HomeMy Public PortalAbout2016-03-24_Agenda_Public Hearing_CRINS ProceduresMUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
A G E N D A
PUBLIC HEARING
To amend the Chester Municipal Planning Strategy and the Chester Village Area Secondary
Planning Strategy, and to amend the Municipality of Chester Land Use By-law and the Chester
Village Area Land Use By-law to be consistent with the adoption of the Canadian
Radiocommunications Information and Notification Services (CRINS) protocol.
24 March 2016
Chester Municipal Council Chambers
1) CALL TO ORDER (CHAIRMAN)
a) The Agenda
b) General Rules of Conduct
c) Council’s decision governed by Chester Municipal Planning Strategy
2) REPORT OF THE CLERK
a) Applicant, application date, and nature of application
b) Meetings: Council, Public Information
c) Documentation: Reports, advertisements, notifications, fees paid
d) Written submissions received
3) COMMENTS BY SOLICITOR
4) OVERVIEW BY PLANNER
a) Nature of proposal
b) Outstanding concerns
c) Recommendations
5) COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON THE PROPOSAL
a) Those in favour
b) Those opposed
c) Any other comments
6) CLOSING REMARKS (CHAIRMAN)
a) Next step: decision by Council
7) DECISION OF COUNCIL / DEFERMENT OF DECISION
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
DISTRICT OF CHESTER
R E P O R T
REPORT TO: Tammy Wilson, CAO
SUBMITTED BY: Pam Myra, Municipal Clerk
DATE: 16 March 2016
SUBJECT: 2016-071: Notice of intention to adopt text amendments to planning
documents and to set new hearing date
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(A) DETAILS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
Request from: Council
Request date: 14 January 2015 (initial request); 18 February 2015 (new Public Hearing date)
Nature of amendments:
1. To repeal Section 9A.0 of the Municipal Planning Strategy and Section 3.9 of the Chester Village
Area Secondary Planning Strategy;
2. to substitute these section with text authorizing the Canadian Radiocommunications and
Information Notification Service (CRINS) to carry out all public notification and analysis of
Radiocommunications facilities in accordance with its Antenna System Siting Review and Consultation
Protocol, Reference Issue 3; and
3. to add statements about Radiocommunications facilities in the Land-use By-law.
Intended purpose: To ensure that policies in the Municipal Planning Strategy and the Chester
Village Area Secondary Planning Strategy, and associated Land Use By-law provisions, are consistent
with the decision of Council to utilize the services of CRINS. This decision was made on 8 October
2015 (2015-420).
(B) MEETING DATES
14 January 2016: Council – 2016-009; First Reading
18 February 2016: Council – 2016-071; new Public Hearing date
7 March 2016: Public Information Meeting
(C) DOCUMENTATION
6 January 2016: Staff report with draft text amendments for consideration
10 February 2016: Staff report requesting new Public Hearing date
8 March 2016: Report on the Public Information Meeting
9 March 2016: Staff memo requesting consideration of friendly amendment
Advertisements (Progress Bulletin)
3 February 2016: Notice of Public Information Meeting (this meeting cancelled due to weather)
2 March 2016: Re-issue of Notice of Public Information Meeting
9 March 2016: Notice #1 of Public Hearing
16 March: Notice #2 of Public Hearing
Other notification:
Letters advising of amendments with notification of Public Hearing to: Chester Village Commission,
Municipality of the District of Lunenburg, Municipality of the County of Kings, Municipality of West
Hants, Halifax Regional Municipality.
Fees paid: N/A
(D) WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED
None to date
Pam Myra
Pam Myra
March 16, 2016
MUNICIPALITY OF THEDISTRICT OF CHESTER
REQUEST FOR DECISIONREPORT TO:Tammy Wilson, CAOSUBMITTED BY:Bill DeGrace,Senior PlannerDATE:January 6, 2018SUBJECT:Radiocommunications facilities -Amendments to Planning DocumentsORIGIN:2015-420: Council decision October 8, 2015 to utilize CRINS services______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION:Council’s decision to utilize the services of the Canadian Radiocommunications Information andNotification Service (CRINS), and to adopt its Protocol for all radiocommunications applications,necessitates text amendments to the Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law, as well as totheChester Village Area Secondary Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law.
RECOMMENDATION:Adopt the text amendments as attached.
BACKGROUND:Council, at its meeting of October 8, 2015 agreed to participate and become a member of the CanadianRadiocommunicationsInformation and Notification Service (CRINS), and to utilize its servicesincluding its Antenna System Siting Review and Consultation Protocol, Reference Issue 3 as may beamended from time to time, for all radiocommunications applications in the District.While radiocommunications falls under the jurisdiction of Industry Canada,the local Land UseAuthority (LUA)is recognized as an essential part of antenna system siting and design. A procedureis currently in place within the Municipal and Secondary Planning Strategies which follows that of adevelopment agreement, but with specific criteria.These criteria are used to assess the suitability of aproposed site to enable a recommendation to issue either a Letter of Concurrence or Letter of Non-concurrence.By utilizing the services of CRINS, and adopting its Protocol,the relevant sections of the two PlanningDocumentsdetailingMODC’s current procedure are no longer relevant.Staff proposes that thesesections be repealed and substituted with text that formally identifies CRINS as the review, notificationandconsultationprovider. CRINS undertakes all siting review, notification by mail and local media,and public consultation on behalf of the Land Use Authority,although the Land Use Authority isimplicatedinthe Protocol.
IMPLICATIONS:
1 Policy:Repeal of Policies 9.A.0 in the Municipal Planning Strategy and 3.9 in the Village Area SecondaryPlanning Strategy, and replacement with new policy statements.
2 Financial/Budgetary:N/A
3 Environmental:N/A
4 Strategic Plan:Goal 5: Continually reinforce the positive image of the Municipality through leadership in publicengagement and communication;
5 Work Program ImplicationsCRINS is responsible for public notification. In the Protocol there is no public information meetingunless the “Degree of Visual Change” (visual impact) has been rated “High” and there is no publichearingunder any circumstance.The utilization of the CRINS protocol has the following implications for staff and Council:
5.1 Staff participates in the process by issuing,in collaboration with CRINS, the required LandUse Authority Recommendations Report. This Report includes a statement on the choice of siterelative to community sensitive locations, fire routing and access, compatibility with existing plans,and environmental concerns.
