new set of documents for both the Municipality and the Village
prior to the 2016 election.
RECOMMENDATION:
That council direct staff to proceed with the Revision plan review process based on the
revised timeline presented.
DISCUSSION:
Staff are proposing to extend of the timeline for the Plan Review. The original timeline, which was
aggressive, was to finish the Plan and hold a public hearing before the October 2016 election. Staff
feels that continuing on this timeline would mean rushing to finish the Planning Strategies and Land
Use By-laws. It would also mean holding a public hearing shortly before the election.
Staff proposes finishing the Plan Review in the spring of 2017, and holding engagement events and
a public hearing at that time. The extra time gives the Citizens Planning Advisory Committee (the
Committee) and Council more chances to discuss and amend the draft planning documents.
Specifically, it gives time to work on key issues, such as: coastal regulations; water quality and
lakefront zoning; housing and age-friendly communities; affordable housing; growth pressures near
Hubbards; and design controls in the Village of Chester.
An extra round of public consultations was held which delayed the process originally presented. In
general, the Committee directed staff to hold a more robust engagement program. This took more
time, but staff met with many residents and built awareness about Plan Review. Engagement will
certainly result in a better plan, with more support from residents. The Committee has thoroughly
reviewed all draft documents; while this takes time, it has built understanding and consensus
around key issues. It has slowed down the process, but it is ultimately beneficial that so much good
discussion has happened.
IMPLICATIONS:
1. Policy:
n/a
2. Financial/Budgetary:
The term position for the Planner expires August 31, 2016. In order to facilitate extending the
timeline for the plan review, this position would need to be renewed from August until March 31,
2017. The 2016/17 operating budget includes an additional 31,000 to extend the position from
August 2016-March 31, 2017. An additional amount would also be incurred for the mandatory
costs associated with this position (i.e. benefits, CPP, worker’s compensation).
The 2015-16 operating budget had $41,701 for the plan review as an additional item. If we do not
extend the timeline, all the remaining cost of $50,062 would be incurred in FY2016-17. By pushing
out the timeline, the costs for public hearing, the public information session and the final document
production ($17, 050) would be incurred in FY 2017-18.
Proposed 2016-17 Proposed 2017-18
quantity unit cost
total
cost quantity unit cost
total
cost
Spring Summer 2016
Pop Up Sessions 18 30 540 Document Production
(hardcopy and on-line) 1 10,000 10,000
Materials 18 30 540
Public Hearing 1 1,350 1,900
3rd round of
Engagement 7 825 5,775 Venue Rental 1 150 150
Venue Rental 7 150 1,050 Refreshments 1 150 150
Refreshments 7 125 875 Advertising colour 2 550 1,100
Advertising 7 400 2,800 Copying 1 500 500
Copying 7 150 1,050
Public Information
Meeting 3 1,200 3,600
Special Newsletter 2 1,500 3,000 Venue Rental 3 150 450
Refreshments 3 150 450
Design Charrette 2 2,600 5,200 Advertising 3 400 1,200
Facilitation/Graphic
Engagement 2 1,000 2,000 Copying 3 500 1,500
Venue Rental 2 250 500
Refreshments 2 350 700 SUBTOTAL 15,500
Advertising 2 500 1,000 Contingency 0 1,550
Materials copies printing 2 500 1,000
TOTAL 2017-18 17,050
Third Sector
Completion of Report 15,496
SUBTOTAL 30,011
Contingency 0 3,001
TOTAL 2016-17 33,012
TOTAL 2017-18 17,050
OVERALL TOTAL 50,062
3. Environmental:
Not applicable.
4. Strategic Plan:
This project supports the actions in the following strategic plan goals:
• Strengthen and support environmental, cultural, and social resources;
• Continually reinforce the positive image of the Municipality through leadership in
public engagement and communication;
5. Work Program Implications:
1. This is already the main priority for the Planning staff for the 2016/17 fiscal year.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Timeline
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the proposed timeline and direct staff to proceed with the “reVision” plan review
process based on the revised timeline presented.
2. Direct staff to revise the timeline and provide direction on a new timeline.
3. Direct staff to proceed with the existing timeline and have the documents approved by Council
prior to the 2016 election.
PL
A
N
R
E
V
I
E
W
W
O
R
K
P
L
A
N
BA
C
K
G
R
O
U
N
D
R
E
P
O
R
T
S
DONE
EN
G
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
1
DONE
VI
S
I
O
N
&
O
B
J
E
C
T
I
V
E
S
DONE
EN
G
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
2
DONE
MP
S
D
r
a
f
t
IN PROGRESS
LU
B
-
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
D
r
a
f
t
IN PROGRESS
Ch
e
s
t
e
r
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
S
P
S
D
r
a
f
t
IN PROGRESS
Ch
e
s
t
e
r
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
L
U
B
D
r
a
f
t
IN PROGRESS
Ch
a
r
e
t
t
e
s
Ne
w
s
l
e
t
t
e
r
1
EN
G
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
3
Ne
w
s
l
e
t
t
e
r
2
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
F
i
n
a
l
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
Co
u
n
c
i
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
Pr
o
v
i
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
/
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
Ph
a
s
e
20
1
5
2
0
1
6
20
1
7
Status
Wi
n
t
e
r
S
p
r
i
n
g
S
u
m
m
e
r
F
a
l
l
W
i
n
t
e
r
S
p
r
i
n
g