Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2017-12-07_COW_Public_Agenda PackagePage 1 of 2 COMMITTEE OF THE WHO LE AGENDA Thursday,December 7,2017 Chester Municipal Council Chambers 151 King Street, Chester, NS 1.MEETING CALLED TO ORDER. 2.APPROVAL OF AGENDA/ORDER OF BUSINESS. 3.PUBLIC INPUT SESSION (8:45 A.M.–9:00 A.M.) 4.MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: 4.1.Committee of the Whole –November 21, 2017 5.MATTERS ARISING: 5.1 Presentation by WestFor Management Inc. to discuss opportunities for the forestry industry and addressing any questions about WestFor and the operation. 6.CORRESPONDENCE. 7.NEW BUSINESS: 7.1 Request for Decision prepared by Information Services Department dated November 11, 2017 regarding New Road Name Assignment –Coyote Creek Road. 7.2 Copy of correspondence dated November 16, 2017 from Municipality of the district of St. Mary’s to President of the UNSM regarding appointment as president and request for consideration of name change for UNSM. 7.3 Request for Decision prepared by Recreation & Parks Director date d November 30, 2017 regarding Western Riptide Request for Support ($430). 7.4 Report for Information prepared by Information Services Department dated November 20,2017 regarding GPS Equipment. 7.5 NSDOTIR Cost Share Road Improvements: a.Request for Decision prepared by CAO dated November 27,2017 regarding NSDOTIR Cost Share Road Improvements. b.Revised Request for Decision dated October 18,2017. c.Letter to NSDOTIR dated October 27,2017. d.Email dated November 27,2017 from NSDOTIR. Page 2 of 2 8.IN CAMERA. 9.ADJOURNMENT. APPOINTMENTS ARRANGED 9:00 a.m.Marcus Zwicker,WestFor Management Inc. STRATEGIC INITATIVES WORKSHOP RE: WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY TO FOLLOW THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING. October 11, 2017 Tammy Wilson CAO Municipality of Chester P.O. Box 369 151 King Street Chester, NS 601110 Dear Ms. Wilson: t a Email: twilson@chester.ca My name is Marcus Zwicker and I am writing to you today in my capacity as General Manager of WestFor Management Inc., a membership organization that manages forestry operations in the Western Crown lands of Nova Scotia. As a partner with government in responsible forestry management, I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and address your Council, I am interested in discussing opportunities for the industry and addressing any questions you may have about WestFor and our operations and in particular, 1. How important long-term fiber security is to the continued success of the each of the businesses that are part of WestFor. 2. Stress that we want to be part of the solution to the current concerns and challenges have arisen regarding forest management in Nova Scotia. I thank you in advance for your consideration and I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Marcus Zwicker General Manager— WestFor Management Inc. Cell - 902 210 7073 Office - 902 530 2362 Email Crown Land –Lunenburg/St. Margaret's Who are we ? •WestFor is a partnership of multi-generational companies that arefamily-owned and operated.Forestry is not only our economic livelihood,it is part of our legacy. Our histories are rooted in Nova Scotia’s forests andwe are committed to ensuring sustainability for future generations. •Our love of forestry is present in all that we do and we respect thisindustry.We are thoughtful in our actions and understand our forestsprovide economic, recreational, environmental, and cultural benefits to allNova Scotians. •We take our role very seriously.We are accountable for managingforestry on western crown land. We work to ensure that high qualityforestry standards are being employed on the lands we manage and westrive to help operators adhere to those standards and take pride in whatwe do. The government has invested time, resources, and money intomaking our organization successful and we do not take our responsibilityto be accountable lightly. What will we do ? •Long term managements plans and short term operating plans