5.2 Staff reviews the siting analysis which is based on established criteria, and reviews theresulting “Degree of Visual Change” (Low,Medium, High).
5.3 The Director of Planning signs the Statement of Concurrence when the Degree of VisualChangehasbeen rated “Low” or “Medium.”
5.4 The relevant planning committee and/or Council reviews the proposal when the Degree ofVisualChange has been rated “High.”
5.5 Staff may participate in the Public Information Meeting, which is held when the Degree ofVisual Change has been rated “High.”
5.6 Council must approve the issuance of a Statement of Concurrence when the Degree of VisualChange has been rated “High.”
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Municipal Planning Strategy, Secondary Planning Strategy and Land Use By-lawamendments
CRINS-SINRC,Antenna System Siting Review and Consultation protocol, Reference Issue 3 [2014]
OPTIONS:a)Adopt the text amendments as attached;b)Adopt alternate text amendments;c)Request further study.
Prepared BY Bill DeGrace Date 7 January 2016Reviewed BY DateAuthorized BY Date
Municipality of the District of Chester
A BY-LAW AMENDING THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER MUNICIPAL
PLANNING STRATEGY AND LAND USE BY-LAW
Be it enacted by the Council of the Municipality of the District of Chester as follows:
Municipal Planning Strategy Amendments
1.Part 9A.0, RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS, is amended by striking out “TOWERS” in the title
and substituting “FACILITIES”.
2.Sections 9A.0.1 through 9A.0.8 are repealed and substituted with:
“Council recognizes that the sole authority for issuing licenses for radiocommunications facilities lies with
the Federal Government and specifically with Industry Canada under the Radiocommunications Act. The
Municipality is a participating Land Use Authority with the Canadian Radiocommunications Information
and Notification Service (CRINS). Consequently, the Municipality authorizes CRINS to conduct siting,
review and public consultation processes in accordance with the CRINS Antenna System Siting Review and
Consultation Protocol, Reference Issue 3 [2014](as amended from time to time). The role of the
Municipality shall be to provide input and comments as part of this Protocol.”
Land Use By-law Amendment
1.Part 4, GENERAL PROVISIONS, is amended by adding after Subsection 4.4.9 a new Subsection:
“4.4.9A Radiocommunications facilities
Nothing in this by-law shall prevent the use of land for the installation of radiocommunications facilities
that have been issued a license by the Federal Government and specifically by Industry Canada, following
due process as prescribed in the Canadian Radiocommunications Information and Notification Service
(CRINS)Antenna System Siting Review and Consultation Protocol, Reference Issue 3 [2014]as amended
from time to time.”
Clerk’s Annotation for Official By-law Book
Date of First Reading:January 14, 2016
Date of Advertisement –Notice of Intention:March 9, 2016; March 16, 2016
Date of Second Reading:
Date of Advertisement of Passage of By-law:
Certification and seal:
Municipality of the District of Chester
A BY-LAW AMENDING THE CHESTER VILLAGE AREA REVISED SECONDARY PLANNING
STRATEGY AND LAND USE BY-LAW
Be it enacted by the Council of the Municipality of the District of Chester as follows:
Secondary Planning Strategy Amendments
1.Part 3.9, RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS, is amended by striking out “TOWERS” in the title and
substituting “FACILITIES”.
2.Sections 3.9.1 through 3.9.8 are repealed and substituted with:
“Council recognizes that the sole authority for issuing licenses for radiocommunications facilities lies with
the Federal Government and specifically with Industry Canada under the Radiocommunications Act. The
Municipality is a participating Land Use Authority with the Canadian Radiocommunications Information
and Notification Service (CRINS).Consequently, the Municipality authorizes CRINS to conduct siting,
review and public consultation processes in accordance with the CRINS Antenna System Siting Review and
Consultation Protocol, Reference Issue 3 [2014](as amended from time to time). The role of the
Municipality shall be to provide input and comments as part of this Protocol.”
Land Use By-law Amendment
1.Part 4, GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR ALL ZONES, is amended by adding after Subsection 4.4.18 a new
Subsection:
“4.4.19 Radiocommunications facilities
Nothing in this by-law shall prevent the use of land for the installation of radiocommunications facilities
that have been issued a license by the Federal Government and specifically by Industry Canada, following
due process as prescribed in the Canadian Radiocommunications Information and Notification Service
(CRINS)Antenna System Siting Review and Consultation Protocol, Reference Issue 3 [2014]as amended
from time to time.”
Clerk’s Annotation for Official By-law Book
Date of First Reading:January 14, 2016
Date of Advertisement –Notice of Intention:March 9, 2016; March 16, 2016
Date of Second Reading:
Date of Advertisement of Passage of By-law:
Certification and seal:
MUNICIPALITY OF THEDISTRICT OF CHESTER
REQUEST FOR DECISIONREPORT TO:Tammy Wilson, CAOSUBMITTED BY:Bill DeGrace, Senior PlannerDATE:February 10, 2016SUBJECT:Radiocommunications facilities -Amendments to Planning DocumentsORIGIN:2016-009: Council decision to set public hearing date______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION:Council’s, at its meeting of January 14, 2016, determined to adopt the Canadian RadiocommunicationsInformationand Notification Service (CRINS)Protocol for all radiocommunications applications,andthe relevant text amendments to the Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law, as well as totheChester Village Area Secondary Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law.Council set a Public Hearing Date of February 25, 2016. A Public Information Meeting was scheduledfor Monday evening, February 8th and advertised as such. Inclement weather caused this meeting tobe cancelled. To ensure adequate time to re-advertise for the Public Information Meeting and thePublic Hearing, staff would like to recommence the process and is requesting a new Public Hearingdate.
RECOMMENDATION:Rescind the motion2016-009 made on January 14, 2016:
MOVED by Councillor Church-Cornelius, SECONDED by Councillor Myra that Council move to
First Reading and give notice of intention to adopt the text amendments to the Municipal Planning
Strategy and Land Use By-law, as well as to the Chester Village Area Secondary Planning Strategy
and Land Use By-law; and setting date for Public Hearing on February 25, 2016 at 9:30
a.m.CARRIED.
