Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2017-02-16_COW_Public Agenda PackagePage 1 of 1 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA Thursday,February 16, 2017 Chester Municipal Council Chambers 151 King Street, Chester, NS 1.MEETING CALLED TO ORDER. 2.APPROVAL OF AGENDA/ORDER OF BUSINESS. 3.PUBLIC INPUT SESSION (to follow Public Hearing at 8:45 a.m.) 4.MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: 4.1.Committee of the Whole –February 2, 2017 5.MATTERS ARISING: 5.1 Strategic Priorities Chart –Review (deferred from February 2, 2017 COW meeting) 5.2 Request for Decision prepared by Engineering and Public Works Department dated February 7, 2017 regarding Sidewalk/Entrance Markings. 5.3 Request for Decision prepared by Engineering and Public Works Department dated February 7,2017 regarding Winter Maintenance –Municipal Roads. 5.4 Request for Decision prepared by Engineering and Public Works Department dated February 2,2017 regarding Mill Cove Fire Protection System –update. 6.CORRESPONDENCE. 7.NEW BUSINESS. 8.IN CAMERA. 9.ADJOURNMENT. MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CHESTER STRATEGIC PRIORITIES CHART BLUE= COUNCIL – NOW PRIORITIES GREEN – COUNCIL – NEXT PRIORITIES Brown = Dept. Projects Jan 2017 NOW Milestone 1. WINDFARM PROJECT April 2017 2. ECON DEV PROJECT LIST April 2017 3. PLAN REVIEW – COUNCIL CHECK-IN March 2017 4. BIO MASS/ ALT ENERGY EOI June 2017 5. CHESTER WATER July 2017 NEXT PRIORITIES SERVICE CAPACITY REVIEW WASTEWATER STRATEGY (2018) VILLAGE SPS / LUB 10 YEAR CAPITAL PLAN PROCUREMENT POLICY POLICY – REVIEW LIST INT MUNIC SHARED SERVICE ORGANIZATION REVIEW (2018) VIC STRATEGY CAO/ ADMINISTRATION WINDFARM PROJECT BIOMASS / ALT ENERGY  PACE BY-LAW  SERVICE CAPACITY  INTER- MUNICIPAL SHARED SERVICES FINANCE 10 YEAR CAPTIAL PLAN PROCUREMENT POLICY  Debt Strategy  Investment Strategy  Alternate Revenue Research (Oct) PUBLIC WORKS CHESTER WATER WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY  Mill Cove Fire Pump  Loader Tender  GRWS School Demo ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT VIC STRATEGY KM Marketing COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW – COUNCIL CHECK-IN ED PROJECTS  Parking Study Scope of Work (March 2017)  VILLAGE SPS/LUB  Affordable Housing CORPORATE  Website Improvements – Phase 2 (Sept)  Safety Program- Complete  IT Risk Mitigation Plan  Communications Strategy (March) RECREATION  Open Space Report (May)  New Ross School- Community Use (June)  Sherbrooke Lake Project- Design (Dec) Gold River Western Shore- Playground Repairs  East River Land- Acquisition SOLID WASTE  Sustain Start-up (Dec)  Waste Water Contract – Direct Haul Option  Recyclable Processing Contract- (Feb)  Solid Waste Contract - JSB ADVOCACY COMFIT CHESTER COMMISSION REN STRATEGY (ECON / TOURISM) REQUEST FOR DECISION/DIRECTION Prepared By:Christa Rafuse, P.Eng Date February 7, 2017 Reviewed By:Matthew S. Davidson, P.Eng Date February 7, 2017 Authorized By:Tammy S. Wilson, CAO Date February 9, 2017 CURRENT SITUATION At the July 14, 2016, Council meeting a discussion was held concerning a sidewalk on Duke Street in Chester. Councilor Church-Cornelius received a complaint about the sidewalk on Duke Street indicating that someone had a mishap and broke their ankle.Council asked staff to review matter and provide a report on options. RECOMMENDATION We are looking for Council to provide direction on how to proceed with sidewalk grade change markings for the Municipality. BACKGROUND At the July 14, 2016 Council meeting it was indicated that Public Works staff would review the use of reflective tape or paint on the sidewalk entrances to prevent trip hazards. Councillor Church-Cornelius provided a photo of what is done in some areas to alert public of the change in height at sidewalk/driveway entrances. A photo of typical painted triangle markings. REPORT TO:Municipal Council SUBMITTED BY:Engineering & Public Works Department DATE:February 7, 2017 SUBJECT:Sidewalk/Driveway Entrance Painting ORIGIN:Council Discussion July 14, 2016 2 Request For Decision DISCUSSION It is standard to have a change in grade at driveway or walkway entrances along sidewalks. This particular incident was caused by just that a change in grade. Council has therefore requested staff to review the general topic of change in grades. Staff posted on a list serve with little to no response and confirmed that typically other Municipalities are not marking the grade changes.Marking the grade changes doesn’t appear to be the norm but may work for smaller communities.The one location that is close by and presently does use the triangular painted markings to identify grade changes is Mahone Bay. They paint all entrances with triangles as shown in the photograph above,via a request for quote annually. They alternate each year doing half of the painting to minimize the operation and maintenance costs. In order to determine the potential cost to complete across the Municipality of the District of Chester staff have counted the entrances with grade changes along our sidewalks.We