on Crown Land •Harvesting •Silviculture •Road Building •Ensure compliance with Crown Operating Procedures, Regulation and 3rd Party Certification •Manage deliveries and scheduling to meet shareholder allocations WestFor -Provincial Context •Western Crown Of Total Provincial Harvest –2014 –7% of 3.64 million m3 –2015 –7% of 3.75 million m3 –2016 –6% of 3.76 million m3 •WestFor manages 12% of forested area in Nova Scotia •Accounts for 11% of shareholder mills fiber supply (2016) •Sustainable Harvest levels are 0.76 m3/ha/yr. Balanced Approach •Public consultation led to landscape goals for a variety of land uses Designation and Value Type Area (ha) of Western Crown Resource Management -Economic 246,505 29% Biodiversity Rich Landscapes -Environmental 68,412 8% Multiple Values -Recreation, Social Values 190,903 22% Parks and Protected, Mi'kmaq Forest - Environmental, Cultural 343,313 40% Western Crown Lands Operations Plans: Consultation •Mi’kmaq of Nova Scotia (Assembly of Chiefs) •Western Region Stakeholder Interaction Committee (20 non -WestFor members) –Mersey Tobeatic Research Institute –Paddlers of Nova Scotia –ATVans –Medway Community Forest –Municipality of Annapolis –Nova Scotia Native Council –Queens County Fish and Game –Registered Professional Foresters Association •All blocks before DNR Integrated Resource Management Team approval are posted on DNR web viewer for public comments and input. Operations Plans: Sustainability •100 Year Management Plan with non decliningvolumes (joint DNR and WestFor) to ensure alllandscape, forest and habitat targets are met. •25 Year Tactical plan developed spatially (mapped)every 10 years (joint DNR and WestFor) •5 year operating plan that identifies specific areas fortreatments from tactical plan (WestFor, approved byDNR) •1 year operating plan identifies: –roads, harvest, silviculture plan with pre -treatmentassessments, on the ground forest ecosystemclassification and all field work completed. (WestFor,approved by DNR Integrated Resources ManagementTeam) Industry challenges •Shrinking local demand for raw materials from forest •Public perception of our industry –cutting trees versus forest management •High pulp/low grade forest (unmanaged forest) •Fragmented land base •Contractor capacity –equipment •Managing industry relationships What are the current issues ? •We acknowledge the concerns of private woodlot owners.However, we havetaken steps to work collaboratively. In 2016, we increased the amount of wood wepurchased from private woodlot owners instead of harvesting our full allocationfrom crown lands. We are making an effort and are actively looking for more waysto be good industry partners. (70% of allocations since 2014) •Our industry is experiencing challenges—but there are opportunities.There is ashrinking demand for raw materials, conflicting public opinions, and difficult-to-manage industry relationships; however, there are opportunities to grow marketsfor our products, attract business, capitalize on natural forest diversity, and worktogether as an industry to ensure a sustainable future for forestry in Nova Scotia. •We understand the government is in a challenging position.The forestry sector inNova Scotia has been experiencing significant challenges, with competingviewpoints that have political impacts. In order to have a sustainable future, wewant to work together. We have collective goals for this industry and would like tobe part of the solution. •Our livelihood depends on longer-term contracts.Shorter contracts mean that wewill be unable to secure sales, create and guarantee jobs for hard -working NovaScotians, or maintain our current level of operations. Losing unused allocationsmeans we will be unable to build inventory for the winter, afford to purchase fromprivate woodlot owners, or have a secure volume for sales contracts and supply. The value chain is broken in Western NS Industry Opportunities •Grow markets for our products –Increase use of raw material –New products •Available wood fiber to attract business •Capitalize on natural forest diversity •Workforce (rural / urban proximity) •Work together / partnership REQUEST FOR DECISION Prepared By: Nick Zinck Date Nov. 11, 2017 Reviewed By: Cliff Gall Date November 22, 2017 Authorized By: Tammy Wilson Date November 23, 2017 CURRENT SITUATION A new private road naming request servicing three or more properties off a shared driveway/right-of way, serviced by Highway 12, Chester Grant has been received. The land owner has proposed the road name “Coyote Creek Road”. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Municipal Council approve the road name “Coyote Creek Road”. BACKGROUND When there are three or more addressable properties using an unnamed shared right-of-way/driveway, the Nova Scotia Civic Address Users Guide states that this point of access must be named. According to P- 44, the road name is suggested following a majority agreement from the land owners supplied by the shared right-of-way. In this instance, there are more than three properties affected, owned by two owners, who are in favor of proposing the name “Coyote Creek Road”. DISCUSSION There are no similar road names within Chester Municipality. Comments received for “Coyote Creek Road””: - District 3 Councillor – Allen Webber: YES - Municipal Public Works Director – Mathew Davidson: YES - Chester Basin Fire Department – Doug Rines: YES IMPLICATIONS Policy Policy P-44 – New Road Names and Road Name Changes Financial/Budgetary A new road sign (with accessory materials) will be purchased and posted by the Public Works Department. Environmental N/A Strategic Plan N/A REPORT TO: Municipal Council SUBMITTED BY: IS Department DATE: Jan. 10, 2017 SUBJECT: New Road Name Assignment ORIGIN: 2 Request For Decision /Direction Work Program Implications N/A OPTIONS 1. Municipal Council can approve the road name “Coyote Creek Road”. 2. Municipal council can decide not to approve the name and direct staff to assign a different name of Council’s choosing. ATTACHMENTS - Request for Decision Form - Signed Petition - Location Map COMMUNICATIONS (INTE RNAL/EXTERNAL) N/A 3 Request For Decision /Direction 4 Request For Decision /Direction REQUEST FOR DECISION Prepared By:Chad Haughn Date November 30, 2017 Reviewed By:Date Authorized By:Tammy Wilson, CAO Date November 30, 2017 CURRENT SITUATION The Western Riptide Peewee Girls team have been selected to attend the Canada 150 Hockey on the Hill Tournament. The team has requested Municipal financial support to help them participate in this event. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve a grant in the amount of $430 to the Western Riptide Peewee Girls for their participation in the Canada 150 Hockey on the Hill Tournament. BACKGROUND The Department of Canadian Heritage and the Ottawa International Hockey Festival organized this Canada 150 signature event. The Canada 150 Hockey on the Hill Tournament is taking place December 27-31, 2017. An outdoor rink has been constructed on the southeast lawn of Parliament Hill and will be the site of this tournament which includes teams from across the country. The Western Riptides submitted a 30 second video and a 250-word essay (poem)and were selected to represent Nova Scotia at this 16-team tournament in Ottawa. The Western Riptide is a South Shore team and of the 18 players, 7 are from the Municipality of Chester: Abi Deviller, Alexa Ewing, Avery Grist,Ceilidh Hayes, Morgan Joudrey, Taegan MacQuarrie and Maggie Mills. DISCUSSION Council has $430 remaining in unused Canada 150 Funds in the 2017-18 grants budget.The deadline for Canada 150 applications has passed, however, since the Riptides are representing Nova Scotia (and MODC) at this special Canada 150 event, this seems to be a fitting use of MODC Canada 150 funds. REPORT TO:Municipal Council SUBMITTED BY:Chad Haughn,Recreation & Parks Department DATE:November 30, 2017 SUBJECT:Western Riptide Request for Support ORIGIN:Funding Request 2 Request For Decision /Direction IMPLICATIONS Policy NA Financial/Budgetary Approval of the recommendation ($430) would deplete