Further, to that that Council give notice of intention to adopt the text amendments to the Municipal
Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law, as well as to the Chester Village Area Secondary Planning
Strategy and Land Use By-law; and setting date for Public Hearing on Thursday March 24, 2016at 9:30 a.m. a Public Hearing regarding the CRINS protocol amendments.
OPTIONS:a)Set a Public Hearing Date of March 24, 2016b)Set an alternate date.
Prepared BY Bill DeGrace Date February 10, 2016Reviewed BY Tara Maguire Date February 10, 2016Authorized BY Date
MUNICIPALITY OF THEDISTRICT OF CHESTER
MEMORANDUMREPORT TO:Warden and CouncilSUBMITTED BY:Bill DeGrace, Senior PlannerDATE:8 March 2016SUBJECT:Radiocommunications facilities –amendments to planning documentsPUBLIC INFORMATION MEETINGORIGIN:2016-071:Notice of intention to adopt text amendments to planningdocumentsand setting of new public hearing date______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION:Council, at its meeting of January 14, 2016, determined to adopt the Canadian RadiocommunicationsInformation and Notification Service (CRINS) Protocol for all radiocommunications applications, and therelevanttext amendments to the Municipal Planning Strategy and the Land Use By-law as well as to the ChesterVillage Area Secondary Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law.
DISCUSSION:On Monday, March 7, 2016, beginning at 7:00 p.m., Garth Sturtevant and I hosted an advertised PublicInformation Meeting. Material provided included the text amendments to planning documents, the CRINSProtocol, a technical paper prepared by CRINS on the Antenna Siting Design Framework, and a sampleconsultation package.A short Power-point on CRINS was on hand for presentation.There were no attendees. We closed the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Prepared BY: Bill DeGrace Date:8 March 2016Reviewed BY:Date:Authorized BY:
MUNICIPALITY OF THEDISTRICT OF CHESTER
MEMORANDUMREPORT TO:Warden and CouncilSUBMITTED BY:Bill DeGrace, Senior PlannerDATE:9 March 2016SUBJECT:Radiocommunications facilities –amendments to planning documentsORIGIN:2016-071:Notice of intention to adopt text amendments to planningdocumentsand setting of new public hearing date______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CURRENT SITUATION:Council, at a Public Hearing set for 24 March 2016, may consider text amendments to planning documents toalign these documents with the Canadian Radiocommunications Information and Notification Service (CRINS)Protocol.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:The text amendments reference Industry Canada. With the change of government, Industry Canada is nowcalledInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada.For greater clarity, and as a friendly amendment, staff recommends DELETING the phrases “and specificallywith Industry Canada”and “and specifically by Industry Canada”where they occur in the proposed textamendments. Because the name of this department may further change, staff recommends retaining only thereferences to “the Federal Government” in the amendments.
Prepared BY: Bill DeGrace Date:9 March 2016Reviewed BY:Date:Authorized BY:
1
Antenna System Siting Review
and Consultation Protocol,
Reference Issue 3
July 15, 2014
2
Table of Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 4
1 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................ 5
2 Jurisdiction and Interpretation ............................................................................................................. 6
3 Radiocommunications Development Plan ................................................................................................ 7
3.1 Annual Review ................................................................................................................................... 7
4 Excluded Antenna Systems ..................................................................................................................... 7
4.1 Basic Exclusions ................................................................................................................................. 7
4.2 Additional Exclusions ..................................................................................................................... 8
4.3 Confirmation of Exclusion.............................................................................................................. 8
4.4 Community Sensitive Locations ....................................................................................................... 8
5 Application Requirements (for Non-Excluded Applications) .................................................................... 9
5.1 Pre-consultation Review .................................................................................................................... 9
5.2 Non-Excluded Radiocommunications Facilities ................................................................................ 9
5.3 Complete Application ...................................................................................................................... 11
5.4 Additional Information .................................................................................................................... 11
6 Siting on LUA-owned Properties ............................................................................................................. 11
7 LUA Recommendations Report ............................................................................................................... 11
7.1 Statement on Land Use ................................................................................................................... 12
7.2 Antenna Siting Design Framework Criteria ................................................................................ 12
7.3 Statement on Compliance with General Design Recommendations .......................................... 13
7.4 Siting of Facility Relative to Existing Use .......................................................................................... 14
7.5 Statement of Concurrence .............................................................................................................. 15
8 Public Consultation .............................................................................................................................. 16
8.1 Notification Package .................................................................................................................... 16
8.2 Notice Sign ..................................................................................................................................... 17
8.3 Public Information Meeting ........................................................................................................... 18
8.4 Local Media Notice .......................................................................................................................... 19
8.5 Timelines and Concluding Consultation .......................................................................................... 20
9 Deliverables ............................................................................................................................................. 20
3
9.1 LUA Recommendations Report and Concurrence .......................................................................... 21
9.2 Circumstances of Municipal Non-concurrence ............................................................................... 21
9.3 Time Frames ........................................................................................................................................ 22
10 Definitions ........................................................................................................................................... 22
4
Introduction
The purpose of the Antenna System Siting Review and Consultation Protocol, Reference Issue 3 1is to detail the review
process for an application submitted through CRINS-SINRC to a participating Land Use Authority (LUA) for the siting and
construction of an antenna system, as well as defining the participating LUA’s expectations relating to the location and
design of radiocommunications facilities.
This protocol applies to any proponent planning to install a new or modify an existing radiocommunications facility
regardless of the type of installation or service. This includes, but not limited to:
• Personal Communications Services (PCS);
• Cellular operators;
• Fixed wireless operators;
• Broadcasting operators;
• Land-mobile operators;
• License-exempt operators; and,
• Amateur radio operators.
All new radiocommunications facilities are expected to follow this process to obtain either a Notice of Facility
Exemption or a Notice of Completion relating to the consultation and the corresponding Land Use Authority (LUA)
Recommendations Report.