estimate that the approximate cost per triangle is $10 each and will require two (2) at each grade entrance. In addition, costs related to traffic control would be applied in those areas as needed. Sidewalk Location No. Entrances to be Painted Total Markings Required Cost at $10 ea (per Painted Triangle Marking)*excl tax Chester 85 170 1700 Chester Basin 17 34 340 New Ross 10 20 200 Hubbards 14 28 280 Western Shore 31 62 620 TOTAL 157 314 3140 Note: Entrances include both driveways and pedestrian. *traffic control is an extra cost IMPLICATIONS Policy Procurement would follow P-04, Procurement Policy as recently amended for Engineering Services. It is expected that this project would be classified as Low-Value Procurement Financial/Budgetary This project was not included in the 2017-18 Operating and Maintenance Budget to date. Estimated budget cost would be $3140, plus traffic control (estimated to minor amount) 3 Request For Decision Environmental N/A Strategic Plan 2. Continually improve public satisfaction with municipal services; 3. Ensure sufficient infrastructure is available to best serve our residents and businesses; 6. Promote conditions conducive to fostering economic prosperity. Work Program Implications The current operations and maintenance program did not account for painting sidewalk grade change warning markers. OPTIONS 1.Direct staff on how Council wishes to proceed with this matter; 2.Defer any decision on the matter and direct staff to bring back further information as identified by Council ATTACHMENTS N/A REQUEST FOR DECISION/DIRECTION Prepared By: Matthew S. Davidson, P.Eng Date February 7, 2017 Reviewed By: Tammy S. Wilson, CAO Date February 8, 2017 Authorized By: Tammy S. Wilson, CAO Date February 9, 2017 CURRENT SITUATION The Municipality contracts winter maintenance (i.e. plowing and salting) for most of its municipal roads through various service providers. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Municipality contract winter maintenance for all of its municipal roads through Nova Scotia Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal, beginning in the 2017- 2018 fiscal year. BACKGROUND The Municipality contracts winter maintenance (i.e. plowing and salting) for most of its municipal roads, see table below for road details, through various service providers. The roads located in Aspotogan, East River Point and Mill Cove, have a total length of approximately 2.8 km. The services for these roads are tendered on a three (3) year rotation, with the current contracts expiring August 31, 2017. William A. Gerhardt Property Improvements provides services in Mill Cove, while George Zinck Excavation provide services in East River Point and Aspotogan. Nova Scotia Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal (NSTIR) currently provides winter maintenance services for Millennium Drive which is approximately 0.53 km. Lake Road in Mill Cove is completed in-house, since it services the Fire Protection System only. Furthermore, the roads contained within KMEMC are completed by on-site staff and equipment. Community Road Name Length Aspotogan Captains Way 0.36 km Aspotogan Commodores Drive 0.42 km Chester Millennium Drive 0.53 km East River Point Endeavour Avenue 0.65 km East River Point Landing Drive 0.33 km Mill Cove Parkwood Drive 0.73 km Mill Cove Foxwood Drive 0.34 km Mill Cove Lake Road 0.13 km REPORT TO: Municipal Council SUBMITTED BY: Engineering & Public Works Department DATE: February 7, 2017 SUBJECT: Winter Maintenance – Municipal Roads ORIGIN: 2 Request For Decision DISCUSSION The contracted level of service specified for the municipal roads in Aspotogan, East River Point and Mill Cove is based upon the NSTIR standard, generally described below: - Snow Plowing and salting will be performed as outlined for Level III roads in the NSTIR Plowing Priorities, latest edition. - Level III roads are classified as local paved roads, most subdivision and residential streets. - Roads are cleared within 24 hours after snow stops - Salted to achieve a base center line and salted only after a storm - Sand may be used to provide improved traction if temperatures are below -12oC After discussions with NSTIR, the roads classification would remain the same, Level III, and therefore the service level standard for winter maintenance would remain unchanged. These roads are all located near or intersect with NSTIR roads, therefore, the roads will be maintained with the existing equipment on their regular routes and we can expect a consistent service level overall. With that said, regardless of our service provider, it is expected that they would meet or exceed the referenced service levels on a regular basis. This has created higher “standard” expectations and thus generating complaints when expectations are not achieved. In those situations, we must keep in mind and communicate the standard referenced above. It should be noted however, whether based on inspections or public complaints of slippery conditions in the Mill Cove area, requests for additional service (i.e. salting/sanding) are