the remaining funds in the Canada 150 grants budget. Environmental NA Strategic Plan Strengthen and support environmental, cultural, and social resources . Work Program Implications NA OPTIONS1.Approve the recommendation and provide a Canada 150 grant in the amount of $430 to the Western Riptide Peewee Girls Team.2.Deny the funding request.3.Approve an alternate amount of grant funding to the Western Riptide Peewee Girls Team. Western Riptide Peewee Girls Outdoor Rink on Parliament Hill 3 Request For Decision /Direction Video Submission:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUeLFC35arQ R EPORT FOR INFORMATIO N Prepared by:Nick Zinck,GIS Specialist Date November 20, 2017 Reviewed by:Cliff Gall, Director of Information Services Date November 28, 2017 Authorized by:Tammy Wilson, CAO Date CURRENT SITUATION Modern asset collection uses GPS (Global Positioning System) as the basis for accurately establishing points on the ground. GPS equipment is a critical component of our asset management and collection program. The 2017/18 Capital Budget includes $20,000 for GPS Equipment. As per Subsection 4.1 of the Municipality’s Procurement Policy (P-04), an information report will be provided to Council for all Low Value Procurement over $10,000. This report is to advise Council that we have procured GPS equipment from SDF Solutions Inc.in the amount of $19,102.00 + HST. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Bids were received on November 28th, 2017. A total of 3 Quotes were received: Company Quote SDF Solutions Inc.$19,102.00 + HST GENEQ Inc.$20,737.00 + HST Geo-Sol Inc.$21,990.00 + HST SDF Solutions Inc.has been selected as the successful bidder. IMPLICATIONS Policy P-04 Procurement Policy, Request for Proposal REPORT TO:Warden Webber and Members of Council SUBMITTED BY:Cliff Gall, Director of Information Services DATE: SUBJECT:GPS Equipment ORIGIN:2017/18 Capital Budget 2 Financial/Budgetary $19,102.00 +HST from 2017/18 Capital Budget Environmental Strategic Plan (Goal) 3.Continually improve public satisfaction with municipal services 4.Ensure sufficient infrastructure is available to best serve our residents and businesses Work Program Implications Accommodated within existing work plan OPTIONS ATTACHMENTS COMMUNICATIONS (INTERNAL/EXTERNAL) REQUST FOR DECISION Prepared By:Tammy Wilson, MURP, MCIP Date November 30, 2017 Reviewed By:Date Authorized By:Date CURRENT SITUATION At the October 26, 2017 Municipal Council meeting, Council established a priority list for road surface upgrades which was thence forwarded to the Nova Scotia Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal (NSDOTIR) for consideration under the Cos t Share Program. NSDOTIR has advised that the number one priority, being Regent Street, must be broken into sections as not all the surface types are the same.In addition, each road in District 1 must be listed separately, even though they are within the same subdivision.The result has been a revision to the priority list. Approval is requested from Council as to the revised road improvement priority list. RECOMMENDATION N/A –For Council’s review and Decision as to a priority list. BACKGROUND See attachments October 18, 2017 Staff Report 50% Cost Shared Road Upgrades DISCUSSION The following is the REVISED PRIORITY LIST as presented by NSDOTIR. Priority Road 1 Regent Street –From Water to King 2 Regent Street –from King to Central 3 Regent Street-from Central to Brunswick 4 Birch Street 5 Maple Street 6 Pine Street 7 Beech 8 Cedar 9 Lawrence Hatt REPORT TO:Municipal Council SUBMITTED BY:Department DATE:November 27, 2017 SUBJECT:NSDOTIR Cost Share Road Improvements ORIGIN:October 26, 2017 Municipal Council 2 Error! Reference source not found./Direction The list previously submitted by Council was as follows Priority Road 1 Regent 2 Birch,Maple Cedar,Pine,Beech 3 Lawrence Hatt 4 Prince Street It is at Council’s discretion the priority that is selected for the road upgrades . IMPLICATIONS Policy No Policy presently exists Financial/Budgetary Funding of MODC’s