1 [Short Title: CRINS-SINRC Reference Protocol, Issue 3 (2014)]
5
1 Objectives
The goal of this protocol is to provide a framework which sets out the LUA’s expectations for appropriate design and
satisfactory public consultation for proposed radiocommunications facilities. The objectives that implement this goal
are:
1.1 Having regard for Industry Canada’s legislative authority in a protocol which also respects the
context for development, and land-use mandate of the LUA;
1.2 Setting out a transparent, consistent, and predictable process for the evaluation of all
radiocommunications facility proposals that:
a) Establishes objective criteria and guidelines for evaluating and processing applications seeking
LUA concurrence;
b) Specifies the LUA’s expectations as to how new radiocommunications facilities are to be sited
and designed in a manner that compliments the surrounding landscape and public realm;
c) Defines a clear consultation process administered through CRINS-SINRC that requires proponents
to engage and inform stakeholders about radiocommunications facilities; and,
d) Develops a predictable timeline for issuing of LUA recommendations that incorporates early
consultation to identify potential issues with applications in order to meet Industry Canada's
timeline requirements.
1.3 Detailing the roles and responsibilities of the various parties in the radiocommunications facility
consultation process;
1.4 Ensuring that the LUA’s residents and businesses are made adequately aware of radiocommunications facility
proposals through education and public consultation; and,
1.5 Establishing an appropriate conclusion to the LUA consultation process, including specific outcomes and
deliverables.
6
2 Jurisdiction and Interpretation
2.1 Wireless communications and broadcast operators in Canada are licensed by the Department of Industry
(Industry Canada) in accordance with the exclusively federal jurisdiction vested in the Radiocommunications
Act Section 5(1) (a) (i.1). Additionally, the broadcasting communication operator’s activities are licensed
separately by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC).
2.2 As a federal undertaking, radiocommunications sites must adhere to all applicable federal regulations and
guidelines, including but not limited to:
• The National Building Code and National Fire Code;
• Canadian Environmental Assessment Act;
• Industry Canada’s CPC-2-0-17 - Conditions of Licence for Mandatory Roaming and Antenna Tower and
Site Sharing and to Prohibit Exclusive Site Arrangements;
• Health Canada's Safety Code 6; and,
• Industry Canada's CPC-2-0-03.
2.3 Radiocommunications sites are not subject to either municipal or provincial land-use legislation
including the Planning Act and /or Municipal Governance Act of a province or territory. No formal
development or planning agreements can be executed and registered on title with respect to
radiocommunications facilities.
2.4 For the purposes of this protocol, the Land Use Authority (LUA) shall be the municipal government, or in
the case of land administered by the Crown, the relevant provincial government or federal government
agency.
2.5 For radiocommunications facilities not excluded under Section 4 of this protocol, proponents are expected to
satisfy the public consultation requirements of the applicable LUA. The role of the LUA is to provide input
and comments to Industry Canada as part of that process.
2.6 This protocol is to be read in its entirety as a comprehensive and integrated policy framework to establish
the site criteria and process leading to the issuing of a Notice of Completion or Notice of Facility
Exemption, and a LUA Recommendations Report for a proposed facility.
2.7 For the purposes of this protocol, the only member of LUA staff having the authority to manage and
exercise responsibilities under this protocol shall be the Director of Planning or his or her designate. No
powers or privileges under this protocol shall at any time be interpreted to extend to any other member of
staff.
7
3 Radiocommunications Development Plan
3.1 Annual Review
3.1.1 Proponents shall be invited to submit within 90 days of the adoption of this protocol and by September 30th of
each subsequent year, a written Radiocommunications Development Plan (RDP) which outlines the
proponent’s expected areas of infrastructure development for the coming year.
3.1.2 The LUA shall review each proponent’s plan and identify areas of common interest between proponents. The
LUA shall host a meeting with all Proponents who submitted an RDP to identify opportunities for joint build
and co-location pursuant to Industry Canada’s CPC 2-0-03 and CPC 2-0-17.
3.1.3 The LUA shall identify, as part of the meeting, areas of development and development applications within its
jurisdiction where Proponents may have an interest in expanding their services. The LUA may facilitate
discussion with land developers, and other interested parties, to allow the Proponents to consider infrastructure
options during the planning stage.
3.1.4 Where feasible, the LUA may offer the Proponents an option for pre-approval on proposed facilities where a
joint build option exists.
4 Excluded Antenna Systems
4.1 Basic Exclusions
Industry Canada excludes a number of proposals from consultation with the public. The exclusions
are as follows:
a) The maintenance of existing radio apparatus including the antenna system, transmission line, mast,
power, or other antenna-supporting structure;
b) Addition or modification of an antenna system (including improving the structural integrity of its
integral mast to facilitate sharing), the transmission line, antenna-supporting structure, or other
radio apparatus to existing infrastructure, building, or other structure, provided the addition or
modification does not result in an overall height increase above the existing structure of no greater
than 25% of the height of the original structure. For greater clarity, Industry Canada extends this
exclusion to radiocommunications facilities proposed to be attached or affixed to any building or
structure, including a rooftop or support pillar;
c) Maintenance of a radiocommunications facility's painting or lighting in order to comply with
the requirements of Transport Canada;
d) Installation of a radiocommunications facility used for a limited duration for a special event or to
support local, provincial, or national emergency operations during that emergency, and is removed
8
within three months after the special event or emergency; and,
e) All radiocommunications facilities less than 15 metres (50 feet) in height except when the proponent
is a telecommunications company as defined under the Telecommunications Act.
4.2 Additional Exclusions
The LUA additionally excludes the following radiocommunications facilities from public consultation:
a) Any facility which has been pre-approved as part of a proponent’s annual Radiocommunications
Development Plan; and,
b) Additional equipment shelters associated with a new co-located facility.
4.3 Confirmation of Exclusion
4.3.1 Notwithstanding 4.1 and 4.2 above, the proponent is required to confirm with the LUA that the proposed
facility meets the exclusion criteria by submitting proposal information in accordance with Section 5.1 of this
protocol.
4.3.2 Where a proponent demonstrates that their proposal meets one or more of the exclusion criteria of Sections 4.1
or Section 4.2, the LUA shall issue a Notice of Facility Exemption to the proponent and Industry Canada.
4.3.3 Proponents are asked to incorporate the design recommendations provided in Section 7.2 of this protocol (as
applicable), even if a Notice of Facility Exemption has been issued.
4.4 Community Sensitive Locations
4.4.1 Notwithstanding the exclusions outlined in Section 4.1 and Section 4.2 of this protocol, Industry Canada
states in Section 6 of CPC-2-0-03 that exclusion criteria should be applied with consideration for local
surroundings. To that end, proponents are expected to engage in a pre-consultation review with the LUA,
even where a proposed radiocommunications facility is excluded, to allow the LUA an opportunity to
determine if the proposed facility falls within a Community Sensitive Location.