made and work completed. Also the service contract has a provision for snow removal at an additional cost. Snow removal relates mostly to Foxwood Drive due to its narrowness. NSTIR will not removal snow as part of a winter service contract, therefore this will remain a municipal responsibility, if required. Also any complaints regarding slippery road conditions will be dealt with on a priority manner as deemed by NSTIR. As stated previously, NSTIR currently provides winter maintenance services for Millennium Drive, Chester. They have provided excellent service in the past and Municipality does not have a record of any complaints due to winter road conditions for past several years. IMPLICATIONS Policy Procurement would follow P-04, Procurement Policy, for any municipal controlled contracted services, which would be another three (3) year contract(s), beginning September 2017. 3 Request For Decision NSTIR services for 2017-2018 would be as per a 2017-2018 Snow and Ice Control agreement, similar to the one in place for Millennium Drive. The current Procurement Policy would have to be amended if we were to contract services through NSTIR. Financial/Budgetary In 2015-2016, it cost approximately $ 31,560.00 Net HST to maintain the approximate 2.8 km of municipal roads in Aspotogan, East River Point and Mill Cove to the reference standard. This translates into an average cost per km of approximately $ 11,270.00. It should be noted that these roads are maintained on a cost per occurrence basis, and last year was considered to be a light winter. The 2015-2016 Snow and Ice Control Agreement for Millennium Drive was based on a per km cost of $ 8,300.00 Net HST, which is a standard rate, increasing each year by CPI. If NSTIR were to maintain the 2.8 km of municipal roads in Aspotogan, East River Point and Mill Cove to the reference standard, the Municipality would realize a savings of $ 2,970 Net HST per km or in total $ 8,316.00 Net HST, based on the 2015-2016 Agreement. Environmental N/A Strategic Plan 2. Continually improve public satisfaction with municipal services; 3. Ensure sufficient infrastructure is available to best serve our residents and businesses; Work Program Implications The current operational work program includes the re-tendering of the winter service contract for municipal roads in the summer of 2017. Staff would also continue to monitor the condition of our municipal roads during the winter to gauge services and report. OPTIONS 1. Proceed with re-tendering of the winter service contract for municipal roads as per P-04; 2. Proceed with contracting winter services through NSTIR for municipal roads; 3. Defer any decision on the matter and direct staff to bring back further information as identified by Council. ATTACHMENTS REQUEST FOR DECISION Prepared By: Christa Rafuse, P.Eng Date February 2, 2017 Reviewed By: Matthew S. Davidson, P.Eng Date February 2, 2017 Authorized By: Tammy S. Wilson, CAO Date February 2, 2017 CURRENT SITUATION On April 28th, 2016, Municipal Council approved the 2016-17 Capital and Operating Budget. Included in the Capital Budget were improvements to the Mill Cove Fire Protection System, which can be general described as the design of a selected improvement option, which includes the installation of a new fire pump and controller. The budget for this project was estimated at $ 150,000, Net HST. On October 13th, 2017 Municipal Council directed staff to consider the installation of an electric fired pump with back-up diesel generator. This would allow the reuse of the diesel generator at another location and recoup a portion of the capital investment. This relates to further direction to staff to investigate the option of decommissioning the Mill Cove Fire Protection System and bring back to Council the implications to the work plan and strategic priorities from undertaking the same. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by Staff that Council proceed with the purchase and installation of a new diesel fired fire pump for the Mill Cove Fire Protection System. BACKGROUND The Utility was installed in 1967, making the system nearly 50 years old. It is understood that since the Municipality assumed Utility ownership in 2003, along with a road network and sewer system, there has not been any significant capital infrastructure investments. In 2015, Staff retained SNC Lavalin Inc. (SNC) to provide an assessment of the suitability and condition of the existing fire protection system. The report was to be accompanied with improvement options and costs to extend the life of the system in order to continue the provision of fire protection to the area. REPORT TO: Municipal Council SUBMITTED BY: Engineering & Public Works Department DATE: February 9, 2017 SUBJECT: Mill Cove Fire Protection System ORIGIN: 2016-2017 Capital Budget 2 Request For Decision SNC provided three (3) costing options for a range of improvements. The costs range from $ 493,275 - $ 697,675, and it should be noted that these costs are Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) which could vary +/- 50 % from the actual cost of construction. Further design is required to refine the costs, however, it is expected based on experience that the cost estimates will be much higher. A fourth (4th) option, which was not reviewed by SNC, would be to potentially discontinue or downsize municipal fire protection services in this area. This requires more study and further direction from Council. Regardless of the way forward, the diesel fire pump and its control panel require replacement for the health and safety of the Community. The equipment models are discontinued and parts are no longer available. Furthermore, there are many noticeable leaks with the pump and its connecting piping and or valves. Department of Labour has also instructed MODC verbally to replace the pump by July 2017. The replacement of the fire pump will provide the time required to investigate the decommission option, as well as design and construct one (1) of the four (4) options. DISCUSSION Staff issued an RFP, which was sent to the three (3) pre-qualified consultants, where only one (1) responded. Stantec was notified on January 11, 2017 that they would complete the work. The RFP included in its scope of work the review of new fire pump options, specifically diesel vs. electric and a controller. Stantec completed a site visit and reviewed the existing pump and engine, it was determined that the rating of the existing pump skid is actually 1000 USGPM @100psi rather than previously reported by a former consultant at 750 USGPM @90 psi. Stantec reviewed both the diesel and electric options and associated costs based on the power requirements of a 1000 USGPM / 100 psi fire pump (roughly 75 HP / 100 kW). It should be noted that a new electrical service would be required for the electrical option. With that in mind, Stantec provided preliminary costs for comparison purposes and option selection. Detailed costing will be prepared as part of the detailed design. Diesel Option: Total project cost: $ 75,000 Recoverable cost: $ 40,000 (diesel skid/controller) Unrecoverable cost: $ 35,000 (demolition, M&E installation) Engineering cost: $ 26,200 3 Request For Decision Electric Option: Total project cost: $ 150,000 Recoverable cost: $ 85,000 (electric skid/controller/generator) Unrecoverable cost: $ 65,000 (demolition, M&E installation, structural) Engineering: $ 37,800 A few things to consider when comparing the options: - There are more unknowns with regards to replacing the diesel fired pump with an electric fire pump than another diesel fired pump. - The engineering fees are approximately $ 11,000 higher for the electric option. - The above cost comparison assumes 100% of the equipment cost could be recovered by selling or re-purposing the equipment, which is unlikely. - Assuming 100 % recoupment of equipment cost for option 1 but 0% for option 2, the options are comparable. - To justify proceeding with the electric replacement option, unrecoverable cost would need to be lower for the electric option to justify the higher total project cost and the risk of being unable to recover the cost of equipment purchased. A few issues were noted onsite that would need to be addressed for the correction operation of a new diesel skid: • The lack of a diesel return line to the diesel storage tank; • The lack of a combustion air opening; and • The lack of pump room ventilation for cooling. These issues could possibly be mitigated with standard operating procedures (SOPs) and minor modifications to meet codes, depending on direction from the Enforcement Authority (i.e. Municipal Building Inspector). Further review by Stantec confirmed the requirement of fuel tank replacement, at a cost less than $10,000. Given the factors outlined above, Stantec has recommended proceeding with the diesel replacement option due to its lower capital investment and lower degree of uncertainty/risk. IMPLICATIONS Policy Procurement would follow P-04, Procurement Policy as recently amended for Engineering Services. 4 Request For Decision Financial/Budgetary This project was included in the 2016-2017 Capital Plan. On April 28th, 2016 Council approved a project budget of $150,000 Net HST, which includes the installation of a new fire pump and controller The purchase and installation of a new fire pump and generator is approximately $ 75,000 and is required no later than the summer of 2017. Environmental N/A Strategic Plan 2. Continually improve public satisfaction with municipal services; 3. Ensure sufficient infrastructure is available to best serve our residents and businesses; Work Program Implications The current capital work program includes the installation of a new fire pump and controller and to investigate further the option of decommissioning the Mill Cove Fire Protection System and bring back to Council the implications to the work plan and strategic priorities from undertaking the same. OPTIONS 1. Complete the replacement with the recommended diesel option. 2. Defer any decision on the matter and direct staff to bring back further information as identified by Council. ATTACHMENTS N/A