share of paving or repaving would have to be determined. At the October 26, 2017 Council meeting staff were directed to prepare a report outlining the options and financial implications of the same. This has been tasked to the Finance Department and a report is pending. Environmental-N/A Strategic Plan –N/A Work Program Implications-N/A. OPTIONS Approve the list as presented by NSDOTIR Approve an alternate list to what has been presented by NSDOTIR ATTACHMENTS -October 18, 2017-Staff Report -October 27, 2017 –Letter to NSDOTIR from MODC -November 27, 2017 –Email from NSDOTIR to T. Wilson R equest for D ecision Prepared By:Tammy Wilson, MURP, MICP, CAO Date October 13, 2017 Reviewed By:Date Authorized By:Date CURRENT SITUATION At the August 24, 2017 Committee of the Whole (COW)meeting Councillor Barkhouse put forth a list of roads for consideration under the 50% Cost Shared Road Upgrade program of the Nova Scotia Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal (NSDOTIR ).At this same meeting, the Committee requested that an estimate of the upgrades be obtained from NSDOTIR, once distance/length of improvement along the road was determined.I Subsequent to the October 13, 2017 version of this report, Councillor Hector and Council Assaff submitted request for consideration. This report has been revised to incorporate the request made. A rough estimate has been determined for each road, using NSDOTIR’s cost per kilometer . The deadline for submitting road upgrade reque sts for consideration under NSDOTIR’s 50% Cost Sharing program is October 31, 2017. RECOMMENDATION That Council select one or two roads to submit for fiscal 2018 -19;and That Council determine method of recovery of MODC’s share upon approval by NSDOTIR (g eneral rate; Gas Tax; Area Rate/Charge) BACKGROUND MODC has entered into a Cost Share Agreement with the NSDOTIR.The Agreement provides for a cost sharing arrangement between NSDOTIR and MODC for the paving of Village and Subdivision Streets. Such requests are due to be submitted to NSDOTIR by October 31, 2017 for consideration for upgrades in the 2018-19 fiscal year. There are approximately 35.47 km of roads in MODC that fall under this Agreement If approved by NSDOTIR, MODC would be required to fund 50% of the paving costs. While Council has directed that a Road Improvement Policy be developed that outlines a procedure for the submission of request, as well as method of recovery for MODC’s share of the improvements,such a policy does not presently exist. Until such a Policy is in place, Council must consider such request on a case by case basis. REPORT TO:Warden Webber; Committee of the Whole Members SUBMITTED BY:Corporate Services/ Administration DATE:October 13, 2017/Revised October 18, 2017 SUBJECT:50% Cost Shared Road Upgrades- ORIGIN:COW-July 20,2017;August 24, 2017 2 R EQUEST FOR D ECISION /Direction At the August 24, 2017 COW meeting Councillor Barkhouse brought forth a list of roads that she would like to have considered under the Cost Sharing Program. Staff were directed to get cost estimates and bring back to COW, so that a determination respecting priorities could be made. In addition to the August 24, 2017 request made by Councillor Barkhouse, Councillor Assaff and Councillor Marshall have submitted roads for consideration of upgrades under this same program . DISCUSSION The following table provides a summary of the Roads staff were asked to get cost estimates on from NSDOTIR. The cost estimates were determined based upon a per kilometer cost and are for estimate purposes only.The length is assumed to be the length of the road.The costs could vary from what is shown. Roads in District 1 and 5 Total of all road request submitted for consideration is $1,130,500.00 Road Lgth (km)Surface Lgth (km)Surface Lgth (km)Surface UpgradeCost (Est)Comment NSTIR Priority Pts Pig Loop 1.4 Paved Safety TBD Unable to give cost est. Some design required. Cost would be high Chester Shore Rd 1.3 Sand seal Paving 260,000.00$single lift overlay, From Pig Loop to Hwy 3 38 Prince