4.4.2 A Community Sensitive Location shall be defined as any property, which under the relevant LUA
regulations:
is currently designated as a Heritage Property;
is an area of designated architectural significance;
contains a site of archeological significance; or,
is an natural conservation area.
4.4.3 A proposed facility will not be eligible for an exemption from consultation, and the LUA will request that
Industry Canada override their policy on radiocommunications facilities excluded from consultation, where
a facility is proposed within a Community Sensitive Location.
9
5 Application Requirements
5.1 Pre-consultation Review
Proponents shall request a pre-consultation review through the CRINS-SINRC system. Requests for pre-
consultation will be accepted once the proponent has submitted the following information to the CRINS-
SINRC online system:
• The location of the proposed radiocommunications facility, including its address and location on the
lot or structure (CRINS-SINRC Site Information Abstract);
• A short summary of the proposed radiocommunications facility and, if applicable, how it meets one of
the exclusion criteria under Section 4 of this protocol (CRINS-SINRC Facility Type Abstract);
• Set of drawings illustrating the proposal, including a conceptual site plan, elevation drawings, and
context plan showing the development within the existing neighborhood (which can be supplied using
an aerial photograph base) according to the drawing guidelines outlined in Section 5.2 (c) and (d).
Such a request shall not be deemed by the LUA as the official commencement of the 120-day
consultation process, in accordance with Section 5.3 of this protocol.
5.2 Non-Excluded Radiocommunications Facilities
Any proposals for non-excluded radiocommunications facilities will require the submission of a complete
application through the CRINS-SINRC online system. This includes completing the online application
information, payment of fees, and uploading electronic versions of supporting documentation as follows:
a) CRINS-SINRC online data entry of the following information :
• The location of the proposed radiocommunications facility, including its
geographic coordinates, its address and location on the lot or structure (CRINS-
SINRC Site Information Abstract);
• A description of the proposed structure type, shelter type, height, access, and
utility sources (CRINS-SINRC Facility Type Abstract);
b) Upload a written justification on the CRINS-SINRC Facility Type Abstract containing:
The rationale for the selection of the proposed site (indication of whether the site provides
coverage and/or capacity, what communities / areas will benefit from the new facility);
Description of co-location alternatives considered within a 3 km radius of the proposed site;
A statement indicating the justification for the height of the proposed radiocommunications
facility (towers only);
A statement on future co-location possibilities for the support structure, if applicable (CPC-2-0-
17);
A statement on how the radiocommunications facility, if located in an area designated for
future urban development, shall complement and become a part of the future community
without unduly limiting the potential for future urban development; and,
A statement indicating the justification for not complying with any of the LUA’s preferred
design criteria in Section 7.3 of this protocol, as applicable.
10
c) Upload to the CRINS-SINRC system a set of colour photographs of the subject lot, oriented toward
the proposed radiocommunications facility from at least three landmarks or important locations in the
vicinity of the proposed site:
• One set showing the current site conditions (minimum 3 photos); and,
• One set including superimposed images of the proposed radiocommunications facility
(minimum 3 photos).
• A topographical map or satellite image showing the location from which the pictures were taken
(1 image).
d) Upload to the CRINS-SINRC system a site plan, elevations, and survey drawings prepared to appropriate
metric scale showing:
• The subject lot and lease area (a key plan can be used for properties having an area of 2.0
hectares or greater);
• General site grading;
• The location of existing lot lines, and setbacks from those for the proposed
radiocommunications facility;
• Setbacks from existing and proposed buildings and structures for the proposed
radiocommunications facility;
• Setbacks from the nearest building not on the subject property, measured from the nearest
point of the building, structure, or feature;
• The staked limits of significant natural heritage features and other sensitive lands and
setbacks from those for the proposed radiocommunications facility within 3 times the height
of the proposed structure (if applicable);
• Existing and proposed landscaping, including an inventory of existing vegetation and any
plantings proposed to screen the base of the tower and any structures on the ground where
applicable;
• Access proposed to the radiocommunications facility, including any motor vehicle
parking spaces including dimensions; and,
• The structure type and height of the proposed radiocommunications facility.
e) Upload to the CRINS-SINRC system mapping prepared to appropriate metric scale
showing:
• The location of the proposed radiocommunications facility within the community; and,
• Network coverage mapping showing the applicant’s current coverage and anticipated
coverage (including signal strengths in dBm) with the installation of the proposed
radiocommunications facility including the nearest existing antenna systems
belonging to the proponent.
f) Upload approvals from Transport Canada's and NAV Canada outlining aeronautical obstruction
marking requirements (whether painting, lighting, or both) if available. If unavailable, the proponents
can provide their applications to Transport Canada and NAV Canada together with an undertaking to
provide those requirements once they become available;
g) Upload a written attestation that the proposed radiocommunications facility will comply with Safety
Code 6, including combined effects within the local radio environment at all times, signed by the
Professional Engineer taking responsibility for the site’s compliance;
11
h) Upload a statement on the potential effects that the proposal may have on nearby electronic equipment
(both existing and proposed) in accordance with CPC-2-0-03 and EMCAB-2, as well as measures
proposed to mitigate those effects; and,
i) Upload a written attestation that the proposed radiocommunications facility will comply with the
National Building Code and National Fire Code in accordance with the proponent’s responsibilities
under enabling federal legislation, signed by the Professional Engineer taking responsibility for the
site’s compliance.
5.3 Complete Application
To clarify Industry Canada’s requirements of Section 4 of CPC-2-0-03, the LUA shall consider the date a
Complete Application was received as the official commencement of the 120-day consultation process.
Such a process is consistent with and required for other development applications in the LUA. A
determination on the completeness of an application or request for additional information will be provided
within five days of receipt of the application by the LUA.
5.4 Additional Information
If a request is made to the proponent for additional information prior to the LUA deeming the application
to be complete and no additional information is supplied within 90 days, the LUA shall advise Industry
Canada of the incomplete nature of the application and will deem the application abandoned.
6 Siting on LUA-owned Properties
Any request to install a radiocommunications facility on lands owned by the LUA shall be made to the Manager of
Realty Services, in accordance with LUA policy. Independently, an application shall be required by the proponent in
accordance with Section 5.2 of this protocol.
7 LUA Recommendations Report
The LUA acknowledges that proponents can install radiocommunications facilities in almost any location. It is the
LUA’s position to work with proponents to achieve the best possible design of a radiocommunications facility for
constituents. Such design strikes an appropriate balance between technological and network coverage requirements,
and unobtrusive development that compliments or improves the surrounding landscape and public realm.
As part of the input provided to proponents and Industry Canada, an LUA Recommendations Report will be provided
for all proposed installations and shall be a required deliverable for non-excluded applications prior to a Notice of
Completion being issued. The LUA Recommendation report shall consist minimally of the following elements:
12
7.1 Statement on Land Use
The LUA shall provide a statement on the Proponent’s choice of site relative to the following criteria:
Community Sensitive Locations
Fire routing and access.
Zoning and compatibility with existing Strategic Plans.
Environmental Concerns
7.2 Antenna Siting Design Framework Criteria
7.2.1 The LUA shall provide Antenna Siting Design Framework (ASDF) criteria for the proposed site to the
proponent through the CRINS-SINRC system. The ASDF criteria shall outline design goals for the
proposed site based on the location chosen by the proponent. The LUA shall inform its recommendations
based on how well the proponent’s design meets the ASDF design criteria.
7.2.2 The ASDF provides an overall classification of the proposed design through a concept known as “Degree
of Visual Change” which is characterized as “Low”, “Medium” or “High”.
7.2.3 The level of public consultation required for a proposed site shall be dictated by the ASDF “Degree of
Visual Change” classification as follows:
“Low” – the proposed facility requires that land owners within a minimum of 120 metres or 3
times the structure height, whichever is greater, be notified by mail/courier requesting
comments or questions over a 30 day period. No road signage is required. No public meeting is
required. LUA Staff shall issue a LUA Recommendation Report within 30 days. A Notice of
Completion shall be issued by CRINS-SINRC upon receipt of the LUA Recommendation
Report and approval by the LUA Designated Representative.
“Medium” – the proposed facility requires that land owners within a minimum of 120 metres or
3 times the structure height, whichever is greater, be notified by mail/courier requesting
comments or questions over a 30 day period. A Public Notice shall be placed in local media
outlets requesting comments or questions over a 30 day period. Road signage shall be erected
prior to the mailout to adjacent landowners and publication of the Public Notice. No public
meeting is required. Staff shall issue an LUA Recommendation report within 30 days and such
report shall be accompanied by a summary of public comments received from adjacent
landowners and members of the public. A Notice of Completion shall be issued by CRINS-
SINRC upon receipt of the LUA Recommendation Report and approval by the LUA
Designated Representative.
“High” – the proposed facility requires that land owners within a minimum of 120 metres or 3
times the structure height, whichever is greater, be notified by mail/courier requesting
comments or questions over a 30 day period. Road signage shall be erected prior to the mailout
to adjacent landowners. A Public Information Meeting shall be held no later than 14 days after
the closing date for submissions from adjacent landowners. LUA staff shall prepare an LUA
Recommendations Report within 60 days, including a summary of public comments received
during the public information meeting, and shall present the report to the LUA’s Planning
Committee and/or Council for review. A Notice of Completion shall be issued by CRINS-
13
SINRC on the date the LUA Recommendation Report is presented to Council. However, a
statement of concurrence from the LUA will only occur with the approval of Council.
7.3 Statement on Compliance with General Design Recommendations
The following general design guidelines shall apply for all radiocommunications facilities in the LUA and proponents
are asked to follow these guidelines, as applicable, for all proposed facilities:
7.3.1 Colors used for all components of the radiocommunications facility shall be compatible with the
surrounding landscape and public realm:
a) Color matching shall be the first preference for the LUA, with the exact color(s)
determined on a case-by-case basis to enhance the surrounding landscape and public realm;
b) Neutral colors shall be the second preference; and,
c) Non-reflective surfaces and paints shall be used.
7.3.2 Designs requiring no illumination are expected except where Transport Canada and NAV Canada
requirements for illumination of the radiocommunications facility are identified.
7.3.3 Where a proposed radiocommunications facility requires an equipment shelter:
a) The first preference is to locate such structures within a main or accessory building used for
other uses on the same lot;
b) A new, above-ground equipment shelter at the base of the structure or abutting the penthouse of a
building is the next preference of the LUA; and,
c) Any new equipment shelter shall require architectural treatments sensitive to the
surrounding landscape and public realm and in the case of a building, consistent with the
architectural style of the building.
7.3.4 Where a proposed radiocommunications facility requires screening and access restriction:
a) Existing vegetation shall be preserved wherever possible, with new plantings provided to
enhance the surrounding landscape and public realm;
b) Where fencing is proposed, design details including the materials proposed and
elevation drawings showing details and gate locations shall be provided in the drawings
uploaded with the application;
c) Fencing shall use materials sensitive to the surrounding landscape and public realm; and,
d) The use of razor wire requires analysis in the justification report, including how its use
will not compromise the surrounding landscape and public realm.
14
7.3.5 Vehicular access to the proposed radiocommunications facility should be provided as follows:
a) Access needs to be suitably provided to a public street or across a private right-of-way;
and,
b) Any parking space provided shall not be within a road allowance.
7.3.6 Where a proposed radiocommunications facility is located on the roof of a building or structure:
a) Support structures and equipment shelters should be color-matched or designed
with architectural treatments and/or shrouding to compliment or blend in with the
existing building; and,
b) Antennas should be flush-mounted wherever possible.
7.3.7 New radiocommunications facilities shall avoid obscuring significant views and vistas.
7.3.8 Where a proposed radiocommunications facility is located on the roof of a building or structure:
a) Any signage required by Industry Canada shall be permitted to be posted on
the radiocommunications facility;
b) The LUA shall require the posting of a small plaque at the base of the
radiocommunications facility, identifying its owner/operator and contact information for
that party; and,
c) No third-party signage, flags, or graphics are permitted on a telecommunication facility
except where such signage is part of the shrouding scheme for the site and the signage is
compliant with the LUAs existing signage requirements.