Street 0.7 Chip on Sand Paving 140,000.00$single lift overlay, From Main to Pleasant 63 Union Street 0.1 Chip on Sand 0.2 Asphalt 0.5 Chip on Sand Paving 160,000.00$single lift overlay, from Duke to Brunswick 5 Main Street 0.5 Chip on Sand Paving 100,000.00$single lift overlay 5 Nauss Point 0.3 Chip on Sand Paving 82,500.00$single lift overlay, likely need a gravel base 73 Regent Street 0.35 Asphalt 0.4 Chip on Sand Paving 150,000.00$single lift overlay; plus 150mm base for 0.1 km 68 892,500.00$Excluding Pig Loop Road 200,000.00$per km 275,000.00$per km Prince Street - contains two sections of road reserve, from Main to Foundry and Pleasant to Victoria Union Street - measurement from Duke to Water seems off a small bit, but round to nearest 0.1 Union Street - I wouldn’t plan to pave past Brunswick street (cemetry), since it seems to be treated as a private driveway Main Street - I would not pave the short section from Victoria to Shore, this is treated as a driveway but NSTIR owns the ROW and plows it Nauss Pt Road - Clarification is required, Pig to WWTP is good, only after the WWTP that should be done, and there seems to be ROW issues and the end pt is not clear. Nauss Pt Road - not paving past Witmere Dr Regent Street - complete entire length, therefore add King to Water (0.25 Km) but delete gravel portion since treat like a driveway and ROW issues ASSUMPTIONS Single Lift Overlay Gravel- 150mm base prior to Paving Road Lgth (km)Surface Upgrade Cost (Est)Comment NSTIR Priority Points Comment Beech Street 0.11 Chipseal Paving $22,000 Single lift overlay 5 Birch Street 0.18 Chipseal Paving $36,000 Single lift overlay 5 Cedar Street 0.11 Chipseal Paving $22,000 Single lift overlay 5 Maple Street 0.24 Chipseal Paving $48,000 Single lift overlay 5 Pine Street 0.25 Chipseal Paving $50,000 Single lift overlay 5 Lawrence Hatt Road 0.3 Gravel Paving $60,000 Single lift overlay 5 End of paved section 3 R EQUEST FOR D ECISION /Direction All of the improvements requested, excepting the Pig Loop Road Upgrades, would be eligible for consideration under the Cost Sharing Agreement. The Pig Loop Road improvements exceed paving and involve shoulder widening and lowering of a hill to improve sight lines. A cost estimate is not available at this time, as it would be subject to a greater review (i.e. design). MODC would be responsible for 100 percent of the costs for the Pig Loop Road Upgrades. IMPLICATIONS Policy No Policy presently exists. Financial/Budgetary Funding of MODC’s share of the paving work would have to be determined. Opt ions include:general tax rate; area rate/ uniform charge;Gas Tax funds. The expense would be in 2018 -19 and thus there is time to determine the same. If funding is to be recovered by an area rate, MODC may wish to undertake a petition to ensure there is residents support and agreement to pay for the same. Environmental -n/a Strategic Plan -n/a. Work Program Implications -n/a OPTIONS List options here. 1.Review list and submit all or some of the roads listed for NSDOTIR’s consideration; and a.Determine method of recovery of MODC’s share of the costs, once a firmer estimate is obtained. 2.Not submit any request ATTACHMENTS 1)NSDOTIR’s Cost Sharing Agreement 2)Map : Village of Chester Roads under Service Agreement. 3)Map : District One Roads under Service Agreement 4)Map: District Five Roads under Service Agreement COMMUNICATIONS (INTE RNAL/EXTERNAL) Upon receipt of approval by NSDOTIR for Cost Sharing in the R oad Upgrade, communications with the affected landowners should be considered. October 27, 2017 Laura CunninghamCapitalProgramAdministration OfficerNova Scotia Department of Transportation and Infrastructure RenewalJohnston Building, 4th Floor1672Granville StreetPO Box 186Halifax, Nova ScotiaB3J 2N2 VIA E-mail laura.cunningham@novascotia.ca Dear Ms.Cunningham,This letter is in response to your letter dated September 25, 2017 in which the Municipalitywas asked to submit a prioritized list of streets for consideration for 50% Cost Sharing.Thefollowing are the roads that Council