7.4 Siting of Facility Relative to Existing Use
The LUA acknowledges that radiocommunications facilities are not subject to the requirements of a Zoning
By-law. Notwithstanding this, the following requirements apply to radiocommunications facilities:
7.4.1 The placement of any parking space or any component of a radiocommunications facility shall not
create or cause a situation of non-compliance with any LUA Zoning By-law for any other use,
building, or structure on the same lot.
15
7.5 Statement of Concurrence
The LUA shall provide a statement of concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposed facility, signed by
the Director of Planning.
7.5.1 If the LUA concurs with the proposed facility subject to conditions, the Statement of Concurrence
shall state any conditions to be satisfied by the proponent, and the Proponent shall be asked to
provide a Letter of Undertaking on their letterhead agreeing to satisfy the conditions.
7.5.2 If the LUA does not concur with proposed facility, then the Statement of Non-Concurrence shall
detail the reasons that the proposed facility is deemed unacceptable, and any remedies available to
the Proponent to satisfy the LUA and bring their proposal into an acceptable state.
7.5.3 In the case that non-concurrence is due to the Proponent not being prepared to satisfy the
conditions provided under a conditional Statement of Concurrence, then the LUA shall request that
Industry Canada not provide a license to the Proponent for the proposed site.
16
8 Public Consultation
In completing a public consultation process for a new, non-excluded radiocommunications facility, it is expected
that CRINS-SINRC and LUA staff shall facilitate the process with support from the proponent as required. A Public
Consultation shall be required only for facilities that do not meet the exclusion criteria of Section 4 of this protocol,
and shall be conducted according to the following process:
8.1 Notification Package
a) The LUA will provide CRINS-SINRC staff with a list of landowners and tenants, where applicable,
within a radius of the greater of 120 metres or three times the height of the proposed
radiocommunications facility. This distance shall be measured outward from the furthest point of the
radiocommunications facility’s supporting mechanism (i.e. outermost guy line, building edge, or tower
face). All properties within this distance shall be included on the mailing list.
b) CRINS-SINRC will prepare and distribute the notification package to the following recipients:
• To the landowners within a radius the greater of 3 times the tower height or 120 metres from
the proposed radiocommunications facility, addressed to the name on the list and “or the
occupant”;
• The Director of Planning or his or her designate;
• The CAO of the LUA;
• If an adjacent municipality is located within 120 metres or three times the tower height of the
proposed radiocommunications facility, the CAO of that municipality; and,
• The local councilor(s).
c) The package shall include the following items submitted under Section 5.2 of this protocol:
• Description of and rationale for the proposed structure including structure type and design,
dimensions, height, color, lighting, and site access (including measures to control public
access);
• Superimposed images of the proposed radiocommunications facility;
• Attestation that the general public will be protected in compliance with Safety Code 6,
including combined effects within the local radio environment at all times;
• The project’s status under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act;
• A description of Transport Canada's and NAV Canada’s aeronautical obstruction marking
requirements (whether painting, lighting, or both) if available. If unavailable, the proponents
can provide their expectation of Transport Canada's requirements together with an
undertaking to provide those requirements once they become available;
• A statement on the potential effects, measures that the proposal may have on nearby
electronic equipment (both existing and proposed) in accordance with CPC-2-0-03 and
EMCAB-2, as well as measures proposed to mitigate those effects;
• Attestation that the proposed facility shall comply with all structural codes and regulations;
• Notice that general information relating to antenna systems is available on the CRINS-SINRC
website;
17
• Contact information for CRINS-SINRC, a representative of the proponent, the Director of
Planning Services or his or her designate, and a representative from Industry Canada; and,
• Information on how to submit comments and the closing date for submission of written public
comments (which shall be not less than 30 days from the date of transmission of the
notification).
8.2 Notice Sign
a) The proponent shall erect, when required under this protocol, one notice sign along each lot line abutting
a public street or roadway.
b) Where a public meeting is required, the sign shall be posted at least 21 days before the public
information meeting. Where no public information meeting is required, the sign shall be posted for
three weeks at any point during the consultation process.
c) All notice signs shall be erected on the lot so that it is clearly visible and legible from all public streets
or roadways abutting the subject lot. The signs shall be provided by CRINS-SINRC and conform to
the following format:
18
d) Photographs illustrating all notice signs posted and the date on which they were installed on the
subject lot shall be uploaded to the CRINS-SINRC online system by the proponent as soon as
possible after installation.
e) All notice signs must be removed no later than 21 days after an issuance of a Notice of Completion.
8.3 Public Information Meeting
a) The Public Information Meeting shall be required for all non-excluded facilities classified as
“High” under ASDF criteria, and shall be open and accessible to all members of the public and
local stakeholders.
b) The convener shall make it clear at the beginning of the public meeting that the LUA is a commenting
agency only, and that all decisions relating to the proposal are to be made by Industry Canada at a later
date.
c) The public information meeting will be convened and facilitated by the LUA or CRINS-SINRC at the
LUA’s request. A representative from the LUA may attend to assist in answering questions.
d) The proponent shall provide, at a minimum, two sets of display panels containing a site plan
drawing and colour photographs of the subject lot, oriented toward the proposed
radiocommunications facility from at least three landmarks or important locations in the vicinity
of the proposed site:
o One set showing the current site conditions; and,
o One set including superimposed images of the proposed radiocommunications facility.
o The convener shall record all names, addresses, and contact information for attendees.
e) All Public Information Meetings convened by CRINS-SINRC shall be video recorded and
made available on the CRINS-SINRC website for viewing.
19
8.4 Local Media Notice
Where a Notice in the local media is required under this protocol, CRINS-SINRC shall additionally place a
notice in the outlets identified by the LUA. Publication of this notice shall be synchronized with the
distribution of the public notification package. The notice shall be consistent with the following format:
20
8.5 Timelines and Concluding Consultation
a) All written submissions received from the public by a means other than direct entry into the CRINS-SINRC
online system by a registered user shall be entered into the online system by CRINS-SINRC staff with 24
hours of receipt. Once entered into the online system an acknowledgement by the proponent shall be made
within 14 days.
b) A dialogue between a party who has provided a written submission and a proponent shall continue until all
Relevant Concerns are answered, or a further response or inquiry is not received from either party within 21
days, whichever occurs first. A proponent must respond to all reasonable and relevant inquiries within 60 days
or provide a reason why the question or concern is not relevant.
c) CRINS-SINRC will maintain the official records of public consultation for the LUA containing, at a
minimum, the following:
• Copies of all letters and other written communications received on or before the last day for
comments associated with the application;
• Copies of responses outlining how the concerns and issues raised were or will be addressed
or, alternatively, clearly setting out the reasons why such concerns are not reasonable or
relevant; and,
• Copies of any follow-up responses received from residents.
• Summary of the public information meeting including attendee list and contact information (if
applicable);
9 Deliverables
Copies of the Notice of Facility Exemption or Notice of Completion, and LUA Recommendations Report shall be
sent directly to Industry Canada with copies sent to the following parties:
• The proponent;
• The CAO of the LUA;
• The applicable Councilors;
• If an adjacent municipality is located within 120 metres of the proposed radiocommunications facility, the CAO
of that municipality; and,
• The Director of Planning for the LUA.
Copies of the above notices and reports shall be maintained by CRINS-SINRC online for 7 years following the
completion of the consultation.
21
9.1 LUA Recommendations Report and Concurrence
The end result of a successful land use authority consultation process consists of two parts:
9.1.1 The first component is an LUA Recommendation Report. This report shall outline the recommendations of
the LUA with respect to the design of the proposed facility. This part of the Concurrence shall only be signed
by the Director of Planning once a Letter of Undertaking signed by the proponent is received by the LUA.
This Letter of Undertaking shall form a Schedule(s) to the final LUA Recommendations Report and shall
include the following requirements, if applicable:
a) Attestation that the proponent shall construct and operate the radiocommunications facility in
accordance with the drawings and justification report submitted; and
b) Any noted design requirements or considerations and other conditions to meet LUA expectations.
9.1.2 The second component is a Notice of Completion of Public Consultation, or a Notice of Facility Exemption.
This part of the Concurrence shall only be signed by the Executive Director of CRINS-SINRC and the LUA
Director of Planning, or his designate, once proponent has completed the consultation as set out in this
protocol.
9.1.3 A proposal which has received a Notice of Facility Exemption or Notice of Completion, and a LUA
Recommendations Report where the LUA has approved the site and the proponent have agreed to be bound
by the conditions of the approval (if applicable) shall be deemed to have received Municipal Concurrence.
9.1.4 The only valid Municipal Concurrence statement the LUA shall issue is one attached to the LUA
Recommendations Report and signed by the Director of Planning or his or her designate and sent directly to
Industry Canada, with a copy to CRINS-SINRC for publication and archive.
9.2 Circumstances of Municipal Non-concurrence
9.2.1 Where the LUA is not in concurrence with a proposal, the LUA will advise the proponent and Industry
Canada within the Industry Canada stipulated 120-day period of its non-concurrence with the proposal.
9.2.2 The LUA will request, for a radiocommunications facility not yet constructed, that Industry Canada not
issue radio license prior to the LUA issuing a Municipal Concurrence.
9.2.3 The LUA will request, for a radiocommunications facility constructed without a Municipal Concurrence, that
Industry Canada direct the proponent to consult with the LUA or use its own powers to remedy the situation.
22
9.3 Time Frames
9.3.1 If, in the mutual opinion of the Director of Planning Services and the proponent, outstanding issues are close
to being resolved approaching the end of the 120-day period but more time is required to finalize, the LUA
shall advise Industry Canada of the situation and provide an estimated date for delivery of a Municipal
Concurrence. The LUA will also request Industry Canada not issue a radio license prior to the LUA issuing a
Municipal Concurrence.
10 Definitions
Co-location (and co-located)
Means the placement of antenna systems on an existing building or structure, or the placement of additional antenna
systems on an existing support structure, by one or more proponents.
Complete application
Means an application for Letter of Municipal Concurrence where all of the items listed in Section 4.1 of this
protocol have been provided to the LUA.
CPC 2-0-03
Means Industry Canada’s Client Procedures Circular, “Radiocommunication and Broadcasting Antenna Systems,”
Issue 5, effective July 15, 2014.
EMCAB-2
Means “Criteria for Resolution of Immunity Complaints Involving Fundamental Emissions of
Radiocommunications Transmitters,” Issue 1, June 1994.
Equipment shelter
Means a structure containing equipment such as radios, electronic, and other apparatus necessary to support the
operation of the radiocommunications facility to receive or transmit signals, and which is not staffed on a
permanent basis.
Height
Means the vertical distance measured from the established grade of a building or structure to the highest point of the
building or structure, including any components attached to the building or structure.
Land Use Authority (LUA)
Means the municipal government, provincial government (Crown land), or federal agency (i.e. Indian and Northern
Affairs Canada) responsible for land use and planning and development within a jurisdiction.
LUA
Same as “Land Use Authority” above.
Landlord
Means the owner of a lot, building, or structure who permits occupancy of that lot, building, or structure by a
radiocommunications facility.
Municipal Concurrence
Means satisfaction by the LUA that the proponent has given adequate regard to this protocol in the siting and
23
design of a proposed radiocommunications facility, and satisfaction with the completeness of the public
consultation process undertaken by the proponent. Such satisfaction shall only be expressed through a statement
issued by the Director of Planning Services or his or her designate as part of the LUA Recommendations Report.
Proponent
Means a company, organization, or person which offers, provides, or operates a radiocommunications facility
for personal use or the general public.
Public Authority
Means the LUA, Government of Canada, Provincial Government, or a Conservation Authority.
Public Realm
Means, in an area of suburban or urban development, the appearance, form, and function of buildings, structures,
landscape, linkages, places, and activities occurring or planned on the subject lot and within the immediate vicinity,
regardless of ownership.
Radio License
Means the approval of sites to be used for radiocommunications facilities, issued only by Industry Canada.
Safety Code 6
Means Health Canada’s Safety Code 6, “Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in
the Frequency Range from 3 kHz to 300 GHz,” 2009.
Surrounding Landscape
Means, in a rural or undeveloped area, the geography of and appearance of the land and associated features
including buildings and vegetation.
Support Structure
Means a structure permanently affixed to the ground or onto an existing building or other existing structure used to
support one or more antenna systems or other platforms for the primary purpose of radiocommunications.
Radiocommunications Facility
Means the components, either individually or in combination, required to operate a wireless communications
network including cell sites, transmitters, receivers, antennae, and signaling and control equipment, and may
include an accessory equipment shelter and support structure.