of the Municipality of the Dist rict of Lunenburg wouldlike to have considered for cost sharing in the fiscal year 2018 -19. These roads are listed inin order of priority. Priority Road Distance Existing Surface Proposed Surface 1 Regent Street 0.75 Asphalt/ChipSeal Asphalt 2 Beech Street;BirchStreet;CedarStreet; MapleStreet; PineStreet 0.89 (total)Chip on Sand Asphalt 3 LawrenceHatt Road 0.3 Gravel Asphalt 4 Prince Street 0.7 Chip on Seal Asphalt P a g e |2 The treatment type noted is Asphalt. If NSDOTIR is willing to consider double chip for someof the roads, Council would be open to the same.Thank you for consideration of this request and I look forward to your response. Sincerely, Tammy S Wilson,MURP, MCIPChief Administrative Officer c.Allen Webber, WardenMatthew Davidson, P.Eng, Director of Engineering and Public WorksGlen Strang, CET, Area Manager 1 Pam Myra From:Cunningham, Laura <Laura.Cunningham@novascotia.ca>Sent:Monday, November 27, 2017 2:04 PMTo:Tammy Wilson, MURP, MCIPCc:Cunningham, LauraSubject:RE: Cost sharing for 2018-19 Hi Tammy, Since your priority list grew to include all five roads in the second request, those must be considered one priority each. Also, because Regent Street is one request but it has three sections, not all the surface types are the same so they must be listed separately as well (if current surface is asphalt then it must be repaving).If however, all three sections were gravel or chip seal, then it could all be one request and the description would read “from Water to Brunswick”. Therefore, I have revised your list to be in this order so if this is incorrect, please let me know. 1.Regent Street –from Water to King 2.Regent Street –from King to Central 3.Regent Street –from Central to Brunswick 4.Beech Street 5.Birch Street 6.Cedar Street 7.Maple Street 8.Pine Street 9.Lawrence Hatt Road 10.Prince Street Thank you. Laura From:Tammy Wilson, MURP, MCIP [mailto:twilson@chester.ca] Sent:Tuesday, November 21, 2017 1:43 PM To:Cunningham, Laura <Laura.Cunningham@novascotia.ca> Subject:RE: Cost sharing for 2018-19 Hi Laura The following is my response to your questions: 1.Regent -include: a.Water to King, b.King to Central c.Central to Brunswick. 2.Yes to all five roads in the second request (Beech, Birch, Cedar, Maple and Pine) 3.Lawrence Hatt Rd-only from end of Pavement to the end of listing at the turning circle. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me . 2 Regards, Tammy Wilson Tammy Wilson,MURP,MCIP Chief Administrative Officer Corporate Services Municipality of Chester PO Box 369 151 King Street,Chester,NS,B0J 1J0 Tel:902-275-3555 ext.1101 Cell:902-275-7544 Web:www.chester.ca Consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email? This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the intended recipients. If you are not an intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. From:Cunningham, Laura [mailto:Laura.Cunningham@novascotia.ca] Sent:Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:17 AM To:Tammy Wilson, MURP, MCIP <twilson@chester.ca> Cc:Cunningham, Laura <Laura.Cunningham@novascotia.ca> Subject:Cost sharing for 2018-19 Good morning Tammy, With the regard to the list of roads that were submitted back in October, I just need you to confirm a few descriptions as some roads have several sections so I need to know what section you are looking for. 1.Regent Street: from Water to King from King to Central from Central to Brunswick from Brunswick to end of listing 2.Beech Street: Within this request there are four streets listed as well: Birch, Cedar, Maple and Pine.Does this mean you would like all of these roads within your second request –all five? 3.Lawrence Hatt Road: from Trunk 3 to end of pavement 3 from end of pavement to end of listing at turning circle Thank you. Laura Cunningham Program Administration Officer Highway Engineering & Capital Programs Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal (902)424-0897 Laura.Cunningham@novascotia.ca please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.